Jon Alen, Is this your opinion or Peirce's?
> > Moreover, my point continues to be that it is not necessary for something > to be actually perceived in order to qualify as a sign. It is sufficient > that (1) it may determine a dynamical interpretant under various > circumstances by virtue of having an immediate interpretant, and (2) it would > determine a dynamical interpretant under ideal circumstances by virtue of > having a final interpretant. > I am particular interested in where to find the source. best, Auke > Regards, > > Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA > Professional Engineer, Amateur Philosopher, Lutheran > Laymanhttp://www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt > -http://twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 12:11 PM Robert Marty < robertmarty...@gmail.com > mailto:robertmarty...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > > Dear Jon Alan, > > JAS > "Something need not be perceived in order to qualify as a > > sign, as long as it is capable of determining a dynamical interpretant by > > virtue of having an immediate interpretant ... and a final interpretant ..." > > > > RM > If I were a literalist, I would say this: > > > > "But against unclear and nonsensical hypotheses, [of] whatever ægis > > [he will be protected]. Pragmatism will be more essentially significant for > > him than for any other logician, for the reason that it is in action that > > logical energy returns to the uncontrolled and uncriticizable parts of the > > mind. His maxim will be this: Peirce: CP 5.212 Cross-Ref:†† The elements of > > every concept enter into logical thought at the gate of perception and make > > their exit at the gate of purposive action; and whatever cannot show its > > passports at both those two gates is to be arrested as unauthorized by > > reason. Peirce: CP 5.212 Cross-Ref:†† The digestion of such thoughts is > > slow, ladies and gentlemen; but when you come in the future to reflect upon > > all that I have said, I am confident you will find the seven hours, you > > have spent in listening to these ideas, have not been altogether wasted." > > Best, > > > > > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON > PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu > . > ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to > l...@list.iupui.edu with no subject, and with the sole line "UNSubscribe > PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at > http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm . > ► PEIRCE-L is owned by The PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and > co-managed by him and Ben Udell. >
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with no subject, and with the sole line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm . ► PEIRCE-L is owned by The PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.
