On Oct 5, 2010, at 4:30 PM, John Francis wrote: > On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 08:57:04AM +1000, Tanya Love wrote: >> >> I know this is an opposing view to what most have posted here, but it works >> for me. And when I am shooting 2-3000 frames every week, the storage space >> and time it would take to keep the "average" shots, would be ridiculous. > > 2000 images a week, 50 weeks a year, at 10MB/image, is one TB a year. > I don't think that's a "ridiculous" amount of storage; A decades worth > of storage will fit in a single RAID array the size of a desktop PC.
AT today's prices, that's about a buck a week for storage. With backups, call it $4/week or about $0.50 per day. By this time next year, it'll be about half that. If my time is worth any money at all, it's practically not worth the time to go through the bother of deleting them. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
