Max Skibinsky wrote:

> Agreed. But we use halfling and giant just as examples with <... size="Small"> and  
><..
> size="Large"> attributes respectively, right? 

right, so far.

> Basically we can replace 'em with human shooting from
> his knees (or shooting while sitting) vs. human firmly standing on the ladder or 
>stilts.

No.  Creatures of a different size catagory are *very*  much different.  
Heck, even their visual organs are different.

And remember that physics, when it conflicts with fun, is tossed out in 
RPGs--look at Magic.

>  "Enlarge"ed
> and "Reduce"ed humans. Specially selected short humans and large humans, etc. Its 
>the size which is
> part of the attack bonus formula, not the race.

A newborn is "small."

No human has ever lived that is "large."


> quite unproven gut feeling: "+ size modifier" rule will be wrong more times for 
>ranged fire then its
> right. 

That depends on how you define "wrong."  I think this is fimly in the 
"reality based things that the game ignores to be a better game," like 
the fact that a single sword-blow can kill someone, at any time.

> Larger then medium creatures attacking farther
> then from point blank range add the inversed (i.e. positive) size modifier to their 
>ranged attacks
> to reflect their effective higher elevation

Bad idea.  A *better* idea would be to modify the range incriment of 
different sized weapons--although I'm out of ideas.

> Game balance is tricky concept.

Not anymore, it isn't. 

> the best they can do is run away screaming "Halflings! Halflings! Run for your
> lives!". Not so gamely and not so balanced in my book.

You forget the fact that the giants have reach, superior strength, and 
*more hit dice.*

Size, in and of itself, isn't a good thing.  The incidental benefits 
that come along with size (greater damage, reach, etc) are good things.

> To make a point even more brutal - if I shoot 10 arrows from crossbow standing and 
>then shoot 10
> arrows on my knees (even crawling if you like) - why should my down-the-earth shoots 
>should be more
> precise?

I repeat: your position doesn't change anything.  A human whos' prone is 
still a man-sized creature.

> But will it really help you hit that remote chair or window with paperclip (rock) or
> pencil (javelin)?

I don't know.  My eyes and the space between them didn't change, so I 
can't account for what effect that would have.

> I know ;) If that's system dogma, its ok and makes certain sense. Just wanted to 
>clarify.


:)

DM

> 

Reply via email to