When I go back to work next Saturday, I will also repeat the test to check the possibility that I screwed up. It sure wouldn't be the first time :-)
Bill, KG4LOV [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Emilio Puga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2001 11:24 AM Subject: RE: MZ-S Data imprinting > Ok, let it go untill tomorrow, when I will do the test. I´m gonna place > the camera in the dark box, cut the film, and put it on the processor, I > think this is the way for doing the test. > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > En nombre de Pål Jensen > Enviado el: domingo, 23 de diciembre de 2001 16:30 > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Asunto: Re: MZ-S Data imprinting > > Bill wrote: > > > > Could some of you "rewinders" please explain how film that has been > removed > > from the camera and processed without being rewound can still show the > > exposure data imprint please explain it to me. I have done this and > seen > > the results. > > > I honestly don't know Bill but some have done similar experiment as you > and gotten a different result. I can't explain it. > > > > Pål > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
