Hi Folks I was going to keep out of this, I am not going to takes sides. BUT, there seems to be an opinion that the License controlled by Wolfgang is a final solution to the SMSQ debate. I would just like to note that several folks have not agreed to this license, else they would have asked Wolfgang to be a reseller, surely then, as they do not wish to agree to new terms, they must be legally able to continue as they did before the license was envisaged, in other words before they can be held to have to comply with a new set of rules, they would have to agree these changes. Otherwise the new license would not apply to them. You can't decide to change the terms of sale, long after you sold the item, without the consent of the buyer. If they don't want to be held liable to this license, why should they pay a new charge, they will be able to continue with the contract they already have
just a thought Regards to all Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.macnamaras.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tarquin Mills" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 11:03 PM Subject: RE: [ql-users] Software pirates in our midst? > > In 2000 I went to the London workshop, I saw the Q40 and liked it. > In 2001 I went to the Byfleet workshop, tried to purchase a Q40 but QBranch > and the Grafs had split, so could not. > In 2002 I will go to the London workshop, I was going to buy a Q60 but now I > find out that they seem to be illegal. Do not say,"use QDOS Classic", my > message is simple and stark, sort it out! Why do non Wintel platforms > keep shooting themselves in the foot? > > P.S. I am bringing 4 new keyboard membranes for sale. > > -- > Tarquin Mills > > ACCUS (Anglia Classic Computer Users Society) > http://www.planet14.sonow4u.co.uk/comp/accus/ > >
