KIT, Sorry man, with my eyes tearing from the laughter after reading the "enemies of civilization against civilization" I couldn't see to read the rest. Something about a murder in Italy.
No, when AC or one of her ilk says something really extraordinarily stupid and/or goofy the stardard fall back position is always that it was just soooo terribly clever people didn't "get it". It's been done to death Keith, ain't gonna' fly for the simple reason that even assumming that was her intent she's STILL an idiot. As if the fate of civilization hangs on the fate of a half- dozen college boys! On Jun 19, 10:38 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > Once again Holly, I encourage you to read the article again. As I said > earlier, I am cognizant of, and understand that it takes liberals and > Democrats a little longer to comprehend and grasp not only comprehensive > political issues, but "tongue-in-cheek" jabs at Moonbats, which Ms. Coulter > is a master of. > > Ms. Coulter was referencing the stripper that made the false accusations > against the Duke LaCrosse players, and who Egan and the New York Times > intially sided with, calling for the literal swift, intense punishment of > these innocent young men, based on this hateful, lying deranged woman who > strips for a living. > > Nothing more.....Nothing less. Coulter made a point, in her typically > humorous manner. I don't guess it was funny to Wacko Left, Socialist-Elitist > Moonbats.....I guess it wasn't funny even to "left of center" confused > Democrats..... > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Hollywood > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > KIT, > > > A half-dozen college boys represent all of cilivization??? Never took > > you for a hysterical drama queen Keith. > > Guess I was wrong. > > > On Jun 19, 10:16 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Holly? > > > > Kind of like the stripper who accused a hand full of Duke LaCrosse > > players > > > of rape, which turned out to be a lie, and of which a prosecutor > > attempted > > > to make a name for himself, win an election, ruin the lives of six young > > > men? > > > > Yep, I would call that an "enemy of civilization"..... > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Hollywood <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > dick, > > > > > Oh I don't know, would be quite a chore to out idiot Ms. Coulter. > > > > C'mon, lighten up old boy. You don't think it's hysterically idiotic > > > > to list strippers as "enemies of civilization against civilization"? I > > > > almost pissed my pants laughing! > > > > > On Jun 19, 7:21 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > You only call her an idiot because she makes your heroes look even > > more > > > > > like idiots than they already do. > > > > > > Hollywood wrote: > > > > > > dick, > > > > > > > Naaaah, she's pretty much an idiot. C'mon slick, READ the goofy > > > > > > article she wrote! > > > > > > > On Jun 18, 9:46 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >> You should only be bright enough to be an idiot like her. Then > > you > > > > > >> might really know something. > > > > > > >> Hollywood wrote: > > > > > > >>> KIT, > > > > > > >>> STRIPPERS are "enemies of civilization against civil > > > > cililization"???? > > > > > >>> Isn't that a bit redundant? Maybe it's just me, but i'd just > > assume > > > > > >>> that an "enemy of civilization" was "against civilization" > > without > > > > > >>> being told. Duuuuuuh.... > > > > > > >>> Aren't Jim Jones and his followers dead and buried? Don't see how > > > > they > > > > > >>> could be much of a threat to anyone. > > > > > > >>> AC seem to be pretty much an idiot. > > > > > > >>> On Jun 17, 10:13 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > >>>> Another good article from CW....I mean Ann Coulter: > > > > > > >>>> ================ > > > > > >>>> ** > > > > > >>>> ** > > > > > >>>> ** > > > > > >>>> *NYT: Duke Lacrosse Players Killed Meredith Kercher* > > > > > >>>> by Ann Coulter > > > > > >>>> Posted 06/17/2009 ET > > > > > >>>> Updated 06/17/2009 ET > > > > > > >>>>http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&id=32351 > > > > > > >>>> Whether it is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Weather Underground, > > Central > > > > Park > > > > > >>>> rapists, Mumia Abu-Jamal, Jim Jones and the People's Temple, > > welfare > > > > > >>>> recipients, Palestinian terrorists, murderers, abortionists, > > > > strippers or > > > > > >>>> common criminals -- liberals always take the side of the enemies > > of > > > > > >>>> civilization against civilization. > > > > > > >>>> In the view of The New York *Times*, every criminal trial is a > > > > shocking > > > > > >>>> miscarriage of justice -- except the ones that actually are > > shocking > > > > > >>>> miscarriages of justice. > > > > > > >>>> Thus, in last week's *Times*, Timothy Egan wrote about a > > shocking > > > > > >>>> miscarriage of justice being carried out against a > > "high-spirited" > > > > American > > > > > >>>> girl accused of murder by a crazed prosecutor in Perugia, Italy. > > > > > > >>>> Egan's column bears as much relationship to the facts of the > > case as > > > > -- > > > > > >>>> well, I guess as anything printed in the *Times*. And yet every > > > > American > > > > > >>>> news network has embraced Egan's version and is flacking for the > > > > accused. > > > > > > >>>> Amanda Knox, her erstwhile boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito, and > > > > another man, > > > > > >>>> Rudy Guede, stand accused of murdering Knox's roommate, Meredith > > > > Kercher, on > > > > > >>>> Nov. 1, 2007, at the house Knox and Kercher shared with two > > other > > > > girls in > > > > > >>>> Perugia. > > > > > > >>>> Egan triumphantly cites an "outside expert hired by CBS News" > > who > > > > calls > > > > > >>>> Knox's prosecution, "the railroad job from hell." Egan does not > > > > mention that > > > > > >>>> the "outside investigator" is Paul Ciolino of the "Innocence > > > > Project," whose > > > > > >>>> investigations always seem to conclude that the accused is being > > > > railroaded. > > > > > > >>>> Ciolino's theory of the crime -- adopted unquestioningly by Egan > > -- > > > > is that > > > > > >>>> the third man, Guede, who has already confessed to the crime, > > acted > > > > alone. > > > > > > >>>> Despite Ciolino's careful analysis of the evidence, his theory > > is > > > > > >>>> contradicted by Guede himself, as well as the coroner and a > > leading > > > > forensic > > > > > >>>> geneticist, both of whom have testified that Kercher's massive > > > > injuries > > > > > >>>> could only have been inflicted by multiple assailants. > > > > > > >>>> It is also contradicted by the court's 106-page report, released > > in > > > > January, > > > > > >>>> explaining the judge's reasons for refusing to release Knox and > > > > Sollecito on > > > > > >>>> bail. > > > > > > >>>> Even the "48 Hours" executive producer doesn't endorse Ciolino's > > > > > >>>> preposterous "single knifeman" theory, admitting: "Do we know > > every > > > > piece of > > > > > >>>> data? No. Is there some troubling DNA? Yes." > > > > > > >>>> Hey, does anyone know if CBS hired more than one "outside > > > > investigator" to > > > > > >>>> look at the Knox case? Because if Egan considers one CBS > > "outside > > > > > >>>> investigator" the Rosetta Stone of this case, it would be odd if > > he > > > > didn't > > > > > >>>> mention the conclusions of another CBS outside investigator. > > > > > > >>>> Why yes there was! > > > > > > >>>> The second investigator, Paolo Sfriso, didn't pronounce > > judgment, > > > > but he did > > > > > >>>> cite some of the evidence. The evidence includes: > > > > > > >>>> -- a large kitchen knife, believed by forensic investigators to > > have > > > > caused > > > > > >>>> at least one of Kercher's three wounds, found at Sollecito's > > house. > > > > Despite > > > > > >>>> having been thoroughly washed, the knife had Knox's DNA on the > > > > handle and > > > > > >>>> the murder victim's DNA on the blade. > > > > > > >>>> -- a bloody footprint at the crime scene that matches > > Sollecito's. > > > > The floor > > > > > >>>> had been cleaned so that the footprint was invisible to the > > naked > > > > eye, but > > > > > >>>> was revealed with Luminol (just like on "CSI"). > > > > > > >>>> -- Knox's bloody footprints, mixed with Kercher's blood, were > > found > > > > in > > > > > >>>> another roommate's room, where a window had been broken to make > > it > > > > look like > > > > > >>>> there had been a break-in -- a theory discounted immediately by > > > > > >>>> investigators. Knox's footprints, too, had been scrubbed but > > were > > > > discovered > > > > > >>>> with Luminol. > > > > > > >>>> -- Kercher's bloody bra strap at the crime scene that had > > abundant > > > > amounts > > > > > >>>> of Sollecito's DNA on it. > > > > > > >>>> Egan explains away the devastating DNA evidence by denying it > > > > exists. > > > > > > >>>> Delusionally, he writes: > > > > > > >>>> "(I)f Knox and Sollecito had killed Kercher, and were in that > > > > > >>>> blood-splattered room, why is there no physical trace from them > > on > > > > the body? > > > > > >>>> A print? A swap of DNA somewhere? After all, Kercher had died > > after > > > > a brutal > > > > > >>>> strangulation, evidence of considerable struggle, with knife > > pokes > > > > in the > > > > > >>>> neck." > > > > > > >>>> Read the trial transcript, Matlock. > > > > > > >>>> Egan does acknowledge the bloody bra strap covered with > > Sollecito's > > > > DNA, butdismissively writes: "(T)hey discovered Kercher's clasp nearly > > six > > > > weeks > > > > > > >>>> after the murder -- a highly suspect and tainted piece of > > evidence > > > > from a > > > > > >>>> contaminated crime scene." > > > > > > >>>> Even the defense isn't complaining about the amount of time that > > > > passed > > > > > >>>> before the bra strap was tested. The bra strap was found during > > the > > > > initial > > > > > >>>> search of the crime scene -- which was promptly sealed off -- > > and > > > > then was > > > > > >>>> collected for testing during the second search of the sealed > > crime > > > > scene > > > > > >>>> some weeks later. > > > > > > >>>> True, the defense has tried to minimize all the evidence by > > throwing > > > > out the > > > > > >>>> old "contamination" chestnut, but without proof of systematic > > > > contamination > > > > > >>>> of the evidence, this is just a boilerplate defense, much like > > "but > > > > he hit > > > > > >>>> me first." (Next the defense will be vowing to look for the > > "real > > > > killer.") > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
