You jumped on me BEFORE he unsubscribed. I am talking about what you should have done weeks ago... Instead you waited, and jumped my bones for cleaning up a mess you as moderator should have already dealt with...
And it was YOU who personally involved me be making a public rebuke of of myself... Which clearly I reject... Now if you in the future deal with issue like a mikey differently, clearly I will not be involved... On Feb 17, 5:23 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > Hardly jgg, he un-subscribed and has NOT posted here since. Bitch if you > like but please do NOT tell me what I did or did not do correctly and what > the end result was.... especially when I was personally involved and you > were not. > > On 2/17/09, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Not sufficently AS HE CONTINUED THESE HABIT IN THIS > > > On Feb 17, 11:24 am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > He was sufficiently rebuked off-board. I do NOT scream in public. > > > > On 2/17/09, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Frankly Mark, when a poster is a consist baiter, you in fact should > > > > single him out to the exclusion of those who respond to him in kind > > > > WHEN the moderators fali to stop the civil discussion killing > > > > baiting... And Mikey was that and did that... It is called if the > > > > rulers refuse to act the people should.. > > > > > Instead of thinking you nipped something in the bud, you in fact > > > > ALLOWED it to become an issue where individuals had to do your > > > > OFFICIAL moderating... We all have been on too many boards not to > > > > know this... > > > > > On Feb 16, 9:39 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Yes, I really do get the whole scenario. That is why the "baiter" was > > > > > included in the warning as well. > > > > > > I very seldom go to the states anymore. The last visit was for two > > weeks > > > > to > > > > > visit friends. I really don't care for the hustle-bustle. I tend to > > visit > > > > my > > > > > "home" country more.. Germany. If you ever visit Costa Rica I would > > be > > > > happy > > > > > to buy you several. > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 8:30 PM, RichardForbes < > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > If we are ever in the same town, I would be glad to buy you a beer. > > > > > > > As for giving it to Mikey, that whole thing started with the > > "little > > > > > > dick" routine. But, he made the choice and was not able to handle > > the > > > > > > pressure. > > > > > > > On Feb 16, 9:20 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > And you seem to like giving it to him. As to the blame... that > > and a > > > > > > dollar > > > > > > > will stiil buy me a really cold beer. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 8:07 PM, RichardForbes < > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > He will blame it on you, as he has done to others > > before. Mikey > > > > seeks > > > > > > > > attention and is willing to stoop to any level to get it. He > > will > > > > be > > > > > > > > back, if for no other reason than the fact that he gets > > attention > > > > > > > > here. > > > > > > > > > On Feb 16, 5:17 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I accept that. Mike has un-subscribed all by himself. > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:06 PM, jgg1000a < > > [email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Let me suggest to you that Mike LACK of logic or use of > > > > straw-men > > > > > > > > > > BECOMES the topic because of his often use of them... > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 16, 10:19 am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > jgg, > > > > > > > > > > > > Because it was pure mimic and did not address the topic. > > It > > > > was > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > reason ALL involved were swatted and not just ONE. > > > > > > > > > > > > It was an equal opportunity swat. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2/16/09, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Annointed One > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) I made a clear mimic of Mike' straw-man - that is to > > say > > > > > > > > something > > > > > > > > > > > > I post must be true because it is posted or on the web > > by > > > > > > people > > > > > > > > who > > > > > > > > > > > > support my position... > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) It also is clear Mike posts support the Democrats > > most > > > > of > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > time > > > > > > > > > > > > -- The Donkeys... And he repeatedly claims Republicans > > > > > > (Elephants) > > > > > > > > > > > > have nothing intelligent to say... > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now what did I say > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Little Mike is a Donkey... It is true because it > > is in > > > > > > > > print... > > > > > > > > > > If Little Mike denies being a Donkey, it must be because > > he > > > > has > > > > > > > > nothing > > > > > > > > > > > > intelligent to say... > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> This is the logic you seek to employ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please explain how calling someone an unthinking Donkey > > is > > > > a > > > > > > > > personal > > > > > > > > > > > > assault while the claim that someone is an unthinking > > > > Elephant > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > not... Or is this just a double standard because > > Donkeys > > > > can > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > > > thinner skins??? > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 15, 7:55 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE < > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > mike, Navy, Richard, jgg, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the posts with nothing but personal insults must stop > > > > NOW. > > > > > > You > > > > > > > > must > > > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > least address something of substance. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 13, 7:41 am, "liberal mike532 !" < > > > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The GOP's Jihad on Obamahttp:// > > > >www.truthout.org/021209J > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Robert Parry, Consortium News: "The Republicans and > > > > their > > > > > > > > > > right-wing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > media allies are doing whatever they can to > > strangle > > > > the > > > > > > Obama > > > > > > > > > > > > > > phenomenon in its cradle; the mainstream media > > pundits > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > stressing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the negative so they don't get called 'in the tank > > for > > > > > > Obama'; > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Democrats are shying away from holding the > > Bush-Cheney > > > > > > > > > > administration > > > > > > > > > > > > > > accountable for its crimes. None of these > > developments > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > particularly > > > > > > > > > > > > > > surprising. Indeed, they track closely to the > > > > > > political-media > > > > > > > > > > pattern > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that took shape the last time a young Democrat won > > the > > > > > > White > > > > > > > > House, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > when Bill Clinton became President in 1993." > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > Mark M. Kahle, ,www.filacoffee.com > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Mark M. Kahle, ,www.filacoffee.com-Hidequotedtext- > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Mark M. Kahle, ,www.filacoffee.com-Hidequotedtext - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > -- > > > > > Mark M. Kahle, ,www.filacoffee.com > > > > -- > > > Mark M. Kahle, ,www.filacoffee.com > > -- > Mark M. Kahle, ,www.filacoffee.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
