On 31/10/2007, Alan Burlison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Shawn Walker wrote: > > >>> To me, I didn't see a naming announcement. What I saw was a project > >>> going forward with an early prototype having chose a tentative name > >>> for it until the community gets their collective posteriors in gear > >>> and makes a final decision. > >> Has the community been asked to make a final decision? > > > > The community would have to get their collective posteriors in gear > > and help finish the branding and trademark usage guidelines first. > > Then we can have a decision. How about that? > > The normal way a democracy works is > > A) Somebody makes a proposal > C) everyone votes on it, if approved then > C) The proposal is acted on > > The A C B ordering that's being used here is certainly novel.
That would only be true if you do not look at what has been done as the proposal; which I happen to. It's hard to propose something intangible; now we have something tangible to base our proposal on. Seems far more logical that way, doesn't it? -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ "We don't have enough parallel universes to allow all uses of all junction types--in the absence of quantum computing the combinatorics are not in our favor..." --Larry Wall _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
