dick, Oh I don't know, would be quite a chore to out idiot Ms. Coulter. C'mon, lighten up old boy. You don't think it's hysterically idiotic to list strippers as "enemies of civilization against civilization"? I almost pissed my pants laughing!
On Jun 19, 7:21 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > You only call her an idiot because she makes your heroes look even more > like idiots than they already do. > > > > Hollywood wrote: > > dick, > > > Naaaah, she's pretty much an idiot. C'mon slick, READ the goofy > > article she wrote! > > > On Jun 18, 9:46 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> You should only be bright enough to be an idiot like her. Then you > >> might really know something. > > >> Hollywood wrote: > > >>> KIT, > > >>> STRIPPERS are "enemies of civilization against civil cililization"???? > >>> Isn't that a bit redundant? Maybe it's just me, but i'd just assume > >>> that an "enemy of civilization" was "against civilization" without > >>> being told. Duuuuuuh.... > > >>> Aren't Jim Jones and his followers dead and buried? Don't see how they > >>> could be much of a threat to anyone. > > >>> AC seem to be pretty much an idiot. > > >>> On Jun 17, 10:13 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> Another good article from CW....I mean Ann Coulter: > > >>>> ================ > >>>> ** > >>>> ** > >>>> ** > >>>> *NYT: Duke Lacrosse Players Killed Meredith Kercher* > >>>> by Ann Coulter > >>>> Posted 06/17/2009 ET > >>>> Updated 06/17/2009 ET > > >>>>http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&id=32351 > > >>>> Whether it is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Weather Underground, Central Park > >>>> rapists, Mumia Abu-Jamal, Jim Jones and the People's Temple, welfare > >>>> recipients, Palestinian terrorists, murderers, abortionists, strippers or > >>>> common criminals -- liberals always take the side of the enemies of > >>>> civilization against civilization. > > >>>> In the view of The New York *Times*, every criminal trial is a shocking > >>>> miscarriage of justice -- except the ones that actually are shocking > >>>> miscarriages of justice. > > >>>> Thus, in last week's *Times*, Timothy Egan wrote about a shocking > >>>> miscarriage of justice being carried out against a "high-spirited" > >>>> American > >>>> girl accused of murder by a crazed prosecutor in Perugia, Italy. > > >>>> Egan's column bears as much relationship to the facts of the case as -- > >>>> well, I guess as anything printed in the *Times*. And yet every American > >>>> news network has embraced Egan's version and is flacking for the accused. > > >>>> Amanda Knox, her erstwhile boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito, and another > >>>> man, > >>>> Rudy Guede, stand accused of murdering Knox's roommate, Meredith > >>>> Kercher, on > >>>> Nov. 1, 2007, at the house Knox and Kercher shared with two other girls > >>>> in > >>>> Perugia. > > >>>> Egan triumphantly cites an "outside expert hired by CBS News" who calls > >>>> Knox's prosecution, "the railroad job from hell." Egan does not mention > >>>> that > >>>> the "outside investigator" is Paul Ciolino of the "Innocence Project," > >>>> whose > >>>> investigations always seem to conclude that the accused is being > >>>> railroaded. > > >>>> Ciolino's theory of the crime -- adopted unquestioningly by Egan -- is > >>>> that > >>>> the third man, Guede, who has already confessed to the crime, acted > >>>> alone. > > >>>> Despite Ciolino's careful analysis of the evidence, his theory is > >>>> contradicted by Guede himself, as well as the coroner and a leading > >>>> forensic > >>>> geneticist, both of whom have testified that Kercher's massive injuries > >>>> could only have been inflicted by multiple assailants. > > >>>> It is also contradicted by the court's 106-page report, released in > >>>> January, > >>>> explaining the judge's reasons for refusing to release Knox and > >>>> Sollecito on > >>>> bail. > > >>>> Even the "48 Hours" executive producer doesn't endorse Ciolino's > >>>> preposterous "single knifeman" theory, admitting: "Do we know every > >>>> piece of > >>>> data? No. Is there some troubling DNA? Yes." > > >>>> Hey, does anyone know if CBS hired more than one "outside investigator" > >>>> to > >>>> look at the Knox case? Because if Egan considers one CBS "outside > >>>> investigator" the Rosetta Stone of this case, it would be odd if he > >>>> didn't > >>>> mention the conclusions of another CBS outside investigator. > > >>>> Why yes there was! > > >>>> The second investigator, Paolo Sfriso, didn't pronounce judgment, but he > >>>> did > >>>> cite some of the evidence. The evidence includes: > > >>>> -- a large kitchen knife, believed by forensic investigators to have > >>>> caused > >>>> at least one of Kercher's three wounds, found at Sollecito's house. > >>>> Despite > >>>> having been thoroughly washed, the knife had Knox's DNA on the handle and > >>>> the murder victim's DNA on the blade. > > >>>> -- a bloody footprint at the crime scene that matches Sollecito's. The > >>>> floor > >>>> had been cleaned so that the footprint was invisible to the naked eye, > >>>> but > >>>> was revealed with Luminol (just like on "CSI"). > > >>>> -- Knox's bloody footprints, mixed with Kercher's blood, were found in > >>>> another roommate's room, where a window had been broken to make it look > >>>> like > >>>> there had been a break-in -- a theory discounted immediately by > >>>> investigators. Knox's footprints, too, had been scrubbed but were > >>>> discovered > >>>> with Luminol. > > >>>> -- Kercher's bloody bra strap at the crime scene that had abundant > >>>> amounts > >>>> of Sollecito's DNA on it. > > >>>> Egan explains away the devastating DNA evidence by denying it exists. > > >>>> Delusionally, he writes: > > >>>> "(I)f Knox and Sollecito had killed Kercher, and were in that > >>>> blood-splattered room, why is there no physical trace from them on the > >>>> body? > >>>> A print? A swap of DNA somewhere? After all, Kercher had died after a > >>>> brutal > >>>> strangulation, evidence of considerable struggle, with knife pokes in the > >>>> neck." > > >>>> Read the trial transcript, Matlock. > > >>>> Egan does acknowledge the bloody bra strap covered with Sollecito's DNA, > >>>> butdismissively writes: "(T)hey discovered Kercher's clasp nearly six > >>>> weeks > > >>>> after the murder -- a highly suspect and tainted piece of evidence from a > >>>> contaminated crime scene." > > >>>> Even the defense isn't complaining about the amount of time that passed > >>>> before the bra strap was tested. The bra strap was found during the > >>>> initial > >>>> search of the crime scene -- which was promptly sealed off -- and then > >>>> was > >>>> collected for testing during the second search of the sealed crime scene > >>>> some weeks later. > > >>>> True, the defense has tried to minimize all the evidence by throwing out > >>>> the > >>>> old "contamination" chestnut, but without proof of systematic > >>>> contamination > >>>> of the evidence, this is just a boilerplate defense, much like "but he > >>>> hit > >>>> me first." (Next the defense will be vowing to look for the "real > >>>> killer.") > > >>>> Egan also dismissed the knife at Sollecito's house with Knox's DNA on the > >>>> handle and Kercher's DNA on the blade, claiming the knife contained only > >>>> "a > >>>> tiny amount of DNA that might match that of the victim." (I know I'm > >>>> constantly finding small amounts of other people's DNA on the blades of > >>>> my > >>>> kitchen knives.) > > >>>> When the defense tried the "small amount of DNA" argument at trial, > >>>> forensic > >>>> biologist Patrizia Stefanoni replied, "If the blood evidence is a > >>>> positive > >>>> match, it is not always important how much there is -- and the material > >>>> on > >>>> the blade matches the victim." > > >>>> Even the accused murderess has a better theory to explain the DNA on the > >>>> knife. Knox wrote in her prison diary: "I think it is possible Raffaele > >>>> went > >>>> to Meredith's house, raped her, then killed her and then when he got > >>>> home, > >>>> while I was sleeping, he pressed my fingerprints on the knife." > > >>>> These are only a few examples of the wildly deceptive account of the > >>>> Amanda > >>>> Knox trial printed in the *Times*. The reason this is important is that > >>>> this > >>>> is how the *Times* portrays all criminal prosecutions: Ruthless > >>>> prosecutor > >>>> railroads innocent bystanders for mysterious reasons. (Unless the victim > >>>> is > >>>> a late-term abortionist or the accused is a Duke lacrosse player.) > > >>>> The only difference in the Knox case, compared to run-of-the-mill > >>>> criminal > >>>> cases, is that the copious foreign reporting on the case makes it child's > >>>> play to see how egregiously the *Times* is lying this time. > > >>>> I don't know if Knox murdered her roommate, but I am sure that America's > >>>> news coverage of this case is a crime. > > >>>> AnnLookin'Tight!.jpg > >>>> 66KViewDownload- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
