Interesting you mention that, because now the choice is 58cm or 62cm, I believe. (In 2009 it was 56 or 60). If the frame is the same as it was in 2009, I’d most likely feel I had a better fit with the current 58. That would probably be my sweet spot in this frame. Although, the frame may have changed since 2009, I don’t know.
> On Jan 5, 2017, at 7:30 PM, Christopher Murray <chrispmurra...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Wasn't the Hillborne designed with the expanded geometry so few sizes would > be needed? Fewer sizes means less inventory, less inventory means less $. If > I remember right $ was talked about quite a bit with the design of the > Hillborne (as the Riv/QBP Bleriot project was winding down). I can't imagine > anyone would argue that less sizes is better or fits all riders as well as > more sizes would. Doesn't the underlying idea have to be that it fits most > riders well enough? Or to put it another way, if both the 56 and 60 fit > couldn't you argue that neither really fit? > > Cheers! > Chris > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google > Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/rbw-owners-bunch/WnI6CTqPKig/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
