dick, Naaaah, she's pretty much an idiot. C'mon slick, READ the goofy article she wrote!
On Jun 18, 9:46 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > You should only be bright enough to be an idiot like her. Then you > might really know something. > > > > Hollywood wrote: > > KIT, > > > STRIPPERS are "enemies of civilization against civil cililization"???? > > Isn't that a bit redundant? Maybe it's just me, but i'd just assume > > that an "enemy of civilization" was "against civilization" without > > being told. Duuuuuuh.... > > > Aren't Jim Jones and his followers dead and buried? Don't see how they > > could be much of a threat to anyone. > > > AC seem to be pretty much an idiot. > > > On Jun 17, 10:13 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Another good article from CW....I mean Ann Coulter: > > >> ================ > >> ** > >> ** > >> ** > >> *NYT: Duke Lacrosse Players Killed Meredith Kercher* > >> by Ann Coulter > >> Posted 06/17/2009 ET > >> Updated 06/17/2009 ET > > >>http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&id=32351 > > >> Whether it is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Weather Underground, Central Park > >> rapists, Mumia Abu-Jamal, Jim Jones and the People's Temple, welfare > >> recipients, Palestinian terrorists, murderers, abortionists, strippers or > >> common criminals -- liberals always take the side of the enemies of > >> civilization against civilization. > > >> In the view of The New York *Times*, every criminal trial is a shocking > >> miscarriage of justice -- except the ones that actually are shocking > >> miscarriages of justice. > > >> Thus, in last week's *Times*, Timothy Egan wrote about a shocking > >> miscarriage of justice being carried out against a "high-spirited" American > >> girl accused of murder by a crazed prosecutor in Perugia, Italy. > > >> Egan's column bears as much relationship to the facts of the case as -- > >> well, I guess as anything printed in the *Times*. And yet every American > >> news network has embraced Egan's version and is flacking for the accused. > > >> Amanda Knox, her erstwhile boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito, and another man, > >> Rudy Guede, stand accused of murdering Knox's roommate, Meredith Kercher, > >> on > >> Nov. 1, 2007, at the house Knox and Kercher shared with two other girls in > >> Perugia. > > >> Egan triumphantly cites an "outside expert hired by CBS News" who calls > >> Knox's prosecution, "the railroad job from hell." Egan does not mention > >> that > >> the "outside investigator" is Paul Ciolino of the "Innocence Project," > >> whose > >> investigations always seem to conclude that the accused is being > >> railroaded. > > >> Ciolino's theory of the crime -- adopted unquestioningly by Egan -- is that > >> the third man, Guede, who has already confessed to the crime, acted alone. > > >> Despite Ciolino's careful analysis of the evidence, his theory is > >> contradicted by Guede himself, as well as the coroner and a leading > >> forensic > >> geneticist, both of whom have testified that Kercher's massive injuries > >> could only have been inflicted by multiple assailants. > > >> It is also contradicted by the court's 106-page report, released in > >> January, > >> explaining the judge's reasons for refusing to release Knox and Sollecito > >> on > >> bail. > > >> Even the "48 Hours" executive producer doesn't endorse Ciolino's > >> preposterous "single knifeman" theory, admitting: "Do we know every piece > >> of > >> data? No. Is there some troubling DNA? Yes." > > >> Hey, does anyone know if CBS hired more than one "outside investigator" to > >> look at the Knox case? Because if Egan considers one CBS "outside > >> investigator" the Rosetta Stone of this case, it would be odd if he didn't > >> mention the conclusions of another CBS outside investigator. > > >> Why yes there was! > > >> The second investigator, Paolo Sfriso, didn't pronounce judgment, but he > >> did > >> cite some of the evidence. The evidence includes: > > >> -- a large kitchen knife, believed by forensic investigators to have caused > >> at least one of Kercher's three wounds, found at Sollecito's house. Despite > >> having been thoroughly washed, the knife had Knox's DNA on the handle and > >> the murder victim's DNA on the blade. > > >> -- a bloody footprint at the crime scene that matches Sollecito's. The > >> floor > >> had been cleaned so that the footprint was invisible to the naked eye, but > >> was revealed with Luminol (just like on "CSI"). > > >> -- Knox's bloody footprints, mixed with Kercher's blood, were found in > >> another roommate's room, where a window had been broken to make it look > >> like > >> there had been a break-in -- a theory discounted immediately by > >> investigators. Knox's footprints, too, had been scrubbed but were > >> discovered > >> with Luminol. > > >> -- Kercher's bloody bra strap at the crime scene that had abundant amounts > >> of Sollecito's DNA on it. > > >> Egan explains away the devastating DNA evidence by denying it exists. > > >> Delusionally, he writes: > > >> "(I)f Knox and Sollecito had killed Kercher, and were in that > >> blood-splattered room, why is there no physical trace from them on the > >> body? > >> A print? A swap of DNA somewhere? After all, Kercher had died after a > >> brutal > >> strangulation, evidence of considerable struggle, with knife pokes in the > >> neck." > > >> Read the trial transcript, Matlock. > > >> Egan does acknowledge the bloody bra strap covered with Sollecito's DNA, > >> butdismissively writes: "(T)hey discovered Kercher's clasp nearly six weeks > > >> after the murder -- a highly suspect and tainted piece of evidence from a > >> contaminated crime scene." > > >> Even the defense isn't complaining about the amount of time that passed > >> before the bra strap was tested. The bra strap was found during the initial > >> search of the crime scene -- which was promptly sealed off -- and then was > >> collected for testing during the second search of the sealed crime scene > >> some weeks later. > > >> True, the defense has tried to minimize all the evidence by throwing out > >> the > >> old "contamination" chestnut, but without proof of systematic contamination > >> of the evidence, this is just a boilerplate defense, much like "but he hit > >> me first." (Next the defense will be vowing to look for the "real killer.") > > >> Egan also dismissed the knife at Sollecito's house with Knox's DNA on the > >> handle and Kercher's DNA on the blade, claiming the knife contained only "a > >> tiny amount of DNA that might match that of the victim." (I know I'm > >> constantly finding small amounts of other people's DNA on the blades of my > >> kitchen knives.) > > >> When the defense tried the "small amount of DNA" argument at trial, > >> forensic > >> biologist Patrizia Stefanoni replied, "If the blood evidence is a positive > >> match, it is not always important how much there is -- and the material on > >> the blade matches the victim." > > >> Even the accused murderess has a better theory to explain the DNA on the > >> knife. Knox wrote in her prison diary: "I think it is possible Raffaele > >> went > >> to Meredith's house, raped her, then killed her and then when he got home, > >> while I was sleeping, he pressed my fingerprints on the knife." > > >> These are only a few examples of the wildly deceptive account of the Amanda > >> Knox trial printed in the *Times*. The reason this is important is that > >> this > >> is how the *Times* portrays all criminal prosecutions: Ruthless prosecutor > >> railroads innocent bystanders for mysterious reasons. (Unless the victim is > >> a late-term abortionist or the accused is a Duke lacrosse player.) > > >> The only difference in the Knox case, compared to run-of-the-mill criminal > >> cases, is that the copious foreign reporting on the case makes it child's > >> play to see how egregiously the *Times* is lying this time. > > >> I don't know if Knox murdered her roommate, but I am sure that America's > >> news coverage of this case is a crime. > > >> AnnLookin'Tight!.jpg > >> 66KViewDownload- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
