Hello Holly!

Happy Father's Day to you also!

Okay, real quick, maybe you can understand this, if I make it simple.

Dik suggests that guns are not the answer.  In fact, Dik says, "Guns are the
lazy solution to problems."

I suggest to Dik that guns are a part of our history, and have worked well
as a deterrent as well as a negotiating factor for assholes who seem to be a
little slow, over two hundred years.

Dik becomes quiet, Perp proves that my theory is correct by discussing how
she almost blew away a S.O.B. with a Mossberg.

Almost time to fire up the grills here in Tampa Town, but if you have any
more questions, or if I can clarify anything else for ya, by all means, give
a Hollar!!

Keith

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Hollywood <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> KIT,
>
> Morning Keith, Happy Father's Day.
>
> Oh yes, please do explain to me what your little essay has to do with
> how rapists pick out their targets.
> I look at a given post and scroll down to the little line that says
> "Show quoted text" to see what that post is responding to. I don't go
> wandering thru the thread or threads trying to find a post that maybe,
> might have something to do with it.
>
> On Jun 21, 6:23 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Good Morning Dik,
> >
> > Unlike Dick,  I tend to believe you. We all have had life experiences
> where
> > we have options to either master and use our diplomatic skills.....Or
> not.
> >
> > I too have been successful in negotiating a number of tense situations,
> (my
> > story is long and boring!!)  but I have also been in situations where
> one's
> > "diplomatic skills" counted for naught.
> >
> > I believe that you too have been in such situations; whether guns were a
> > part or parcel of the scenario or not.  Sometimes, a show of strength and
> > force is the only way to negotiate.
> >
> > Hey Holly!!
> >
> > Once again, I know that it is difficult for you to comprehend everything
> > that is written on your first reading.  I suggest that you go back,
> re-read
> > Dik's initial comment, and then re-read my post.  If there are questions
> > after doing so, then I will be more than happy to try and break down the
> > history as well as the analogy for you.
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 12:42 AM, RICHARD BROWN <
> >
> >
> >
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > I've watched 15 members of a street gang who were armed with chains,
> > > knives and clubs and wanting to attack me change their minds after
> > > about two minutes.  Five minutes later we parted in good spirits.
> > > I've watched eight Tiajuana police officers put their guns away and
> > > remove their roadblock in less than two minutes when they had been
> > > determined to take me into custody one way or another before I was
> > > stopped by them.  It really is all about mind set.
> > > Dik
> >
> > > On Jun 20, 9:25 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > It also has to do with the mindset of the thug.  Thugs are not
> usually
> > > > up to being dissed by someone like the woman you are postulating -
> and I
> > > > don't believe it for a second unless the thug was a browbeaten mama's
> > > boy.
> >
> > > > RICHARD BROWN wrote:
> > > > > I wrote a play about just such a woman.  I met her when she was 75.
> > > > > She was 4;8" tall and blind since birth.  I saw her dismiss a guy
> who
> > > > > was 6:10 and weighed about 300 lbs. wearing a white suit and a
> power
> > > > > tie.  He was literally shaking afterwards and the people around him
> > > > > were laughing behind their hands.  She didn't put up with any crap
> > > > > from anyone.
> > > > > It has to do with your mind set not the caliber of your gun. :-)
> > > > > Dik
> >
> > > > > On Jun 20, 8:56 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > >> I would bet you are not a sub 5 foot woman weighing about 85 lb
> > > soaking
> > > > >> wet and with arthritis and osteoporosis either.  Supposed you were
> > > such
> > > > >> a woman and a thug tried to break in at 3 AM.  Do you think she
> would
> > > > >> not need a weapon to subdue the thug or would she just smile and
> sing
> > > > >> Kumbaya to him and he would melt with  the glorious aura of her
> > > > >> personality and hand over his weapon and apologize for bothering
> her
> > > and
> > > > >> leave with his head down in disgrace.
> >
> > > > >> RICHARD BROWN wrote:
> >
> > > > >>> Keith, for 35 years I owned and operated an investigation agency
> with
> > > > >>> 12 operatives.  We never used guns and we had many of them
> pointed at
> > > > >>> us.  We worked in every neighborhood in southern California,
> > > including
> > > > >>> Watts.  None of us were ever harmed.  We knew how to solve any
> > > > >>> situation without violence.  I have faced down 15 men on two
> > > occasions
> > > > >>> without having to use a gun or resort to violence.  I have stood
> up
> > > to
> > > > >>> robbers and murderers without being assaulted.  It is not un-
> > > > >>> American.  I am not opposed to others who want to own or use
> guns.  I
> > > > >>> just have never found a need to do so.  I have disarmed two
> visitors
> > > > >>> to our hospital without violence.  When we have a Code Grey I
> arrive
> > > > >>> on the scene and immediately bring the hostile person to a
> peaceful
> > > > >>> mindset because of my training.  I know that most people find
> this to
> > > > >>> be alien to their experience.  Certainly the staff at the
> hospital do
> > > > >>> not understand how I do it, they just know that I can do it.
>  Anyone
> > > > >>> can do it, but they have to surrender the mind set of violence as
> a
> > > > >>> solution to any problem.  When they do that, they are able to see
> the
> > > > >>> obvious solution.
> > > > >>> Sometimes you don't have to kick the machine, just plug it in.
>  :-)
> > > > >>> Dik
> >
> > > > >>> On Jun 20, 7:55 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > >>>> Firearms are the foundation of this Nation, as our forefathers
> wrote
> > > in both
> > > > >>>> the Federalist, and Anti-Federalist Papers.  All were pretty
> much
> > > agreed on
> > > > >>>> the purposes of the Second Amendment, which was:
> >
> > > > >>>> (1) To protect one's family and property against vermin,
> wildlife,
> > > thieves,
> > > > >>>> rogues, bandits, etc.;
> >
> > > > >>>> (2)  To protect one's family, home and Nation against foreign
> > > invaders; and
> > > > >>>> to act as a deterrent; and most importantly;
> >
> > > > >>>> (3) To protect one's family, home, and Nation against a
> tyrannical
> > > > >>>> government, and to act as a deterrent against an out of control
> > > > >>>> government.   Those such as Charles Schumer, Nanc Pelosi, and
> other
> > > far left
> > > > >>>> extremists would do away with this provision of our
> Constitution.
> >
> > > > >>>> There is nothing lazy about discouraging an attack with firearms
> > > Dick, it is
> > > > >>>> the American way!  Anything less is un-American!
> >
> > > > >>>> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 10:44 PM, RICHARD BROWN <
> >
> > > > >>>> [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > >>>>> Rapists pickon  women who appear weak, timid and vulnerable.
>  If a
> > > > >>>>> woman has studied any kind of martial arts, she will walk and
> carry
> > > > >>>>> herself in a bold and confident manner which will automatically
> > > > >>>>> discourage an attack.  Guns are the lazy solution to problems.
> > > > >>>>> Dik
> >
> > > > >>>>> On Jun 20, 1:12 pm, Travis <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > >>>>>> "Cover the face with a Rebel Flag and f..k for the
> Confereracy."
> >
> > > > >>>>>> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 2:25 PM, THE ANNOINTED ONE <
> > > [email protected]
> > > > >>>>>> wrote:
> >
> > > > >>>>>>> No wonder.... based on the photos who'd want to ???
> >
> > > > >>>>>>> On Jun 20, 11:22 am, Travis <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> From: *Travis*
> > > > >>>>>>>> Date: Fri, Jun 19, 2009
> > > > >>>>>>>> Subject:  Women with Guns Don't Get Raped
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> Well, duuuh!  Anyone thinks Democrats and liberals care?
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> B
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>>http://blogs.ink19.com/truthtopower/archives/6963
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>>  Women on Target: Preparing women to defend Liberty
> > > > >>>>>>>> June 16, 3:17 PM · Howard Nemerov - Austin Gun Rights
> Examiner
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> The United Kingdom and Australia instituted gun bans in
> 1997.
> > > Between
> >
> > > > >>>>>>> 1995
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> and 2006, women in the United Kingdom suffered a 76.5%
> increase
> > > in
> >
> > > > >>>>> rape;
> >
> > > > >>>>>>> by
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> 2007 Australian women experienced a 29.9% increase.
> Meanwhile,
> > > rape *
> > > > >>>>>>>> decreased* 19.1% in America.*
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> Today, women are raped twice as often in the UK as America,
> and
> >
> > > > >>>>>>> Australian
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> women are raped three times as often. This is damning
> evidence
> > > that
> >
> > > > >>>>> gun
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> control places women at *greater *risk. American women are
> > > hearing
> >
> > > > >>>>> this
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> message, and more and more are arming themselves every day,
> not
> > > only
> >
> > > > >>>>> to
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> protect themselves and their families from harm, but to
> ensure
> > > our
> > > > >>>>>>>> government doesn’t enact laws which disenfranchise women.
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> In support of this effort, the National Rifle Association
> > > developed
> >
> > > > >>>>> the
> >
> > > > >>>>>>> Women
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> on Target <http://www.nrahq.org/women/wot.asp> (WOT)
> program to
> >
> > > > >>>>>>> introduce
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> women to shooting sports in a safe and fun manner.
> Yesterday, 61
> >
> > > > >>>>> women
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> participated in WOT at the American Shooting
> > > > >>>>>>>> Center<http://www.amshootcenters.com/>in Houston, Texas,
> hosted
> > > by
> >
> > > > >>>>> the
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> Houston
> > > > >>>>>>>> Daughters of Liberty <http://www.daughtersofliberty.com/>.
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> Beth Hellmann, Program Coordinator for NRA Women’s Programs,
> was
> > > a
> >
> > > > >>>>> WOT
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> clinic coordinator for 5 years at her gun club before
> joining
> > > NRA
> > > > >>>>>>>> headquarters and has run the WOT program since its
> inception.
> > > She has
> >
> > > > >>>>>>> seen
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> WOT grow from just 13 clinics in the first year to over 200
> > > clinics
> > > > >>>>>>>> annually, and says that 2009 looks like another record
> breaking
> > > year.
> >
> > > > >>>>>>> Clinic
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> directors report that classes are filling up months in
> advance,
> > > and
> >
> > > > >>>>> often
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> add clinics to accommodate demand. The WOT program is on
> track
> > > to
> >
> > > > >>>>> teach
> >
> > > > >>>>>>> over
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> 8,000 women this year, breaking last year’s record of 7,250
> > > students
> >
> > > > >>>>> and
> >
> > > > >>>>>>> 240
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> clinics. By mid-June of this year, 232 clinics are already
> >
> > > > >>>>> registered.
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> Beth started her career in shooting instruction when her son
> > > wanted
> >
> > > > >>>>> to
> >
> > > > >>>>>>> join
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> the high school rifle team. She was surprised that the
> school
> > > even
> >
> > > > >>>>> had a
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> rifle team in this “civilized” era, but grew up in a
> shooting
> > > family,
> >
> > > > >>>>> so
> >
> > > > >>>>>>> she
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> was amenable. She asked the coaches if they needed any help,
> > > figuring
> >
> > > > >>>>>>> that
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>> being a woman they would have her bake brownies for fund
> raisers
> > > or
> > > > >>>>>>>> something along those “traditional” lines. Instead, they
> invited
> >
> > ...
> >
> > read more »- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>  >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to