You should only be bright enough to be an idiot like her. Then you might really know something.
Hollywood wrote: > KIT, > > STRIPPERS are "enemies of civilization against civil cililization"???? > Isn't that a bit redundant? Maybe it's just me, but i'd just assume > that an "enemy of civilization" was "against civilization" without > being told. Duuuuuuh.... > > Aren't Jim Jones and his followers dead and buried? Don't see how they > could be much of a threat to anyone. > > AC seem to be pretty much an idiot. > > On Jun 17, 10:13 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Another good article from CW....I mean Ann Coulter: >> >> ================ >> ** >> ** >> ** >> *NYT: Duke Lacrosse Players Killed Meredith Kercher* >> by Ann Coulter >> Posted 06/17/2009 ET >> Updated 06/17/2009 ET >> >> http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&id=32351 >> >> Whether it is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Weather Underground, Central Park >> rapists, Mumia Abu-Jamal, Jim Jones and the People's Temple, welfare >> recipients, Palestinian terrorists, murderers, abortionists, strippers or >> common criminals -- liberals always take the side of the enemies of >> civilization against civilization. >> >> In the view of The New York *Times*, every criminal trial is a shocking >> miscarriage of justice -- except the ones that actually are shocking >> miscarriages of justice. >> >> Thus, in last week's *Times*, Timothy Egan wrote about a shocking >> miscarriage of justice being carried out against a "high-spirited" American >> girl accused of murder by a crazed prosecutor in Perugia, Italy. >> >> Egan's column bears as much relationship to the facts of the case as -- >> well, I guess as anything printed in the *Times*. And yet every American >> news network has embraced Egan's version and is flacking for the accused. >> >> Amanda Knox, her erstwhile boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito, and another man, >> Rudy Guede, stand accused of murdering Knox's roommate, Meredith Kercher, on >> Nov. 1, 2007, at the house Knox and Kercher shared with two other girls in >> Perugia. >> >> Egan triumphantly cites an "outside expert hired by CBS News" who calls >> Knox's prosecution, "the railroad job from hell." Egan does not mention that >> the "outside investigator" is Paul Ciolino of the "Innocence Project," whose >> investigations always seem to conclude that the accused is being railroaded. >> >> Ciolino's theory of the crime -- adopted unquestioningly by Egan -- is that >> the third man, Guede, who has already confessed to the crime, acted alone. >> >> Despite Ciolino's careful analysis of the evidence, his theory is >> contradicted by Guede himself, as well as the coroner and a leading forensic >> geneticist, both of whom have testified that Kercher's massive injuries >> could only have been inflicted by multiple assailants. >> >> It is also contradicted by the court's 106-page report, released in January, >> explaining the judge's reasons for refusing to release Knox and Sollecito on >> bail. >> >> Even the "48 Hours" executive producer doesn't endorse Ciolino's >> preposterous "single knifeman" theory, admitting: "Do we know every piece of >> data? No. Is there some troubling DNA? Yes." >> >> Hey, does anyone know if CBS hired more than one "outside investigator" to >> look at the Knox case? Because if Egan considers one CBS "outside >> investigator" the Rosetta Stone of this case, it would be odd if he didn't >> mention the conclusions of another CBS outside investigator. >> >> Why yes there was! >> >> The second investigator, Paolo Sfriso, didn't pronounce judgment, but he did >> cite some of the evidence. The evidence includes: >> >> -- a large kitchen knife, believed by forensic investigators to have caused >> at least one of Kercher's three wounds, found at Sollecito's house. Despite >> having been thoroughly washed, the knife had Knox's DNA on the handle and >> the murder victim's DNA on the blade. >> >> -- a bloody footprint at the crime scene that matches Sollecito's. The floor >> had been cleaned so that the footprint was invisible to the naked eye, but >> was revealed with Luminol (just like on "CSI"). >> >> -- Knox's bloody footprints, mixed with Kercher's blood, were found in >> another roommate's room, where a window had been broken to make it look like >> there had been a break-in -- a theory discounted immediately by >> investigators. Knox's footprints, too, had been scrubbed but were discovered >> with Luminol. >> >> -- Kercher's bloody bra strap at the crime scene that had abundant amounts >> of Sollecito's DNA on it. >> >> Egan explains away the devastating DNA evidence by denying it exists. >> >> Delusionally, he writes: >> >> "(I)f Knox and Sollecito had killed Kercher, and were in that >> blood-splattered room, why is there no physical trace from them on the body? >> A print? A swap of DNA somewhere? After all, Kercher had died after a brutal >> strangulation, evidence of considerable struggle, with knife pokes in the >> neck." >> >> Read the trial transcript, Matlock. >> >> Egan does acknowledge the bloody bra strap covered with Sollecito's DNA, >> butdismissively writes: "(T)hey discovered Kercher's clasp nearly six weeks >> >> after the murder -- a highly suspect and tainted piece of evidence from a >> contaminated crime scene." >> >> Even the defense isn't complaining about the amount of time that passed >> before the bra strap was tested. The bra strap was found during the initial >> search of the crime scene -- which was promptly sealed off -- and then was >> collected for testing during the second search of the sealed crime scene >> some weeks later. >> >> True, the defense has tried to minimize all the evidence by throwing out the >> old "contamination" chestnut, but without proof of systematic contamination >> of the evidence, this is just a boilerplate defense, much like "but he hit >> me first." (Next the defense will be vowing to look for the "real killer.") >> >> Egan also dismissed the knife at Sollecito's house with Knox's DNA on the >> handle and Kercher's DNA on the blade, claiming the knife contained only "a >> tiny amount of DNA that might match that of the victim." (I know I'm >> constantly finding small amounts of other people's DNA on the blades of my >> kitchen knives.) >> >> When the defense tried the "small amount of DNA" argument at trial, forensic >> biologist Patrizia Stefanoni replied, "If the blood evidence is a positive >> match, it is not always important how much there is -- and the material on >> the blade matches the victim." >> >> Even the accused murderess has a better theory to explain the DNA on the >> knife. Knox wrote in her prison diary: "I think it is possible Raffaele went >> to Meredith's house, raped her, then killed her and then when he got home, >> while I was sleeping, he pressed my fingerprints on the knife." >> >> These are only a few examples of the wildly deceptive account of the Amanda >> Knox trial printed in the *Times*. The reason this is important is that this >> is how the *Times* portrays all criminal prosecutions: Ruthless prosecutor >> railroads innocent bystanders for mysterious reasons. (Unless the victim is >> a late-term abortionist or the accused is a Duke lacrosse player.) >> >> The only difference in the Knox case, compared to run-of-the-mill criminal >> cases, is that the copious foreign reporting on the case makes it child's >> play to see how egregiously the *Times* is lying this time. >> >> I don't know if Knox murdered her roommate, but I am sure that America's >> news coverage of this case is a crime. >> >> AnnLookin'Tight!.jpg >> 66KViewDownload >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
