Shawn Walker wrote: >>> I just realized the above has lost some context, so just to be >>> clear... When I say "push" above, I'm referring only to the >>> naming of the today's release. I aware there's a plan in the >>> works to have a vote on trademark policy aimed at future naming >>> decisions. >> What will be the point of having a vote on something that is a fait >> accompli? > > How do you know it is until we vote? If we vote and it isn't approved > but they still go forward, then you can say that.
They've already made the naming announcement, and there has been no announcement of a vote. How is that *not* a fait accompli? -- Alan Burlison -- _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
