> I disagree. For instance, if I helped writing the combined module, and
> someone separated it without thoroughly making sure that everyone is ok
> with this separation, I believe it's upto him to be responsible to merge it
> back in.
That surely happens in 0.01% of the cases. My example
referred to the fact that decisions by anyone on this list
are completely meaningless, unless the person can convert
that decision into actual code.
> What you suggest is that PHP will really be f(t), as people's
> resources change with time. I do not agree.
PHP has hardly evolved over the last six months. php-dev has
become another dragging, slow committee where no actual
evolution can happen. The sorry state of PHP development
stems from that.
Sometimes I envy the Linux kernel model where a dictator can
actually move the development process forward and does not
need to seek consensus with those individuals who managed to
subscribe to some mailing list.
- Sascha
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
