LOL!
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Hollywood <[email protected]>wrote: > > KIT, > > Sorry man, with my eyes tearing from the laughter after reading the > "enemies of civilization against civilization" I couldn't see to read > the rest. Something about a murder in Italy. > > No, when AC or one of her ilk says something really extraordinarily > stupid and/or goofy the stardard fall back position is always that it > was just soooo terribly clever people didn't "get it". It's been done > to death Keith, ain't gonna' fly for the simple reason that even > assumming that was her intent she's STILL an idiot. As if the fate of > civilization hangs on the fate of a half- dozen college boys! > > On Jun 19, 10:38 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > Once again Holly, I encourage you to read the article again. As I said > > earlier, I am cognizant of, and understand that it takes liberals and > > Democrats a little longer to comprehend and grasp not only comprehensive > > political issues, but "tongue-in-cheek" jabs at Moonbats, which Ms. > Coulter > > is a master of. > > > > Ms. Coulter was referencing the stripper that made the false accusations > > against the Duke LaCrosse players, and who Egan and the New York Times > > intially sided with, calling for the literal swift, intense punishment of > > these innocent young men, based on this hateful, lying deranged woman who > > strips for a living. > > > > Nothing more.....Nothing less. Coulter made a point, in her typically > > humorous manner. I don't guess it was funny to Wacko Left, > Socialist-Elitist > > Moonbats.....I guess it wasn't funny even to "left of center" confused > > Democrats..... > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Hollywood <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > KIT, > > > > > A half-dozen college boys represent all of cilivization??? Never took > > > you for a hysterical drama queen Keith. > > > Guess I was wrong. > > > > > On Jun 19, 10:16 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Holly? > > > > > > Kind of like the stripper who accused a hand full of Duke LaCrosse > > > players > > > > of rape, which turned out to be a lie, and of which a prosecutor > > > attempted > > > > to make a name for himself, win an election, ruin the lives of six > young > > > > men? > > > > > > Yep, I would call that an "enemy of civilization"..... > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Hollywood < > [email protected] > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > dick, > > > > > > > Oh I don't know, would be quite a chore to out idiot Ms. Coulter. > > > > > C'mon, lighten up old boy. You don't think it's hysterically > idiotic > > > > > to list strippers as "enemies of civilization against > civilization"? I > > > > > almost pissed my pants laughing! > > > > > > > On Jun 19, 7:21 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > You only call her an idiot because she makes your heroes look > even > > > more > > > > > > like idiots than they already do. > > > > > > > > Hollywood wrote: > > > > > > > dick, > > > > > > > > > Naaaah, she's pretty much an idiot. C'mon slick, READ the goofy > > > > > > > article she wrote! > > > > > > > > > On Jun 18, 9:46 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> You should only be bright enough to be an idiot like her. > Then > > > you > > > > > > >> might really know something. > > > > > > > > >> Hollywood wrote: > > > > > > > > >>> KIT, > > > > > > > > >>> STRIPPERS are "enemies of civilization against civil > > > > > cililization"???? > > > > > > >>> Isn't that a bit redundant? Maybe it's just me, but i'd just > > > assume > > > > > > >>> that an "enemy of civilization" was "against civilization" > > > without > > > > > > >>> being told. Duuuuuuh.... > > > > > > > > >>> Aren't Jim Jones and his followers dead and buried? Don't see > how > > > > > they > > > > > > >>> could be much of a threat to anyone. > > > > > > > > >>> AC seem to be pretty much an idiot. > > > > > > > > >>> On Jun 17, 10:13 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >>>> Another good article from CW....I mean Ann Coulter: > > > > > > > > >>>> ================ > > > > > > >>>> ** > > > > > > >>>> ** > > > > > > >>>> ** > > > > > > >>>> *NYT: Duke Lacrosse Players Killed Meredith Kercher* > > > > > > >>>> by Ann Coulter > > > > > > >>>> Posted 06/17/2009 ET > > > > > > >>>> Updated 06/17/2009 ET > > > > > > > > >>>>http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&id=32351 > > > > > > > > >>>> Whether it is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Weather Underground, > > > Central > > > > > Park > > > > > > >>>> rapists, Mumia Abu-Jamal, Jim Jones and the People's Temple, > > > welfare > > > > > > >>>> recipients, Palestinian terrorists, murderers, abortionists, > > > > > strippers or > > > > > > >>>> common criminals -- liberals always take the side of the > enemies > > > of > > > > > > >>>> civilization against civilization. > > > > > > > > >>>> In the view of The New York *Times*, every criminal trial is > a > > > > > shocking > > > > > > >>>> miscarriage of justice -- except the ones that actually are > > > shocking > > > > > > >>>> miscarriages of justice. > > > > > > > > >>>> Thus, in last week's *Times*, Timothy Egan wrote about a > > > shocking > > > > > > >>>> miscarriage of justice being carried out against a > > > "high-spirited" > > > > > American > > > > > > >>>> girl accused of murder by a crazed prosecutor in Perugia, > Italy. > > > > > > > > >>>> Egan's column bears as much relationship to the facts of the > > > case as > > > > > -- > > > > > > >>>> well, I guess as anything printed in the *Times*. And yet > every > > > > > American > > > > > > >>>> news network has embraced Egan's version and is flacking for > the > > > > > accused. > > > > > > > > >>>> Amanda Knox, her erstwhile boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito, > and > > > > > another man, > > > > > > >>>> Rudy Guede, stand accused of murdering Knox's roommate, > Meredith > > > > > Kercher, on > > > > > > >>>> Nov. 1, 2007, at the house Knox and Kercher shared with two > > > other > > > > > girls in > > > > > > >>>> Perugia. > > > > > > > > >>>> Egan triumphantly cites an "outside expert hired by CBS > News" > > > who > > > > > calls > > > > > > >>>> Knox's prosecution, "the railroad job from hell." Egan does > not > > > > > mention that > > > > > > >>>> the "outside investigator" is Paul Ciolino of the "Innocence > > > > > Project," whose > > > > > > >>>> investigations always seem to conclude that the accused is > being > > > > > railroaded. > > > > > > > > >>>> Ciolino's theory of the crime -- adopted unquestioningly by > Egan > > > -- > > > > > is that > > > > > > >>>> the third man, Guede, who has already confessed to the > crime, > > > acted > > > > > alone. > > > > > > > > >>>> Despite Ciolino's careful analysis of the evidence, his > theory > > > is > > > > > > >>>> contradicted by Guede himself, as well as the coroner and a > > > leading > > > > > forensic > > > > > > >>>> geneticist, both of whom have testified that Kercher's > massive > > > > > injuries > > > > > > >>>> could only have been inflicted by multiple assailants. > > > > > > > > >>>> It is also contradicted by the court's 106-page report, > released > > > in > > > > > January, > > > > > > >>>> explaining the judge's reasons for refusing to release Knox > and > > > > > Sollecito on > > > > > > >>>> bail. > > > > > > > > >>>> Even the "48 Hours" executive producer doesn't endorse > Ciolino's > > > > > > >>>> preposterous "single knifeman" theory, admitting: "Do we > know > > > every > > > > > piece of > > > > > > >>>> data? No. Is there some troubling DNA? Yes." > > > > > > > > >>>> Hey, does anyone know if CBS hired more than one "outside > > > > > investigator" to > > > > > > >>>> look at the Knox case? Because if Egan considers one CBS > > > "outside > > > > > > >>>> investigator" the Rosetta Stone of this case, it would be > odd if > > > he > > > > > didn't > > > > > > >>>> mention the conclusions of another CBS outside investigator. > > > > > > > > >>>> Why yes there was! > > > > > > > > >>>> The second investigator, Paolo Sfriso, didn't pronounce > > > judgment, > > > > > but he did > > > > > > >>>> cite some of the evidence. The evidence includes: > > > > > > > > >>>> -- a large kitchen knife, believed by forensic investigators > to > > > have > > > > > caused > > > > > > >>>> at least one of Kercher's three wounds, found at Sollecito's > > > house. > > > > > Despite > > > > > > >>>> having been thoroughly washed, the knife had Knox's DNA on > the > > > > > handle and > > > > > > >>>> the murder victim's DNA on the blade. > > > > > > > > >>>> -- a bloody footprint at the crime scene that matches > > > Sollecito's. > > > > > The floor > > > > > > >>>> had been cleaned so that the footprint was invisible to the > > > naked > > > > > eye, but > > > > > > >>>> was revealed with Luminol (just like on "CSI"). > > > > > > > > >>>> -- Knox's bloody footprints, mixed with Kercher's blood, > were > > > found > > > > > in > > > > > > >>>> another roommate's room, where a window had been broken to > make > > > it > > > > > look like > > > > > > >>>> there had been a break-in -- a theory discounted immediately > by > > > > > > >>>> investigators. Knox's footprints, too, had been scrubbed but > > > were > > > > > discovered > > > > > > >>>> with Luminol. > > > > > > > > >>>> -- Kercher's bloody bra strap at the crime scene that had > > > abundant > > > > > amounts > > > > > > >>>> of Sollecito's DNA on it. > > > > > > > > >>>> Egan explains away the devastating DNA evidence by denying > it > > > > > exists. > > > > > > > > >>>> Delusionally, he writes: > > > > > > > > >>>> "(I)f Knox and Sollecito had killed Kercher, and were in > that > > > > > > >>>> blood-splattered room, why is there no physical trace from > them > > > on > > > > > the body? > > > > > > >>>> A print? A swap of DNA somewhere? After all, Kercher had > died > > > after > > > > > a brutal > > > > > > >>>> strangulation, evidence of considerable struggle, with knife > > > pokes > > > > > in the > > > > > > >>>> neck." > > > > > > > > >>>> Read the trial transcript, Matlock. > > > > > > > > >>>> Egan does acknowledge the bloody bra strap covered with > > > Sollecito's > > > > > DNA, butdismissively writes: "(T)hey discovered Kercher's clasp > nearly > > > six > > > > > weeks > > > > > > > > >>>> after the murder -- a highly suspect and tainted piece of > > > evidence > > > > > from a > > > > > > >>>> contaminated crime scene." > > > > > > > > >>>> Even the defense isn't complaining about the amount of time > that > > > > > passed > > > > > > >>>> before the bra strap was tested. The bra strap was found > during > > > the > > > > > initial > > > > > > >>>> search of the crime scene -- which was promptly sealed off > -- > > > and > > > > > then was > > > > > > >>>> collected for testing during the second search of the sealed > > > crime > > > > > scene > > > > > > >>>> some weeks later. > > > > > > > > >>>> True, the defense has tried to minimize all the evidence by > > > throwing > > > > > out the > > > > > > >>>> old "contamination" chestnut, but without proof of > systematic > > > > > contamination > > > > > > >>>> of the evidence, this is just a boilerplate defense, much > like > > > "but > > > > > he hit > > > > > > >>>> me first." (Next the defense will be vowing to look for the > > > "real > > > > > killer.") > > > > ... > > > > read more ยป- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
