If by "home user" he means "the average user", then he's absolutely right (just scanning this list proves that). I'm sure there are people who happen to be using Linux at home, but tha's not really the point. If Linux was ready for the "home user", they'd already be using it. At 12:16 AM 8/16/99 -0500, you wrote: >Somebody was saying to me that he believed Linux was a good corporate tool >but not a good op system for home use because of it's steep learning curve. > >What do the list subscribers here think? Think Linux-Mandrake isn't ready >for Prime Time yet? > >I wonder. Are there any home users on this list? > >Thanks for any replies, > > >Richard >
- Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Dan Hamilton
- Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average Users (Was:... chris
- Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average Users (... Dan Hamilton
- Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average Use... chris
- Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average... Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average Use... James Schofield
- Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average... chris
- Re: [newbie] Linux Not for Average... Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Jeanette Russo
- Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? chris
- Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Dan Brown
- Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Andy Goth
- RE: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Thomas J. Hamman
- Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Guillermo Belli
- RE: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Aaron deRozario
- RE: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? RICHARD FRIEDMAN
- Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Guillermo Belli
- Re: [newbie] Linux for home consumers? Ripcrd6