On Mon, 16 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If by "home user" he means "the average user", then he's absolutely right > (just scanning this list proves that). Not quite. Follow some Windows mailing lists and you'll see people have quite some trouble getting that to work, also. Most of the problem reports here are either directly related to installation, or very specific to something most others don't use. > If Linux was ready for the "home user", they'd already be using it. And they are. The only reason why Windoze is still around is Microsoft's marketing and the "it is what I've used all the time, so why should I change now" attitude a lot of people have. LLaP bero -- Tired of waiting for Windows 2000? STOP WAITING! http://www.ms-windows-2000.com/
- Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average Users (Was:... chris
- Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average Users (... Dan Hamilton
- Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average Use... chris
- Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average... Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average Use... James Schofield
- Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average... chris
- Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average... Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Jeanette Russo
- Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? chris
- Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Dan Brown
- Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Andy Goth
- RE: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Thomas J. Hamman
- Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Guillermo Belli
- RE: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Aaron deRozario
- RE: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? RICHARD FRIEDMAN
- Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Guillermo Belli
- Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Ripcrd6
- Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Jeanette Russo