Holly?

Kind of like the stripper who accused a hand full of Duke LaCrosse players
of rape, which turned out to be a lie, and of which a prosecutor attempted
to make a name for himself, win an election, ruin the lives of six young
men?

Yep,  I would call that an "enemy of civilization".....

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Hollywood <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> dick,
>
> Oh I don't know, would be quite a chore to out idiot Ms. Coulter.
> C'mon, lighten up old boy. You don't think it's hysterically idiotic
> to list strippers as "enemies of civilization against civilization"? I
> almost pissed my pants laughing!
>
>
> On Jun 19, 7:21 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > You only call her an idiot because she makes your heroes look even more
> > like idiots than they already do.
> >
> >
> >
> > Hollywood wrote:
> > > dick,
> >
> > > Naaaah, she's pretty much an idiot. C'mon slick, READ the goofy
> > > article she wrote!
> >
> > > On Jun 18, 9:46 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >> You should only be bright enough to be an idiot like her.  Then you
> > >> might really know something.
> >
> > >> Hollywood wrote:
> >
> > >>> KIT,
> >
> > >>> STRIPPERS are "enemies of civilization against civil
> cililization"????
> > >>> Isn't that a bit redundant? Maybe it's just me, but i'd just assume
> > >>> that an "enemy of civilization" was "against civilization" without
> > >>> being told. Duuuuuuh....
> >
> > >>> Aren't Jim Jones and his followers dead and buried? Don't see how
> they
> > >>> could be much of a threat to anyone.
> >
> > >>> AC seem to be pretty much an idiot.
> >
> > >>> On Jun 17, 10:13 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >>>> Another good article from CW....I mean Ann Coulter:
> >
> > >>>> ================
> > >>>> **
> > >>>> **
> > >>>> **
> > >>>> *NYT: Duke Lacrosse Players Killed Meredith Kercher*
> > >>>> by Ann Coulter
> > >>>> Posted 06/17/2009 ET
> > >>>> Updated 06/17/2009 ET
> >
> > >>>>http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&id=32351
> >
> > >>>> Whether it is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Weather Underground, Central
> Park
> > >>>> rapists, Mumia Abu-Jamal, Jim Jones and the People's Temple, welfare
> > >>>> recipients, Palestinian terrorists, murderers, abortionists,
> strippers or
> > >>>> common criminals -- liberals always take the side of the enemies of
> > >>>> civilization against civilization.
> >
> > >>>> In the view of The New York *Times*, every criminal trial is a
> shocking
> > >>>> miscarriage of justice -- except the ones that actually are shocking
> > >>>> miscarriages of justice.
> >
> > >>>> Thus, in last week's *Times*, Timothy Egan wrote about a shocking
> > >>>> miscarriage of justice being carried out against a "high-spirited"
> American
> > >>>> girl accused of murder by a crazed prosecutor in Perugia, Italy.
> >
> > >>>> Egan's column bears as much relationship to the facts of the case as
> --
> > >>>> well, I guess as anything printed in the *Times*. And yet every
> American
> > >>>> news network has embraced Egan's version and is flacking for the
> accused.
> >
> > >>>> Amanda Knox, her erstwhile boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito, and
> another man,
> > >>>> Rudy Guede, stand accused of murdering Knox's roommate, Meredith
> Kercher, on
> > >>>> Nov. 1, 2007, at the house Knox and Kercher shared with two other
> girls in
> > >>>> Perugia.
> >
> > >>>> Egan triumphantly cites an "outside expert hired by CBS News" who
> calls
> > >>>> Knox's prosecution, "the railroad job from hell." Egan does not
> mention that
> > >>>> the "outside investigator" is Paul Ciolino of the "Innocence
> Project," whose
> > >>>> investigations always seem to conclude that the accused is being
> railroaded.
> >
> > >>>> Ciolino's theory of the crime -- adopted unquestioningly by Egan --
> is that
> > >>>> the third man, Guede, who has already confessed to the crime, acted
> alone.
> >
> > >>>> Despite Ciolino's careful analysis of the evidence, his theory is
> > >>>> contradicted by Guede himself, as well as the coroner and a leading
> forensic
> > >>>> geneticist, both of whom have testified that Kercher's massive
> injuries
> > >>>> could only have been inflicted by multiple assailants.
> >
> > >>>> It is also contradicted by the court's 106-page report, released in
> January,
> > >>>> explaining the judge's reasons for refusing to release Knox and
> Sollecito on
> > >>>> bail.
> >
> > >>>> Even the "48 Hours" executive producer doesn't endorse Ciolino's
> > >>>> preposterous "single knifeman" theory, admitting: "Do we know every
> piece of
> > >>>> data? No. Is there some troubling DNA? Yes."
> >
> > >>>> Hey, does anyone know if CBS hired more than one "outside
> investigator" to
> > >>>> look at the Knox case? Because if Egan considers one CBS "outside
> > >>>> investigator" the Rosetta Stone of this case, it would be odd if he
> didn't
> > >>>> mention the conclusions of another CBS outside investigator.
> >
> > >>>> Why yes there was!
> >
> > >>>> The second investigator, Paolo Sfriso, didn't pronounce judgment,
> but he did
> > >>>> cite some of the evidence. The evidence includes:
> >
> > >>>> -- a large kitchen knife, believed by forensic investigators to have
> caused
> > >>>> at least one of Kercher's three wounds, found at Sollecito's house.
> Despite
> > >>>> having been thoroughly washed, the knife had Knox's DNA on the
> handle and
> > >>>> the murder victim's DNA on the blade.
> >
> > >>>> -- a bloody footprint at the crime scene that matches Sollecito's.
> The floor
> > >>>> had been cleaned so that the footprint was invisible to the naked
> eye, but
> > >>>> was revealed with Luminol (just like on "CSI").
> >
> > >>>> -- Knox's bloody footprints, mixed with Kercher's blood, were found
> in
> > >>>> another roommate's room, where a window had been broken to make it
> look like
> > >>>> there had been a break-in -- a theory discounted immediately by
> > >>>> investigators. Knox's footprints, too, had been scrubbed but were
> discovered
> > >>>> with Luminol.
> >
> > >>>> -- Kercher's bloody bra strap at the crime scene that had abundant
> amounts
> > >>>> of Sollecito's DNA on it.
> >
> > >>>> Egan explains away the devastating DNA evidence by denying it
> exists.
> >
> > >>>> Delusionally, he writes:
> >
> > >>>> "(I)f Knox and Sollecito had killed Kercher, and were in that
> > >>>> blood-splattered room, why is there no physical trace from them on
> the body?
> > >>>> A print? A swap of DNA somewhere? After all, Kercher had died after
> a brutal
> > >>>> strangulation, evidence of considerable struggle, with knife pokes
> in the
> > >>>> neck."
> >
> > >>>> Read the trial transcript, Matlock.
> >
> > >>>> Egan does acknowledge the bloody bra strap covered with Sollecito's
> DNA, butdismissively writes: "(T)hey discovered Kercher's clasp nearly six
> weeks
> >
> > >>>> after the murder -- a highly suspect and tainted piece of evidence
> from a
> > >>>> contaminated crime scene."
> >
> > >>>> Even the defense isn't complaining about the amount of time that
> passed
> > >>>> before the bra strap was tested. The bra strap was found during the
> initial
> > >>>> search of the crime scene -- which was promptly sealed off -- and
> then was
> > >>>> collected for testing during the second search of the sealed crime
> scene
> > >>>> some weeks later.
> >
> > >>>> True, the defense has tried to minimize all the evidence by throwing
> out the
> > >>>> old "contamination" chestnut, but without proof of systematic
> contamination
> > >>>> of the evidence, this is just a boilerplate defense, much like "but
> he hit
> > >>>> me first." (Next the defense will be vowing to look for the "real
> killer.")
> >
> > >>>> Egan also dismissed the knife at Sollecito's house with Knox's DNA
> on the
> > >>>> handle and Kercher's DNA on the blade, claiming the knife contained
> only "a
> > >>>> tiny amount of DNA that might match that of the victim." (I know I'm
> > >>>> constantly finding small amounts of other people's DNA on the blades
> of my
> > >>>> kitchen knives.)
> >
> > >>>> When the defense tried the "small amount of DNA" argument at trial,
> forensic
> > >>>> biologist Patrizia Stefanoni replied, "If the blood evidence is a
> positive
> > >>>> match, it is not always important how much there is -- and the
> material on
> > >>>> the blade matches the victim."
> >
> > >>>> Even the accused murderess has a better theory to explain the DNA on
> the
> > >>>> knife. Knox wrote in her prison diary: "I think it is possible
> Raffaele went
> > >>>> to Meredith's house, raped her, then killed her and then when he got
> home,
> > >>>> while I was sleeping, he pressed my fingerprints on the knife."
> >
> > >>>> These are only a few examples of the wildly deceptive account of the
> Amanda
> > >>>> Knox trial printed in the *Times*. The reason this is important is
> that this
> > >>>> is how the *Times* portrays all criminal prosecutions: Ruthless
> prosecutor
> > >>>> railroads innocent bystanders for mysterious reasons. (Unless the
> victim is
> > >>>> a late-term abortionist or the accused is a Duke lacrosse player.)
> >
> > >>>> The only difference in the Knox case, compared to run-of-the-mill
> criminal
> > >>>> cases, is that the copious foreign reporting on the case makes it
> child's
> > >>>> play to see how egregiously the *Times* is lying this time.
> >
> > >>>> I don't know if Knox murdered her roommate, but I am sure that
> America's
> > >>>> news coverage of this case is a crime.
> >
> > >>>>  AnnLookin'Tight!.jpg
> > >>>> 66KViewDownload- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>  >
> > - Show quoted text -
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to