Re: qmail is not a replacement for sendmail

[Justin Bell]

On Thu, Apr 29, 1999 at 04:26:03PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
# On Thu, Apr 29, 1999 at 10:00:45AM -0500, Justin Bell wrote:
# > On Thu, Apr 29, 1999 at 01:22:51PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
# I'm not knocking qmail (it's excellent and works very well for me) but
# just trying to point out that a little more help for users of small
# systems who aren't full time sysadmins would be very welcome.  There's
# no ideal MTA for small (unix/linux) systems, all the existing ones are
# trying to be the best for big systems IMHO.  Given this lack of MTA
# for small systems qmail will be the MTA of choice for quite a few
# people who need a bit more hand holding than is easily available at
# present.

Qmail is not the best solution for small users in some instances, multiple
messages sent per message, etc.  

If you think the docs for small systems needs to be better, there is nothing
stopping you from writing them....
-- 
/- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -\
|Justin Bell  NIC:JB3084| Time and rules are changing.         |
|Pearson                | Attention span is quickening.        |
|Developer              | Welcome to the Information Age.      |
\-------- http://www.superlibrary.com/people/justin/ ----------/