On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 22:43:10 +0100, Simon Phipps <si...@webmink.com>
wrote:
...
>
> As it happens I'd already started exploring this one with the
Document
Is the intent to host all of the extensions currently at the OOo
site?
Or a subset? Or a different set?
They host only extensions that have open source licenses, so the ones
at the
OOo site that have proprietary licenses are not hosted.
While this is understandable, it is not good enough. We will have to
find an
alternative repository and link to it from Apache's website. This is
something
that can wait though.
Pedro
