Marcel Kilgus writes:

> >> I mean things like ".." and "\" (root directory) of DOS.
> > Yes!!
>
> Ok, so at least one likes my idea :-)

Two, I hope?

> > <>
> >> Shouldn't we just decide on a "suggested value" now instead of making
> >> it dynamic (things like configuration options can't be dynamic
> >> anyway)? Windows has a max path length of 260 characters for example
> >> (UNC names can actually be longer, but hardly anybody uses them for
> >> local files).
> > As long as it is a "reasonable" limit.
>
> Sure. What's reasonable for you?

How about using the same as the enhanced ISO9660 standard (Joliet)? That
might be one complication less.

<>

Per

_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Reply via email to