On 31/10/2007, Alan Burlison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Shawn Walker wrote: > > >> They've already made the naming announcement, and there has been no > >> announcement of a vote. How is that *not* a fait accompli? > > > > That's a rather fatalistic view. > > I prefer 'factual view' myself.
Yes, let's play word games, it's so much fun! :D > > To me, I didn't see a naming announcement. What I saw was a project > > going forward with an early prototype having chose a tentative name > > for it until the community gets their collective posteriors in gear > > and makes a final decision. > > Has the community been asked to make a final decision? The community would have to get their collective posteriors in gear and help finish the branding and trademark usage guidelines first. Then we can have a decision. How about that? -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ "We don't have enough parallel universes to allow all uses of all junction types--in the absence of quantum computing the combinatorics are not in our favor..." --Larry Wall _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
