Marcel Kilgus writes: > >> I mean things like ".." and "\" (root directory) of DOS. > > Yes!! > > Ok, so at least one likes my idea :-)
Two, I hope? > > <> > >> Shouldn't we just decide on a "suggested value" now instead of making > >> it dynamic (things like configuration options can't be dynamic > >> anyway)? Windows has a max path length of 260 characters for example > >> (UNC names can actually be longer, but hardly anybody uses them for > >> local files). > > As long as it is a "reasonable" limit. > > Sure. What's reasonable for you? How about using the same as the enhanced ISO9660 standard (Joliet)? That might be one complication less. <> Per _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
