I didn't build sage on my G4 since 4.3.4, and there gfortran points to something I got from fink. So I must have built Sage using fink's gfortran, built against gcc-4.3.4 ? Hmm. OK, let me try the current release and see if I get anywhere. (It will take a while...)
Dima On Sep 9, 11:20 pm, kcrisman <kcris...@gmail.com> wrote: > Okay, I finally figured out how to check this - I had to run the > binary directly, the scripts didn't work because of the way they're > used (since gfortran isn't in my PATH, of course): > > G95 (GCC 4.0.3 (g95 0.91!) Jun 4 2007) > > Dima, can you look at your $SAGE_LOCAL/bin/sage_fortran and tell us > what it says? If it has sage_fortran.bin, run > > $SAGE_LOCAL/bin/sage_fortran.bin --version > > which will almost certainly be G95, otherwise it's probably > > $SAGE_LOCAL/bin/gfortran-xx --version > > which will be gfortran. > > I would be open to building a custom gfortran binary against GCC 4.0.1 > for distribution with Sage in this edge case, but would need a lot of > hand-holding. > > Then > again,http://www.macresearch.org/xcode_gfortran_contest_winner_damien_bobillot > seems to indicate there is a plugin for Xcode 2.4 (the default Tiger > one), andhttp://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinariesMacOSwould > apparently work with Xcode 2.5... > > Sorry for all the activity on this. My interest on this is not > related to drkirkby's (legitimate) concerns, but is related to #9808. > > - kcrisman -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
