You only call her an idiot because she makes your heroes look even more like idiots than they already do.
Hollywood wrote: > dick, > > Naaaah, she's pretty much an idiot. C'mon slick, READ the goofy > article she wrote! > > On Jun 18, 9:46 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> You should only be bright enough to be an idiot like her. Then you >> might really know something. >> >> >> >> Hollywood wrote: >> >>> KIT, >>> >>> STRIPPERS are "enemies of civilization against civil cililization"???? >>> Isn't that a bit redundant? Maybe it's just me, but i'd just assume >>> that an "enemy of civilization" was "against civilization" without >>> being told. Duuuuuuh.... >>> >>> Aren't Jim Jones and his followers dead and buried? Don't see how they >>> could be much of a threat to anyone. >>> >>> AC seem to be pretty much an idiot. >>> >>> On Jun 17, 10:13 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Another good article from CW....I mean Ann Coulter: >>>> >>>> ================ >>>> ** >>>> ** >>>> ** >>>> *NYT: Duke Lacrosse Players Killed Meredith Kercher* >>>> by Ann Coulter >>>> Posted 06/17/2009 ET >>>> Updated 06/17/2009 ET >>>> >>>> http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&id=32351 >>>> >>>> Whether it is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Weather Underground, Central Park >>>> rapists, Mumia Abu-Jamal, Jim Jones and the People's Temple, welfare >>>> recipients, Palestinian terrorists, murderers, abortionists, strippers or >>>> common criminals -- liberals always take the side of the enemies of >>>> civilization against civilization. >>>> >>>> In the view of The New York *Times*, every criminal trial is a shocking >>>> miscarriage of justice -- except the ones that actually are shocking >>>> miscarriages of justice. >>>> >>>> Thus, in last week's *Times*, Timothy Egan wrote about a shocking >>>> miscarriage of justice being carried out against a "high-spirited" American >>>> girl accused of murder by a crazed prosecutor in Perugia, Italy. >>>> >>>> Egan's column bears as much relationship to the facts of the case as -- >>>> well, I guess as anything printed in the *Times*. And yet every American >>>> news network has embraced Egan's version and is flacking for the accused. >>>> >>>> Amanda Knox, her erstwhile boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito, and another man, >>>> Rudy Guede, stand accused of murdering Knox's roommate, Meredith Kercher, >>>> on >>>> Nov. 1, 2007, at the house Knox and Kercher shared with two other girls in >>>> Perugia. >>>> >>>> Egan triumphantly cites an "outside expert hired by CBS News" who calls >>>> Knox's prosecution, "the railroad job from hell." Egan does not mention >>>> that >>>> the "outside investigator" is Paul Ciolino of the "Innocence Project," >>>> whose >>>> investigations always seem to conclude that the accused is being >>>> railroaded. >>>> >>>> Ciolino's theory of the crime -- adopted unquestioningly by Egan -- is that >>>> the third man, Guede, who has already confessed to the crime, acted alone. >>>> >>>> Despite Ciolino's careful analysis of the evidence, his theory is >>>> contradicted by Guede himself, as well as the coroner and a leading >>>> forensic >>>> geneticist, both of whom have testified that Kercher's massive injuries >>>> could only have been inflicted by multiple assailants. >>>> >>>> It is also contradicted by the court's 106-page report, released in >>>> January, >>>> explaining the judge's reasons for refusing to release Knox and Sollecito >>>> on >>>> bail. >>>> >>>> Even the "48 Hours" executive producer doesn't endorse Ciolino's >>>> preposterous "single knifeman" theory, admitting: "Do we know every piece >>>> of >>>> data? No. Is there some troubling DNA? Yes." >>>> >>>> Hey, does anyone know if CBS hired more than one "outside investigator" to >>>> look at the Knox case? Because if Egan considers one CBS "outside >>>> investigator" the Rosetta Stone of this case, it would be odd if he didn't >>>> mention the conclusions of another CBS outside investigator. >>>> >>>> Why yes there was! >>>> >>>> The second investigator, Paolo Sfriso, didn't pronounce judgment, but he >>>> did >>>> cite some of the evidence. The evidence includes: >>>> >>>> -- a large kitchen knife, believed by forensic investigators to have caused >>>> at least one of Kercher's three wounds, found at Sollecito's house. Despite >>>> having been thoroughly washed, the knife had Knox's DNA on the handle and >>>> the murder victim's DNA on the blade. >>>> >>>> -- a bloody footprint at the crime scene that matches Sollecito's. The >>>> floor >>>> had been cleaned so that the footprint was invisible to the naked eye, but >>>> was revealed with Luminol (just like on "CSI"). >>>> >>>> -- Knox's bloody footprints, mixed with Kercher's blood, were found in >>>> another roommate's room, where a window had been broken to make it look >>>> like >>>> there had been a break-in -- a theory discounted immediately by >>>> investigators. Knox's footprints, too, had been scrubbed but were >>>> discovered >>>> with Luminol. >>>> >>>> -- Kercher's bloody bra strap at the crime scene that had abundant amounts >>>> of Sollecito's DNA on it. >>>> >>>> Egan explains away the devastating DNA evidence by denying it exists. >>>> >>>> Delusionally, he writes: >>>> >>>> "(I)f Knox and Sollecito had killed Kercher, and were in that >>>> blood-splattered room, why is there no physical trace from them on the >>>> body? >>>> A print? A swap of DNA somewhere? After all, Kercher had died after a >>>> brutal >>>> strangulation, evidence of considerable struggle, with knife pokes in the >>>> neck." >>>> >>>> Read the trial transcript, Matlock. >>>> >>>> Egan does acknowledge the bloody bra strap covered with Sollecito's DNA, >>>> butdismissively writes: "(T)hey discovered Kercher's clasp nearly six weeks >>>> >>>> after the murder -- a highly suspect and tainted piece of evidence from a >>>> contaminated crime scene." >>>> >>>> Even the defense isn't complaining about the amount of time that passed >>>> before the bra strap was tested. The bra strap was found during the initial >>>> search of the crime scene -- which was promptly sealed off -- and then was >>>> collected for testing during the second search of the sealed crime scene >>>> some weeks later. >>>> >>>> True, the defense has tried to minimize all the evidence by throwing out >>>> the >>>> old "contamination" chestnut, but without proof of systematic contamination >>>> of the evidence, this is just a boilerplate defense, much like "but he hit >>>> me first." (Next the defense will be vowing to look for the "real killer.") >>>> >>>> Egan also dismissed the knife at Sollecito's house with Knox's DNA on the >>>> handle and Kercher's DNA on the blade, claiming the knife contained only "a >>>> tiny amount of DNA that might match that of the victim." (I know I'm >>>> constantly finding small amounts of other people's DNA on the blades of my >>>> kitchen knives.) >>>> >>>> When the defense tried the "small amount of DNA" argument at trial, >>>> forensic >>>> biologist Patrizia Stefanoni replied, "If the blood evidence is a positive >>>> match, it is not always important how much there is -- and the material on >>>> the blade matches the victim." >>>> >>>> Even the accused murderess has a better theory to explain the DNA on the >>>> knife. Knox wrote in her prison diary: "I think it is possible Raffaele >>>> went >>>> to Meredith's house, raped her, then killed her and then when he got home, >>>> while I was sleeping, he pressed my fingerprints on the knife." >>>> >>>> These are only a few examples of the wildly deceptive account of the Amanda >>>> Knox trial printed in the *Times*. The reason this is important is that >>>> this >>>> is how the *Times* portrays all criminal prosecutions: Ruthless prosecutor >>>> railroads innocent bystanders for mysterious reasons. (Unless the victim is >>>> a late-term abortionist or the accused is a Duke lacrosse player.) >>>> >>>> The only difference in the Knox case, compared to run-of-the-mill criminal >>>> cases, is that the copious foreign reporting on the case makes it child's >>>> play to see how egregiously the *Times* is lying this time. >>>> >>>> I don't know if Knox murdered her roommate, but I am sure that America's >>>> news coverage of this case is a crime. >>>> >>>> AnnLookin'Tight!.jpg >>>> 66KViewDownload- Hide quoted text - >>>> >> - Show quoted text - >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
