Wasn't the Hillborne designed with the expanded geometry so few sizes would be needed? Fewer sizes means less inventory, less inventory means less $. If I remember right $ was talked about quite a bit with the design of the Hillborne (as the Riv/QBP Bleriot project was winding down). I can't imagine anyone would argue that less sizes is better or fits all riders as well as more sizes would. Doesn't the underlying idea have to be that it fits most riders well enough? Or to put it another way, if both the 56 and 60 fit couldn't you argue that neither really fit?
Cheers! Chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
