On 8 Nov 2002, at 17:15, Dave P wrote: (...)
> Now that we've had two or three different problems with the license, and > Wolfgang has given various reassurances (which has been a positive > experience, Wolfgang!), Thanks, but this begs the question - have I been acting in accordance with these reassurances? (Just BEGGING for a compilment here, of course). > maybe we can amend the license a little to make > these assurances explicit? It's november. Maybe we could make the > relatively minor changes and have SMSQ/E license v1.1 come into force on > January 1st? Oh groan. Groan. Groan. groan. Mind you,I'm not saying no - just, well, groan. Do you really want us to go through the entire debate again every year? > I'm not looking at this as a way to squeeze more out of the license, No comment... > but > merely to tidy up those parts that have alrerady been found ambiguous? > Maybe Wolfgang would like to submit the license to annual review, as the > situation will change over time? Actually, I wouldn't like it - but if there is really a demand for that, I'll do it. Wolfgang ----------------- www.wlenerz.com
