On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 01:20, Joeb wrote: > Fajar Priyanto wrote: > > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >Hash: SHA1 > > > >Dear all, > >I've been using Mdk for all my life. I love it. > > > >However, when our company called a software house to develop a web application > >using PHP + mysql, they said we should change our server from Mdk to RH. > > > >We haven't asked them in details for the reasons, but maybe you can help me > >here. What is exactly the difference between RH and Mdk, maybe in terms of > >security, directory structure, performance, etc? This thing really makes me > >confuse, because I understand that Mdk is the descendant of RH? > > > >Thanks, > >- -- > >Fajar > >Linux mdk91.sistek.kom 2.4.21-0.13mdk GNU/Linux > >11:47:50 up 4:07, 11 users, load average: 1.56, 0.82, 0.41 > > > >I'm a soldier, not a diplomat. I can only tell the truth. > > -- Kirk, "Errand of Mercy", stardate 3198.9 > > > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > >Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) > > > >iD8DBQE/Xq7gUrYxG8KGMVERAr//AJ9QuJLobTzGb/BAiwmQrdl56yXNhACeKve3 > >Hg+V/yRrOtc7fEivef6kkeE= > >=R6st > >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > >Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? > >Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com > > > > > I imagine they want you to change because they have RH installed. The > real question shouldn't be what's the difference between RH and Mdk, but > why would PHP and mysql be different between the two (they shouldn't). > > As for Mdk being a descendant, well that's true, Mdk started as > modification to RH that used KDE as the default desktop (IIRC). But > that was a long time ago. Mdk is it's own distribution now. > > Joeb > you could saw MDK is an RPM based distro as opposed to deb.
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com