Pedro Giffuni wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 22:43:10 +0100, Simon Phipps <si...@webmink.com> wrote: > ... >> >>> > >>> > As it happens I'd already started exploring this one with the Document >> >>> >>> Is the intent to host all of the extensions currently at the OOo site? >>> Or a subset? Or a different set? >>> >> >> They host only extensions that have open source licenses, so the ones >> at the >> OOo site that have proprietary licenses are not hosted. >> > > While this is understandable, it is not good enough. We will have to > find an > alternative repository and link to it from Apache's website. This is > something > that can wait though. > > Pedro
This is being worked on at this time. Andy
