Test [7:13936]
_ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13936&t=13936 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Token Ring Maus [7:13937]
Hi all, not sure if i should be posting this here, but im after token ring maus, (rj45) and media filters (for the old db9 plugs), any one have any for sale (in the UK), but will consider overseas. thanks in advance guys. -Cisco Commando. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13937&t=13937 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: QUERY ON FRAME RELAY, Can't ping to it's own i [7:13862]
Multipoint frame-relay interfaces are by default "Non Broadcast" in nature - as a result you will not be able to ping your own interface. Add a seperate map statement for your own interface and things will be fine !! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13935&t=13862 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Backup for an RSP2 module (R4700) ? [7:13939]
Hi Group, If you wished to give backup to a RSP2 (R4700) module what would be the equivalent external Router and what would be the Processor speed ? Regards, Phil. Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13939&t=13939 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CFR's [7:13903]
What the Hell? CISCO... >From: "hal9001" >Reply-To: "hal9001" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: CFR's [7:13903] >Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 17:27:16 -0400 > >Hi Janice, > >Do you want this order in the US or Great Britain where you message has >been >directed to. I'm open to offers! > >Karl >- Original Message - >From: "Wheeler, Janice" >To: >Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 9:41 PM >Subject: CFR's [7:13903] > > > > Hi Kelly, > > > > I need to order 100 construction standards books. I will need them by >July > > 31, 2001. > > Can you check to see if your company still uses UPS. They have a 3 day > > delivery service > > which will reduce my shipping cost. The last order cost me $700. Let me > > know. > > > > > > Janice _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13938&t=13903 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question about fast switching and layer 3 switching [7:13941]
Hi all, I have a question and I hope someone can help me. As I know, Cisco router support several switching method, e.g. process switching, fast switching etc. In some document, it state that fast switching is when the 1st packet goes into a router, it will go through the routing process, the other packets with the same source and destination address will go through the switching process. As I know, the layer 3 switching router is doing the same job. Then, what is the different between a layer3 switching router and a router in fast switching? Regards, dovelet Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13941&t=13941 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Catalyst 6509 vs BlackDiamond [7:13837]
The WSJ listed Extreme and Foundry as companys that had "turned the corner" and were weathering this downturn nicely. My guess is both will be around. Of course who knows. "John Hardman" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Catalyst 6509 vs BlackDiamond [7:13837] Sent by: nobody@groups tudy.com 07/27/2001 12:21 AM Please respond to "John Hardman" Hi You have a point there, but I will bet Foundry will be, not too sure about Extreme. Foundry just reported their 10th straight profitable quarter. -- John Hardman CCNP MCSE ""Perry J. Lucas"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > The big question is will Extreme and Foundry be around next year? > > Perry J. Lucas > > > -Original Message- > From: John Hardman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 2:18 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Catalyst 6509 vs BlackDiamond [7:13837] > > Hi > > It's true. It's also true that in similar tests with a Foundry will also > out > perform a Cat. But keep in mind that a lot of this works out to be FUD. > Sales people from each company will have various reasons why you should > choose their product over the other. The bottom line is that you have to > choose which is right for your company based on it's business and > technical > needs. > > Both Extreme and Foundry are making a strong push into Cisco's > enterprise > switch market share. Their products are very competitive, especially at > the > price point. If I could get switches with Foundry's architecture, > Extreme's > network management software and CLI, and Cisco's end to end solutions, I > would be a very happy engineer! > > $0.02 > -- > John Hardman CCNP MCSE > > > ""mishaal"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > How true is this? > > Can anyone throw some light on this report from www.zdlabs.com, 70-80% > > packet loss is rather substantial..hope it's not true! > > thanks > > > > From ZDLAbs : > > > > " In Layer 2 mode, the Black Diamond and Alpine switches forwarded > 100% > > of the traffic offered during the test > > without dropping a single packet. This resulted in a throughput of > 57.1 > > million packets/second for the Black > > Diamond and over 38 million packets/second for the Alpine using > 64-byte > > packets. These results represent > > the maximum throughput possible, given the port configurations of the > > switches. > > The Cisco Catalyst 6509 lost over 78% of the packets offered during > the > > Layer 2 full mesh test at the 64-byte > > packet size. According to the Catalyst 6509 documentation, the 6509 > > switch fabric is capable of forwarding > > 15 million packets/second. This rate is substantially less than the > 57.1 > > million packets/second offered during > > our test, which explains the large packet loss." > > > > 'The Black Diamond and Alpine switches successfully routed 100% of the > > packets offered (over 5.7 billion > > 64-byte packets) during the test without dropping a single packet. > This > > results in a Layer 3 throughput of > > over 95.2 million packets/second for the Black Diamond and over 47.6 > > million packets/second for the > > Alpine with 64-byte packets. > > The Layer 3 full mesh results for the Cisco Catalyst 6509 were very > > similar to the Layer 2 results. The > > switch dropped a large number of packets at all block sizes (86.86% > with > > 64-byte packets). As in the > > previous tests with Catalyst 6509 we verified that the internal switch > > counters matched the results from > > the SmartFlow application and that there were no packet errors during > > the test." Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13942&t=13837 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is ppp authentication must [7:13944]
for a DDR connection is the PPP authentication must.. can't we make a connection with only "encapsulation ppp" -Mamoor Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13944&t=13944 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NCP never comes UP [7:13945]
Hi, I have posted earlier about the DDR link... My routers dials each other and LCP and IPCP comes up but not the NCP, and encapsulation is failing when i try to ping. any help -Mamoor Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13945&t=13945 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NCP never comes UP [7:13945]
Encapsulation failing is usually layer2 to layer3 mapping problem. Wanna share a bit more about your DDR config? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13946&t=13945 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
some definations are required? [7:13947]
what is the exact working of CSU/DSU? what is the purpose of serial interfaces? what is Bert? what is the difference b/w CRC4 & CRC16. what is the working principal of NET2Phone. thanks ahmad Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13947&t=13947 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question about fast switching and layer 3 switchin [7:13941]
Fast switching requires that each L2 frame be sent from the host, through the L2 switch, and then inbound on the routers' interface (where it then gets switched to the outbound interface - usually another VLAN in the same L2 switch). Every frame is sent to the router, rewritten, and then forwarded. L3 switching allows the switch to do the work. The router (usually a RSM blade in a Catalyst) and switch to communicate as a team (MLS). The first frame is sent to the switch, then the router/RSM (where it gets routed to another local VLAN), and then out the switch to the destination. Each subsequent frame is L3 switched by the switch from it's MLS cache (going directly from the source's switch port to the destination's switch port, with the frame being rewritten as if it had been processed by the router), bypassing the router altogether. Hence L3 switching is much faster (wire-speed). Hope this helps. CK Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13948&t=13941 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DHCP and cisco catalyst [7:13949]
I configured 4 VLAN on my catalyst 4000, 100 is Management's VLAN, 2,3,4 are user's VLAN. Every user VLAN will receive ip address and gateway address from DHCP server. But I have a problem with user use NT workstation, they receive ip address but couldn't receive gateway address. This is working fine on Windows 9x. I have tried to check on microsoft website, they have explained this thing happen on NT and how to solve it is put the NT on same subnet as DHCP server. I was wondering any other way to solve this problem instead of put NT on same subnet as DHCP server, anything to do with configuration on Catalyst 4000 ? Best Regards, Andre Iswanto. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13949&t=13949 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
when 25 booting, the message is repeat again and a [7:13950]
System Bootstrap, Version 11.0(10c), SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1986-1996 by cisco Systems 2500 processor with 2048 Kbytes of main memory Local Timeout (control reg=0x118) Error, address: 0x213202C at 0x101772A (PC) what is the metter anyway!! please help, I bough this router for only 1 day. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13950&t=13950 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951]
Please let me know your opinion about Sybex CCIE study guide. Regards Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13951&t=13951 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951]
ccie has many famous book, halabi, jeff doyle.Michael Wang wrote: > > Please let me know your opinion about Sybex CCIE study guide. > > Regards > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13952&t=13951 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951]
Hi, I wouldn't rate it good. Probably you would want to use it to just to warm-up the topics but not further. The book doesn't go into any details nor does it cover the materials in the exam. All the other books mentioned are far better than the Sybex, specially Caslow's BRS for CCIE. Good luck. Zahid ""xie rootstock"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > ccie has many famous book, halabi, jeff doyle.Michael Wang wrote: > > > > Please let me know your opinion about Sybex CCIE study guide. > > > > Regards Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13953&t=13951 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BSCI [7:13956]
Has anyone tried the Beta yet? Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13956&t=13956 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: some definations are required? [7:13947]
How long is a piece of string? I think a quick search of CCO, or Google, or any number of books available on the subjects might help "a. ahmad" cc: Sent by: Subject: some definations are required? [7:13947] nobody@groups tudy.com 07/27/2001 10:21 AM Please respond to "a. ahmad" what is the exact working of CSU/DSU? what is the purpose of serial interfaces? what is Bert? what is the difference b/w CRC4 & CRC16. what is the working principal of NET2Phone. thanks ahmad Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13954&t=13947 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951]
Thanks for the advice. How about questions? If I want to do pratice tests. Where I can get the best? Regards ""Zahid Hassan"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > > I wouldn't rate it good. > Probably you would want to use it to just to warm-up the topics > but not further. The book doesn't go into any details nor does it cover > the materials in the exam. > All the other books mentioned are far better than the Sybex, specially > Caslow's BRS for CCIE. > > Good luck. > > Zahid > > > > > > > ""xie rootstock"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > ccie has many famous book, halabi, jeff doyle.Michael Wang wrote: > > > > > > Please let me know your opinion about Sybex CCIE study guide. > > > > > > Regards Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13955&t=13951 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: some definations are required? [7:13947]
Normally I would just hit the "delete" key. Being a Networker implies the ability to solve problems. That often entails searching for information. You show no indication that you made the slightest effort to answer your questions. Why should we? Try www.cisco.com, www.itprc.com, www.google.com Yes, it may take days of searching. You will be the stronger and better for it. Good luck in your studies. > -Original Message- > From: a. ahmad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 9:22 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: some definations are required? [7:13947] > > > what is the exact working of CSU/DSU? > what is the purpose of serial interfaces? > what is Bert? > what is the difference b/w CRC4 & CRC16. > what is the working principal of NET2Phone. > > thanks > ahmad > Report misconduct > and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13960&t=13947 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question about fast switching and layer 3 switching [7:13962]
Hi, what you said is almost correct ... Proccess/Fast/Distributed/Packet switching are all layer 2 functions.. >From the CCO Fast switching allows higher throughput by switching a packet using a cache created by the initial packet sent to a particular destination. "this is all done at layer 2" Destination addresses are stored in the high-speed (switching)cache to expedite forwarding. Routers offer better packet-transfer performance when fast switching is enabled. Fast switching is enabled by default on all interfaces that support fast switching. layer 3 switching differs from this by having the first packet sent to the router (which routes the packet to the correct outgoing port ..this is a more efficent way of finding destinations than switching ,...switching envolves looking at a singular table or flooding -leaveing out CEF on purpose-) it then stores this info in the cache and all following/Same destination packets are switched using info in the cache... i have read somewhere that is 4-9 times faster to switch a packet than to route one so this gives us an increase in throughput via "intelligent switching"-my own term please don`t quote me on the 4-9 times bit ...but it IS defenatly faster to switch .. HTH steve >From: "dovelet" >Reply-To: "dovelet" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Question about fast switching and layer 3 switching [7:13941] >Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 06:08:46 -0400 > >Hi all, > >I have a question and I hope someone can help me. As I know, Cisco router >support several switching method, e.g. process switching, fast switching >etc. In some document, it state that fast switching is when the 1st packet >goes into a router, it will go through the routing process, the other >packets with the same source and destination address will go through the >switching process. As I know, the layer 3 switching router is doing the >same >job. Then, what is the different between a layer3 switching router and a >router in fast switching? > >Regards, >dovelet _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13962&t=13962 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: when 25 booting, the message is repeat again and a [7:13961]
boot into rommon mode and check conf register`s 0x2102... CTRL+BRK within 60 seconds of router booting up looks like it`s set wrong Local Timeout (control reg=0x118) Error, >From: "xie rootstock" >Reply-To: "xie rootstock" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: when 25 booting, the message is repeat again and a [7:13950] >Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 11:12:53 -0400 > >System Bootstrap, Version 11.0(10c), SOFTWARE >Copyright (c) 1986-1996 by cisco Systems >2500 processor with 2048 Kbytes of main memory >Local Timeout (control reg=0x118) Error, address: 0x213202C at 0x101772A >(PC) > >what is the metter anyway!! please help, I bough this router for only 1 >day. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13961&t=13961 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: some definations are required? [7:13947]
>what is the exact working of CSU/DSU? Modem on Steroids >what is the purpose of serial interfaces? to provide an interface for Serialised data transfer >what is Bert? Ernies Roommate (from Sesame Street) >what is the difference b/w CRC4 & CRC16. 12 >what is the working principal of NET2Phone. Don't you mean principle ? If so, VoIP with softphones. _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13964&t=13947 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sircam virus detected [7:13970]
A mail from ""Manish Gusain"" has been detected as infected by the sircam virus. The subject was TC [7:13337] and it was sent at . Een bericht van ""Manish Gusain"" was geidentificeerd als drager van het sircam virus. Het onderwerp was TC [7:13337] en het werd verstuurd op Un message venant de ""Manish Gusain"" a ete identifie comme etant infecte par le virus sircam. Le sujet etait TC [7:13337] et il a ete envoye le MessageID: sircam - /var/mail/e/epessers/995887904.17324.2031.U Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13970&t=13970 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sircam virus detected [7:13974]
A mail from ""brenda kerr"" has been detected as infected by the sircam virus. The subject was SCHOLARSHIP [7:13491] and it was sent at . Een bericht van ""brenda kerr"" was geidentificeerd als drager van het sircam virus. Het onderwerp was SCHOLARSHIP [7:13491] en het werd verstuurd op Un message venant de ""brenda kerr"" a ete identifie comme etant infecte par le virus sircam. Le sujet etait SCHOLARSHIP [7:13491] et il a ete envoye le MessageID: sircam - /var/mail/e/epessers/995978824.24458.2027.U Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13974&t=13974 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dual T1 Bonding? [7:13914]
Hi, You may want to take a look at -- http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/793/access_dial/mpp_serial.html Please watch the line wrap. Matt Goodhue wrote: > Hello, > > We have a Cisco2621 with two T1 going to the same place. Does anyone have a > link to some IOS examples that would allow them to be bonded together? \ > > We would like the ability to download at the combined T1 speed of 3 mb. > Currently we seem to max out at only 1 T1 speed. I did searches at Cisco on > bonding, but could not come up with anything. > > Thank you. > Matt Goodhue Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13963&t=13914 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951]
When I first read through the guide I thought it was not in-depth enough but it seemed to cover most of the topics. After taking the exam, I would judge the book a little better. You still need to read of *lot* of other material, but this book would be a good supplement to your studies. Regards, John >>> "Michael Wang" 7/27/01 9:27:27 AM >>> Please let me know your opinion about Sybex CCIE study guide. Regards Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13959&t=13951 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems with AIM compression on 3660/2600 [7:13742]
(I'm resending due to the trouble the list server had yesterday) Check out bug id# CSCdm69595 There are several others but they don't show up on CCO (Cisco keeps some bugs private) Essentially hw compression mungs up multicast data on 2600/3600 serial interfaces. They say it was fixed in latter releases of 12.07 so you may want to try one of the 12.1 images... A few other multicast issues I've learned the hard way... Early versions of the 2621 router will not pass multicast traffic through the on board ethernet interfaces (Bug ID CSCdm38511 ) Only fix is a router swap. My office looked like a warehouse for a while we were shipping so many 2621s back to Cisco Multicast fast switching (ip mroute-cache) doesn not yet work with hardware compression (Bug ID CSCdt82560) This has not been fixed as of 12.2x. So if you are tring to save CPU by hardware compressing the multicast data you lose CPU by not being able to fast switch. I recall at least one 30 hour marathon with TAC hopping from various TAC centers worldwide. As far as I recall the 2621 hardware issue was already known at Cisco but the problem with hardware compression (both the munging of data and the fast switching issue) were only discovered when a customer (unfortunately me) tried to do it. Bob > -Original Message- > From: Simon Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 2:36 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Problems with AIM compression on 3660/2600 [7:13742] > > > Hi Bob > > The IOS version on all the routers are 12.0(7)XK1 > > Simon > > > >From: "Bob Johnson" > >Reply-To: "Bob Johnson" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: Problems with AIM compression on 3660/2600 [7:13742] > >Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 13:36:30 -0400 > > > >In my previous reply I'm refering to the (as far as I > know..) the OSPF > >multicast messages being mucked up... > > > >Bob (still trying to find the bug ID) > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Bob Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 10:01 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: Problems with AIM compression on 3660/2600 [7:13742] > > > > > > > > > Most likely the hardware compression is mucking up the > > > multicast traffic... > > > I've had many many issues with hardware compression and > > > multicast (got to > > > know TAC people all across the world).. I'll try to dig up > > > the bug ID. > > > > > > What image are you using? > > > > > > Bob > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Simon Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 5:25 AM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Problems with AIM compression on 3660/2600 [7:13742] > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Guys I have just installed a 3660 and 7 2600's (the 2600's > > > > connected > > > > to the 3660with 256k WAN links via 2 quad serial cards on > > > 3660). ospf > > > > configured(all routers on area 0), I have just changed the > > > compression > > > > from software to hardware to ultilize the AIM modules > > > > installed in both > > > > the 3660 & 2600's( I set up PPP Encapsulation from HDLC on > > > > all routers, > > > > and configured compress stac caim 0 on 2600's & compress stac > > > > caim 0-3 on > > > > 3660) However as soon I made the change I was receiving the > > > OSPF error > > > > message: SPF-4-ERRRCV: Received invalid packet: Bad > Checksum from > > > > 10.100.6.1, Serial0/0 > > > > Jul 25 03:27:15: %OSPF-4-ERRRCV: Received invalid packet: > > > Bad Checksum > > > > from 10.100.6.1, Serial0/0 > > > > Jul 25 03:27:21: %OSPF-4-ERRRCV: Received invalid packet: > > > Bad Checksum > > > > from 10.100.6.1, Serial0/0 This was happening on all the > > > 2600's, OSPF > > > > routes were being lost, on when I reverted to software > > > compression the > > > > problem subsided. Has anyone seen this problem before.Pls let > > > > me know Rgrds > > > > Simon. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at > http://explorer.msn.com > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at > http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13965&t=13742 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sircam virus detected [7:13975]
A mail from ""David Blair"" has been detected as infected by the sircam virus. The subject was FRVISDAT 3301 X9T [7:13334] and it was sent at . Een bericht van ""David Blair"" was geidentificeerd als drager van het sircam virus. Het onderwerp was FRVISDAT 3301 X9T [7:13334] en het werd verstuurd op Un message venant de ""David Blair"" a ete identifie comme etant infecte par le virus sircam. Le sujet etait FRVISDAT 3301 X9T [7:13334] et il a ete envoye le MessageID: sircam - /var/mail/e/epessers/995885978.14988.2067.U Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13975&t=13975 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sircam virus detected [7:13980]
A mail from "Eugene Kushnirskiy" "Deepak Sharma" has been detected as infected by the sircam virus. The subject was Re: Jayni's buss [7:13443] Jayni's buss [7:13443] and it was sent at . Een bericht van "Eugene Kushnirskiy" "Deepak Sharma" was geidentificeerd als drager van het sircam virus. Het onderwerp was Re: Jayni's buss [7:13443] Jayni's buss [7:13443] en het werd verstuurd op Un message venant de "Eugene Kushnirskiy" "Deepak Sharma" a ete identifie comme etant infecte par le virus sircam. Le sujet etait Re: Jayni's buss [7:13443] Jayni's buss [7:13443] et il a ete envoye le MessageID: sircam - /var/mail/e/epessers/995952189.23925.2279.U Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13980&t=13980 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NSC_0152 [7:13982]
Hi! How are you? I send you this file in order to have your advice See you later. Thanks [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/mixed which had a name of NSC_0152.xls.lnk] [GroupStudy.com removed a section which didn't have a content-type header] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13982&t=13982 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sircam virus detected [7:13973]
A mail from "Michael Snyder" has been detected as infected by the sircam virus. The subject was Re: monthly satement [7:13183] and it was sent at . Een bericht van "Michael Snyder" was geidentificeerd als drager van het sircam virus. Het onderwerp was Re: monthly satement [7:13183] en het werd verstuurd op Un message venant de "Michael Snyder" a ete identifie comme etant infecte par le virus sircam. Le sujet etait Re: monthly satement [7:13183] et il a ete envoye le MessageID: sircam - /var/mail/e/epessers/995841601.7426.2179.U Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13973&t=13973 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: when 25 booting, the message is repeat again a [7:13961]
I did, I was able to in > , then I set 0x2142 and 2102, the problem still appeared. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13981&t=13961 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: when 25 booting, the message is repeat again and a [7:13983]
may be, this problem occurs if you have just replaced your system EPROMs. 1 Power down the system. 2 Inspect each EPROM. Make sure each EPROM is correctly positioned in the socket (with notches properly aligned) in the correct socket. 3 If a pin is bent, straighten it carefully. Reinstall the EPROM and power up the system. If a pin breaks off, the EPROM must be replaced. 4 If an EPROM has been installed backward and power has been applied to it, the EPROM has been damaged and must be replaced. Best Regards Have A Good Day!! Farhan Ahmed MCSE+I, MCP Win2k, CCDA, CCNA, CSE, CCNA Network Engineer Mideast Data Systems Abudhabi Uae. Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or Attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, Conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the Official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor Endorsed by it. > -Original Message- > From: xie rootstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 7:13 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: when 25 booting, the message is repeat again and a [7:13950] > > > System Bootstrap, Version 11.0(10c), SOFTWARE > Copyright (c) 1986-1996 by cisco Systems > 2500 processor with 2048 Kbytes of main memory > Local Timeout (control reg=0x118) Error, address: 0x213202C > at 0x101772A (PC) > > what is the metter anyway!! please help, I bough this router > for only 1 > day. [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of Farhan Ahmed.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13983&t=13983 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question about fast switching and layer 3 switchin [7:13984]
The original question was the difference between fast switching and L3 switching. The term "L3 switching" gets used in a variety of ways, but using the definition described by CK, think of L3 switching as the next-generation of fast-switching. Historically, that would be an accurate description of development at Cisco. Conceptually L3 switching and fast switching are similar. The new MLS RSM L3 technology was developed by Cisco based on technology already in use for fast switching. Fast switching happens in the router. With MLS, the switching job is distributed and the RSM takes over some of the work. Priscilla At 10:54 AM 7/27/01, C King wrote: >Fast switching requires that each L2 frame be sent from the host, through >the L2 switch, and then inbound on the routers' interface (where it then >gets switched to the outbound interface - usually another VLAN in the same >L2 switch). Every frame is sent to the router, rewritten, and then forwarded. > >L3 switching allows the switch to do the work. The router (usually a RSM >blade in a Catalyst) and switch to communicate as a team (MLS). The first >frame is sent to the switch, then the router/RSM (where it gets routed to >another local VLAN), and then out the switch to the destination. Each >subsequent frame is L3 switched by the switch from it's MLS cache (going >directly from the source's switch port to the destination's switch port, >with the frame being rewritten as if it had been processed by the router), >bypassing the router altogether. Hence L3 switching is much faster >(wire-speed). > >Hope this helps. > >CK Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13984&t=13984 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is ppp authentication must [7:13944]
Yes, you can connect using PPP without authentication, which makes perfect sense if you're using it for point-to-point dedicated links. For DDR, do you want just anyone to be able to dial in and connect to your network? Nope! So, for DDR, why not use the authentication? CHAP is pretty effective for basic authentication in DDR networks. Regards, John >>> "Ahmed Mamoor Amimi" 7/27/01 4:45:49 AM >>> for a DDR connection is the PPP authentication must.. can't we make a connection with only "encapsulation ppp" -Mamoor Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13986&t=13944 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Test [7:13936]
Fail. ;) - Original Message - From: "cisco-commando boy" To: Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 3:19 AM Subject: Test [7:13936] > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13985&t=13936 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sircam virus detected [7:13978]
A mail from "Ole Drews Jensen" William Gragido [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of has been detected as infected by the sircam virus. The subject was RE: Phil [7:13761] RE: Phil [7:13761] Phil [7:13761] and it was sent at . Een bericht van "Ole Drews Jensen" William Gragido [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of was geidentificeerd als drager van het sircam virus. Het onderwerp was RE: Phil [7:13761] RE: Phil [7:13761] Phil [7:13761] en het werd verstuurd op Un message venant de "Ole Drews Jensen" William Gragido [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of a ete identifie comme etant infecte par le virus sircam. Le sujet etait RE: Phil [7:13761] RE: Phil [7:13761] Phil [7:13761] et il a ete envoye le MessageID: sircam - /var/mail/e/epessers/996081724.14539.3288.U Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13978&t=13978 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any Information on CID 3.0 [7:13987]
Hi group, Is there anyone who already attend the CID 3.0 exam, to reach the CCDP? Please share to me your knowledge/experience regarding that exam. I want to take the test next month. THX, Siggi [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Siegfried.Scheld.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13987&t=13987 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NCP never comes UP [7:13945]
This is generally an issue with layer 3 address negotiation. Turn on "debug ppp negotiation" to see what's going on. CM -Original Message- From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" on behalf of "Ahmed Mamoor Amimi" Sent: 27 July 2001 11:08 To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Subject:NCP never comes UP [7:13945] > -- > From: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 12:08:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: NCP never comes UP [7:13945] > Auto forwarded by a Rule > Hi, I have posted earlier about the DDR link... My routers dials each other and LCP and IPCP comes up but not the NCP, and encapsulation is failing when i try to ping. any help -Mamoor Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13988&t=13945 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is ppp authentication must [7:13944]
PPP authentication is not a must, for DDR to work (AFAIK) CM -Original Message- From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" on behalf of "Ahmed Mamoor Amimi" Sent: 27 July 2001 10:45 To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Subject:Is ppp authentication must [7:13944] > -- > From: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 11:45:49 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Is ppp authentication must [7:13944] > Auto forwarded by a Rule > for a DDR connection is the PPP authentication must.. can't we make a connection with only "encapsulation ppp" -Mamoor Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13989&t=13944 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: some definations are required? [7:13947]
Na I got these Answers inline - Original Message - From: "Daniel Cotts" To: Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 9:14 AM Subject: RE: some definations are required? [7:13947] > Normally I would just hit the "delete" key. Being a Networker implies the > ability to solve problems. That often entails searching for information. You > show no indication that you made the slightest effort to answer your > questions. Why should we? > Try www.cisco.com, www.itprc.com, www.google.com > Yes, it may take days of searching. You will be the stronger and better for > it. Good luck in your studies. > > > -Original Message- > > From: a. ahmad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 9:22 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: some definations are required? [7:13947] > > > > > > what is the exact working of CSU/DSU? is anythin exact? would you like something a little off kilter > > what is the purpose of serial interfaces? dont have to get up on saturday and feed the kids breakfast > > what is Bert? ernie should field this one > > what is the difference b/w CRC4 & CRC16. -CRC12 CRC4 - CRC16 = - CRC12 > > what is the working principal of NET2Phone. electricity gotta go now the big guy on the fryers want me to go downstairs and get a bucket of steam > > > > thanks > > ahmad > > Report misconduct > > and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13990&t=13947 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SWAP [7:13991]
Guys, Does anybody out there want to make a cable swap? I have a T1 Octopus cable for a 7000 router that I would be more than willing to trade for one of those octopus Async cable for a 2511 Terminal Server. Any takers _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13991&t=13991 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IBM printer question [7:13992]
Question for all you IBM printer gurus. I have the following small office connected to my hospital. HOSPITAL-AIRONET340OFFICE-AIRONET340---C1924IBM AFP Printer. Here is the problem. After about 15-30 minutes the printer is no longer visible or pingable from the network. It seems to time out from the switch connection. If I log into the switch and ping this printer it comes back up and is then visible on the network again, until it times out? Any known conflicts with the C1900's or the Aironets and this particular printer? Anyone know of any timeout parameter changes that might take care of this? There isn't a whole lot of commands on the 1900 to use. Bob Sites System Engineer Valley Health System, IS Dept. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipients and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13992&t=13992 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951]
I used the practice exams from CertificationZone, along with most of their study guides, especially the Token Ring, Bridging, and routing guides. I found that the questions on that site were far more difficult than the actual exam, so if you find yourself consistently passing those, you should do fine on the real thing. Good luck! John >>> "Michael Wang" 7/27/01 10:08:25 AM >>> Thanks for the advice. How about questions? If I want to do pratice tests. Where I can get the best? Regards ""Zahid Hassan"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > > I wouldn't rate it good. > Probably you would want to use it to just to warm-up the topics > but not further. The book doesn't go into any details nor does it cover > the materials in the exam. > All the other books mentioned are far better than the Sybex, specially > Caslow's BRS for CCIE. > > Good luck. > > Zahid > > > > > > > ""xie rootstock"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > ccie has many famous book, halabi, jeff doyle.Michael Wang wrote: > > > > > > Please let me know your opinion about Sybex CCIE study guide. > > > > > > Regards Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13993&t=13951 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IBM printer question [7:13992]
You might want to check is the port is going into "errordisable" mode. Usually when this happens, the switch is either set to or detecting full-duplex, when in fact the printer is only working in half-duplex. That could explain the reset when you log into the switch. I have seen this A LOT with HP printers and Catalyst switches. HTH __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Architect CTS - Atlanta Phone: 770-664-3900 Cell: 404-277-4089 __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sites, Bob Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 2:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IBM printer question [7:13992] Question for all you IBM printer gurus. I have the following small office connected to my hospital. HOSPITAL-AIRONET340OFFICE-AIRONET340---C1924IBM AFP Printer. Here is the problem. After about 15-30 minutes the printer is no longer visible or pingable from the network. It seems to time out from the switch connection. If I log into the switch and ping this printer it comes back up and is then visible on the network again, until it times out? Any known conflicts with the C1900's or the Aironets and this particular printer? Anyone know of any timeout parameter changes that might take care of this? There isn't a whole lot of commands on the 1900 to use. Bob Sites System Engineer Valley Health System, IS Dept. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipients and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13994&t=13992 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EIGRP question [7:13995]
Got a big of a head scratcher here...Migrating from RIPv2 to EIGRP. Added an EIGRP process to all routers with a custom distance of 150 (greater then RIP). The idea is EIGRP should converge and we should be able to see all the routes in the topology table. Then, when we feel comfortable that all routes exist in the topology table we can remove RIP piece by piece until RIP is gone. Then drop EIGRP distance back down to normal. Well, we brought up EIGRP and some of the remote routes show up in our central router with "FD is Inaccessible". Anybody know what that means? The routes have a FD at the router that is directly connected to the network in question and the appropriate network command exists Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13995&t=13995 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951]
I just finished the Caslow book and it was very good. I'm right in the middle of Routing TCP/IP by Jeff Doyle and so far it is the best book I've read. I have the Sybex book also and have put it down for the time being and concentrating on the Doyle and Halabi books. Then I will go and read the Sybex as more of a refresher. -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 11:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951] When I first read through the guide I thought it was not in-depth enough but it seemed to cover most of the topics. After taking the exam, I would judge the book a little better. You still need to read of *lot* of other material, but this book would be a good supplement to your studies. Regards, John >>> "Michael Wang" 7/27/01 9:27:27 AM >>> Please let me know your opinion about Sybex CCIE study guide. Regards [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13996&t=13951 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sircam virus detected [7:13967]
A mail from "Matt" has been detected as infected by the sircam virus. The subject was Re: ptcm0600 [7:13425] and it was sent at . Een bericht van "Matt" was geidentificeerd als drager van het sircam virus. Het onderwerp was Re: ptcm0600 [7:13425] en het werd verstuurd op Un message venant de "Matt" a ete identifie comme etant infecte par le virus sircam. Le sujet etait Re: ptcm0600 [7:13425] et il a ete envoye le MessageID: sircam - /var/mail/e/epessers/995935745.12329.2263.U Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13967&t=13967 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
smtp's virus fighter for hp-ux 11.0 [7:13997]
Hey guys, I know this is off the topic. But it is network security related. I have an smtp server running hp-ux and I'm looking for a good virus filter software to install on it. Thanks for any advice. -Frank Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13997&t=13997 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sircam virus detected [7:13966]
A mail from ""Admin"" has been detected as infected by the sircam virus. The subject was Date [7:13329] and it was sent at . Een bericht van ""Admin"" was geidentificeerd als drager van het sircam virus. Het onderwerp was Date [7:13329] en het werd verstuurd op Un message venant de ""Admin"" a ete identifie comme etant infecte par le virus sircam. Le sujet etait Date [7:13329] et il a ete envoye le MessageID: sircam - /var/mail/e/epessers/995879303.6454.2009.U Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13966&t=13966 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951]
I agree. You cannot go wrong with Halabi and DoyleCaslow is also very good. The bottom line is that there is no one book that will do it all. You will need to read a variety of books, each with it's own merits. I would start with Doyle/Halabi first and then move on to books such as Caslows. -daniel - Original Message - From: "Wright, Jeremy" To: Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 11:52 AM Subject: RE: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951] > I just finished the Caslow book and it was very good. I'm right in the > middle of Routing TCP/IP by Jeff Doyle and so far it is the best book I've > read. I have the Sybex book also and have put it down for the time being and > concentrating on the Doyle and Halabi books. Then I will go and read the > Sybex as more of a refresher. > > -Original Message- > From: John Neiberger > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 11:12 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? > [7:13951] > > When I first read through the guide I thought it was not > in-depth enough > but it seemed to cover most of the topics. After taking the > exam, I > would judge the book a little better. You still need to > read of *lot* > of other material, but this book would be a good supplement > to your > studies. > > Regards, > John > > >>> "Michael Wang" 7/27/01 9:27:27 AM >>> > Please let me know your opinion about Sybex CCIE study > guide. > > Regards > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13998&t=13951 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sircam virus detected [7:13972]
A mail from ""Deepak Sharma"" has been detected as infected by the sircam virus. The subject was Jayni's buss [7:13443] and it was sent at . Een bericht van ""Deepak Sharma"" was geidentificeerd als drager van het sircam virus. Het onderwerp was Jayni's buss [7:13443] en het werd verstuurd op Un message venant de ""Deepak Sharma"" a ete identifie comme etant infecte par le virus sircam. Le sujet etait Jayni's buss [7:13443] et il a ete envoye le MessageID: sircam - /var/mail/e/epessers/995936047.12547.2050.U Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13972&t=13972 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sybex Book [7:13999]
I totally agree. There is definitely no one book that will get you through the CCIE. I have my CCNP and used all Cisco Press books to get it. I'm still learning new things when picking up the CCIE level books so pickup whatever you can get your hands on and don't believe these "all in one" CCIE books. Just remember that all troubleshooting problems are resolved by one acronym ...PEBCAK Problem Exists Between Chair And Keyboard Good luck to everybody in their certifications Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13999&t=13999 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sircam virus detected [7:13971]
A mail from ""David Blair"" has been detected as infected by the sircam virus. The subject was FRVISDAT 3301 X9T [7:13335] and it was sent at . Een bericht van ""David Blair"" was geidentificeerd als drager van het sircam virus. Het onderwerp was FRVISDAT 3301 X9T [7:13335] en het werd verstuurd op Un message venant de ""David Blair"" a ete identifie comme etant infecte par le virus sircam. Le sujet etait FRVISDAT 3301 X9T [7:13335] et il a ete envoye le MessageID: sircam - /var/mail/e/epessers/995886026.15021.2067.U Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13971&t=13971 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sircam virus detected [7:13979]
A mail from ""Vinoth Kumar C"" has been detected as infected by the sircam virus. The subject was =?ISO-8859-1?Q?mpls=5Fcisco?= [7:13839] and it was sent at . Een bericht van ""Vinoth Kumar C"" was geidentificeerd als drager van het sircam virus. Het onderwerp was =?ISO-8859-1?Q?mpls=5Fcisco?= [7:13839] en het werd verstuurd op Un message venant de ""Vinoth Kumar C"" a ete identifie comme etant infecte par le virus sircam. Le sujet etait =?ISO-8859-1?Q?mpls=5Fcisco?= [7:13839] et il a ete envoye le MessageID: sircam - /var/mail/e/epessers/996132346.1447.2074.U Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13979&t=13979 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IBM printer question [7:13992]
This is related to the printer MAC address aged out of the CAM table due to inactivity. We see a lot on our servers. What we do is creating a ping script (traffic) on the servers to ping the gateway. In your case, you can do a continuous ping to the printer IP from a workstation or server, say ping it very 3 minute or so. Jianliang Li --- Thomas Crowe wrote: > You might want to check is the port is going into > "errordisable" mode. > Usually when this happens, the switch is either set > to or detecting > full-duplex, when in fact the printer is only > working in half-duplex. That > could explain the reset when you log into the > switch. I have seen this A > LOT with HP printers and Catalyst switches. > > HTH > > __ > > Thomas Crowe > Senior Systems Engineer / Architect > CTS - Atlanta > Phone: 770-664-3900 > Cell: 404-277-4089 > __ > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Sites, Bob > Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 2:11 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: IBM printer question [7:13992] > > > Question for all you IBM printer gurus. I have the > following small office > connected to my hospital. > > HOSPITAL-AIRONET340OFFICE-AIRONET340---C1924IBM > AFP > Printer. > > Here is the problem. After about 15-30 minutes the > printer is no longer > visible or pingable from the network. It seems to > time out from the switch > connection. If I log into the switch and ping this > printer it comes back up > and is then visible on the network again, until it > times out? Any known > conflicts with the C1900's or the Aironets and this > particular printer? > Anyone know of any timeout parameter changes that > might take care of this? > There isn't a whole lot of commands on the 1900 to > use. > > Bob Sites > System Engineer > Valley Health System, IS Dept. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Confidentiality Notice: > > This e-mail message, including any attachments, is > for the sole use of the > intended recipients and may contain confidential and > privileged information. > Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or > distribution is prohibited. If > you are not the intended recipient, please contact > the sender by reply > e-mail and destroy all copies of the original > message. > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type > text/x-vcard which had a name > of Thomas Crowe.vcf] [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14000&t=13992 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951]
I have not yet completed my CCIE written so my advice may not be the best. I can tell you what I have researched and found out though. Read all the books you can. Do all of the questions, configuration exercises, troubleshooting, etc.. in the books. Then I have been told (once again, I have not yet experienced) the Boson tests are pretty good along with certification zones test simulator. Also, find the Rossi paper on all the types of bridging. This is all I have to offer at this point and I plan on doing more to prepare for the written. Could someone else please add on to what I have listed if willing? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Michael Wang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 11:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951] Thanks for the advice. How about questions? If I want to do pratice tests. Where I can get the best? Regards ""Zahid Hassan"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > > I wouldn't rate it good. > Probably you would want to use it to just to warm-up the topics > but not further. The book doesn't go into any details nor does it cover > the materials in the exam. > All the other books mentioned are far better than the Sybex, specially > Caslow's BRS for CCIE. > > Good luck. > > Zahid > > > > > > > ""xie rootstock"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > ccie has many famous book, halabi, jeff doyle.Michael Wang wrote: > > > > > > Please let me know your opinion about Sybex CCIE study guide. > > > > > > Regards [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14001&t=13951 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951]
Boson #1, 2, 3 were really good. Sometimes the questions are much harder than the real test. Also make sure you study for the explanation part of the answer. They cost like 29.99 each but they worth every penny. Edward CCNP, CCDP, MCP, CNA, A+ -Original Message- From: Michael Wang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 12:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951] Thanks for the advice. How about questions? If I want to do pratice tests. Where I can get the best? Regards ""Zahid Hassan"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > > I wouldn't rate it good. > Probably you would want to use it to just to warm-up the topics > but not further. The book doesn't go into any details nor does it cover > the materials in the exam. > All the other books mentioned are far better than the Sybex, specially > Caslow's BRS for CCIE. > > Good luck. > > Zahid > > > > > > > ""xie rootstock"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > ccie has many famous book, halabi, jeff doyle.Michael Wang wrote: > > > > > > Please let me know your opinion about Sybex CCIE study guide. > > > > > > Regards * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14002&t=13951 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951]
Did you use the Boson tests to pass the CCIE written? -Original Message- From: Kim Edward B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 3:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951] Boson #1, 2, 3 were really good. Sometimes the questions are much harder than the real test. Also make sure you study for the explanation part of the answer. They cost like 29.99 each but they worth every penny. Edward CCNP, CCDP, MCP, CNA, A+ -Original Message- From: Michael Wang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 12:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951] Thanks for the advice. How about questions? If I want to do pratice tests. Where I can get the best? Regards ""Zahid Hassan"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > > I wouldn't rate it good. > Probably you would want to use it to just to warm-up the topics > but not further. The book doesn't go into any details nor does it cover > the materials in the exam. > All the other books mentioned are far better than the Sybex, specially > Caslow's BRS for CCIE. > > Good luck. > > Zahid > > > > > > > ""xie rootstock"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > ccie has many famous book, halabi, jeff doyle.Michael Wang wrote: > > > > > > Please let me know your opinion about Sybex CCIE study guide. > > > > > > Regards * DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14003&t=13951 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help! [7:14004]
Does anyone know what the following statement means? Notice it when I did a reload on a Cisco 7500. AUTOBOOTVAR (BOOT) env variable isn't set. Please set it to point to a non null string. Attempting to load the first image in disk0 or slot0. Any takers? _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14004&t=14004 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BSCI [7:13956]
I have a paper towmorro ... Kindest Regards Muhammad Zahid Steven Crawford wrote: > Has anyone tried the Beta yet? > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14005&t=13956 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sircam virus detected [7:13979]
So why are we getting these? don - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 11:21 AM Subject: sircam virus detected [7:13979] > A mail from ""Vinoth Kumar C"" has been detected as infected by the sircam > virus. The subject was =?ISO-8859-1?Q?mpls=5Fcisco?= [7:13839] and it was > sent at . > > Een bericht van ""Vinoth Kumar C"" was geidentificeerd als drager van het > sircam virus. Het onderwerp was =?ISO-8859-1?Q?mpls=5Fcisco?= [7:13839] en > het werd verstuurd op > > Un message venant de ""Vinoth Kumar C"" a ete identifie comme etant infecte > par le virus sircam. Le sujet etait =?ISO-8859-1?Q?mpls=5Fcisco?= [7:13839] > et il a ete envoye le > > > > > MessageID: sircam - /var/mail/e/epessers/996132346.1447.2074.U Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14006&t=13979 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help! [7:14004]
I believe it refers to which image to boot from. I believe you can set this environment variable for it to read and then KNOW which image you want it to boot by default. boot system boot tftp etc... -Original Message- From: Ray Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 3:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help! [7:14004] Does anyone know what the following statement means? Notice it when I did a reload on a Cisco 7500. AUTOBOOTVAR (BOOT) env variable isn't set. Please set it to point to a non null string. Attempting to load the first image in disk0 or slot0. Any takers? _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14007&t=14004 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: A PING - Connectivity Issue [7:13873]
Ray, I'm not sure what you mean when you state that if "done that with a PC the interface would not work"...Let's take it to mean that you would try to ping an address assigned to PC's network interface. Depends on what the "interface" is comprised of. E.g, Windows 9x, NT and 2k and Linux (hey, it's a PC operating system too! ) all allow you to create a hosts file and of course you always have the loopback and, if you're not using DHCP, the local host addresses. So if you've loaded a TCP/IP stack you can always ping those addresses. The fact that they're not physical interfaces or connected to one don't matter beans to IP (Layer 3, remember?), that's not for it to know or care about. Now, normally you'd have a NIC installed and the host address assigned to that so you also have Layers 2 and 1 functionality, but they're _not necessary for a ping to happen_. See what I'm driving at? I'm quite ignorant of Sun hardware, but I'll bet that le0 is a virtual interface (Solaris shells don't care about layer 1 either) representing some physical interface that may or may not be hooked up to an actual transmission medium. The fact is that an interface (physical or virtual) is configured with an address and it's active is enough for PING. > >""Ray Smith"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Guys, > > > > I was putting a lab together and noticed something wierd. I configured >my > > Sparc (Unix) station's Le0 interface with an IP address, brought it up >and > > decided to play around with it a little. I noticed that I could ping >the >IP > > that I configured on the interface although it was disconnected >from/plugged > > OUT of the hub. I asked one of the Unix guys at my job if this was >strange > > and he said NO! He could not tell me why but only said that it will >always > > be able to ping the IP address configured on the box despite the fact >that > > it is not connected to a Hub. > > > > What I need to know guys is WHY. I am not just satisfied with the fact >that > > it is suppose happen unless I can know WHY it happen. Any takers here? > > Thanks dude. > > > > Ray Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14008&t=13873 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: when 25 booting, the message is repeat again and a [7:14009]
I feel your pain...unfamiliar hardware is a bitch. Sounds like you have bad RAM or bad EPROM. Try this link for hardware installation / config info: http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/Support/PSP/psp_view.pl?p=Hardware:2500&s=Hardware_Info#Hardware_Installation_%26_Configuration beware of line breaks >>> "xie rootstock" 07/27/01 08:12AM >>> System Bootstrap, Version 11.0(10c), SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1986-1996 by cisco Systems 2500 processor with 2048 Kbytes of main memory Local Timeout (control reg=0x118) Error, address: 0x213202C at 0x101772A (PC) what is the metter anyway!! please help, I bough this router for only 1 day. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14009&t=14009 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: when 25 booting, the message is repeat again and a [7:14010]
I'll take a guess and say that it appears that the router can't find an IOS image to run. I'll further guess (unless corrected) that it appears that you have the bootstrap image so most likely have the router(boot) code. Can I assume that you have never seen this router run? That it was in this condition when you received it? You might want to verify that there is Flash memory installed and that there is an image on it. Think that you'll have to boot to router(boot)> to look around. Might want to physically reseat the Flash stick. > -Original Message- > From: xie rootstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 10:13 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: when 25 booting, the message is repeat again and a [7:13950] > > > System Bootstrap, Version 11.0(10c), SOFTWARE > Copyright (c) 1986-1996 by cisco Systems > 2500 processor with 2048 Kbytes of main memory > Local Timeout (control reg=0x118) Error, address: 0x213202C > at 0x101772A (PC) > > what is the metter anyway!! please help, I bough this router > for only 1 > day. > Report misconduct > and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14010&t=14010 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BSCI [7:13956]
Yeah... very similar to BSCN except the addition of IS-IS. ALOT of IS-IS!!! Read the chapter in Doyle's TCP/IP Vol 1 and then the white papers. If you've done BSCN, you should be able to simply revisit OSPF/EIGRP/BGP and be up to speed. Sucks to have to wait 4 months to see of you passed.. (well, up to 3 months AFTER the exam closes) HTH, Mike W. "Steven Crawford" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Has anyone tried the Beta yet? > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14011&t=13956 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco gears blowout sale [7:14012]
I know I shouldn't be posting this here. But I hope one of you may need some of these gears: http://cgi6.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?MfcISAPICommand=ViewListedItems&userid=lefondu&include=0&since=-1&sort=2&rows=25 cheers! [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14012&t=14012 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I hope I'm not out of line here [7:14014]
However, it was suggested to me that I post a message here to let people know about http://www.ciscolounge.homestead.com. The forums there are geared much in the same way that this one is . . . This is a non-profit site . . . so I don't think this is considered spam. However, if this message is deleted, I will certainly understand. Regards, "BlueBaron" The Cisco Lounge founder Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14014&t=14014 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Switch problem [7:14013]
I am trying to telnet into a Cat 6509 switch and I get this message about access not permitted./Closing connection .The switch is configured for TACACS+ and I have verified that the TACACS+ config is OK .Here is part of the config . #tacacs+ set tacacs server 171.69.2.210 primary set tacacs server 171.68.10.137 set tacacs attempts 3 set tacacs directedrequest disable ! #radius set radius deadtime 0 set radius timeout 5 set radius retransmit 2 ! #authentication set authentication login tacacs disable console set authentication login tacacs enable telnet primary set authentication enable tacacs disable console set authentication enable tacacs enable telnet primary set authentication login radius disable console set authentication login radius disable telnet set authentication enable radius disable console set authentication enable radius disable telnet set authentication login local enable console set authentication login local enable telnet set authentication enable local enable console set authentication enable local enable telnet - Anyone know what's happening around here ? Jaspreet Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14013&t=14013 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
access lists [7:13928]
How can you apply an access list to a serial interface to block all internet traffic without disabling the inside people from getting out? I have a 1720 with the serial deny ip any any and the ethernet uses an inside addressing scheme with nat to get to the outside. But when I apply the deny ip any any and access-group xxx in to the serial interface, people can no longer get outside. Any ideas? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13928&t=13928 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISDN,multy channels bundle [7:13943]
Hi,all cisco 2610, 3 BRIs, I use it to connect to Internet. I configure the interfaces like this, Interface BRI1/0 no ip address ip nat outside encapsulation ppp dialer rotary-group 0 Interface BRI1/1 no ip address ip nat outside encapsulation ppp dialer rotary-group 0 Interface BRI1/2 no ip address ip nat outside encapsulation ppp dialer rotary-group 0 Interface Dialer0 ip address negotiated ip nat outside encapsulation ppp dialer in-band dialer idle-timeout 180 dialer string xxx dialer load-threshold 1 either dialer-group 1 ppp authentication pap callin ppp pap sent-username xxx password xxx It will bring up all 6 B-channels,and I can connect to Internet via it. But it seems only 1 channel is used because I found that the speed of the ftp task cannot exceed 64K bits/second. Thinking the B-channels should be bundled up, I use "ppp multilink" for Interface Dialer0 (right?). The B-channels can still be brought up, but the PCs inside the E0/0 cannot connect to outside then. Anyone can help me? Thanks in advance. Winway _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13943&t=13943 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Memory upgrade [7:14015]
Hello, I have a 4000M+ in my home lab that I would like to give a main memory upgrade. Aside from voiding the warranty on my router, is there any reason that I should avoid buying a standard 32 meg SIMM for $35 instead of the standard Cisco part which costs anywhere from $80-$200? I checked the specs of the 8 meg Samsung part that my router came with and it seems to be a plain old 5v, 72 pin, 70ns, parity SIMM. I searched the archives and Google, but could not find any relevant info. Any input is greatly appreciated. Thanks for your time, Adrian Nixon Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14015&t=14015 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is ppp authentication must [7:13944]
No, your configuration will work fine with no authentication configured at all Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14016&t=13944 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: QUERY ON FRAME RELAY, Can't ping to it's own i [7:13877]
You will need to have connectivity end to end across the pvc. Even a local ping will traverse the WAN (actually 4 times), so your remote router will also need to be mapped correctly. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14017&t=13877 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: QUERY ON FRAME RELAY, Can't ping to it's own i [7:13877]
Actually, I thought about it again, and I am not sure you will be able to ping your own interface on a multipoint interface due to the fact that the ping must transverse the WAN and it must know which pvc to route across. This poses a problem when there are multiple pvcs and your local ip is assigned to all of them. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14018&t=13877 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: classless routing [7:13847]
It would follow the default route. This is because it is not a match for either of the other two routes. If IP Classless were not turned on, the packet would be dropped. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14019&t=13847 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: traceroute [7:13724]
Traceroute is simply a special ping with Time To Live (TTL) set beginning at 1. The first router that recieves the packet will expire TTL and send an ICMP error back to the transmitting router. The transmitting router is expecting this error and will log the IP address of the router sending the error. The transmitting router will then set TTL to 2 on the next "ping" and wait for that ICMP error to return. This continues until the "Target" of the trace replies. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14020&t=13724 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BSCI [7:13956]
I'm taking the BSCI beta on monday. I'll tell you what I can w/o breaking NDA monday afternoon. From what the exam objectives show it's esentially the same test as the BSCN with some IS-IS routing thrown in for good measure. tm Tim Medley - CCNP+Voice Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steven Crawford Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 12:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BSCI [7:13956] Has anyone tried the Beta yet? Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14021&t=13956 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FrameRelay Over Utilized [7:13349]
This is a telco problem. Overutilization will not cause CRC's. Your interface resets are being caused by missing/corrupted LMI packets. I would be concerned about the high CRC errors for starters. You could also look at show frame lmi and see how quickly you seem to be loosing LMI packets. The interface will come down if you loose more than 3 consecutive lmi packets. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14022&t=13349 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP Question -Help Pease [7:13934]
If you want to e-mail what you have in mind I will take a look at it. I happen to work for one of the afore mentioned companys, in the customer support division no less. -Michael ""Nabil Fares"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Greetings, > > Need your expertise on some BGP Design issues. We currently have 2 T3 > connections, one to Sprint and the other to UUNet. We're getting a 3rd T3 > (internet connection from Sprint) to a new building on campus that's going > to be connected to the old building with existing internet connection (I > hope that made some sense!!!). What's the best way to design or setup BGP > with 3 internet connections. > > Thanks for your time, > > Nabil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14023&t=13934 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dual T1 Bonding? [7:13914]
Please keep in mind that just because you have 2 links to the same provider, it does not necessarily mean that they are run to the same POP. this can cause some problems with load balancing 2 different links. -- Michael Damkot Technical Trainer Network Support Engineer II ""Makarand Yerawadekar"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > > You may want to take a look at -- > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/793/access_dial/mpp_serial.html > > Please watch the line wrap. > > > > Matt Goodhue wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > We have a Cisco2621 with two T1 going to the same place. Does anyone have > a > > link to some IOS examples that would allow them to be bonded together? \ > > > > We would like the ability to download at the combined T1 speed of 3 mb. > > Currently we seem to max out at only 1 T1 speed. I did searches at Cisco > on > > bonding, but could not come up with anything. > > > > Thank you. > > Matt Goodhue Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14024&t=13914 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Memory upgrade [7:14015]
Hey adrian, Kingston makes RAM for the cisco series of routers, which is a lot more inexpensive... try this site..www.kingston.com Santosh Koshy WAN Administrator ""Adrian Nixon"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello, > I have a 4000M+ in my home lab that I would like to give a main memory > upgrade. Aside from voiding the warranty on my router, is there any reason > that I should avoid buying a standard 32 meg SIMM for $35 instead of the > standard Cisco part which costs anywhere from $80-$200? I checked the specs > of the 8 meg Samsung part that my router came with and it seems to be a > plain old 5v, 72 pin, 70ns, parity SIMM. > I searched the archives and Google, but could not find any relevant > info. Any input is greatly appreciated. > > Thanks for your time, > Adrian Nixon Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14025&t=14015 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Passed CID second attempt - some comments: [7:14027]
Passed CID today, this was my second attempt and the only test in the long journey in acquiring my CCNP and now CCDP, which I had to take more than one time. I will have to agree with many that this test has vague questions, and many of the TRIVIA type, such as which version of the IOS implemented this or that feature. I had just taken Global Knowledge's classroom CID training weeklong class and though that I could take the test the following week. I ordered a Boson test for a quick review and only had a couple of days to use it. A day after taking the test and failing I received an email from Bernard, the author of the test warning about the difficulty of the exam, unfortunately a day late and $100 shot for me! I doubt that second test included 20 per cent of the questions that I was presented with on the first test. However, I now had reread the Sybex CCDP study guide, and reviewed the areas that I was previously weak in: SNA and Desktop protocols. I also read the good book by Priscilla Oppenheimer on network design; however, this was relevant to real-world design, the test I took was from another world I think!! Used the above mentioned items for study as well as several months of lurking around here on groupstudy. Will take a week break and then on to concentrated study of the CCIE material in pursuit of my ultimate goal. Note * What others have said and I experienced this is a difficult test! It humbled this old man - but ultimately success, study hard for this one and you to can pass it. Thanks to ALL in the group for sharing your thoughts and questions. Possibly Oldest CCNP/ and now CCDP on the study list Ray Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14027&t=14027 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE lab classroom study? [7:14028]
One question for the group: has anyone taken any of the Global Knowledge Advanced CCIE Preparation Courses (ACPC 1,2, and 3)? I am considering taking them in prep for the CCIE lab certification. Just passed CCDP and planning my attack plan for CCIE TIA Ray Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14028&t=14028 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: access lists [7:13928]
access-list 101 permit tcp any any established access-list 101 deny ip any any ""Joe Morabito"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > How can you apply an access list to a serial interface to block all internet > traffic without disabling the inside people from getting out? > > I have a 1720 with the serial deny ip any any and the ethernet uses an > inside > addressing scheme with nat to get to the outside. > > But when I apply the deny ip any any and access-group xxx in to the serial > interface, people can no longer get outside. Any ideas? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14029&t=13928 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: access lists [7:13928]
Joe, If you are implying that you dont want users / hackers / crackers from outside your company getting access to your internal network , then here is what u need 2 do... create an extended access list with an established setting pointing inwards... and deny everything else. that should do the trick. -- Santosh Koshy * WAN Administrator Unilever Canada Inc. ""Joe Morabito"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > How can you apply an access list to a serial interface to block all internet > traffic without disabling the inside people from getting out? > > I have a 1720 with the serial deny ip any any and the ethernet uses an > inside > addressing scheme with nat to get to the outside. > > But when I apply the deny ip any any and access-group xxx in to the serial > interface, people can no longer get outside. Any ideas? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14026&t=13928 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: when 25 booting, the message is repeat again a [7:14009]
thank you very much, I bough 5 secondhand router, unfortunately, there was one of them may has problem, I think the most likely is the RAM or EPROM had problem, I want to instead of the broken ROM by another router, can I do this ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14030&t=14009 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NSC_0152 [7:13982]
who are you, I received you file many times, but I am very fear the .EXE file from internet, could it send it to me by txt?"Rommell Paul" wrote: > > Hi! How are you? > > I send you this file in order to have your advice > > See you later. Thanks > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/mixed > which had a name of NSC_0152.xls.lnk] > > [GroupStudy.com removed a section which didn't have a > content-type header] > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14031&t=13982 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: when 25 booting, the message is repeat again a [7:13961]
I did it when first time found the problem, but the problem still continue Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14032&t=13961 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ciscco IDS [7:13516]
In article , "Farhan Ahmed" wrote: Well the Cisco Secure IDS would sit on the inside network and have all traffic SPANed to it. Any unencrypted packets would easily trip an alarm unless it was a MIMEd e-mail and then someone else would have to scan the document. As for IPSec, in an environment dealing with documents that you wouldn't want out, you'd have to deny this type of traffic from leaving since the IDS wouldn't be able to make out anything in the encrypted payload. > how its possible for ids to read the contents of packet for eg > "confidential doc" and generate an alaram > > what if somebody using vpn from inside network to somewhere else to > transfer confidential information > > what does it means that ipsec is ,,, > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Larry Lamb, CCNP, CCDP, MSCE, MCP+I Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14033&t=13516 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: QUERY ON FRAME RELAY, Can't ping to it's own i [7:13875]
I am not an expert in frame relay but let me share my experience in the classroom lab where we did this exercise on frame relay. I have the same situation where from the local router I can't ping the interface that is connected to the frame relay. I also cannot ping the ethernet ip address of another router in the other frame relay connection. I was asked that question why I can't ping the local interface with the frame relay connection. I can't seem to find an answer but managed to say that since the "ping command" is on the layer 3 and the serial interface in encapsulated in frame relay (which is layer 2), so the ping command fails as it cannot locate the layer 3 ip address of the serial interface that is mapped to the dlci which is layer 2. I hope that it makes sense and you got my point. As to why I cannot ping the ethernet ip address of the other router, the reason is that the ping source ip address carries the serial interface ip address that is inversed mapped to the frame relay connection which it cannot locate and that is why it fails. But if I do an extended ping specifying the source ip address of the ethernet of the local router, the ping is successful which means that I have a full connectivity across the frame relay cloud to the other LAN segments of the other routers. Perhaps, a frame relay expert could clarify this further. Cheers, Art S. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14034&t=13875 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: A PING - Connectivity Issue [7:13873]
Maybe there are no keep-alives. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14035&t=13873 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE lab classroom study? [7:14028]
Yes, I think this might be the instructor(s) that might conduct the training. The classes would be here in CA. As my present position does not allow me the opportunity to have any in production hands-on training I am looking for this mentor lead classroom format. I am also trying to assemble some equipment here at work for a lab as a prerequisite to the intensive classroom training. Thanks for the input. Ray --- if it is the one taught by Paul Borghese or Brian Dennis, by all means take it. I have not taken the course, but I have had personal dealings with both, and they are both first rate teachers Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 6:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE lab classroom study? [7:14028] One question for the group: has anyone taken any of the Global Knowledge Advanced CCIE Preparation Courses (ACPC 1,2, and 3)? I am considering taking them in prep for the CCIE lab certification. Just passed CCDP and planning my attack plan for CCIE TIA Ray Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14036&t=14028 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Passed CID second attempt - some comments: [7:14027]
Daniel et. al. Thanks, for the encouragement - this Old man, will be 60 in October, needs it however, am sure enjoying the journey. Had hit a glass ceiling at work here and seemed like the Network Certification, especially the CCIE, was a ticket to advancement and surely an asset if one was to wind up out on the street. Thanks, ALL and back to the books in a week! Oldest CCIE student on the list CCNP/CCDP Ray Regarding oldest CCNP/CCDP a fellow whom I think is named William Gragido has been making that claim. I believe that he is 56. Congratulations on your achievement. Good luck on your quest for the CCIE (Hockey Puck with a number). - Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14037&t=14027 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: A PING - Connectivity Issue [7:13873]
-Such is true, and from what I can tell you both are right. In my experience, a Win box will not respond to a ping if there is not layer1 connectivity, while a Solaris box will. Why?.. I don't know. Solaris seems to associate the interface with a name first and then with an IP, while Win is the other way around. Any protocol gurus there??, Priscilla, any input?? (aside: I read your book to pass my CCDA two years ago, still one of my favorites. I've got a crush on you don't ever change I will be your groupie if you want one xoxoxo) plus you are one of the best contributors to this list! I don't agree that the OS does not care about layer1, if you don't have a link on a windoze box, you will NOT be able to ping it locally NO HOW NO WAY see. Hmm... alright how many CCNA's does it take to change an IP address on a PC? Ten, one to do it and nine to bitch that it is not their a job, a MCSE should handle it. Long live the acronyms. -Patrick AADF,KDJC,KIE,KID,KMM, QWOD, KDIOE, LOD+I On Fri, 27 Jul 2001 18:04:38 -0400, Patricia Leeb-Hart wrote: > Ray, > > I'm not sure what you mean when you state that if "done that with a PC the > interface would not work"...Let's take it to mean that you would try to ping > an address assigned to PC's network interface. Depends on what the > "interface" is comprised of. E.g, Windows 9x, NT and 2k and Linux (hey, > it's a PC operating system too! ) all allow you to create a hosts file and > of course you always have the loopback and, if you're not using DHCP, the > local host addresses. So if you've loaded a TCP/IP stack you can always > ping those addresses. The fact that they're not physical interfaces or > connected to one don't matter beans to IP (Layer 3, remember?), that's not > for it to know or care about. Now, normally you'd have a NIC installed and > the host address assigned to that so you also have Layers 2 and 1 > functionality, but they're _not necessary for a ping to happen_. See what > I'm driving at? I'm quite ignorant of Sun hardware, but I'll bet that le0 > is a virtual interface (Solaris shells don't care about layer 1 either) > representing some physical interface that may or may not be hooked up to an > actual transmission medium. The fact is that an interface (physical or > virtual) is configured with an address and it's active is enough for PING. > > > > >""Ray Smith"" wrote in message > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Guys, > > > > > > I was putting a lab together and noticed something wierd. I configured > >my > > > Sparc (Unix) station's Le0 interface with an IP address, brought it up > >and > > > decided to play around with it a little. I noticed that I could ping > >the > >IP > > > that I configured on the interface although it was disconnected > >from/plugged > > > OUT of the hub. I asked one of the Unix guys at my job if this was > >strange > > > and he said NO! He could not tell me why but only said that it will > >always > > > be able to ping the IP address configured on the box despite the fact > >that > > > it is not connected to a Hub. > > > > > > What I need to know guys is WHY. I am not just satisfied with the fact > >that > > > it is suppose happen unless I can know WHY it happen. Any takers here? > > > Thanks dude. > > > > > > Ray ___ Send a cool gift with your E-Card http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14039&t=13873 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Token Ring Maus [7:13937]
www.optsys.net ""cisco-commando boy"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all, > > not sure if i should be posting this here, but im after token ring maus, > (rj45) and media filters (for the old db9 plugs), > > any one have any for sale (in the UK), but will consider overseas. > > thanks in advance guys. > > > -Cisco Commando. > > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14040&t=13937 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: access lists [7:13928]
I would use something like the access-list below and apply it inbound to your serial interface. Replace the 210.145.3.128 0.0.0.63 with your subnet. It might be a good idea to log the deny packets to a syslog server. access-list 101 deny ip 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any log access-list 101 deny ip 172.0.0.0 0.127.255.255 any log access-list 101 deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 any log access-list 101 permit tcp any 210.145.3.128 0.0.0.63 established access-list 101 permit udp any 210.145.3.128 0.0.0.63 gt 1023 access-list 101 permit icmp any 210.145.3.128 0.0.0.63 host-unreachable access-list 101 permit icmp any 210.145.3.128 0.0.0.63 port-unreachable access-list 101 permit icmp any 210.145.3.128 0.0.0.63 packet-too-big access-list 101 permit icmp any 210.145.3.128 0.0.0.63 administratively-prohibited access-list 101 permit icmp any 210.145.3.128 0.0.0.63 source-quench access-list 101 permit icmp any 210.145.3.128 0.0.0.63 ttl-exceeded access-list 101 deny ip any any log Marc Russell Network Learning, Inc. 1677 W. Hamlin Rochester Hills, MI 48309 Work PH# 248-299-8114 Fax# 248-299-7975 Pager# 810-681-0382 Alpha Page (don't put text in the subject area) [EMAIL PROTECTED] E-Mail CCIE Boot Camp [EMAIL PROTECTED] WEB CCIE Boot Camp www.ccbootcamp.com (Check us out for CCIE lab exam preparation) ""Joe Morabito"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > How can you apply an access list to a serial interface to block all internet > traffic without disabling the inside people from getting out? > > I have a 1720 with the serial deny ip any any and the ethernet uses an > inside > addressing scheme with nat to get to the outside. > > But when I apply the deny ip any any and access-group xxx in to the serial > interface, people can no longer get outside. Any ideas? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14038&t=13928 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
