At 5:01 PM +0100 1/21/03, K Stol wrote:
well, I think not, then I can't help it. What do you think about compiling
Lua to parrot (IMCC)?
I like the idea, and I don't think you'll see anyone else tackle it
for a while. (And if that falls through, there's always LISP... :)
From: "Dan Sugalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> At 4:46 PM +0100 1/21/03, K Stol wrote:
>Well, I'd do it as a project for my Bachelor's, so I won't get permission
to
>do such a project, if it already exists.
Ah, that could be a problem. Will it be a problem if you start a
project that someone else later also starts?
>From: "Dan Sugalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > At 9:17 AM +0100 1/21/03, K Stol wrote:
>> >Hi there,
>> >
>> >A few weeks ago I posted something about a Tcl->parrot compiler, but
>> >Will Coleda already was working on such a project. It would be a as
>> >a final project for my bachelor's. But because such already exists,
>> >I'm looking for something else.
>>
>> If you're interested in doing a Tcl compiler, by all means, go
>> ahead--I wouldn't let the fact that someone else is doing it stop
>> you. The point of doing it is for the experience, which you'll get
>> regardless of any other implementation. It's also distinctly possible
>> that neither you nor Will will finish a full implementation (as it's
>> likely a rather large undertaking for one person) but you'll each
> > > have part of it that can be merged together.
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
