> MC wrote: > > Not that I care for bureaucracy, and not that I > know what is happening here, but... > > > > I think if you strong-arm past the OpenSolaris > community bureaucracy (and again, not saying you are, > because I don't know much about it), it'll be > archived forever and referenced in the future to show > how Sun only takes said OpenSolaris bureaucracy > seriously when it is convenient for them. > > > > > Context?
Re: Context See: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=168840 And see the many threads on many different lists/forums about the naming issue. My understanding of the OpenSolaris constitution, community, and OGB is that the OGB appoints members of the community ("core contributers") to have the power to vote on issues that concern the community. The naming issue obviously concerns some members of the community. So I figured I'd see some voting happen before decisions were made. I became especially concerned about the integrity of the OpenSolaris bureaucracy when I read this part of Mr. Murdock's statement: > Again, I have no doubt this will be controversial. However, it is the > right thing to do for the community I became concerned because I thought it wasn't his call to decide what is right for the community. I hope that clarifies my previous post for you! This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
