RE: How much is a CCIE worth? [7:32856]
Don't rightly know, depends. But, for comparison, here's a little quote from Information Week: "Enron's board members made more than $300,000 per year, for just one board job." And just look at their performance! Maybe we should start a "board member" study group. Best, G. VP OGC Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32856&t=32856 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: External DSU recommendation [7:32841]
We use Paradyne CSU/DSU's. Really easy to configure and not too difficult to troubleshoot. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32855&t=32841 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors on Ethernet Ports on 6500?!?!?! [7:32853]
This is wild stuff, so I thought I'd run it by GroupStudy to see if anyone had seen this before or knew what caused it. We're currently migrating connections from a 5513+RSM to a new 6509+Sup2/MSFC2. There were three ethernet connections, that upon being moved from the 5500 to the 6500, starting showing input errors and CRC errors. When these connections were moved, the port on the 6500 was configured identically to the same port on the 5500 as far as speed, duplex, VLAN assignment, and spanning tree settings. These same devices (same patch cables and all) created no errors on the 5500 whatsoever. Here's the kicker: When we went back and changed the port speed/duplex to "auto" on the 6500, it negociated the same speed/duplex settings we had forced, but now there were no more errors. (i.e. a server set for 100-Full, that was plugged into a switchport on the 5500 forced to 100-Full was fine, but plugged into a port on the 6500 forced to 100-Full caused errors, and plugged into the exact same 6500 port set for "auto" speed/duplex had no errors.) Any ideas on why letting the switch detect settings caused no errors while forcing it to those same settings causes errors? Thanks, Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32853&t=32853 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Switch for home lab [7:32797]
I agree and disagree; let me know what you think... The prices on used Cat5k's is less then it was a while back, and they're certainly easier to find then the cat2901's. Would price difference/availablity change your feelings? --- Dennis -Original Message- From: Michael Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 11:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Switch for home lab [7:32797] Steven A. Ridder wrote: > > I would only focus on the 5K or, as I just learned, a 1200, as > you need to > know the set's, show's and clear's for the big test. > > The other switches are just annoying with all the different > commands. Get > the 1200, or 5k. Actually, IMHO, the 2901 is the best choice if you're lookng for a switch for your lab. The 2901 uses the same CatOS images as the 5K, and for study purposes, is the exact same thing. The major difference between the 2901 and the 5K is that the 2901 is a fixed config with a Sup and a 12-port 10/100 ethernet blade built-in. If you want the functionality of being able to buy difference blades to use, then get the 5K. If you want it for a ethernet switch that you can do trunking, VLANs, etc, get the 2901. Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32854&t=32797 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Latency to APNIC [7:32852]
Is anyone aware of increased latency from Korean networks into the US or v/v lately? My users in Korea are complaining of slow page loads.Traces from Chicago, IL US to Korea show a speed bump between the last hop in the US and the next hop in Korea.(65ms to Palo Alto CA. - 244ms from Palo Alto to Korea). I suspect this has always been the case and the customer is doing something different but any input on this is much appreciated. TX -- This message is intended only for the use of the addressee(s) named herein. The information contained in this message is confidential and may constitute proprietary or inside information. Unauthorized review, dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this message, including all attachments, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you havereceived this message inerror, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and destroy thismessage and all copies thereof, including all attachments. [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of holtzb.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32852&t=32852 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Latency to APNIC [7:32851]
Is anyone aware of increased latency from Korean networks into the US or v/v lately? My users in Korea are complaining of slow page loads.Traces from Chicago, IL US to Korea show a speed bump between the last hop in the US and the next hop in Korea.(65ms to Palo Alto CA. - 244ms from Palo Alto to Korea). I suspect this has always been the case and the customer is doing something different but any input on this is much appreciated. TX Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32851&t=32851 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Switch for home lab [7:32797]
Steven A. Ridder wrote: > > I would only focus on the 5K or, as I just learned, a 1200, as > you need to > know the set's, show's and clear's for the big test. > > The other switches are just annoying with all the different > commands. Get > the 1200, or 5k. Actually, IMHO, the 2901 is the best choice if you're lookng for a switch for your lab. The 2901 uses the same CatOS images as the 5K, and for study purposes, is the exact same thing. The major difference between the 2901 and the 5K is that the 2901 is a fixed config with a Sup and a 12-port 10/100 ethernet blade built-in. If you want the functionality of being able to buy difference blades to use, then get the 5K. If you want it for a ethernet switch that you can do trunking, VLANs, etc, get the 2901. Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32846&t=32797 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: External DSU recommendation [7:32841]
All good names. Check with your telco to see which brand they use. Buy that. It will make troubleshooting much easier if they are familiar with your gear. > -Original Message- > From: Richard Tufaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 12:22 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: External DSU recommendation [7:32841] > > > Any recommendations on an External DSU, connecting to an T3 > (DS3). Larscom, > Digital link, ADC Kentrox? > > Richard Tufaro - MCSE - GSEC- CCNA > Network Engineer - Anda Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > MSN IM - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32850&t=32841 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CIR [7:32747]
Never had what work?? I hate to nag, but could people try to remember that many of us read these messages in connectionless, stateless mode. Messages that say "never had it work" are meaningless. Yesterday there was one that just said "no." Hunh? Please reply with the original message (or at least part of it) intact. Thanks. Priscilla Also RFC 1149 compliant, but with consideration for the fact that avian carriers don't reassemble messages. ;-) >"Steven A. Ridder" wrote: > > > > I've never had it work. Even if I reboot. I always type it in. 10/100 > > autosensing works better in my opinion. > > > > -- > > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32849&t=32747 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I need Help in Cisco [7:31875]
Hi all, someone can help me? i try to pass all my trafic from cisco across squid in Linux the configuration is, In my squid proxy i have this http_port 80 icp_port 3130 httpd_accel virtual 80 httpd_accel_with_proxy on On the cisco I did: route-map proxy-redirect permit 10 match ip address 110 set ip next-hop 208.206.76.44 access-list 110 deny tcp host 208.206.76.44 any eq www access-list 110 allow tcp any any eq www int e0 ip policy route-map proxy-redirect but when i write in the cisco sh route-map, cisco show me the follow cisco#sh route-map route-map proxy-redirect, permit, sequence 10 Match clauses: ip address (access-lists): 110 Set clauses: ip next-hop 208.206.76.44 Policy routing matches: 145918 packets, 12186643 bytes cisco#sh route-map route-map proxy-redirect, permit, sequence 10 Match clauses: ip address (access-lists): 110 Set clauses: ip next-hop 208.206.76.44 Policy routing matches: 146700 packets, 12254407 bytes cisco#sh route-map route-map proxy-redirect, permit, sequence 10 Match clauses: ip address (access-lists): 110 Set clauses: ip next-hop 208.206.76.44 Policy routing matches: 147153 packets, 12302917 bytes But when my network try to connect to anything site i see that the machine in my network not resolve the ip address and don4t present the web page of the site that i try to acces. what can i do to solve this problem? - Original Message - From: "c1sc0k1d" To: Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:56 AM Subject: Re: I need Help in Cisco [7:31875] > With the limited description you gave I'd say you probably want policy > routing. > > The k1d > > > > ""Ing. Milton Amador Z."" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I have one Cisco 3640 i need to send all my trafic www to one linux box, > in > > this linux box i have Proxy squid, but i don4t know how make this. > > > > Somebody know how make this? > > > > > > Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32847&t=31875 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: External DSU recommendation [7:32841]
We have pretty good luck with ADC. Dave Richard Tufaro wrote: > > Any recommendations on an External DSU, connecting to an T3 (DS3). Larscom, > Digital link, ADC Kentrox? > > Richard Tufaro - MCSE - GSEC- CCNA > Network Engineer - Anda Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > MSN IM - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32845&t=32841 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is CCIEprep on crack or what ? [7:32787]
At 01:35 AM 1/22/02, Ozzie Sutcliffe wrote: >I was looking over some troubleshooting stuff and on of the scenario's >involved a router that was fine and the admin goes to lunch. >Comes back from lunch,S0 is down and down,a show controller sees no cable . >The rest of the garbage raves on about about the DB60 being symmetrical and >the cable was installed upside down. >Every DB 60 I have seen was NOT symmetrical and would take some cutting with >tin snips to install upside down. You haven't seen such cables, so you think CCIEprep is on crack? This troubleshooting trick is as old as the Cisco training department. Probably older than you?! ;-) Actually, I checked my drawer of old cables and couldn't find any such cables, but I'm pretty sure they do exist. Priscilla > >The 12 secenario's I saw were really advanced CCNA not even CCNP level >stuff.. >Is this the standard of CCIEpreps stuff ??? > >Oz Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32844&t=32787 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Looking for Great CISCO Training Center in SJ area [7:32843]
Looks like he's the City Administrator in Cripple Creek: http://www.cripple-creek.co.us/govt.html This could ofcourse be a different guy, but who knows. Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: Hartnell, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 12:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Looking for Great CISCO Training Center in SJ area [7:32838] I had Kip for ICRC/ACRC years ago. He was, by far and away, the best vendor-cert trainer I ever had. Best, G. VP OGC > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 8:44 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Looking for Great CISCO Training Center in SJ area > [7:32821] > > > Try to find if Kip Petersen sp? is doing training in that > area. Last that I > knew he had moved to MentorTech. Previous to that he worked > for the folks > who had been doing the NetGun program. He was going to open a SJ area > training center for MentorTech. They are now out of business. > Hopefully he > is still teaching. FWIW He was one of the original five Cisco > trainers - > before Cisco farmed out training. > > > -Original Message- > > From: tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 5:31 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Looking for Great CISCO Training Center in SJ area > [7:32794] > > > > > > Hi. > > Would you recommend good cisco training centers covering CCIE > > routing & > > switching? > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32843&t=32843 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Catalyst 5000 vs. Catalyst 1201 for CCNP home [7:32606]
It may just understand RIP in order to learn the address of router(s) on its segment? Indeed, that doesn't make it a Layer-3 forwarding device. Priscilla At 09:58 PM 1/21/02, Patrick Ramsey wrote: >Well..I've never even seen a 1201 but if it supports rip as a routing >protocol, then that should tell you it does layer 3... Don't get confused >though... Routing protocols have nothing to do with what layer of the OSI >model a device operates on. A switch running just on layer 2 may have the >abillity to have multiple segments coming into it, but can not pick packets >up from 1 layer 3 network and place them on another layer 3 network. A >switch that can operate on layer 3 doesn't have to run >rip/ospf/eigrp/etc...to do it. Static routes will work just fine. > >-Patrick > > >>> "Steven A. Ridder" 01/21/02 14:54 PM >>> >Why do they call a 1201 a L3 switch? What L3 functions can it do besides >RIP? > >-- >RFC 1149 Compliant. > > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32842&t=32606 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
External DSU recommendation [7:32841]
Any recommendations on an External DSU, connecting to an T3 (DS3). Larscom, Digital link, ADC Kentrox? Richard Tufaro - MCSE - GSEC- CCNA Network Engineer - Anda Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN IM - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32841&t=32841 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
External DSU recommendation [7:32840]
Any recommendations on an External DSU, connecting to an T3 (DS3). Larscom, Digital link, ADC Kentrox? Ohh and the T3 will be frame. Richard Tufaro - MCSE - GSEC- CCNA Network Engineer - Anda Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN IM - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32840&t=32840 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Connector tales (was: Is CCIEprep on crack or what [7:32836]
When I was doing formal protocol testing at the Corporation for Open Systems, our standards were officially international when they existed, but we accepted relevant national standards--or those we thought were relevant. Specifically, while the X.25 stack called for physical layers including X.21 bis, we accepted RS-232C. The electrical differences were insignificant. Both specify a DB-25 connector. But it turned that X.25 specifically points to ISO 2110 as the connector specification. We received a device to test from a European vendor, and plugged in the appropriate DB-25. No problem. To be sure nothing got loose, we then screwed down the retaining screws at the ends of the hood, noting it was a little difficult. After the device passed testing and was about to be returned, we found the awful truth. There is one teensy, tiny difference between ISO and EIA DB-25 connectors. ISO have metric screw threads and EIA have English. We eventually had to drill them out. In like manner, when it comes to the DB-60, I had a young friend who took an individual IQ test, which contained a timed test of putting various-shaped pegs in variously-shaped holes. The psychologist told him a good time was (let's say 3 minutes), but he completed it in about 30 seconds. He inquired what his speed meant. Tugging on the square peg stuck in the round hole, the psychologist grumbled "it means you're very strong." Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32836&t=32836 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISL / DISL and a non-cisco switch [7:32757]
It is possible to establish trunk between cisco and non-cisco switch, but: 1. Only 802.1q trunk 2. No dynamic negotiation is possible. You have to hard code trunk as "ON", and you have to disable DISL with "nonegotiate". Sasa CCIE #8635 bergenpeak wrote: > > Is it possible to establish a DISL trunk between a cisco switch > and a non-cisco switch? > > If so, how would one configure the port on the cisco switch side? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32839&t=32757 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Looking for Great CISCO Training Center in SJ area [7:32838]
I had Kip for ICRC/ACRC years ago. He was, by far and away, the best vendor-cert trainer I ever had. Best, G. VP OGC > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 8:44 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Looking for Great CISCO Training Center in SJ area > [7:32821] > > > Try to find if Kip Petersen sp? is doing training in that > area. Last that I > knew he had moved to MentorTech. Previous to that he worked > for the folks > who had been doing the NetGun program. He was going to open a SJ area > training center for MentorTech. They are now out of business. > Hopefully he > is still teaching. FWIW He was one of the original five Cisco > trainers - > before Cisco farmed out training. > > > -Original Message- > > From: tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 5:31 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Looking for Great CISCO Training Center in SJ area > [7:32794] > > > > > > Hi. > > Would you recommend good cisco training centers covering CCIE > > routing & > > switching? > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32838&t=32838 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AUX to AUX dialup [7:32658]
can you send over your configs just so i can go through them to see were I am going wrong At 12:47 PM 21/01/2002 -0500, Ouellette, Tim wrote: >Don't forget the "login local" command under your aux port. Your configs >look very similar to mine that I use at home for connecting two 2501's via >aux to aux with a Teletone (tls4) pots simulator. If you still can't get it >working, lemme know and i'll fire over my configs to you. > >Tim > >-Original Message- >From: D'Wayne Saunders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 11:54 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: AUX to AUX dialup [7:32658] > > >Hi all I am having a few problem with connecting two 1720 routers for >dialin and dial out from the aux port >i dial in from nas2 to nas1 here are the config and debug of ppp negotation > > >NAS1#sh ru >Building configuration... > >Current configuration: >! >! Last configuration change at 10:49:00 CST Mon Jan 21 2002 by dwaynes >! NVRAM config last updated at 10:45:00 CST Mon Jan 21 2002 by dwaynes >! >version 12.0 >service timestamps debug uptime >service timestamps log uptime >no service password-encryption >! >hostname NAS1 >! >aaa new-model >aaa authentication login default group tacacs+ enable >aaa authentication enable default group tacacs+ enable >aaa authentication ppp default group tacacs+ local >aaa accounting exec default start-stop group tacacs+ >aaa accounting commands 15 default start-stop group tacacs+ >aaa accounting network default start-stop group tacacs+ >aaa accounting connection default start-stop group tacacs+ >aaa accounting system default start-stop group tacacs+ >! >username NAS2 password 0 >! >! >! >! >memory-size iomem 25 >clock timezone CST 9 30 >ip subnet-zero >no ip domain-lookup >ip host r3 192.168.10.67 >ip host r2 192.168.8.2 >! >! >! >cns event-service server >! >! >process-max-time 200 >! >interface Serial0 > no ip address > no ip directed-broadcast > no ip mroute-cache > shutdown >! >interface BRI0 > no ip address > no ip directed-broadcast > shutdown > isdn guard-timer 0 on-expiry accept >! >interface FastEthernet0 > ip address 192.168.10.69 255.255.255.192 > no ip directed-broadcast >! >interface Async5 > ip unnumbered FastEthernet0 > no ip directed-broadcast > encapsulation ppp > dialer in-band > dialer rotary-group 1 > async mode dedicated > fair-queue 64 16 0 >! >interface Dialer1 > ip unnumbered FastEthernet0 > no ip directed-broadcast > encapsulation ppp > dialer in-band > dialer-group 1 > peer default ip address pool dial > ppp authentication chap >! >ip local pool dial 192.168.10.91 >ip classless >ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1 >no ip http server >! >access-list 1 permit any >dialer-list 1 protocol ip list 1 >tacacs-server host 192.168.10.100 >tacacs-server key merlin06 >! >line con 0 > password 7 030752180500 > transport input none >line aux 0 > modem InOut > modem autoconfigure discovery > transport input all > stopbits 1 > speed 115200 > flowcontrol hardware >line vty 0 4 > password 7 01100F175804 >! >ntp clock-period 17179467 >ntp server 192.168.10.100 >no scheduler allocate >end > >NAS1# > > >NAS2#sh ru >Building configuration... > >Current configuration: >! >version 12.0 >service timestamps debug uptime >service timestamps log uptime >no service password-encryption >! >hostname NAS2 >! >! >username dwaynes password 0 merlin06 >username NAS1 password 0 merlin06 >memory-size iomem 25 >ip subnet-zero >! >chat-script Dialout ABORT ERROR ABORT BUSY "" "AT" OK "ATDT T" TIMEOUT 45 >CONNE >CT c >! >! > ! > ! > ! > interface Serial0 > no ip address > no ip directed-broadcast > no ip mroute-cache > shutdown > no fair-queue >! >interface BRI0 > no ip address > no ip directed-broadcast > shutdown >! >interface FastEthernet0 > ip address 192.168.10.70 255.255.255.192 > no ip directed-broadcast >! >interface Async5 > no ip address > no ip directed-broadcast > encapsulation ppp > dialer in-band > dialer pool-member 1 > async default routing > ppp authentication pap >! >interface Dialer1 > ip unnumbered FastEthernet0 > no ip directed-broadcast > encapsulation ppp > dialer remote-name NAS1 > dialer pool 1 > dialer-group 1 > ppp authentication pap >! >ip classless >no ip http server >! >! >line con 0 > transport input none >line aux 0 > modem InOut > modem autoconfigure discovery > stopbits 1 > speed 115200 > flowcontrol hardware >line vty 0 4 > login >! >no scheduler allocate >end > >NAS2# > > > >NAS1# >00:58:26: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Async5, changed state to up >00:58:26: As5 PPP: Treating connection as a callin >00:58:26: As5 PPP: Phase is ESTABLISHING, Passive Open >00:58:26: As5 LCP: State is Listen >00:58:28: As5 LCP: TIMEout: State Listen >00:58:28: As5 LCP: O CONFREQ [Listen] id 59 len 24 >00:58:28: As5 LCP:ACCM 0x000A (0x0206000A) >00:58:28: As5 LCP:AuthProto PAP (0x0304C023) >00:58:28: As5 LC
RE: O/T Async Tunnelling [7:32837]
You can use the command aaa authentication login fred none then on the line configuration use login authentication fred. This will prevent you from having to use tacacs+ on that line. L8r. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 11:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:O/T Async Tunnelling Hi, Can anyone answer what is probably a simple question... I'm trying to set-up an async tunnel to allow for remote call logging and have the following question: If aaa model is in use with tacacs+ how do you get around the issue whereby 'autocommand telnet /stream' gets a response back requesting a login? I have tried adding 'no login authentication' on the remote router but this doesn't prevent the default aaa mode of local authentication kicking in. I cannot turn off tacacs+ so this is not an option. Can you bypass this in anyway??? I was thinking of scripting it in some way but hoped there was an easier answer. If you are wondering what an async tunnel is: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/700/14.shtml thanks in advance, Kevin. --- This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (including its group companies) shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (or its group companies) does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. --- **Note: CCIE Security list is available. For more information go to: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/security.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32837&t=32837 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ebay question [7:32808]
Has anyone used the seller [EMAIL PROTECTED] before? Anyone got any good ebay sellers to recommend? thanks stuart Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32808&t=32808 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is CCIEprep on crack or what ? [7:32787]
Yes, Lou Rossi frequently uses crack from what I understand. It's very popular in Florida! J/K (Lou's a great guy and doesnt use crack) It is VERY easy to install one of DB60 cables UPSIDE-DOWN. thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] used Cisco gear: www.optsys.net CCIE Labs, racks, and classes: http://www.ccbootcamp.com/quicklinks.html ""Ozzie Sutcliffe"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I was looking over some troubleshooting stuff and on of the scenario's > involved a router that was fine and the admin goes to lunch. > Comes back from lunch,S0 is down and down,a show controller sees no cable FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NAT Problems with 12.2(5)? RE: Gawd I hate my [7:32357]
On my AS 5400, NAT doesn't work .the IOS version is 12.1 (5) T5does this IOS version have same problems with NAT like IOS 12.2(5). plz advise komy ""Kaminski, Shawn G"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > In case anybody is interested, I submitted the post below regarding NAT > problems with IOS 12.2(5). The Cisco TAC engineer wrote back with the > following information, which matches up with the problems we were having: > > "A search was done on the known issues on 12.2 IOS platform and I got two > bugs similar to your issue. I am just wondering whether you are running > into these issues. > > CSCdv40492 - NAT stops working after some days > > and the same is duplicated by the following bug also: > > CSCdr69168 - It seems that router using same port number 65535. After that, > some connections will be down or fail. Workaround is to reload the router. > If they try to do "clear ip nat trans *", it still has this problem. > > The above two bugs are resolved in the following IOS versions. > 12.2(06.06)T > 12.2(06.08)DA > 12.2(06.06)PI > 12.002(006.005) > > I would suggest you to consult with your NSA engineer for your account for > appropriate code recommendation." > > > Shawn K. > > > -Original Message- > From: Kaminski, Shawn G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 3:33 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: NAT Problems with 12.2(5)? RE: Gawd I hate my life [7:31883] > > > Regarding IOS's, has anyone had any problems with NAT when using 12.2(5)? > Without going into details, we're having some NAT issues and it seems to > have started after upgrading our routers to 12.2(5). CCO doesn't currently > show any NAT problems or bugs with this version. > > Shawn K. > > -Original Message- > From: Brad Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:29 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Gawd I hate my life ;-> [7:31817] > > > snip > > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software > > IOS (tm) 3600 Software (C3620-JS56I-M), Version 12.1(5)T10, RELEASE > > SOFTWARE (f > snip > > dont use IOS 12.(5)T10. you folks you should be using 12.(5)T9, it has less > bugs in it. > > thanks, > -Brad Ellis > CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) > Network Learning Inc > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > used Cisco gear: www.optsys.net > CCIE Labs, racks, and classes: http://www.ccbootcamp.com/quicklinks.html > ""Chuck Larrieu"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > OK, so I've been doing rack testing for some people who are going to > > be going public Real Soon Now. > > > > Got some things mocked up. Some of which relate to topics discussed on > this > > forum yesterday and today. I need to check something and issue the > > command "show ip prot" enter. > > > > r2#sh ip prot > > % Ambiguous command: "sh ip prot" > > r2# > > > > well, now... > > > > r2#show ip prot? > > protocol-discovery protocols > > > > r2#show ip prot > > > > so what is "show ip protocol-discovery? > > > > r2#sh ip protocol-discovery ? > > interface Show for a specific interface > > protocol Show stats about a pariticula protocol > > stats Show Stats > > top-n Show Top-N protocols by bytes > > | Output modifiers > > > > > > OK. so a command I've been using since 11.2 is no longer valid. except > that > > it is on other routers. > > > > but look - still good on other routers: > > > > r3#sh ip prot? > > protocols > > > > r3#sh ip prot > > > > > > OK, check CCO, no record of any such command as show ip > > protocol-discovery in any command reference I check. A search of CCO > > for the phrase reveals nothing. > > > > now what? > > > > the IOS version in question is: > > > > r2#sh ver > > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software > > IOS (tm) 3600 Software (C3620-JS56I-M), Version 12.1(5)T10, RELEASE > > SOFTWARE (f > > c2) > > > > sigh. have not run into this before, not in two trips through the lab, > > not on any number of routers and IOS versions, both at home and in > > customer installations. > > > > Anyone got any clue what show IP protocol-discovery does? > > > > sheesh.. another good shortcut down the tubes. > > > > Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32793&t=32357 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is CCIEprep on crack or what ? [7:32787]
Slightly related is a favorite troubleshooting exercise of one of the first 10 CCIEs: set up a dual-homed site, and switch the two WAN cables during lunch. >Yes it's quite easy to do!! Been there, done that :( > > Dave > >Jim Brown wrote: >> >> You can definitely install a DB60 upside down. I won't even say I've >watched >> a trainee do it, I've done it myself. It is easier than you think, the hood >> becomes distorted and it becomes even easier the next time. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Ozzie Sutcliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 11:35 PM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Is CCIEprep on crack or what ? [7:32787] >> >> I was looking over some troubleshooting stuff and on of the scenario's >> involved a router that was fine and the admin goes to lunch. Comes back >from >> lunch,S0 is down and down,a show controller sees no cable . The rest of >the >> garbage raves on about about the DB60 being symmetrical and the cable was >> installed upside down. Every DB 60 I have seen was NOT symmetrical and >would >> take some cutting with tin snips to install upside down. >> >> The 12 secenario's I saw were really advanced CCNA not even CCNP level >> stuff.. Is this the standard of CCIEpreps stuff ??? >> >> Oz >> >> [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef] >-- >David Madland >Sr. Network Engineer >CCIE# 2016 >Qwest Communications Int. Inc. >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >612-664-3367 > >"Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32835&t=32787 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CIR [7:32747]
My last post was about how when I reply to a message, sometimes the previous comments never show through. Somehow, neither the comments nor mine showed up. I believe this server has a bug in it when using newsgroups. Anyways... Drew said: I'm not sure, but I think that Steven ment that he had never had the AUTO LMI working, but that the 10/100 AUTO SENSE worked better in his opinion. Ole And I said correct. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32834&t=32747 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CIR [7:32747]
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
O/T Async Tunnelling [7:32832]
Hi, Can anyone answer what is probably a simple question... I'm trying to set-up an async tunnel to allow for remote call logging and have the following question: If aaa model is in use with tacacs+ how do you get around the issue whereby 'autocommand telnet /stream' gets a response back requesting a login? I have tried adding 'no login authentication' on the remote router but this doesn't prevent the default aaa mode of local authentication kicking in. I cannot turn off tacacs+ so this is not an option. Can you bypass this in anyway??? I was thinking of scripting it in some way but hoped there was an easier answer. If you are wondering what an async tunnel is: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/700/14.shtml thanks in advance, Kevin. --- This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (including its group companies) shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (or its group companies) does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. --- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32832&t=32832 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CIR [7:32747]
I'm not sure, but I think that Steven ment that he had never had the AUTO LMI working, but that the 10/100 AUTO SENSE worked better in his opinion. Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 11:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CIR [7:32747] Agree 10% though I don't know what it has to do with CIR ;) Dave "Steven A. Ridder" wrote: > > I've never had it work. Even if I reboot. I always type it in. 10/100 > autosensing works better in my opinion. > > -- > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32831&t=32747 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: whats the diff [7:32819]
Can I ask why you're buying 7204's vs. 7206's? I don't think the cost difference between the two is that great and you get 50% more slots - not to sound like a sales guy or anything. At any rate, my take on the VXR vs. non-VXR thing. The 'regular' 7200's were the first edition of the product line. The VXRs are the new, "latest and greatest." I don't think you can put anything faster than a NPE-225 in a non-VXR chassis; so to get the performance boost of an NPE-300 or 400 you'll need to go with the VXR chassis. Taking a quick look at the price list (an old one at that) I don't see the non-VXR chassis listed as an option for the 7204. You used to be able to buy a 7202 but that doesn't seem to be offered anymore either. The on-line docs talk specifically about the MIX interconnects in the mid-plane of the VXR chassis; this is basically for TDM and/or voice applications. I think the bigger kicker is the support for the faster NPEs. http://cco.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/7200.htm#xtocid4 Of all the 7200's I've seen in production, they've all be 06's and VXRs except for two non-VXR 7206's that my client is looking to upgrade this year. Last note, there are a few less popular port adapters that aren't supported in the VXR chassis (a full-duplex T/R port adapter for one); I believe for all of those (and there's not many) PAs not supported by VXRs there are other modules that serve a similar purpose which are supported. So this should only bite you if you have a stock of existing PAs that you want to put into the new chassis. Have fun. Ben -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard Tufaro Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: whats the diff [7:32819] Whats the Diff between an Cisco 7204 and an 7204VXR. I can't seem to find it anywhere. When you do the config maker on Cisco's site they make you choose that one as the only option for the 7204. Are they the same thing. According to the docs, there ate 3 prod #'s. Cisco7204-DC, Cisco7204-CH and Cisco7204VXR. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32830&t=32819 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CIR [7:32747]
Thanks Dave, I appreciate your input. Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 11:01 AM To: Ole Drews Jensen Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CIR [7:32747] I understand and appreciate your concern but in the hundreds of frame connections I have done I have never seen LMI negociation fail becuse it was auto on the switches. Dave Ole Drews Jensen wrote: > > Remembering my day in hell when I had a 10/100 auto sense problem where the > STP blocked a LAN interface on my router, I was wondering how well the AUTO > LMI setting works. Is it reliable and recommendable? > > Thanks, > > Ole > > ~~~ > Ole Drews Jensen > Systems Network Manager > CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I > RWR Enterprises, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ~~~ > http://www.RouterChief.com > ~~~ > NEED A JOB ??? > http://www.oledrews.com/job > ~~~ > > -Original Message- > From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 9:22 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: CIR [7:32747] > > You would be correct. We configure our switches to auto so the > customer can choose their favorite LMI. Some providers force you to use > ANSI which wil not provide CIR, hmm I wonder why they would do that... > > Dave > > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > > > > I would have thought that this would only work if your provider also used > > Cisco LMI type?? > > > > Apart from the other suggestions, you could always ask your provider. Try > > asking whoever you deal with for support, rather than whoever you deal > > with for ordering - the support mob will hopefully check what is > > provisioned, while the ordering mob may just check what you ordered. > > Your provider may have some reporting system in place for customers that > > you can use to check - you may be able to get other reports as well. Maybe > > not, but it doesn't hurt to ask. > > > > JMcL > > - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 22/01/2002 11:47 am - > > > > "MADMAN" > > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 22/01/2002 10:13 am > > Please respond to "MADMAN" > > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > cc: > > Subject:Re: CIR [7:32747] > > > > leave the default Cisco lmi type and it's provided by via LMI full > > status update: > > > > C7206#sh frame-relay map > > Serial5/0.18 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 18(0x12,0x420), broadcast, > > BW = 102 > > 4000 > > status defined, active > > Serial5/0.19 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 19(0x13,0x430), broadcast, > > BW = 768 > > 000 > > status defined, active > > Serial5/0.16 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 16(0x10,0x400), broadcast, > > BW = 102 > > 4000 > > status defined, active > > Serial5/0.17 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 17(0x11,0x410), broadcast, > > BW = 102 > > 4000 > > status defined, active > > Serial5/1.24 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 24(0x18,0x480), broadcast, > > BW = 768 > > 000 > > status defined, active > > Serial5/1.29 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 29(0x1D,0x4D0), broadcast, > > BW = 102 > > 4000 > > status defined, active > > Serial5/1.21 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 21(0x15,0x450), broadcast, > > BW = 768 > > 000 > > status defined, active > > > > Joaquim Lopes wrote: > > > > > > How can i check if the cir that i'm paying is what my provider its > > > delivering? > > > thanks > > -- > > David Madland > > Sr. Network Engineer > > CCIE# 2016 > > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 612-664-3367 > > > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" > -- > David Madland > Sr. Network Engineer > CCIE# 2016 > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 612-664-3367 > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32829&t=32747 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CIR [7:32747]
Agree 10% though I don't know what it has to do with CIR ;) Dave "Steven A. Ridder" wrote: > > I've never had it work. Even if I reboot. I always type it in. 10/100 > autosensing works better in my opinion. > > -- > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32828&t=32747 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 7204 [7:32814]
Have I seen any bugs? Yes of coarse but overall they are a good router with plenty of umph espcially if you VXR it. Keep in mind a VXR is useless with anything less than a NPE300. Dave Richard Tufaro wrote: > > Anyone want to share stories about an 7204? What has been your experience > with them? We may be getting ready to hook up with a few, for our WAN > concentrator. -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32827&t=32814 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE written [7:32733]
Hallo, In article , [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... > Has the test changed since the first of the year?? ..my test was on 01/04/2002, and this was the "old" test. Gerd Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32826&t=32733 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CIR [7:32747]
I understand and appreciate your concern but in the hundreds of frame connections I have done I have never seen LMI negociation fail becuse it was auto on the switches. Dave Ole Drews Jensen wrote: > > Remembering my day in hell when I had a 10/100 auto sense problem where the > STP blocked a LAN interface on my router, I was wondering how well the AUTO > LMI setting works. Is it reliable and recommendable? > > Thanks, > > Ole > > ~~~ > Ole Drews Jensen > Systems Network Manager > CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I > RWR Enterprises, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ~~~ > http://www.RouterChief.com > ~~~ > NEED A JOB ??? > http://www.oledrews.com/job > ~~~ > > -Original Message- > From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 9:22 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: CIR [7:32747] > > You would be correct. We configure our switches to auto so the > customer can choose their favorite LMI. Some providers force you to use > ANSI which wil not provide CIR, hmm I wonder why they would do that... > > Dave > > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > > > > I would have thought that this would only work if your provider also used > > Cisco LMI type?? > > > > Apart from the other suggestions, you could always ask your provider. Try > > asking whoever you deal with for support, rather than whoever you deal > > with for ordering - the support mob will hopefully check what is > > provisioned, while the ordering mob may just check what you ordered. > > Your provider may have some reporting system in place for customers that > > you can use to check - you may be able to get other reports as well. Maybe > > not, but it doesn't hurt to ask. > > > > JMcL > > - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 22/01/2002 11:47 am - > > > > "MADMAN" > > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 22/01/2002 10:13 am > > Please respond to "MADMAN" > > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > cc: > > Subject:Re: CIR [7:32747] > > > > leave the default Cisco lmi type and it's provided by via LMI full > > status update: > > > > C7206#sh frame-relay map > > Serial5/0.18 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 18(0x12,0x420), broadcast, > > BW = 102 > > 4000 > > status defined, active > > Serial5/0.19 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 19(0x13,0x430), broadcast, > > BW = 768 > > 000 > > status defined, active > > Serial5/0.16 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 16(0x10,0x400), broadcast, > > BW = 102 > > 4000 > > status defined, active > > Serial5/0.17 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 17(0x11,0x410), broadcast, > > BW = 102 > > 4000 > > status defined, active > > Serial5/1.24 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 24(0x18,0x480), broadcast, > > BW = 768 > > 000 > > status defined, active > > Serial5/1.29 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 29(0x1D,0x4D0), broadcast, > > BW = 102 > > 4000 > > status defined, active > > Serial5/1.21 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 21(0x15,0x450), broadcast, > > BW = 768 > > 000 > > status defined, active > > > > Joaquim Lopes wrote: > > > > > > How can i check if the cir that i'm paying is what my provider its > > > delivering? > > > thanks > > -- > > David Madland > > Sr. Network Engineer > > CCIE# 2016 > > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 612-664-3367 > > > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" > -- > David Madland > Sr. Network Engineer > CCIE# 2016 > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 612-664-3367 > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32825&t=32747 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: whats the diff [7:32819]
One of the big diffs is support for more mem via newer npe cards. See http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/core/7200vx/, the hardware Config link has npe info towards the bottom. Bri - Original Message - From: "Richard Tufaro" To: Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 8:12 AM Subject: whats the diff [7:32819] > Whats the Diff between an Cisco 7204 and an 7204VXR. I can't seem to find it > anywhere. When you do the config maker on Cisco's site they make you choose > that one as the only option for the 7204. Are they the same thing. According > to the docs, there ate 3 prod #'s. Cisco7204-DC, Cisco7204-CH and > Cisco7204VXR. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32823&t=32819 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Looking for Great CISCO Training Center in SJ area [7:32822]
UC Santa Cruz has an extension with a pretty nice lab in San Jose. Bri - Original Message - From: "tim" To: Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 3:30 AM Subject: Looking for Great CISCO Training Center in SJ area [7:32794] > Hi. > Would you recommend good cisco training centers covering CCIE routing & > switching? > > Thanks in advance. > > Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32822&t=32822 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Looking for Great CISCO Training Center in SJ area [7:32821]
Try to find if Kip Petersen sp? is doing training in that area. Last that I knew he had moved to MentorTech. Previous to that he worked for the folks who had been doing the NetGun program. He was going to open a SJ area training center for MentorTech. They are now out of business. Hopefully he is still teaching. FWIW He was one of the original five Cisco trainers - before Cisco farmed out training. > -Original Message- > From: tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 5:31 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Looking for Great CISCO Training Center in SJ area [7:32794] > > > Hi. > Would you recommend good cisco training centers covering CCIE > routing & > switching? > > Thanks in advance. > > Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32821&t=32821 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCDA Material [7:32818]
If you are talking about just books and study guides then Amazon.com and barnesandnoble.com can't be beat. Most of the time they will even have used materials for almost half off the cost of the new. Just make sure you are getting the exact same thing. I've never really needed any more than one of the Cisco press books and an Exam Cram. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32820&t=32818 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
whats the diff [7:32819]
Whats the Diff between an Cisco 7204 and an 7204VXR. I can't seem to find it anywhere. When you do the config maker on Cisco's site they make you choose that one as the only option for the 7204. Are they the same thing. According to the docs, there ate 3 prod #'s. Cisco7204-DC, Cisco7204-CH and Cisco7204VXR. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32819&t=32819 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCDA Material [7:32818]
Where do I find CCDA Material ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32818&t=32818 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CIR [7:32747]
I've never had it work. Even if I reboot. I always type it in. 10/100 autosensing works better in my opinion. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7204 [7:32814]
Anyone want to share stories about an 7204? What has been your experience with them? We may be getting ready to hook up with a few, for our WAN concentrator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32814&t=32814 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CIR [7:32747]
Remembering my day in hell when I had a 10/100 auto sense problem where the STP blocked a LAN interface on my router, I was wondering how well the AUTO LMI setting works. Is it reliable and recommendable? Thanks, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 9:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CIR [7:32747] You would be correct. We configure our switches to auto so the customer can choose their favorite LMI. Some providers force you to use ANSI which wil not provide CIR, hmm I wonder why they would do that... Dave "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > > I would have thought that this would only work if your provider also used > Cisco LMI type?? > > Apart from the other suggestions, you could always ask your provider. Try > asking whoever you deal with for support, rather than whoever you deal > with for ordering - the support mob will hopefully check what is > provisioned, while the ordering mob may just check what you ordered. > Your provider may have some reporting system in place for customers that > you can use to check - you may be able to get other reports as well. Maybe > not, but it doesn't hurt to ask. > > JMcL > - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 22/01/2002 11:47 am - > > "MADMAN" > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 22/01/2002 10:13 am > Please respond to "MADMAN" > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: > Subject:Re: CIR [7:32747] > > leave the default Cisco lmi type and it's provided by via LMI full > status update: > > C7206#sh frame-relay map > Serial5/0.18 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 18(0x12,0x420), broadcast, > BW = 102 > 4000 > status defined, active > Serial5/0.19 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 19(0x13,0x430), broadcast, > BW = 768 > 000 > status defined, active > Serial5/0.16 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 16(0x10,0x400), broadcast, > BW = 102 > 4000 > status defined, active > Serial5/0.17 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 17(0x11,0x410), broadcast, > BW = 102 > 4000 > status defined, active > Serial5/1.24 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 24(0x18,0x480), broadcast, > BW = 768 > 000 > status defined, active > Serial5/1.29 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 29(0x1D,0x4D0), broadcast, > BW = 102 > 4000 > status defined, active > Serial5/1.21 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 21(0x15,0x450), broadcast, > BW = 768 > 000 > status defined, active > > Joaquim Lopes wrote: > > > > How can i check if the cir that i'm paying is what my provider its > > delivering? > > thanks > -- > David Madland > Sr. Network Engineer > CCIE# 2016 > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 612-664-3367 > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32815&t=32747 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is CCIEprep on crack or what ? [7:32787]
Yes it's quite easy to do!! Been there, done that :( Dave Jim Brown wrote: > > You can definitely install a DB60 upside down. I won't even say I've watched > a trainee do it, I've done it myself. It is easier than you think, the hood > becomes distorted and it becomes even easier the next time. > > -Original Message- > From: Ozzie Sutcliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 11:35 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Is CCIEprep on crack or what ? [7:32787] > > I was looking over some troubleshooting stuff and on of the scenario's > involved a router that was fine and the admin goes to lunch. Comes back from > lunch,S0 is down and down,a show controller sees no cable . The rest of the > garbage raves on about about the DB60 being symmetrical and the cable was > installed upside down. Every DB 60 I have seen was NOT symmetrical and would > take some cutting with tin snips to install upside down. > > The 12 secenario's I saw were really advanced CCNA not even CCNP level > stuff.. Is this the standard of CCIEpreps stuff ??? > > Oz > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef] -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32813&t=32787 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CIR [7:32747]
You would be correct. We configure our switches to auto so the customer can choose their favorite LMI. Some providers force you to use ANSI which wil not provide CIR, hmm I wonder why they would do that... Dave "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > > I would have thought that this would only work if your provider also used > Cisco LMI type?? > > Apart from the other suggestions, you could always ask your provider. Try > asking whoever you deal with for support, rather than whoever you deal > with for ordering - the support mob will hopefully check what is > provisioned, while the ordering mob may just check what you ordered. > Your provider may have some reporting system in place for customers that > you can use to check - you may be able to get other reports as well. Maybe > not, but it doesn't hurt to ask. > > JMcL > - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 22/01/2002 11:47 am - > > "MADMAN" > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 22/01/2002 10:13 am > Please respond to "MADMAN" > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: > Subject:Re: CIR [7:32747] > > leave the default Cisco lmi type and it's provided by via LMI full > status update: > > C7206#sh frame-relay map > Serial5/0.18 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 18(0x12,0x420), broadcast, > BW = 102 > 4000 > status defined, active > Serial5/0.19 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 19(0x13,0x430), broadcast, > BW = 768 > 000 > status defined, active > Serial5/0.16 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 16(0x10,0x400), broadcast, > BW = 102 > 4000 > status defined, active > Serial5/0.17 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 17(0x11,0x410), broadcast, > BW = 102 > 4000 > status defined, active > Serial5/1.24 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 24(0x18,0x480), broadcast, > BW = 768 > 000 > status defined, active > Serial5/1.29 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 29(0x1D,0x4D0), broadcast, > BW = 102 > 4000 > status defined, active > Serial5/1.21 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 21(0x15,0x450), broadcast, > BW = 768 > 000 > status defined, active > > Joaquim Lopes wrote: > > > > How can i check if the cir that i'm paying is what my provider its > > delivering? > > thanks > -- > David Madland > Sr. Network Engineer > CCIE# 2016 > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 612-664-3367 > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32812&t=32747 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Switch for home lab [7:32797]
If you are ready for the big toys.. the 5K is a good way to go. If and I do mean IF you shop carefully, you can find a Cat5K for under 800 US. Dont pay extra for the pretty ones with all the covers.. Do pay attention to what cards are included. The sups come in several different flavors. The cheapest is a SupI and unless you have fiber converters, make sure it has the 10/100 ports. There is not enough difference between the I and II to justify the difference in price for a lab.. the IIIs are pretty pricy but I can see where an advanced lab would have one. On the Ethernet blades, get at least a 5213A which can do ISL. A better bet is the 5203 which will do Etherchannel(required for CCNP) Again, this will drive up the cost. I bought mine very cheaply and then added a few items as time went on. Get a 2nd switch.. a 2912 which is cheaper then the 24 port version. This switch can run 10/100 on all ports and run Etherchannel on all ports. Now you can hook the two together and have some fun. Toss in a 2620/21 and you have a router on a stick for the vlans and you have saved over 1500 bucks on the RSM. Just my opinions.. MikeS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32811&t=32797 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is CCIEprep on crack or what ? [7:32787]
You can definitely install a DB60 upside down. I won't even say I've watched a trainee do it, I've done it myself. It is easier than you think, the hood becomes distorted and it becomes even easier the next time. -Original Message- From: Ozzie Sutcliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 11:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Is CCIEprep on crack or what ? [7:32787] I was looking over some troubleshooting stuff and on of the scenario's involved a router that was fine and the admin goes to lunch. Comes back from lunch,S0 is down and down,a show controller sees no cable . The rest of the garbage raves on about about the DB60 being symmetrical and the cable was installed upside down. Every DB 60 I have seen was NOT symmetrical and would take some cutting with tin snips to install upside down. The 12 secenario's I saw were really advanced CCNA not even CCNP level stuff.. Is this the standard of CCIEpreps stuff ??? Oz [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32810&t=32787 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 1720 and VoIP [7:32807]
I don't believe so. I believe you need a 1750 which has the DSP's. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco 1720 and VoIP [7:32807]
Can a 1720 do VoIP? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32807&t=32807 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISDN connector PIN configuration [7:32802]
Here's a link on CCO that indicates the pinouts! http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_fix/cis2500/2524/ boa/boapin.htm#21253 Watch the word wrap! HTH Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sim, CT (Chee Tong) Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 7:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ISDN connector PIN configuration [7:32802] Our Telecom only install the ISDN line on their krone block and end it with a pair of wire. Can we need to patch the pair of wire into a RJ45 connector (not RJ11 ) and connect it to the ISDN U interface port and make it work. But I am not sure about the PIN configuration of the connector. Is that middle two pins , pin 4 and pin 5 like normal phone wire. == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32806&t=32802 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question regarding configuration [7:32805]
Hi, I have one customer who is having two Internet connections from two different ISPs.He want to use the second connection as backup .One of the connections are from Road runner and the other one is a frame relay fractional T1 connection terminated on a 2600 Router.I want to keep the frame relay connection as backup.The customer has one internal router,pix firewall and one VPN server.The customer want to send all internet traffic thru the PIX for security.If I want ,I can keep the PIX outside,VPN server outside interface and two Internet router's inside interfaces in one subnet FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ICND Study Materials [7:32798]
Click on my RouterChief link below and see what I did... Hth, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: Vikram Shah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 6:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ICND Study Materials [7:32798] Hello Friends, If anyone can tell is there any online study materials available for ICND.. So that i can read that study materials as i m doing some classes but throughthere study materials i cannot follow properly... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32804&t=32798 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Switch for home lab [7:32797]
I would only focus on the 5K or, as I just learned, a 1200, as you need to know the set's, show's and clear's for the big test. The other switches are just annoying with all the different commands. Get the 1200, or 5k. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISDN connector PIN configuration [7:32802]
Our Telecom only install the ISDN line on their krone block and end it with a pair of wire. Can we need to patch the pair of wire into a RJ45 connector (not RJ11 ) and connect it to the ISDN U interface port and make it work. But I am not sure about the PIN configuration of the connector. Is that middle two pins , pin 4 and pin 5 like normal phone wire. == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32802&t=32802 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sample DNS & DHCP Configs [7:32801]
Hi All, Has anyone got any sample DNS/DHCP configs they could let me have for my lab. Many Thanks Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32801&t=32801 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ATTEMPT state.....Why? [7:32788]
> Hello,In an OSPF netw. in a FR hub-and-spoke topology(RTA and RTC being > the spokes and RTB being the hub), using physical intfs. and using map > statements in the spokes, and neighbor statements, why do the spokes show > a state of Attempt/Drother for the other spoke but in the hub show the > state Full/Drother? Any ideas?? Thank you.RTA#sh ip ospf neiNeighbor > ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface > N/A 0 ATTEMPT/DROTHER-192.168.10.243 Serial0 > 6.6.6.6 1 FULL/DR 00:01:41192.168.10.242 Serial0 This indicate that RTA tried to send a Hello message to RTC, but doesn`t see the hello reply from RTC. If RTA does receive hello from RTC, the state will change to INIT. Please refer to Doyle vol I, page 438. Normally in the hub-and spoke topology, you only configure the hub to have neighbor statement to both spokes, and spoke will make an adjacency to hub only, not to the other spoke. So it better to remove the neighbour statement at both spokes. HTH Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32800&t=32788 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NAT problem on AS 5400 [7:32799]
hi all, NAT doesn't work on my AS 5400IOS version is 12.1(5) T5 .are there any problems with the IOS version??? plz advise. komy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32799&t=32799 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICND Study Materials [7:32798]
Hello Friends, If anyone can tell is there any online study materials available for ICND.. So that i can read that study materials as i m doing some classes but throughthere study materials i cannot follow properly... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32798&t=32798 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Switch for home lab [7:32797]
Could someone suggest a switch that would be good for a home lab. I cant find a cat 5k (that I can afford) but might be able to get a 2901 or 2924. Do either of those fit the bill? I have found lots in the archives about routers for the home lab but not about which switches are needed. Also would one or 2 switches be enough? It has also been suggested that I buy a 3900 token ring switch--any ideas on this? thanks stuart laubstein Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32797&t=32797 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco Interactive Mentor [7:32796]
Good Day, Has anyone had any luck using the CIM products. I have the switching CIM and have been a little disappointed with the labs. I am very confined in what commands I can enter. The simulation software doesn't even correctly reflect the changes i have made when using the show commands. Finally, VTP isn't working correctly on the switches. There are only 2 switches in my domain. Both are configured with the same domain name. I checked this about a dozen times. Actually both are configured as servers because the program would not let me configure one as a client. Anyway, to make a long storey short, it doesn't matter which switch i make changes to vlans on the changes are not seen on the second switch. Has anyone been successful with seeing VTP working properly in the CIM environment? regards, amanda Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32796&t=32796 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is CCIEprep on crack or what ? [7:32787]
Good Day Guys, I am looking for a reference for CCIE study. I am currently a CCNA and schedualed to take the Switching exam in about 2 weeks. After that , I will only need the CIT for CCNP. I noticed that you said that if you prepared well for CCNP that the CCIE wasn't that much further. I hope that is true. I have been working with cisco products for about 4 years now. I have been slow at getting certified , mostly, out of a lack of confidence Well... out of laziness and a lack of confidence. Are you a ccie regards, amanda Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32795&t=32787 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looking for Great CISCO Training Center in SJ area [7:32794]
Hi. Would you recommend good cisco training centers covering CCIE routing & switching? Thanks in advance. Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32794&t=32794 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: Stupid Question [7:32591]
INTERESTING, The 6509 Switches have the option of having NAM (Network Analysis Module) and IDS (Intrusion detection system) cards. (i.e. 6509- Switch, Router, NMS, IDS etc. on one box) >From Cisco's Web site "An illuminated hard drive activity LED indicates that the hard drive is in use." "To prevent corruption of the NAM, it is critical that the NAM run through the shutdown procedure before shutting off. If the NAM fails to respond to CLI or NAM shutdown commands, you can use the Shutdown button as an alternative shutdown method. " http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat6000/6000hw/mod_i nst/01overvw.htm#xtocid2525837 (Hard drive ?? What OS/IOS would require a hard drive... (The mind does wonder ;-) ) You cannot JUST POWER OFF SOME SWITCHES... It all depends what switching platform you have, and what options you have installed... Hope this helps, Aki -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: ?e?t??a, 21 ?a???a 2002 8:42 55 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Stupid Question [7:32591] Just turn them off or simply unplug them. Fortunately the IOS was not written by Microsoft and nothing will get corrupted!!! -Serge. Richard Tufaro wrote: > > What is the proper way to shutdown a router? not reload, but > shutdown? Just flick the switch? Seems to brutal to me. > > Richard Tufaro - MCSE - GSEC- CCNA > Network Engineer - Anda Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > MSN IM - [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32792&t=32591 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MZMaker & IOS c2500-js-l.12.1.10 [7:32748]
Lost me there. 16Mb is max on 2500's. Surely it's not a 2500 image which won't run on any 2500's? If he had 16Mb available for RAM it would be fine. Gaz ""Jason"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > You don't have enuff DRAM. Even if you have full 16 meg, it is not enuff > > JW > > ""Will Francis"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi Guys > > > > I'm just in the process of building my home lab and I read quite a few > > previous posting suggesting that one can use MZMAKER to compress > enterprise > > version of IOS 12.1 to run from a 2500 series router with 8mb flash and > > 16mb Dram. > > > > I just tried this and my router just keep on rebooting itself, any ideas > at > > all will be greatly appreciated. > > > > System Bootstrap, Version 11.0(10c), SOFTWARE > > Copyright (c) 1986-1996 by cisco Systems > > 2500 processor with 14336 Kbytes of main memory > > > > %SYS-4-CONFIG_NEWER: Configurations from version 12.0 may not be correctly > > understood.F3: 8564+6636705+165012 at 0x1000 > > > > Error : memory requirements exceed available memory > > Memory required : 0x00E392A4 > > > > Exception: Software forced crash at 0x111E (PC) > > > > > > Thanks in advance !!! > > > > -- > > Regards, > > > > Stanley. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32791&t=32748 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
