KIT, A half-dozen college boys represent all of cilivization??? Never took you for a hysterical drama queen Keith. Guess I was wrong.
On Jun 19, 10:16 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > Holly? > > Kind of like the stripper who accused a hand full of Duke LaCrosse players > of rape, which turned out to be a lie, and of which a prosecutor attempted > to make a name for himself, win an election, ruin the lives of six young > men? > > Yep, I would call that an "enemy of civilization"..... > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Hollywood <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > dick, > > > Oh I don't know, would be quite a chore to out idiot Ms. Coulter. > > C'mon, lighten up old boy. You don't think it's hysterically idiotic > > to list strippers as "enemies of civilization against civilization"? I > > almost pissed my pants laughing! > > > On Jun 19, 7:21 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > You only call her an idiot because she makes your heroes look even more > > > like idiots than they already do. > > > > Hollywood wrote: > > > > dick, > > > > > Naaaah, she's pretty much an idiot. C'mon slick, READ the goofy > > > > article she wrote! > > > > > On Jun 18, 9:46 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> You should only be bright enough to be an idiot like her. Then you > > > >> might really know something. > > > > >> Hollywood wrote: > > > > >>> KIT, > > > > >>> STRIPPERS are "enemies of civilization against civil > > cililization"???? > > > >>> Isn't that a bit redundant? Maybe it's just me, but i'd just assume > > > >>> that an "enemy of civilization" was "against civilization" without > > > >>> being told. Duuuuuuh.... > > > > >>> Aren't Jim Jones and his followers dead and buried? Don't see how > > they > > > >>> could be much of a threat to anyone. > > > > >>> AC seem to be pretty much an idiot. > > > > >>> On Jun 17, 10:13 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>>> Another good article from CW....I mean Ann Coulter: > > > > >>>> ================ > > > >>>> ** > > > >>>> ** > > > >>>> ** > > > >>>> *NYT: Duke Lacrosse Players Killed Meredith Kercher* > > > >>>> by Ann Coulter > > > >>>> Posted 06/17/2009 ET > > > >>>> Updated 06/17/2009 ET > > > > >>>>http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&id=32351 > > > > >>>> Whether it is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Weather Underground, Central > > Park > > > >>>> rapists, Mumia Abu-Jamal, Jim Jones and the People's Temple, welfare > > > >>>> recipients, Palestinian terrorists, murderers, abortionists, > > strippers or > > > >>>> common criminals -- liberals always take the side of the enemies of > > > >>>> civilization against civilization. > > > > >>>> In the view of The New York *Times*, every criminal trial is a > > shocking > > > >>>> miscarriage of justice -- except the ones that actually are shocking > > > >>>> miscarriages of justice. > > > > >>>> Thus, in last week's *Times*, Timothy Egan wrote about a shocking > > > >>>> miscarriage of justice being carried out against a "high-spirited" > > American > > > >>>> girl accused of murder by a crazed prosecutor in Perugia, Italy. > > > > >>>> Egan's column bears as much relationship to the facts of the case as > > -- > > > >>>> well, I guess as anything printed in the *Times*. And yet every > > American > > > >>>> news network has embraced Egan's version and is flacking for the > > accused. > > > > >>>> Amanda Knox, her erstwhile boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito, and > > another man, > > > >>>> Rudy Guede, stand accused of murdering Knox's roommate, Meredith > > Kercher, on > > > >>>> Nov. 1, 2007, at the house Knox and Kercher shared with two other > > girls in > > > >>>> Perugia. > > > > >>>> Egan triumphantly cites an "outside expert hired by CBS News" who > > calls > > > >>>> Knox's prosecution, "the railroad job from hell." Egan does not > > mention that > > > >>>> the "outside investigator" is Paul Ciolino of the "Innocence > > Project," whose > > > >>>> investigations always seem to conclude that the accused is being > > railroaded. > > > > >>>> Ciolino's theory of the crime -- adopted unquestioningly by Egan -- > > is that > > > >>>> the third man, Guede, who has already confessed to the crime, acted > > alone. > > > > >>>> Despite Ciolino's careful analysis of the evidence, his theory is > > > >>>> contradicted by Guede himself, as well as the coroner and a leading > > forensic > > > >>>> geneticist, both of whom have testified that Kercher's massive > > injuries > > > >>>> could only have been inflicted by multiple assailants. > > > > >>>> It is also contradicted by the court's 106-page report, released in > > January, > > > >>>> explaining the judge's reasons for refusing to release Knox and > > Sollecito on > > > >>>> bail. > > > > >>>> Even the "48 Hours" executive producer doesn't endorse Ciolino's > > > >>>> preposterous "single knifeman" theory, admitting: "Do we know every > > piece of > > > >>>> data? No. Is there some troubling DNA? Yes." > > > > >>>> Hey, does anyone know if CBS hired more than one "outside > > investigator" to > > > >>>> look at the Knox case? Because if Egan considers one CBS "outside > > > >>>> investigator" the Rosetta Stone of this case, it would be odd if he > > didn't > > > >>>> mention the conclusions of another CBS outside investigator. > > > > >>>> Why yes there was! > > > > >>>> The second investigator, Paolo Sfriso, didn't pronounce judgment, > > but he did > > > >>>> cite some of the evidence. The evidence includes: > > > > >>>> -- a large kitchen knife, believed by forensic investigators to have > > caused > > > >>>> at least one of Kercher's three wounds, found at Sollecito's house. > > Despite > > > >>>> having been thoroughly washed, the knife had Knox's DNA on the > > handle and > > > >>>> the murder victim's DNA on the blade. > > > > >>>> -- a bloody footprint at the crime scene that matches Sollecito's. > > The floor > > > >>>> had been cleaned so that the footprint was invisible to the naked > > eye, but > > > >>>> was revealed with Luminol (just like on "CSI"). > > > > >>>> -- Knox's bloody footprints, mixed with Kercher's blood, were found > > in > > > >>>> another roommate's room, where a window had been broken to make it > > look like > > > >>>> there had been a break-in -- a theory discounted immediately by > > > >>>> investigators. Knox's footprints, too, had been scrubbed but were > > discovered > > > >>>> with Luminol. > > > > >>>> -- Kercher's bloody bra strap at the crime scene that had abundant > > amounts > > > >>>> of Sollecito's DNA on it. > > > > >>>> Egan explains away the devastating DNA evidence by denying it > > exists. > > > > >>>> Delusionally, he writes: > > > > >>>> "(I)f Knox and Sollecito had killed Kercher, and were in that > > > >>>> blood-splattered room, why is there no physical trace from them on > > the body? > > > >>>> A print? A swap of DNA somewhere? After all, Kercher had died after > > a brutal > > > >>>> strangulation, evidence of considerable struggle, with knife pokes > > in the > > > >>>> neck." > > > > >>>> Read the trial transcript, Matlock. > > > > >>>> Egan does acknowledge the bloody bra strap covered with Sollecito's > > DNA, butdismissively writes: "(T)hey discovered Kercher's clasp nearly six > > weeks > > > > >>>> after the murder -- a highly suspect and tainted piece of evidence > > from a > > > >>>> contaminated crime scene." > > > > >>>> Even the defense isn't complaining about the amount of time that > > passed > > > >>>> before the bra strap was tested. The bra strap was found during the > > initial > > > >>>> search of the crime scene -- which was promptly sealed off -- and > > then was > > > >>>> collected for testing during the second search of the sealed crime > > scene > > > >>>> some weeks later. > > > > >>>> True, the defense has tried to minimize all the evidence by throwing > > out the > > > >>>> old "contamination" chestnut, but without proof of systematic > > contamination > > > >>>> of the evidence, this is just a boilerplate defense, much like "but > > he hit > > > >>>> me first." (Next the defense will be vowing to look for the "real > > killer.") > > > > >>>> Egan also dismissed the knife at Sollecito's house with Knox's DNA > > on the > > > >>>> handle and Kercher's DNA on the blade, claiming the knife contained > > only "a > > > >>>> tiny amount of DNA that might match that of the victim." (I know I'm > > > >>>> constantly finding small amounts of other people's DNA on the blades > > of my > > > >>>> kitchen knives.) > > > > >>>> When the defense tried the "small amount of DNA" argument at trial, > > forensic > > > >>>> biologist Patrizia Stefanoni replied, "If the blood evidence is a > > positive > > > >>>> match, it is not always important how much there is -- and the > > material on > > > >>>> the blade matches the victim." > > > > >>>> Even the accused murderess has a better theory to explain the DNA on > > the > > > >>>> knife. Knox wrote in her prison diary: "I think it is possible > > Raffaele went > > > >>>> to Meredith's house, raped her, then killed her and then when he got > > home, > > > >>>> while I was sleeping, he pressed my fingerprints on the knife." > > > > >>>> These are only a few examples of the wildly deceptive account of the > > Amanda > > > >>>> Knox trial printed in the *Times*. The reason this is important is > > that this > > > >>>> is how the *Times* portrays all criminal prosecutions: Ruthless > > prosecutor > > > >>>> railroads innocent bystanders for mysterious reasons. (Unless the > > victim is > > > >>>> a late-term abortionist or the accused is a Duke lacrosse player.) > > > > >>>> The only difference in the Knox case, compared to run-of-the-mill > > criminal > > > >>>> cases, is that the copious foreign reporting on the case makes it > > child's > > > >>>> play to see how egregiously the *Times* is lying this time. > > > > >>>> I don't know if Knox murdered her roommate, but I am sure that > > America's > > > >>>> news coverage of this case is a crime. > > > > >>>> AnnLookin'Tight!.jpg > > > >>>> 66KViewDownload- Hide quoted text - > > > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
