CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Abigail]

Every now and then, I get a "CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report". Now, I
guess there could be some value in that, but almost every time I get
such a report, it's about a module failing in 5.9.5.

5.9.5 was a development release leading up to 5.10.0. It had issues.
Of course there will be failures. 5.9.x is gone, and sending people
reports about modules failing in dead development tracks of perl isn't,
IMO, useful. In fact, it's counterproductive, as people will start
ignoring the reports - missing the reports when it is useful.

Furthermore, the complete report repeatedly suggests a resource,
http://cpantest.grango.org/wiki/CPANAuthorNotes, to use for suggesting
getting FAIL reports. However, the entire grango.org domain seems
to be non-existent.


Abigail

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[M W487]

Sorry to bother you.  I apologize.  It appears that the automated test
software sometimes does strange things.  I did not write it, but I use it.

On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Daniel Pfeiffer wrote:

> la 16.02.2009 03:03 CPAN Tester Report Server skribis:
>
>> Dear Daniel Pfeiffer,
>>
>> ...
>>
>> mpp-1.50-090212:
>> - cygwin-thread-multi-64int / :
>>  - FAIL http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/3299277
>>
> This page twice shows the tarball extraction (which it wrongly labels with
> make test).  In both cases the output is cut off somewhere in the middle of
> a line (in the second case after about half as many files as in the first),
> and the actual testing doesn't seem to even have started.  I have received
> success reports for this, so the tarball on CPAN is not corrupt.
>
> coralament / best Grötens / liebe Grüße / best regards / elkorajn salutojn
> Daniel Pfeiffer
>
> --
> lerne / learn / apprends / lär dig / ucz sięEsperanto:
>   http://lernu.net  /  http://ikurso.net
>
>

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[David Golden]

For what it's worth -- this type of thing has been seen before and
from both CPANPLUS and CPAN::Reporter based testers.  It's as if two
(or more) emails were smashed together into one.  Our hypothesis is
that there is something happening in the way Net::SMTP talks to
certain mail servers.

-- David

2009/2/18 M W487 :
> Sorry to bother you.  I apologize.  It appears that the automated test
> software sometimes does strange things.  I did not write it, but I use it.
>
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Daniel Pfeiffer wrote:
>
>> la 16.02.2009 03:03 CPAN Tester Report Server skribis:
>>
>>> Dear Daniel Pfeiffer,
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> mpp-1.50-090212:
>>> - cygwin-thread-multi-64int / :
>>>  - FAIL http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/3299277
>>>
>> This page twice shows the tarball extraction (which it wrongly labels with
>> make test).  In both cases the output is cut off somewhere in the middle of
>> a line (in the second case after about half as many files as in the first),
>> and the actual testing doesn't seem to even have started.  I have received
>> success reports for this, so the tarball on CPAN is not corrupt.
>>
>> coralament / best Grötens / liebe Grüße / best regards / elkorajn salutojn
>> Daniel Pfeiffer
>>
>> --
>> lerne / learn / apprends / lär dig / ucz sięEsperanto:
>>   http://lernu.net  /  http://ikurso.net
>>
>>
>

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[M W487]

I was going to send a message to the Net::SMTP author, when I noticed that
there are two related reports.  Is that any kind of clue?

http://groups.google.com/group/perl.cpan.testers/search?group=perl.cpan.testers&q=mw487.yahoo.com+%22feb+14%22+mpp&qt_g=Search+this+group

http://tinyurl.com/ctdowu

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 8:20 AM, David Golden  wrote:

> For what it's worth -- this type of thing has been seen before and
> from both CPANPLUS and CPAN::Reporter based testers.  It's as if two
> (or more) emails were smashed together into one.  Our hypothesis is
> that there is something happening in the way Net::SMTP talks to
> certain mail servers.
>
> -- David
>
> 2009/2/18 M W487 :
> > Sorry to bother you.  I apologize.  It appears that the automated test
> > software sometimes does strange things.  I did not write it, but I use
> it.
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Daniel Pfeiffer  >wrote:
> >
> >> la 16.02.2009 03:03 CPAN Tester Report Server skribis:
> >>
> >>> Dear Daniel Pfeiffer,
> >>>
> >>> ...
> >>>
> >>> mpp-1.50-090212:
> >>> - cygwin-thread-multi-64int / :
> >>>  - FAIL http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/3299277
> >>>
> >> This page twice shows the tarball extraction (which it wrongly labels
> with
> >> make test).  In both cases the output is cut off somewhere in the middle
> of
> >> a line (in the second case after about half as many files as in the
> first),
> >> and the actual testing doesn't seem to even have started.  I have
> received
> >> success reports for this, so the tarball on CPAN is not corrupt.
> >>
> >> coralament / best Grötens / liebe Grüße / best regards / elkorajn
> salutojn
> >> Daniel Pfeiffer
> >>
> >> --
> >> lerne / learn / apprends / lär dig / ucz sięEsperanto:
> >>   http://lernu.net  /  http://ikurso.net
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Barbie]

Hi Abigail,

> Every now and then, I get a "CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report". Now, I
> guess there could be some value in that, but almost every time I get
> such a report, it's about a module failing in 5.9.5.

The mailer isn't intelligent enough to know what perls it should or
shouldn't tell you about by default. However, you can set preferences
(via https://prefs.cpantesters.org) to ignore 5.9.* versions.

When I have a little more time, I'll set up a default of production
releases only for those with no specific settings for their summaries.

> Furthermore, the complete report repeatedly suggests a resource,
> http://cpantest.grango.org/wiki/CPANAuthorNotes, to use for suggesting
> getting FAIL reports. However, the entire grango.org domain seems
> to be non-existent.

Thanks for letting me know. I'd missed these in recent checks. I will
try and get these update today. The grango.org is my test domain, which
was previously used to host the wiki and stats sites.

Cheers,
Barbie.
-- 
Birmingham Perl Mongers <http://birmingham.pm.org>
Memoirs Of A Roadie <http://barbie.missbarbell.co.uk>
CPAN Testers Blog <http://blog.cpantesters.org>

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Barbie]

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 02:16:27PM +0100, Barbie wrote:
> Hi Abigail,
> 
> > Furthermore, the complete report repeatedly suggests a resource,
> > http://cpantest.grango.org/wiki/CPANAuthorNotes, to use for suggesting
> > getting FAIL reports. However, the entire grango.org domain seems
> > to be non-existent.
> 
> Thanks for letting me know. I'd missed these in recent checks. I will
> try and get these update today. The grango.org is my test domain, which
> was previously used to host the wiki and stats sites.

As it turns out this is printed via CPAN-Reporter. This was updated in
1.1706 to use the correct URL. It is likely the tester who posted the
report you saw is using an older version of CPAN-Reporter.

Cheers,
Barbie.
-- 
Birmingham Perl Mongers 
Memoirs Of A Roadie 
CPAN Testers Blog 

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Johan Vromans]

[Quoting CPAN Tester Report Server, on January 16 2010, 21:13, in "CPAN Testers 
Daily S"]
> Dear Johan Vromans,
> 
> EekBoek-1.04.06:
> - alpha-linux / 5.10.0:
>   - FAIL http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/6656308

... and several more ...

All tests fail since some mandatory modules, that are
**clearly**marked**as**mandatory**, do not get installed for the
test, e.g.:

  Checking whether your kit is complete...
  Looks good

  Checking prerequisites...
   - ERROR: DBI is not installed

This should trigger CPANPLUS to install it, shouldn't it?

  ... and then, later ...

  It was observed that the test suite seem to fail without these modules:

  DBI

  As such, adding the prerequisite module(s) to 'PREREQ_PM' in your
  Makefile.PL should solve this problem.  For example:

I therefore must assume it's a TESTER problem.

-- Johan

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Andreas J. Koenig]

> On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 22:02:46 +0100, j...@cpan.org (Johan Vromans) said:

  > I therefore must assume it's a TESTER problem.

Yes, we're suffering already for a few days but today Barbie fixed the
testers master database by hiding the broken reports that come from a
broken and so far unstopped broken test machine.

I'm sure I'm speaking for all involved parties when I say we're very
sorry for the mess.

-- 
andreas

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[David Cantrell]

On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:53:38PM +0100, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 22:02:46 +0100, j...@cpan.org (Johan Vromans) said:
> > http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2010/01/msg6656308.html
> > I therefore must assume it's a TESTER problem.
> Yes, we're suffering already for a few days but today Barbie fixed the
> testers master database by hiding the broken reports that come from a
> broken and so far unstopped broken test machine.

But this is one of Chris's reports, not APOCAL's.

-- 
David Cantrell | London Perl Mongers Deputy Chief Heretic

Today's previously unreported paraphilia is tomorrow's Internet sensation

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[David Golden]

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:47 PM, David Cantrell  wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:53:38PM +0100, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
>> On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 22:02:46 +0100, j...@cpan.org (Johan Vromans) said:
>> > http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2010/01/msg6656308.html
>> > I therefore must assume it's a TESTER problem.
>> Yes, we're suffering already for a few days but today Barbie fixed the
>> testers master database by hiding the broken reports that come from a
>> broken and so far unstopped broken test machine.
>
> But this is one of Chris's reports, not APOCAL's.

Yes -- that pretty clearly should have been discarded and not sent at
all.  There's something about 'prereq_data' not being recognized.

Aha!  EekBoek bundles M::B 0.28, which didn't have 'prereq_data'.

Chris -- I think CPANPLUS needs to check the exit code of 'Build
prereq_data' and fall back on scraping _build/prereqs if it's not OK.
Never underestimate the ability of authors/users to find the wrong
module, I guess.  :-)

Johan -- Would you please consider updating the bundled M::B?  You
might want to see if the instructions in Module::Build::Bundling are
sufficient to automate it for you easily.

David

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[David Golden]

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:13 AM, Johan Vromans  wrote:
> First is the problem that inc::latest requires a packlist for M::B. I
> do not have the faintest idea what should go into the packlist. Perl
> packlists contain absolute file names. What file names should go in
> the packlist for inc::latest?

It's just the packlist that gets installed with Module::Build.  I.e.
by ExtUtils::Packlist.  All this means is that you can't bundle on a
Perl that came with M::B 0.36+ because there are no packlists for
modules distributed with the Perl core.  (That is an issue I haven't
had a chance to pursue with p5p.)

> Second problem is that newer M::B require versions of perl modules
> that are not yet normally found in distros:
>
>  ExtUtils::CBuilder (0.24) is installed, but we need version >= 0.27
>  ExtUtils::ParseXS (2.18_02) is installed, but we need version >= 2.21
>  ExtUtils::Manifest (1.51_01) is installed, but we prefer to have 1.54
>  YAML::Tiny (1.31) is installed, but we need version >= 1.38
>  ExtUtils::Install (1.44) is installed, but we need version >= 1.54
>  ExtUtils::Installed (1.43) is installed, but we need version >= 1.999
>  Software::License is not installed

That's a fair point.  All of those would need to be bundled as well.
Bundling is still "experimental" for Module::Build.

> What minimal version of M::B has sufficient support for prereq ?

0.32

> As a side note: Do I really need things like E::CBuilder and
> E::ParseXS to install a perl-only module?

No -- but Module::Build has to support both Perl and XS modules and we
can't guarantee sane behavior across all platforms without them.  In
the past, when they were optional, people would install Module::Build
and then wind up unable to install XS modules because they didn't have
those modules.  Now, when you install Module::Build you get a known
working toolchain configuration.

More generally -- a preferred way to deal with a Module::Build
dependency is to add it to configure_requires in META.yml.

Or, since you have a Makefile.PL, you could add Build.PL to your
MANIFEST.SKIP file and only ship the Makefile.PL.  You'd have Build.PL
for your use as an author, but would avoid Module::Build being an
install-time dependency for your users.

David

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Johan Vromans]

[Quoting David Golden, on January 19 2010, 13:15, in "Re: CPAN Testers Dai"]
> Johan -- Would you please consider updating the bundled M::B?  You
> might want to see if the instructions in Module::Build::Bundling are
> sufficient to automate it for you easily.

I'd love to say "no problem", but in fact I do run into several
problems when I try to do that.

First is the problem that inc::latest requires a packlist for M::B. I
do not have the faintest idea what should go into the packlist. Perl
packlists contain absolute file names. What file names should go in
the packlist for inc::latest?

Second problem is that newer M::B require versions of perl modules
that are not yet normally found in distros:

  ExtUtils::CBuilder (0.24) is installed, but we need version >= 0.27
  ExtUtils::ParseXS (2.18_02) is installed, but we need version >= 2.21
  ExtUtils::Manifest (1.51_01) is installed, but we prefer to have 1.54
  YAML::Tiny (1.31) is installed, but we need version >= 1.38
  ExtUtils::Install (1.44) is installed, but we need version >= 1.54
  ExtUtils::Installed (1.43) is installed, but we need version >= 1.999
  Software::License is not installed

What minimal version of M::B has sufficient support for prereq ?

As a side note: Do I really need things like E::CBuilder and
E::ParseXS to install a perl-only module?

-- Johan

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[David Golden]

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Johan Vromans  wrote:
> [Quoting David Golden, on January 21 2010, 06:30, in "Re: CPAN Testers Dai"]
>> It's just the packlist that gets installed with Module::Build.  I.e.
>> by ExtUtils::Packlist.  All this means is that you can't bundle on a
>> Perl that came with M::B 0.36+ because there are no packlists for
>> modules distributed with the Perl core.  (That is an issue I haven't
>> had a chance to pursue with p5p.)
>
> Again, does that mean I have to include a packlist with absolute file
> names derived from the build system that may (will) not correspond to
> the file names used on the target system?

No -- the packlist is used to determine which files to bundle.  It's
actually remarkably hard to know what files belong to a given module
once they've been installed.  Packlists sort of work, but aren't
ideal.  I suspect the ultimate answer is to treat inc/ like a
local::lib directory and install things from original CPAN
distributions (with dependencies).

It reminds me of that line in Aliens: "I say we take off and nuke the
site from orbit -- it's the only way to be sure"

> Thanks for the answers, pointers, patience, and the nice tools.

You're welcome.  Thanks for being patient with the evolving state of
tools and offering constructive complaints instead of just saying "you
suck!"  :-)

David

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Johan Vromans]

[Quoting David Golden, on January 21 2010, 06:30, in "Re: CPAN Testers Dai"]
> It's just the packlist that gets installed with Module::Build.  I.e.
> by ExtUtils::Packlist.  All this means is that you can't bundle on a
> Perl that came with M::B 0.36+ because there are no packlists for
> modules distributed with the Perl core.  (That is an issue I haven't
> had a chance to pursue with p5p.)

Again, does that mean I have to include a packlist with absolute file
names derived from the build system that may (will) not correspond to
the file names used on the target system?

> > What minimal version of M::B has sufficient support for prereq ?
> 
> 0.32

Okay, I'll try this first.

> Or, since you have a Makefile.PL, you could add Build.PL to your
> MANIFEST.SKIP file and only ship the Makefile.PL.  You'd have Build.PL
> for your use as an author, but would avoid Module::Build being an
> install-time dependency for your users.

That could be worth an investigation.

Thanks for the answers, pointers, patience, and the nice tools.

-- Johan

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Johan Vromans]

[Quoting David Golden, on January 21 2010, 08:22, in "Re: CPAN Testers Dai"]
> You're welcome.  Thanks for being patient with the evolving state of
> tools and offering constructive complaints instead of just saying "you
> suck!"  :-)

I might not always agree with the way M::B and friend try to achieve
their goals but I very much appreciate the work you do to produce
something sensible that actually works. So keep on.

-- Johan

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Chris 'BinGOs' Williams]

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 01:15:10PM -0500, David Golden wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:47 PM, David Cantrell  
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:53:38PM +0100, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> >> On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 22:02:46 +0100, j...@cpan.org (Johan Vromans) said:
> >> > http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2010/01/msg6656308.html
> >> > I therefore must assume it's a TESTER problem.
> >> Yes, we're suffering already for a few days but today Barbie fixed the
> >> testers master database by hiding the broken reports that come from a
> >> broken and so far unstopped broken test machine.
> >
> > But this is one of Chris's reports, not APOCAL's.
> 
> Yes -- that pretty clearly should have been discarded and not sent at
> all.  There's something about 'prereq_data' not being recognized.
> 
> Aha!  EekBoek bundles M::B 0.28, which didn't have 'prereq_data'.
> 
> Chris -- I think CPANPLUS needs to check the exit code of 'Build
> prereq_data' and fall back on scraping _build/prereqs if it's not OK.
> Never underestimate the ability of authors/users to find the wrong
> module, I guess.  :-)

And there I was thinking I had already done that in CPANPLUS::Dist::Build
which is the culprit

  Revision history for Perl extension CPANPLUS::Dist::Build.

  0.44 Wed Nov 18 12:37:03 GMT 2009
- Make the prereq resolving fallback to _build/ querying 
  if the 'prereq_data' action fails. Spotted by Johan Vromans.

*sigh*

-- 
Chris Williams
aka BinGOs
PGP ID 0x4658671F
http://www.gumbynet.org.uk
==


pgp9Bc7TSqyoH.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Chris 'BinGOs' Williams]

On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 06:29:41AM +, Chris 'BinGOs' Williams wrote:
> 
>   Revision history for Perl extension CPANPLUS::Dist::Build.
> 
>   0.44 Wed Nov 18 12:37:03 GMT 2009
> - Make the prereq resolving fallback to _build/ querying 
>   if the 'prereq_data' action fails. Spotted by Johan Vromans.
> 
> *sigh*
> 

Further to this I have just uploaded CPANPLUS-Dist-Build-0.46 to CPAN.

There was a flaw in my previous logic which I have actually tested this time
against EekBoek.

Thanks to Johan for his patience.

-- 
Chris Williams
aka BinGOs
PGP ID 0x4658671F
http://www.gumbynet.org.uk
==


pgpnMSkgNFJuS.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[David Golden]

On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Johan Vromans  wrote:
> On a related topic...
>
> I sync my CPAN with cpantesters, and I noticed that in
> modules/by-module/Module there's M::B 0.2804 through 0.32 .
> (All Ken's and Eric's)
>
> In authors/id/D/DA/DAGOLDEN there's M::B 0.33_01 through 0.3603 .
>
> Shouldn't the newer versions also be in modules/by-module/Module ?

The mysteries of PAUSE are deep.  :-)

Andreas -- are you following this thread?

-- David

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Johan Vromans]

[Quoting Chris 'BinGOs' Williams, on January 23 2010, 08:06, in "Re: CPAN 
Testers Dai"]
> There was a flaw in my previous logic which I have actually tested
> this time against EekBoek.

Did you use 1.04.06 for testing? 1.04.06.01 has been upgraded to
contain M::B 0.32.

-- Johan

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Johan Vromans]

On a related topic...

I sync my CPAN with cpantesters, and I noticed that in
modules/by-module/Module there's M::B 0.2804 through 0.32 .
(All Ken's and Eric's)

In authors/id/D/DA/DAGOLDEN there's M::B 0.33_01 through 0.3603 .

Shouldn't the newer versions also be in modules/by-module/Module ?

-- Johan

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Barbie]

On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 01:06:22PM +0100, Johan Vromans wrote:
> On a related topic...
> 
> I sync my CPAN with cpantesters, and I noticed that in
> modules/by-module/Module there's M::B 0.2804 through 0.32 .
> (All Ken's and Eric's)
> 
> In authors/id/D/DA/DAGOLDEN there's M::B 0.33_01 through 0.3603 .
> 
> Shouldn't the newer versions also be in modules/by-module/Module ?

They should. I'll restart the sync in a bit and see if it captures the
missing files. It uses Andreas' special rsync distribution to mirror
authors and modules directories directly from PAUSE.

Cheers,
Barbie.
-- 
Birmingham Perl Mongers 
Memoirs Of A Roadie 
CPAN Testers Blog 
YAPC Conference Surveys 

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Barbie]

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:35:05AM +, Barbie wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 01:06:22PM +0100, Johan Vromans wrote:
> > On a related topic...
> > 
> > I sync my CPAN with cpantesters, and I noticed that in
> > modules/by-module/Module there's M::B 0.2804 through 0.32 .
> > (All Ken's and Eric's)
> > 
> > In authors/id/D/DA/DAGOLDEN there's M::B 0.33_01 through 0.3603 .
> > 
> > Shouldn't the newer versions also be in modules/by-module/Module ?
> 
> They should. I'll restart the sync in a bit and see if it captures the
> missing files. It uses Andreas' special rsync distribution to mirror
> authors and modules directories directly from PAUSE.

I've now restarted the sync and although it seemed to update a few
things, mostly CHECKSUM files, it still hasn't referenced the
Module-Build files.

Andreas does PAUSE have these files in the modules/by-module/Module
directory?

Cheers,
Barbie.
-- 
Birmingham Perl Mongers 
Memoirs Of A Roadie 
CPAN Testers Blog 
YAPC Conference Surveys 

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Barbie]

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:51:34AM +, Barbie wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:35:05AM +, Barbie wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 01:06:22PM +0100, Johan Vromans wrote:
> > > On a related topic...
> > > 
> > > I sync my CPAN with cpantesters, and I noticed that in
> > > modules/by-module/Module there's M::B 0.2804 through 0.32 .
> > > (All Ken's and Eric's)
> > > 
> > > In authors/id/D/DA/DAGOLDEN there's M::B 0.33_01 through 0.3603 .
> > > 
> > > Shouldn't the newer versions also be in modules/by-module/Module ?
> > 
> > They should. I'll restart the sync in a bit and see if it captures the
> > missing files. It uses Andreas' special rsync distribution to mirror
> > authors and modules directories directly from PAUSE.
> 
> I've now restarted the sync and although it seemed to update a few
> things, mostly CHECKSUM files, it still hasn't referenced the
> Module-Build files.
> 
> Andreas does PAUSE have these files in the modules/by-module/Module
> directory?

I think I see where the problem lies. The RECENT files in /modules only
list the index files, none of the actual files to update. Has something
changed in the last month regards how these are updated?

The /authors file list:

-rw-r--r-- 1 barbie users23844 2010-01-25 12:02
authors/RECENT-1d.yaml
-rw-r--r-- 1 barbie users 4886 2010-01-25 12:04
authors/RECENT-1h.yaml
-rw-r--r-- 1 barbie users   749404 2010-01-25 07:59
authors/RECENT-1M.yaml
-rw-r--r-- 1 barbie users  2348521 2010-01-19 06:02
authors/RECENT-1Q.yaml
-rw-r--r-- 1 barbie users   200588 2010-01-25 07:59
authors/RECENT-1W.yaml
-rw-r--r-- 1 barbie users  6195539 2009-12-28 22:55
authors/RECENT-1Y.yaml
-rw-r--r-- 1 barbie users 8397 2010-01-25 12:04
authors/RECENT-6h.yaml
lrwxrwxrwx 1 barbie users   14 2008-10-11 09:52
authors/RECENT.recent -> RECENT-1h.yaml
-rw-r--r-- 1 barbie users 15844339 2009-11-23 11:09
authors/RECENT-Z.yaml

but /modules only has:

-rw-r--r-- 1 barbie users 1294 2010-01-25 11:53 modules/RECENT-1d.yaml
-rw-r--r-- 1 barbie users  910 2010-01-25 11:53 modules/RECENT-1h.yaml
-rw-r--r-- 1 barbie users 1291 2010-01-25 11:25 modules/RECENT-1W.yaml
lrwxrwxrwx 1 barbie users   14 2008-10-11 10:47 modules/RECENT.recent ->
RECENT-1h.yaml
-rw-r--r-- 1 barbie users 1273 2010-01-24 22:55 modules/RECENT-Z.yaml

Are these correct?

Cheers,
Barbie.
-- 
Birmingham Perl Mongers 
Memoirs Of A Roadie 
CPAN Testers Blog 
YAPC Conference Surveys 

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Andreas J. Koenig]

(Apologies for the late reply, I had written this answer but missed to
send it out)

> On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:17:28 -0500, David Golden  said:

  > On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Johan Vromans  wrote:
 >> On a related topic...
 >> 
 >> I sync my CPAN with cpantesters, and I noticed that in
 >> modules/by-module/Module there's M::B 0.2804 through 0.32 .
 >> (All Ken's and Eric's)
 >> 
 >> In authors/id/D/DA/DAGOLDEN there's M::B 0.33_01 through 0.3603 .
 >> 
 >> Shouldn't the newer versions also be in modules/by-module/Module ?

  > The mysteries of PAUSE are deep.  :-)

  > Andreas -- are you following this thread?

The by-module/ and by-category/ symlink trees were a compromise. Before
search.cpan.org existed the symlink trees were requested by people who
could not imagine what a search engine might look like three years
before google was born.

It's high time to kill them. Not only because they are misconceptions,
also because they actually never worked correctly.

-- 
andreas

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Andreas J. Koenig]

> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:06:46 +, Barbie  
> said:

  > but /modules only has:

  > -rw-r--r-- 1 barbie users 1294 2010-01-25 11:53 modules/RECENT-1d.yaml
  > -rw-r--r-- 1 barbie users  910 2010-01-25 11:53 modules/RECENT-1h.yaml
  > -rw-r--r-- 1 barbie users 1291 2010-01-25 11:25 modules/RECENT-1W.yaml
  > lrwxrwxrwx 1 barbie users   14 2008-10-11 10:47 modules/RECENT.recent ->
  > RECENT-1h.yaml
  > -rw-r--r-- 1 barbie users 1273 2010-01-24 22:55 modules/RECENT-Z.yaml

  > Are these correct?

Yes, these are correct. modules/ is both buggy and overdue to be ripped
out of CPAN. And the recentfiles mirroring code is not covering the
symlink tree, only the handful of files that are not symlinks.

-- 
andreas

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Barbie]

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:16:26PM +0100, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:06:46 +, Barbie  
> > said:
> 
>   > but /modules only has:
> 
>   > -rw-r--r-- 1 barbie users 1294 2010-01-25 11:53 modules/RECENT-1d.yaml
>   > -rw-r--r-- 1 barbie users  910 2010-01-25 11:53 modules/RECENT-1h.yaml
>   > -rw-r--r-- 1 barbie users 1291 2010-01-25 11:25 modules/RECENT-1W.yaml
>   > lrwxrwxrwx 1 barbie users   14 2008-10-11 10:47 modules/RECENT.recent ->
>   > RECENT-1h.yaml
>   > -rw-r--r-- 1 barbie users 1273 2010-01-24 22:55 modules/RECENT-Z.yaml
> 
>   > Are these correct?
> 
> Yes, these are correct. modules/ is both buggy and overdue to be ripped
> out of CPAN. And the recentfiles mirroring code is not covering the
> symlink tree, only the handful of files that are not symlinks.

Thanks, for the update. I can see authors/ is complete, which is the
core part of the repo for distributions.

Perhaps the discussion for removing modules/ needs to move to
cpan-workers.

Cheers,
Barbie.
-- 
Birmingham Perl Mongers 
Memoirs Of A Roadie 
CPAN Testers Blog 
YAPC Conference Surveys 

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Alex J. Avriette]

Hi folks... While Net::TDMA is not the worlds most fabulous module (and in
fact its test coverage is probably less than 1%), all your failures were
"out of memory." I test at home on a 64-bit Snow Leopard Server Mac with
20gb of ram and untold terabytes of disk. The module is intended to
*teach*people how to work with TDMA, how the protocol works, and so
on. I can
create a new test, t/00_memory.t or something, to indicate whether this is
going to work at all, but the thing is, in order to test an entire TDMA
"Day", we have to *construct* one. If the user hasn't got the juice, it's
not going to work real well.

Here's a test from mine:

number of cores available:  8
users on system:   12
system load averages:   0.18 0.28 0.15
distinct processes on system:  106
actual cpu idle percentage: 1

thunder:Net-TDMA-0.1pre alex$ make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e"
"test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
t/00_dayok 1/0

This may take a while.
# Your first test, with specified parameters, took 39 seconds.

This, too, may take a while.
t/00_dayok 8/0# The arbitrarily constructed day took 45 seconds to
complete.
# Nominally this would take place in 1/32 of a second, or .031s.
# Which is why /usr/bin/perl is probably not fast enough for this.
t/00_dayok

All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=9, 90 wallclock secs (82.83 cusr +  7.31 csys = 90.14 CPU)
thunder:Net-TDMA-0.1pre alex$



--
Alex J Avriette
http://www.spunfr.com/ (Harder Better Faster Stronger)
http://www.linkedin.com/in/avriette  (+1 858 3677293)



On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 9:29 PM, CPAN Tester Report Server <
do_not_re...@cpantesters.org> wrote:

> Dear Alex J. Avriette,
>
> Please find below the latest reports for your distributions, generated by
> CPAN Testers, from the last 24 hours.
>
> To set your preferences for what you wish to have reported in this Daily
> Summary, please visit the CPAN Testers Preferences system at
> https://prefs.cpantesters.org.
>
>
> Net-TDMA-0.1pre:
> - IP35-irix-64int / 5.8.8:
>  - FAIL http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/7031347
>
> - alpha-netbsd / 5.10.0:
>  - FAIL http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/7033635
>
> - darwin-thread-multi-2level / 5.10.1:
>  - FAIL http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/7031357
>
> - i386-freebsd / 5.10.1:
>  - FAIL http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/7025754
>
> - i386-freebsd-thread-multi / 5.10.1:
>  - FAIL http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/7031307
>
> - i86pc-solaris-64int / 5.10.1:
>  - FAIL http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/7028046
>
> - i86pc-solaris-64int / 5.11.5:
>  - FAIL http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/7028169
>
> - x86_64-linux-thread-multi / 5.11.5:
>  - FAIL http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/7030785
>
> - x86_64-linux-thread-multi / 5.8.9:
>  - FAIL http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/7030798
>
> - x86_64-linux-thread-multi-ld / 5.11.5:
>  - FAIL http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/7025605
>
>
>
> If you have an issue with a particular report, or wish to gain further
> information from the tester, please use the 'Find A Tester' tool at
> http://stats.cpantesters.org/cpanmail.html, using the NNTP ID of the
> report to locate the correct email address.
>
> If you wish to unsubscribe from these notifications, please login to the
> CPAN Testers Preferences system, with your PAUSE credentials, and disable
> CPAN Testers notifications permanently or temporarily. If you have problems
> with accessing the site, please contact Barbie  and
> request to be removed from the automatic mailings.
>
> Thanks,
> The CPAN Testers
> --
> Reports: http://www.cpantesters.org
> Statistics:  http://stats.cpantesters.org
> Wiki:http://wiki.cpantesters.org
> Preferences: https://prefs.cpantesters.org
>

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[David Golden]

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:51 PM, Alex J. Avriette  wrote:
> I can create a new test, t/00_memory.t or something, to indicate whether this 
> is
> going to work at all, but the thing is, in order to test an entire TDMA
> "Day", we have to *construct* one. If the user hasn't got the juice, it's
> not going to work real well.

Hi, Alex.  You have a really unique module and it's likely not very
well suited for the kind of automated testing that is useful for other
modules -- none of the smokers are going to have that kind of memory.
The best thing to do is probably to just tell CPAN Testers to skip
your module entirely.  In your Makefile.PL, add this line right after
your use() statements before the call to WriteMakefile():

exit 0 if $ENV{AUTOMATED_TESTING};

This will exit normally without creating a Makefile.  That is a signal
to CPAN Testers to abort without sending a fail report.  (Don't exit()
with a non-zero code or you'll get more FAIL reports!)

Also, as an unrelated note, I strongly suggest that you don't use
non-numerics in your distribution version.  E.g. "0.1pre".  This is
non-standard.  You also don't have a $VERSION set in your modules,
which makes it impossible for a CPAN client to determine whether to
install new versions when you release them.

Again, I strongly encourage you to set "our $VERSION=0.1" in your main
module and let ExtUtils::MakeMaker pick up the version using
"VERSION_FROM".

Regards,
David Golden

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[David Cantrell]

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:51:57PM -0400, Alex J. Avriette wrote:
> Hi folks... While Net::TDMA is not the worlds most fabulous module (and in
> fact its test coverage is probably less than 1%), all your failures were
> "out of memory." I test at home on a 64-bit Snow Leopard Server Mac with
> 20gb of ram and untold terabytes of disk...
>
> > Net-TDMA-0.1pre:
> > - IP35-irix-64int / 5.8.8:
> >  - FAIL http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/7031347

That was me.  That machine has 20GB of RAM.  At the time the test
aborted, it still had 13GB free, and there's no ulimit in place.

-- 
David Cantrell | Nth greatest programmer in the world

Vegetarian: n: a person who, due to malnutrition caused by
  poor lifestyle choices, is eight times more likely to
  catch TB than a normal person

Fw: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Salvador Fandino]

Hello,

Several links in the "CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report" message below do not 
work or do not point to the expected report.

Regards,

  - Salva


- Forwarded Message 
> From: CPAN Tester Report Server 
> To: Salvador Fandino Garcia 
> Sent: Thu, June 3, 2010 6:54:54 AM
> Subject: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report
> 
> Dear Salvador Fandino Garcia,

Please find below the latest reports for 
> your distributions, generated by CPAN Testers, from the last 24 hours. 
> 

To set your preferences for what you wish to have reported in this Daily 
> Summary, please visit the CPAN Testers Preferences system at 
> href="https://prefs.cpantesters.org"; target=_blank 
> >https://prefs.cpantesters.org.


Net-OpenSSH-0.47:
- 
> i386-freebsd / v5.12.0:
  - FAIL 
> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/8a86be5c-47d8-11df-a870-f3f4225e3911

- 
> i686-linux / v5.12.0:
  - UNKNOWN 
> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/209b3884-51aa-11df-b6d3-2edcca64c448

  
> - UNKNOWN 
> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/acd5907a-51b3-11df-9007-28d5ca64c448

- 
> i686-linux / v5.13.0:
  - UNKNOWN 
> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/c0ecc84e-51a9-11df-b6d3-2edcca64c448

  
> - UNKNOWN 
> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/b6477b32-51b3-11df-9007-28d5ca64c448



Sort-Key-DateTime-0.06:
- 
> i686-linux / v5.13.0:
  - FAIL 
> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/d0a9a722-4ebe-11df-89b3-b90ecb64c448

- 
> x86_64-linux / v5.8.6:
  - FAIL 
> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/9f3fd114-5217-11df-b12e-350c7b45d684

- 
> x86_64-linux-gnu-thread-multi / v5.10.0:
  - FAIL 
> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/2386b0a6-5217-11df-b12e-350c7b45d684



Win32-Socketpair-0.01:
- 
> i386-freebsd / v5.8.9:
  - NA 
> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/0f744fac-48d9-11df-9759-eb5590befd91

- 
> i386-freebsd-thread-multi-64int / v5.12.0:
  - NA 
> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/a2241316-4fb2-11df-862b-995f90befd91



If 
> you have an issue with a particular report, or wish to gain further 
> information 
> from the tester, please use the 'Find A Tester' tool at 
> http://stats.cpantesters.org/cpanmail.html, using the ID or GUID of the 
> report, 
> as listed above, to locate the correct email address.

If you wish to 
> unsubscribe from these notifications, please login to the CPAN Testers 
> Preferences system, with your PAUSE credentials, and disable CPAN Testers 
> notifications permanently or temporarily. If you have problems with accessing 
> the site, please contact Barbie <
> href="mailto:bar...@cpan.org";>bar...@cpan.org> and request to be removed 
> from the automatic mailings. 

Thanks,
The CPAN Testers
-- 
> 
Reports: http://www.cpantesters.org
Statistics:  
> http://stats.cpantesters.org
Wiki:
> http://wiki.cpantesters.org
Preferences: 
> href="https://prefs.cpantesters.org"; target=_blank 
> >https://prefs.cpantesters.org

Fwd: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Philip Prindeville]

Sorry, I'm looking at this link and not getting it.

Is the machine in a bogus state that ran this test?


 Original Message 
Subject:    CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report
Date:   Sat, 23 Jul 2011 05:26:27 +
From:   CPAN Tester Report Server 
To: Philip Prindeville 



Dear Philip Prindeville,

Please find below the latest reports for your distributions, generated by CPAN 
Testers, from the last 24 hours. 

To set your preferences for what you wish to have reported in this Daily 
Summary, please visit the CPAN Testers Preferences system at 
https://prefs.cpantesters.org.


Net-Patricia-1.19:
- i686-linux / 5.14.1:
  - FAIL 
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/30853506-b35b-11e0-ae72-d004d8ab0ee8



If you have an issue with a particular report, or wish to gain further 
information from the tester, please use the 'Find A Tester' tool at 
http://stats.cpantesters.org/cpanmail.html, using the ID or GUID of the report, 
as listed above, to locate the correct email address.

If you wish to unsubscribe from these notifications, please login to the CPAN 
Testers Preferences system, with your PAUSE credentials, and disable CPAN 
Testers notifications permanently or temporarily. If you have problems with 
accessing the site, please contact Barbie  and request to be 
removed from the automatic mailings. 

Thanks,
The CPAN Testers
-- 
Reports: http://www.cpantesters.org
Statistics:  http://stats.cpantesters.org
Wiki:http://wiki.cpantesters.org
Preferences: https://prefs.cpantesters.org

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[David Golden]

My guess is that your code has "use diagnostics" and the smoker's
machine does not have the usual system documentation installed.
diagnostics.pm actually uses perldiag (Pod) to supply its mesages.

-- David

On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Philip Prindeville  wrote:
> Sorry, I'm looking at this link and not getting it.
>
> Is the machine in a bogus state that ran this test?
>
>
>  Original Message ----
> Subject:        CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report
> Date:   Sat, 23 Jul 2011 05:26:27 +
> From:   CPAN Tester Report Server 
> To:     Philip Prindeville 
>
>
>
> Dear Philip Prindeville,
>
> Please find below the latest reports for your distributions, generated by 
> CPAN Testers, from the last 24 hours.
>
> To set your preferences for what you wish to have reported in this Daily 
> Summary, please visit the CPAN Testers Preferences system at 
> https://prefs.cpantesters.org.
>
>
> Net-Patricia-1.19:
> - i686-linux / 5.14.1:
>  - FAIL 
> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/30853506-b35b-11e0-ae72-d004d8ab0ee8
>
>
>
> If you have an issue with a particular report, or wish to gain further 
> information from the tester, please use the 'Find A Tester' tool at 
> http://stats.cpantesters.org/cpanmail.html, using the ID or GUID of the 
> report, as listed above, to locate the correct email address.
>
> If you wish to unsubscribe from these notifications, please login to the CPAN 
> Testers Preferences system, with your PAUSE credentials, and disable CPAN 
> Testers notifications permanently or temporarily. If you have problems with 
> accessing the site, please contact Barbie  and request to be 
> removed from the automatic mailings.
>
> Thanks,
> The CPAN Testers
> --
> Reports:     http://www.cpantesters.org
> Statistics:  http://stats.cpantesters.org
> Wiki:        http://wiki.cpantesters.org
> Preferences: https://prefs.cpantesters.org
>
>

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Philip Prindeville]

Ok, thanks. So I shouldn't be worried?

On 7/24/11 3:51 AM, David Golden wrote:
> My guess is that your code has "use diagnostics" and the smoker's
> machine does not have the usual system documentation installed.
> diagnostics.pm actually uses perldiag (Pod) to supply its mesages.
>
> -- David
>
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Philip Prindeville  wrote:
>> Sorry, I'm looking at this link and not getting it.
>>
>> Is the machine in a bogus state that ran this test?
>>
>>
>> ---- Original Message 
>> Subject:CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report
>> Date:   Sat, 23 Jul 2011 05:26:27 +
>> From:   CPAN Tester Report Server 
>> To: Philip Prindeville 
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear Philip Prindeville,
>>
>> Please find below the latest reports for your distributions, generated by 
>> CPAN Testers, from the last 24 hours.
>>
>> To set your preferences for what you wish to have reported in this Daily 
>> Summary, please visit the CPAN Testers Preferences system at 
>> https://prefs.cpantesters.org.
>>
>>
>> Net-Patricia-1.19:
>> - i686-linux / 5.14.1:
>>  - FAIL 
>> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/30853506-b35b-11e0-ae72-d004d8ab0ee8
>>
>>
>>
>> If you have an issue with a particular report, or wish to gain further 
>> information from the tester, please use the 'Find A Tester' tool at 
>> http://stats.cpantesters.org/cpanmail.html, using the ID or GUID of the 
>> report, as listed above, to locate the correct email address.
>>
>> If you wish to unsubscribe from these notifications, please login to the 
>> CPAN Testers Preferences system, with your PAUSE credentials, and disable 
>> CPAN Testers notifications permanently or temporarily. If you have problems 
>> with accessing the site, please contact Barbie  and request 
>> to be removed from the automatic mailings.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> The CPAN Testers
>> --
>> Reports: http://www.cpantesters.org
>> Statistics:  http://stats.cpantesters.org
>> Wiki:http://wiki.cpantesters.org
>> Preferences: https://prefs.cpantesters.org
>>
>>

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[David Golden]

No.  You might reconsider whether you need diagnostics or whether
warnings are sufficient.  I think of diagnostics as an end-user choice
because it's so verbose.

-- David

On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Philip Prindeville  wrote:
> Ok, thanks. So I shouldn't be worried?
>
> On 7/24/11 3:51 AM, David Golden wrote:
>> My guess is that your code has "use diagnostics" and the smoker's
>> machine does not have the usual system documentation installed.
>> diagnostics.pm actually uses perldiag (Pod) to supply its mesages.
>>
>> -- David
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Philip Prindeville  wrote:
>>> Sorry, I'm looking at this link and not getting it.
>>>
>>> Is the machine in a bogus state that ran this test?
>>>
>>>
>>>  Original Message 
>>> Subject:        CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report
>>> Date:   Sat, 23 Jul 2011 05:26:27 +
>>> From:   CPAN Tester Report Server 
>>> To:     Philip Prindeville 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear Philip Prindeville,
>>>
>>> Please find below the latest reports for your distributions, generated by 
>>> CPAN Testers, from the last 24 hours.
>>>
>>> To set your preferences for what you wish to have reported in this Daily 
>>> Summary, please visit the CPAN Testers Preferences system at 
>>> https://prefs.cpantesters.org.
>>>
>>>
>>> Net-Patricia-1.19:
>>> - i686-linux / 5.14.1:
>>>  - FAIL 
>>> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/30853506-b35b-11e0-ae72-d004d8ab0ee8
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If you have an issue with a particular report, or wish to gain further 
>>> information from the tester, please use the 'Find A Tester' tool at 
>>> http://stats.cpantesters.org/cpanmail.html, using the ID or GUID of the 
>>> report, as listed above, to locate the correct email address.
>>>
>>> If you wish to unsubscribe from these notifications, please login to the 
>>> CPAN Testers Preferences system, with your PAUSE credentials, and disable 
>>> CPAN Testers notifications permanently or temporarily. If you have problems 
>>> with accessing the site, please contact Barbie  and 
>>> request to be removed from the automatic mailings.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> The CPAN Testers
>>> --
>>> Reports:     http://www.cpantesters.org
>>> Statistics:  http://stats.cpantesters.org
>>> Wiki:        http://wiki.cpantesters.org
>>> Preferences: https://prefs.cpantesters.org
>>>
>>>
>
>

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Dean Hamstead]

Im hoping some charitable soul can help me out here.

For some reason i cant seem to get SVN::Core SVN::Client and SVN::Ra to 
be recognized properly.
I have tried listing them as deps and have also now tried listing 
Alien::SVN as a dep.


Feel free to fork and show me what im missing 
(https://github.com/djzort/SVN-Web)



Dean


On Tue, 29 May 2012 02:15:14 +, CPAN Tester Report Server wrote:

Dear Dean Hamstead,

Please find below the latest reports for your distributions,
generated by CPAN Testers, from the last 24 hours.

To set your preferences for what you wish to have reported in this
Daily Summary, please visit the CPAN Testers Preferences system at
https://prefs.cpantesters.org.


SVN-Web-0.60_3:
- amd64-freebsd / 5.12.2:
  - FAIL

http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/63bb5004-a888-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5

- amd64-freebsd-thread-multi / 5.12.2:
  - FAIL

http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/62688864-a89e-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5

- x86_64-linux / 5.12.3:
  - FAIL

http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/6454b4f0-a8fc-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5

- x86_64-linux / 5.12.4:
  - FAIL

http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/62eb8460-a8aa-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5

- x86_64-linux-ld / 5.12.4:
  - FAIL

http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/29081cb4-a8bd-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5

- x86_64-linux-thread-multi / 5.12.4:
  - FAIL

http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/80a954a4-a8d3-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5

- x86_64-linux-thread-multi / 5.14.0:
  - FAIL

http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/0a6c124a-a883-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5

- x86_64-linux-thread-multi-ld / 5.14.0:
  - FAIL

http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/b91747f6-a897-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5



If you have an issue with a particular report, or wish to gain
further information from the tester, please use the 'Find A Tester'
tool at http://stats.cpantesters.org/cpanmail.html, using the ID or
GUID of the report, as listed above, to locate the correct email
address.

If you wish to unsubscribe from these notifications, please login to
the CPAN Testers Preferences system, with your PAUSE credentials, and
disable CPAN Testers notifications permanently or temporarily. If you
have problems with accessing the site, please contact Barbie
 and request to be removed from the automatic
mailings.

Thanks,
The CPAN Testers


--
Come play computer games with us at http://fragfest.com.au

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[David Golden]

I see the deps properly specified in a distribution built from a
github clone, but that doesn't seem to be the same as what's on CPAN.

-- David

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:45 AM, Dean Hamstead  wrote:
> Im hoping some charitable soul can help me out here.
>
> For some reason i cant seem to get SVN::Core SVN::Client and SVN::Ra to be
> recognized properly.
> I have tried listing them as deps and have also now tried listing Alien::SVN
> as a dep.
>
> Feel free to fork and show me what im missing
> (https://github.com/djzort/SVN-Web)
>
>
> Dean
>
>
> On Tue, 29 May 2012 02:15:14 +, CPAN Tester Report Server wrote:
>>
>> Dear Dean Hamstead,
>>
>> Please find below the latest reports for your distributions,
>> generated by CPAN Testers, from the last 24 hours.
>>
>> To set your preferences for what you wish to have reported in this
>> Daily Summary, please visit the CPAN Testers Preferences system at
>> https://prefs.cpantesters.org.
>>
>>
>> SVN-Web-0.60_3:
>> - amd64-freebsd / 5.12.2:
>>  - FAIL
>>
>>
>> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/63bb5004-a888-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5
>>
>> - amd64-freebsd-thread-multi / 5.12.2:
>>  - FAIL
>>
>>
>> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/62688864-a89e-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5
>>
>> - x86_64-linux / 5.12.3:
>>  - FAIL
>>
>>
>> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/6454b4f0-a8fc-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5
>>
>> - x86_64-linux / 5.12.4:
>>  - FAIL
>>
>>
>> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/62eb8460-a8aa-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5
>>
>> - x86_64-linux-ld / 5.12.4:
>>  - FAIL
>>
>>
>> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/29081cb4-a8bd-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5
>>
>> - x86_64-linux-thread-multi / 5.12.4:
>>  - FAIL
>>
>>
>> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/80a954a4-a8d3-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5
>>
>> - x86_64-linux-thread-multi / 5.14.0:
>>  - FAIL
>>
>>
>> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/0a6c124a-a883-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5
>>
>> - x86_64-linux-thread-multi-ld / 5.14.0:
>>  - FAIL
>>
>>
>> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/b91747f6-a897-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5
>>
>>
>>
>> If you have an issue with a particular report, or wish to gain
>> further information from the tester, please use the 'Find A Tester'
>> tool at http://stats.cpantesters.org/cpanmail.html, using the ID or
>> GUID of the report, as listed above, to locate the correct email
>> address.
>>
>> If you wish to unsubscribe from these notifications, please login to
>> the CPAN Testers Preferences system, with your PAUSE credentials, and
>> disable CPAN Testers notifications permanently or temporarily. If you
>> have problems with accessing the site, please contact Barbie
>>  and request to be removed from the automatic
>> mailings.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> The CPAN Testers
>
>
> --
> Come play computer games with us at http://fragfest.com.au

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Dean Hamstead]

yes my bad, i have pushed changes to git (using cvs 9-5, i forget to 
push)


previously i listed out SVN::Ra SVN::Client SVN::Core and got this 
result

http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/a81acbac-a73f-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5

I then looked on cpan to see what was going on with these three 
modules, and saw that they were in Alien::SVN,
so swapped out the definition to just Alien::SVN. Which gave the 
results below. The dist.ini for this is now

pushed to github.

Thanks for taking the time to look


Dean

On Wed, 30 May 2012 10:34:29 -0400, David Golden wrote:

I see the deps properly specified in a distribution built from a
github clone, but that doesn't seem to be the same as what's on CPAN.

-- David

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:45 AM, Dean Hamstead  
wrote:

Im hoping some charitable soul can help me out here.

For some reason i cant seem to get SVN::Core SVN::Client and SVN::Ra 
to be

recognized properly.
I have tried listing them as deps and have also now tried listing 
Alien::SVN

as a dep.

Feel free to fork and show me what im missing
(https://github.com/djzort/SVN-Web)


Dean


On Tue, 29 May 2012 02:15:14 +, CPAN Tester Report Server wrote:


Dear Dean Hamstead,

Please find below the latest reports for your distributions,
generated by CPAN Testers, from the last 24 hours.

To set your preferences for what you wish to have reported in this
Daily Summary, please visit the CPAN Testers Preferences system at
https://prefs.cpantesters.org.


SVN-Web-0.60_3:
- amd64-freebsd / 5.12.2:
 - FAIL



http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/63bb5004-a888-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5

- amd64-freebsd-thread-multi / 5.12.2:
 - FAIL



http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/62688864-a89e-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5

- x86_64-linux / 5.12.3:
 - FAIL



http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/6454b4f0-a8fc-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5

- x86_64-linux / 5.12.4:
 - FAIL



http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/62eb8460-a8aa-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5

- x86_64-linux-ld / 5.12.4:
 - FAIL



http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/29081cb4-a8bd-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5

- x86_64-linux-thread-multi / 5.12.4:
 - FAIL



http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/80a954a4-a8d3-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5

- x86_64-linux-thread-multi / 5.14.0:
 - FAIL



http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/0a6c124a-a883-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5

- x86_64-linux-thread-multi-ld / 5.14.0:
 - FAIL



http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/b91747f6-a897-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5



If you have an issue with a particular report, or wish to gain
further information from the tester, please use the 'Find A Tester'
tool at http://stats.cpantesters.org/cpanmail.html, using the ID or
GUID of the report, as listed above, to locate the correct email
address.

If you wish to unsubscribe from these notifications, please login 
to
the CPAN Testers Preferences system, with your PAUSE credentials, 
and
disable CPAN Testers notifications permanently or temporarily. If 
you

have problems with accessing the site, please contact Barbie
 and request to be removed from the automatic
mailings.

Thanks,
The CPAN Testers



--
Come play computer games with us at http://fragfest.com.au


--
Come play computer games with us at http://fragfest.com.au

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Dean Hamstead]

I have tried combinations of SVN::Core(etc), Alien::SVN and 
SVN::Core(etc) + Alien::SVN


It looks like SVN::Core(etc) isnt being detected as being provided by 
Alien::SVN, and some platforms dont seem to implement Alien::SVN?


SVN::Core+Alien::SVN seems to work the best, but im curious what impact 
that would have for packagers etc. Also i have the understanding that 
the Alien:: packages are supposed to provide placeholder type of things 
for out of cpan dependencies?




Dean


On Wed, 30 May 2012 10:34:29 -0400, David Golden wrote:

I see the deps properly specified in a distribution built from a
github clone, but that doesn't seem to be the same as what's on CPAN.

-- David

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:45 AM, Dean Hamstead  
wrote:

Im hoping some charitable soul can help me out here.

For some reason i cant seem to get SVN::Core SVN::Client and SVN::Ra 
to be

recognized properly.
I have tried listing them as deps and have also now tried listing 
Alien::SVN

as a dep.

Feel free to fork and show me what im missing
(https://github.com/djzort/SVN-Web)


Dean


On Tue, 29 May 2012 02:15:14 +, CPAN Tester Report Server wrote:


Dear Dean Hamstead,

Please find below the latest reports for your distributions,
generated by CPAN Testers, from the last 24 hours.

To set your preferences for what you wish to have reported in this
Daily Summary, please visit the CPAN Testers Preferences system at
https://prefs.cpantesters.org.


SVN-Web-0.60_3:
- amd64-freebsd / 5.12.2:
 - FAIL



http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/63bb5004-a888-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5

- amd64-freebsd-thread-multi / 5.12.2:
 - FAIL



http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/62688864-a89e-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5

- x86_64-linux / 5.12.3:
 - FAIL



http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/6454b4f0-a8fc-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5

- x86_64-linux / 5.12.4:
 - FAIL



http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/62eb8460-a8aa-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5

- x86_64-linux-ld / 5.12.4:
 - FAIL



http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/29081cb4-a8bd-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5

- x86_64-linux-thread-multi / 5.12.4:
 - FAIL



http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/80a954a4-a8d3-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5

- x86_64-linux-thread-multi / 5.14.0:
 - FAIL



http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/0a6c124a-a883-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5

- x86_64-linux-thread-multi-ld / 5.14.0:
 - FAIL



http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/b91747f6-a897-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5



If you have an issue with a particular report, or wish to gain
further information from the tester, please use the 'Find A Tester'
tool at http://stats.cpantesters.org/cpanmail.html, using the ID or
GUID of the report, as listed above, to locate the correct email
address.

If you wish to unsubscribe from these notifications, please login 
to
the CPAN Testers Preferences system, with your PAUSE credentials, 
and
disable CPAN Testers notifications permanently or temporarily. If 
you

have problems with accessing the site, please contact Barbie
 and request to be removed from the automatic
mailings.

Thanks,
The CPAN Testers



--
Come play computer games with us at http://fragfest.com.au


--
Come play computer games with us at http://fragfest.com.au

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[David Golden]

It think you just say "Alien::SVN" as your prereq because SVN::Core is
actually provided by the Subversion source.  Packagers should
recognize that Alien::* means external libraries and they'll figure it
out.  (Or probably have it automated.)

-- David

On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Dean Hamstead  wrote:
> I have tried combinations of SVN::Core(etc), Alien::SVN and SVN::Core(etc) +
> Alien::SVN
>
> It looks like SVN::Core(etc) isnt being detected as being provided by
> Alien::SVN, and some platforms dont seem to implement Alien::SVN?
>
> SVN::Core+Alien::SVN seems to work the best, but im curious what impact that
> would have for packagers etc. Also i have the understanding that the Alien::
> packages are supposed to provide placeholder type of things for out of cpan
> dependencies?
>
>
>
>
> Dean
>
>
> On Wed, 30 May 2012 10:34:29 -0400, David Golden wrote:
>>
>> I see the deps properly specified in a distribution built from a
>> github clone, but that doesn't seem to be the same as what's on CPAN.
>>
>> -- David
>>
>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:45 AM, Dean Hamstead 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Im hoping some charitable soul can help me out here.
>>>
>>> For some reason i cant seem to get SVN::Core SVN::Client and SVN::Ra to
>>> be
>>> recognized properly.
>>> I have tried listing them as deps and have also now tried listing
>>> Alien::SVN
>>> as a dep.
>>>
>>> Feel free to fork and show me what im missing
>>> (https://github.com/djzort/SVN-Web)
>>>
>>>
>>> Dean
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 29 May 2012 02:15:14 +, CPAN Tester Report Server wrote:


 Dear Dean Hamstead,

 Please find below the latest reports for your distributions,
 generated by CPAN Testers, from the last 24 hours.

 To set your preferences for what you wish to have reported in this
 Daily Summary, please visit the CPAN Testers Preferences system at
 https://prefs.cpantesters.org.


 SVN-Web-0.60_3:
 - amd64-freebsd / 5.12.2:
  - FAIL




 http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/63bb5004-a888-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5

 - amd64-freebsd-thread-multi / 5.12.2:
  - FAIL




 http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/62688864-a89e-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5

 - x86_64-linux / 5.12.3:
  - FAIL




 http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/6454b4f0-a8fc-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5

 - x86_64-linux / 5.12.4:
  - FAIL




 http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/62eb8460-a8aa-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5

 - x86_64-linux-ld / 5.12.4:
  - FAIL




 http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/29081cb4-a8bd-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5

 - x86_64-linux-thread-multi / 5.12.4:
  - FAIL




 http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/80a954a4-a8d3-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5

 - x86_64-linux-thread-multi / 5.14.0:
  - FAIL




 http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/0a6c124a-a883-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5

 - x86_64-linux-thread-multi-ld / 5.14.0:
  - FAIL




 http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/b91747f6-a897-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5



 If you have an issue with a particular report, or wish to gain
 further information from the tester, please use the 'Find A Tester'
 tool at http://stats.cpantesters.org/cpanmail.html, using the ID or
 GUID of the report, as listed above, to locate the correct email
 address.

 If you wish to unsubscribe from these notifications, please login to
 the CPAN Testers Preferences system, with your PAUSE credentials, and
 disable CPAN Testers notifications permanently or temporarily. If you
 have problems with accessing the site, please contact Barbie
  and request to be removed from the automatic
 mailings.

 Thanks,
 The CPAN Testers
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Come play computer games with us at http://fragfest.com.au
>
>
> --
> Come play computer games with us at http://fragfest.com.au

Fwd: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Anselmo Canfora]

Hello,
I received the notification reported below, it seems that Test::More is 
broken in one of the test machines. Who is the person I should notify this?





Thank you in advance for the help!

Anselmo Canfora



 Original message 

Dear Anselmo Canfora,

Please find below the latest reports for your distributions, generated by CPAN 
Testers, from the last 24 hours.

To change your preferences, or disable notifications, please visit the CPAN 
Testers Preferences system at https://prefs.cpantesters.org.


JSONP-0.71:
- x86_64-linux-thread-multi-ld / 5.18.2:
  - FAIL 
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/2ef9476c-48d2-11e4-bf95-495f2c6f0924



If you have an issue with a particular report, or wish to gain further 
information from the tester, please use the 'Find A Tester' tool at 
http://stats.cpantesters.org/cpanmail.html, using the ID or GUID of the report, 
as listed above, to locate the correct email address.

You can also adjust the frequency and nature of these notification or unsubscribe 
from the notifications entirely, by going to the CPAN Testers Preferences website 
(https://prefs.cpantesters.org) and login with your PAUSE credentials. You can 
disable CPAN Testers notifications permanently or temporarily. If you have problems 
with accessing the site, please contact Barbie  and request to 
be removed from the automatic mailings.

Thanks,
The CPAN Testers
--
Reports: http://www.cpantesters.org
Statistics:  http://stats.cpantesters.org
Preferences: https://prefs.cpantesters.org
Wiki:http://wiki.cpantesters.org
Blog:http://blog.cpantesters.org

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Olivier Mengué]

Those blog posts (and the attached comments) may be useful to learn more
about Test::More testing you're suffering:

http://blogs.perl.org/users/chad_exodist_granum/2014/08/the-new-testbuilder---why.html
http://blogs.perl.org/users/brian_d_foy/2014/09/testmore-has-lots-of-crazy-new-development-thats-breaking-my-modules.html

2014-10-01 12:37 GMT+02:00 Anselmo Canfora :

>  Hello,
> I received the notification reported below, it seems that Test::More is
> broken in one of the test machines. Who is the person I should notify this?
>
>
>
>
> Thank you in advance for the help!
>
> Anselmo Canfora
>
>
>
>  Original message 
>
> Dear Anselmo Canfora,
>
> Please find below the latest reports for your distributions, generated by 
> CPAN Testers, from the last 24 hours.
>
> To change your preferences, or disable notifications, please visit the CPAN 
> Testers Preferences system at https://prefs.cpantesters.org.
>
>
> JSONP-0.71:
> - x86_64-linux-thread-multi-ld / 5.18.2:
>   - FAIL 
> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/2ef9476c-48d2-11e4-bf95-495f2c6f0924
>
>
>
> If you have an issue with a particular report, or wish to gain further 
> information from the tester, please use the 'Find A Tester' tool at 
> http://stats.cpantesters.org/cpanmail.html, using the ID or GUID of the 
> report, as listed above, to locate the correct email address.
>
> You can also adjust the frequency and nature of these notification or 
> unsubscribe from the notifications entirely, by going to the CPAN Testers 
> Preferences website (https://prefs.cpantesters.org) and login with your PAUSE 
> credentials. You can disable CPAN Testers notifications permanently or 
> temporarily. If you have problems with accessing the site, please contact 
> Barbie   and request to be removed from the 
> automatic mailings.
>
> Thanks,
> The CPAN Testers
> --
> Reports: http://www.cpantesters.org
> Statistics:  http://stats.cpantesters.org
> Preferences: https://prefs.cpantesters.org
> Wiki:http://wiki.cpantesters.org
> Blog:http://blog.cpantesters.org
>
>
>
>

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Anselmo Canfora]

Thank you,
I given a quick glance to blog posts, not sure if my case can be drawn 
back to the reported issues explained there. If you notice the imagine 
below, the output states: /Test::More-> broken/ (instead of version 
number).
Could be in this case, the module (or the underlying ones) failed to 
test itself?:)

The Report of my case is here:

http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/2ef9476c-48d2-11e4-bf95-495f2c6f0924

Anselmo Canfora

Il 02/10/2014 15.30, Olivier Mengué ha scritto:
Those blog posts (and the attached comments) may be useful to learn 
more about Test::More testing you're suffering:


http://blogs.perl.org/users/chad_exodist_granum/2014/08/the-new-testbuilder---why.html
http://blogs.perl.org/users/brian_d_foy/2014/09/testmore-has-lots-of-crazy-new-development-thats-breaking-my-modules.html

2014-10-01 12:37 GMT+02:00 Anselmo Canfora >:


Hello,
I received the notification reported below, it seems that
Test::More is broken in one of the test machines. Who is the
person I should notify this?




Thank you in advance for the help!

Anselmo Canfora



 Original message 

Dear Anselmo Canfora,

Please find below the latest reports for your distributions, generated by 
CPAN Testers, from the last 24 hours.

To change your preferences, or disable notifications, please visit the CPAN 
Testers Preferences system athttps://prefs.cpantesters.org.


JSONP-0.71:
- x86_64-linux-thread-multi-ld / 5.18.2:
   - 
FAILhttp://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/2ef9476c-48d2-11e4-bf95-495f2c6f0924



If you have an issue with a particular report, or wish to gain further 
information from the tester, please use the 'Find A Tester' tool 
athttp://stats.cpantesters.org/cpanmail.html, using the ID or GUID of the 
report, as listed above, to locate the correct email address.

You can also adjust the frequency and nature of these notification or unsubscribe from 
the notifications entirely, by going to the CPAN Testers Preferences website 
(https://prefs.cpantesters.org) and login with your PAUSE credentials. You can disable CPAN 
Testers notifications permanently or temporarily. If you have problems with accessing the 
site, please contact Barbie    and 
request to be removed from the automatic mailings.

Thanks,
The CPAN Testers
-- 
Reports:http://www.cpantesters.org

Statistics:http://stats.cpantesters.org
Preferences:https://prefs.cpantesters.org
Wiki:http://wiki.cpantesters.org
Blog:http://blog.cpantesters.org

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Serguei Trouchelle]

It's happening again:

http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/b78880ce-27da-11ea-a823-10fac181c852

On 2019-10-22 05:05, Nigel Horne wrote:



My set up hasn't changed.  If it's not working on 31.5 there's something amiss 
somewhere, but not with my setup.

-Nigel

On 10/22/19, 5:26 AM, "Serguei Trouchelle"  wrote:

 Hello,
 
 There's something wrong with your smoker setup.
 
 On 2019-10-21 21:12, CPAN Tester Report Server wrote:

 > Dear Serguei Trouchelle,
 >
 > Please find below the latest reports for your distributions, generated 
by CPAN Testers, from the last 24 hours.
 >
 > To change your preferences, or disable notifications, please visit the 
CPAN Testers Preferences system at https://prefs.cpantesters.org.
 >
 >
 > CPAN-SQLite-0.217:
 > - amd64-netbsd / 5.31.5:
 >- UNKNOWN http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/b52b2232-f427-11e9-934a-579662b887d7 
("Nigel Horne" )
 >
 >
 >
 > If you have an issue with a particular report, or wish to gain further 
information from the tester, please use the 'Find A Tester' tool at 
http://stats.cpantesters.org/cpanmail.html, using the ID or GUID of the report, as 
listed above, to locate the correct email address.
 >
 > You can also adjust the frequency and nature of these notifications or 
unsubscribe from the notifications entirely, by going to the CPAN Testers Preferences 
website (https://prefs.cpantesters.org) and login with your PAUSE credentials. You can 
disable CPAN Testers notifications permanently or temporarily. If you have problems with 
accessing the site, please contact the admins  and request 
to be removed from the automatic mailings.
 >
 > Thanks,
 > The CPAN Testers
 >
 > CPAN Testers is only made possible with the support of our sponsors.
 > For more information on sponsoring, please visit the I ♥ CPAN Testers 
website (http://iheart.cpantesters.org)
 >
 > One of our esteemed sponsors is Xiing - GeekUni, a Bronze Sponsors.
 >
 > Geekuni is an institute which provides online software development 
courses. Every concept is presented in the context of a hands-on exercise and the 
completion of the course is a fully functional piece of software.
 >
 > https://geekuni.com/
 >
 
 
 --

 S.T.
 
 




--
S.T.

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Serguei Trouchelle]

Nothing. It only happens in your smoker, and every time it looks like 
something removes all files while smoker is running. Are you sure you're 
only running one CPAN process at the time?


On 2019-12-29 07:07, Nigel Horne wrote:

What is different about your package that makes it fail in this way?

-Nigel

On 29/12/2019 02:23, Serguei Trouchelle wrote:

It's happening again:

http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/b78880ce-27da-11ea-a823-10fac181c852 



On 2019-10-22 05:05, Nigel Horne wrote:



My set up hasn't changed.  If it's not working on 31.5 there's 
something amiss somewhere, but not with my setup.


-Nigel

On 10/22/19, 5:26 AM, "Serguei Trouchelle"  wrote:

 Hello,
  There's something wrong with your smoker setup.
  On 2019-10-21 21:12, CPAN Tester Report Server wrote:
 > Dear Serguei Trouchelle,
 >
 > Please find below the latest reports for your distributions, 
generated by CPAN Testers, from the last 24 hours.

 >
 > To change your preferences, or disable notifications, please 
visit the CPAN Testers Preferences system at 
https://prefs.cpantesters.org.

 >
 >
 > CPAN-SQLite-0.217:
 > - amd64-netbsd / 5.31.5:
 >    - UNKNOWN 
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/b52b2232-f427-11e9-934a-579662b887d7 
("Nigel Horne" )

 >
 >
 >
 > If you have an issue with a particular report, or wish to 
gain further information from the tester, please use the 'Find A 
Tester' tool at http://stats.cpantesters.org/cpanmail.html, using 
the ID or GUID of the report, as listed above, to locate the correct 
email address.

 >
 > You can also adjust the frequency and nature of these 
notifications or unsubscribe from the notifications entirely, by 
going to the CPAN Testers Preferences website 
(https://prefs.cpantesters.org) and login with your PAUSE 
credentials. You can disable CPAN Testers notifications permanently 
or temporarily. If you have problems with accessing the site, please 
contact the admins  and request to be removed 
from the automatic mailings.

 >
 > Thanks,
 > The CPAN Testers
 >
 > CPAN Testers is only made possible with the support of our 
sponsors.
 > For more information on sponsoring, please visit the I ♥ 
CPAN Testers website (http://iheart.cpantesters.org)

 >
 > One of our esteemed sponsors is Xiing - GeekUni, a Bronze 
Sponsors.

 >
 > Geekuni is an institute which provides online software 
development courses. Every concept is presented in the context of a 
hands-on exercise and the completion of the course is a fully 
functional piece of software.

 >
 > https://geekuni.com/
 >
   --
 S.T.







--
S.T.

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Karen Etheridge]

I have been getting blasted with these types of failures again too. e.g.:

http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/a3e7fbf8-2c2b-11ea-9cc5-910b4c49479c
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/a8244f3e-2a0d-11ea-bad3-922c4c49479c

Nigel, I'll be honest with you: I automatically ignore every report I
receive from you, because the false positive rate is so outrageously
high it's not even worth looking anymore.

On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 7:14 PM Serguei Trouchelle  wrote:
>
> Nothing. It only happens in your smoker, and every time it looks like
> something removes all files while smoker is running. Are you sure you're
> only running one CPAN process at the time?
>
> On 2019-12-29 07:07, Nigel Horne wrote:
> > What is different about your package that makes it fail in this way?
> >
> > -Nigel
> >
> > On 29/12/2019 02:23, Serguei Trouchelle wrote:
> >> It's happening again:
> >>
> >> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/b78880ce-27da-11ea-a823-10fac181c852
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2019-10-22 05:05, Nigel Horne wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> My set up hasn't changed.  If it's not working on 31.5 there's
> >>> something amiss somewhere, but not with my setup.
> >>>
> >>> -Nigel
> >>>
> >>> On 10/22/19, 5:26 AM, "Serguei Trouchelle"  wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  Hello,
> >>>   There's something wrong with your smoker setup.
> >>>   On 2019-10-21 21:12, CPAN Tester Report Server wrote:
> >>>  > Dear Serguei Trouchelle,
> >>>  >
> >>>  > Please find below the latest reports for your distributions,
> >>> generated by CPAN Testers, from the last 24 hours.
> >>>  >
> >>>  > To change your preferences, or disable notifications, please
> >>> visit the CPAN Testers Preferences system at
> >>> https://prefs.cpantesters.org.
> >>>  >
> >>>  >
> >>>  > CPAN-SQLite-0.217:
> >>>  > - amd64-netbsd / 5.31.5:
> >>>  >- UNKNOWN
> >>> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/b52b2232-f427-11e9-934a-579662b887d7
> >>> ("Nigel Horne" )
> >>>  >
> >>>  >
> >>>  >
> >>>  > If you have an issue with a particular report, or wish to
> >>> gain further information from the tester, please use the 'Find A
> >>> Tester' tool at http://stats.cpantesters.org/cpanmail.html, using
> >>> the ID or GUID of the report, as listed above, to locate the correct
> >>> email address.
> >>>  >
> >>>  > You can also adjust the frequency and nature of these
> >>> notifications or unsubscribe from the notifications entirely, by
> >>> going to the CPAN Testers Preferences website
> >>> (https://prefs.cpantesters.org) and login with your PAUSE
> >>> credentials. You can disable CPAN Testers notifications permanently
> >>> or temporarily. If you have problems with accessing the site, please
> >>> contact the admins  and request to be removed
> >>> from the automatic mailings.
> >>>  >
> >>>  > Thanks,
> >>>  > The CPAN Testers
> >>>  >
> >>>  > CPAN Testers is only made possible with the support of our
> >>> sponsors.
> >>>  > For more information on sponsoring, please visit the I ♥
> >>> CPAN Testers website (http://iheart.cpantesters.org)
> >>>  >
> >>>  > One of our esteemed sponsors is Xiing - GeekUni, a Bronze
> >>> Sponsors.
> >>>  >
> >>>  > Geekuni is an institute which provides online software
> >>> development courses. Every concept is presented in the context of a
> >>> hands-on exercise and the completion of the course is a fully
> >>> functional piece of software.
> >>>  >
> >>>  > https://geekuni.com/
> >>>  >
> >>>--
> >>>  S.T.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>
> --
> S.T.

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Andreas Koenig]

> On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 20:22:49 -0800, Karen Etheridge  
> said:

  > I have been getting blasted with these types of failures again too. e.g.:
  > http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/a3e7fbf8-2c2b-11ea-9cc5-910b4c49479c
  > http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/a8244f3e-2a0d-11ea-bad3-922c4c49479c

  > Nigel, I'll be honest with you: I automatically ignore every report I
  > receive from you, because the false positive rate is so outrageously
  > high it's not even worth looking anymore.

Automatically ignoring will not help finding the bug that is triggered
in Nigel's setup.

I think it is worthwhile to report when Nigel's smoker start acting up.
I'd also find it worthwhile that Nigel stops his smokers when it happens
and reports at least to me, as the author of CPAN.pm, what happened in
his environment, so that we can figure out how to prevent it or at least
to shut down the smoker automatically.

My impression is that Nigel's smokers have been running fine for a long
time, but at least the solaris one is now acting up in weird ways. I
just found this one:

http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/4d53df1a-2c66-11ea-abbc-55fa4b49479c

It is an "unknown" that reports during t/00-report-prereqs.t that
Package::DeprecationManager 0.17 is installed. It goes on the run a
zillion tests OK. But all of a sudden it does not find
Package::DeprecationManager anymore. It also can't locate Moose anymore.

As if somebody had removed the whole directory in which the test was
running.

Nigel, please stop this and maybe other smokers and help find out the
root cause. I'm sorry that this happens, I can imagine that the bug is
entirely mine, but I don't know what it is and how to fix it. I need
your input and your intuition to pinpoint the bug.

Thank you!
-- 
andreas

Re: Fw: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Barbie]

Hi Salvador,

> Several links in the "CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report" message below do not 
> work or do not point to the expected report.

There have been some updates this week, and one looks to contain a bug.
I'm currently investigating and hope to have it fixed shortly.

Cheers,
Barbie.
-- 
Birmingham Perl Mongers <http://birmingham.pm.org>
Memoirs Of A Roadie <http://barbie.missbarbell.co.uk>
CPAN Testers Blog <http://blog.cpantesters.org>
YAPC Conference Surveys <http://yapc-surveys.org>

Re: Fwd: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Barbie]

On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 08:15:04AM -0500, Vick Khera wrote:
> This distribution has been marked as "delete" on the module list for
> quite some time.  Why am I still receiving reports about it?

Because version 2.05 is still available on CPAN. You may have deleted
older versions. If this should been deleted and hasn't, then I suggest
you go to your PAUSE account [1] and try and delete it again.

[1] https://pause.perl.org/pause/

> 
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: CPAN Tester Report Server 
> Date: Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:39 PM
> Subject: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report
> To: Vick Khera 
> 
> 
> Dear Vick Khera,
> 
> Please find below the latest reports for your distributions, generated
> by CPAN Testers, from the last 24 hours.
> 
> To set your preferences for what you wish to have reported in this
> Daily Summary, please visit the CPAN Testers Preferences system at
> https://prefs.cpantesters.org.
> 
> 
> Apache-Sandwich-2.05:
> - i686-linux-thread-multi / 5.13.6:
>  - FAIL 
> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/c583cc88-fe90-11df-b534-59d87b0c96ea
> 
> 
> 
> If you have an issue with a particular report, or wish to gain further
> information from the tester, please use the 'Find A Tester' tool at
> http://stats.cpantesters.org/cpanmail.html, using the ID or GUID of
> the report, as listed above, to locate the correct email address.
> 
> If you wish to unsubscribe from these notifications, please login to
> the CPAN Testers Preferences system, with your PAUSE credentials, and
> disable CPAN Testers notifications permanently or temporarily. If you
> have problems with accessing the site, please contact Barbie
>  and request to be removed from the automatic
> mailings.
> 
> Thanks,
> The CPAN Testers
> --
> Reports:     http://www.cpantesters.org
> Statistics:  http://stats.cpantesters.org
> Wiki:        http://wiki.cpantesters.org
> Preferences: https://prefs.cpantesters.org
> 

Cheers,
Barbie.
-- 
Birmingham Perl Mongers <http://birmingham.pm.org>
Memoirs Of A Roadie <http://barbie.missbarbell.co.uk>
CPAN Testers Blog <http://blog.cpantesters.org>
YAPC Conference Surveys <http://yapc-surveys.org>
Ark Appreciation Pages <http://ark.eology.org>

Re: Fwd: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Vick Khera]

On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Barbie  wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 08:15:04AM -0500, Vick Khera wrote:
>> This distribution has been marked as "delete" on the module list for
>> quite some time.  Why am I still receiving reports about it?
>
> Because version 2.05 is still available on CPAN. You may have deleted
> older versions. If this should been deleted and hasn't, then I suggest
> you go to your PAUSE account [1] and try and delete it again.
>

Thanks.  I guess I'll have to do that. I was hoping to leave it up for
posterity... Does the tester run all modules regardless of if they're
listed in the module list?

Re: Fwd: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Andreas J. Koenig]

> On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:39:17 -0500, Vick Khera  said:

  > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Barbie  wrote:
 >> On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 08:15:04AM -0500, Vick Khera wrote:
 >>> This distribution has been marked as "delete" on the module list for
 >>> quite some time.  Why am I still receiving reports about it?
 >> 
 >> Because version 2.05 is still available on CPAN. You may have deleted
 >> older versions. If this should been deleted and hasn't, then I suggest
 >> you go to your PAUSE account [1] and try and delete it again.
 >> 

  > Thanks.  I guess I'll have to do that. I was hoping to leave it up for
  > posterity...

Which is appreciated!

  > Does the tester run all modules regardless of if they're
  > listed in the module list?

I can't answer for that tester but I can answer for the programs that I
use to smoke CPAN. I could not even guarantee that they stay away from
backpan. So even if a distribution is deleted from CPAN it might be
tested again by me. It doesn't happen often but when searching for the
cause of some bug or test failure backpan is a valuable source.

If you do not want to receive the test reports, you better go to
http://prefs.cpantesters.org/ and set your preferences such that you
don't receive them.

-- 
andreas

[do_not_re...@cpantesters.org: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report]

[Richard Jelinek]

Hi,

we're having issues with the CPAN Testers report for
Lingua::RUS::Number (see below). Test output seems to indicate there
are encoding errors (double/tripple encoding) but we're unable to
reproduce this on any OS, any Perl version available here.

Does anyone have an idea what could cause these fails on these
particular systems? (In other tests @ linux this module passes also @
CPAN Testers)



- Forwarded message from CPAN Tester Report Server 
 -

Envelope-to: i...@petamem.com
Delivery-date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 03:43:47 +0100
Delivered-To: peta...@cpan.org
To: PetaMem 
From: CPAN Tester Report Server 
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 02:43:34 +
Subject: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report
X-PMX-Version: 5.6.1.2065439, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 
2013.3.12.170320

Dear PetaMem,

Please find below the latest reports for your distributions, generated by CPAN 
Testers, from the last 24 hours. 

To set your preferences for what you wish to have reported in this Daily 
Summary, please visit the CPAN Testers Preferences system at 
https://prefs.cpantesters.org.


Lingua-RUS-Number-0.0708:
- x86_64-linux-ld / 5.14.3:
  - FAIL 
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/0b26fdb6-97b7-11e2-b37c-3668c51cef80

- x86_64-linux-ld / 5.14.4:
  - FAIL 
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/03197f18-97b7-11e2-9845-2165c51cef80

- x86_64-linux-ld / 5.16.2:
  - FAIL 
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/29b96912-97b7-11e2-aaef-6074c51cef80

- x86_64-linux-ld / 5.17.6:
  - FAIL 
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/fb561b60-97b6-11e2-905e-d063c51cef80

- x86_64-linux-ld / 5.17.9:
  - FAIL 
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/f3c90330-97b6-11e2-af3f-8a5fc51cef80

- x86_64-linux-thread-multi-ld / 5.12.5:
  - FAIL 
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/0c480870-97b7-11e2-b37c-3668c51cef80

- x86_64-linux-thread-multi-ld / 5.16.2:
  - FAIL 
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/045ae83a-97b7-11e2-9845-2165c51cef80

- x86_64-linux-thread-multi-ld / 5.17.10:
  - FAIL 
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/f4bb5284-97b6-11e2-af3f-8a5fc51cef80

- x86_64-linux-thread-multi-ld / 5.17.8:
  - FAIL 
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/fc5cdff8-97b6-11e2-905e-d063c51cef80



If you have an issue with a particular report, or wish to gain further 
information from the tester, please use the 'Find A Tester' tool at 
http://stats.cpantesters.org/cpanmail.html, using the ID or GUID of the report, 
as listed above, to locate the correct email address.

If you wish to unsubscribe from these notifications, please login to the CPAN 
Testers Preferences system, with your PAUSE credentials, and disable CPAN 
Testers notifications permanently or temporarily. If you have problems with 
accessing the site, please contact Barbie  and request to be 
removed from the automatic mailings. 

Thanks,
The CPAN Testers
-- 
Reports: http://www.cpantesters.org
Statistics:  http://stats.cpantesters.org
Wiki:http://wiki.cpantesters.org
Preferences: https://prefs.cpantesters.org

- End forwarded message -

-- 
 Dipl.-Inf. Univ. Richard C. Jelinek

PetaMem GmbH - www.petamem.com  Geschäftsführer: Richard Jelinek
Language Technology - We Mean IT!   Sitz der Gesellschaft: Fürth
2.58921 * 10^8 Mind UnitsRegistergericht: AG Fürth, HRB-9201

Re: [do_not_re...@cpantesters.org: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report]

[Andreas Koenig]

Richard Jelinek  writes:

> Hi,
>
> we're having issues with the CPAN Testers report for
> Lingua::RUS::Number (see below). Test output seems to indicate there
> are encoding errors (double/tripple encoding)

I'm the submitter of the reports. I don't see any indication of encoding
problems when I run the tests on the console, I see beautiful cyrillic
letters. I blame either my incompetence or the cpantesters toolchain
that the double encoding happens, but it is not the cause of the
problem.

The cause is that some of my smokers are compiled with -Duselongdouble.
There is a 100% correlation between having compiled with -Duselongdouble
and a failing test. One of the outputs I see is

not ok 2 - 8.00 RUR
#   Failed test '8.00 RUR'
#   at t/Number.t line 70.
#  got: 'семь рублей ноль копеек'
# expected: 'восемь рублей ноль копеек'
main::(t/Number.t:71):  $tests++;

seven vs eight? This is a truncation problem somewhere and that the
number 8.00 gets an internal representation as 7.999 something. Try
rounding to an integer when you want an integer!

> but we're unable to
> reproduce this on any OS, any Perl version available here.
>
> Does anyone have an idea what could cause these fails on these
> particular systems? (In other tests @ linux this module passes also @
> CPAN Testers)

Thank you for asking.



http://analysis.cpantesters.org/solved?distv=Lingua-RUS-Number-0.0708
already had the answer when I looked:

Top Regressions:
1.000   conf:nvsize
1.000   conf:nvtype
1.000   conf:uselongdouble
1.000   qr:(Failed test\s+\S+.*)
1.000   conf:alignbytes
1.000   conf:archname
1.000   conf:archname+osvers

If analysis has a result like it has here, the diagnose is usually
correct


Thanks again && Regards,
-- 
andreas

Possible Typo in Report [was Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report]

[Shlomi Fish]

Hi all,

this message reads:

On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 02:23:17 +
CPAN Tester Report Server  wrote:

> Dear Shlomi Fish,
> 
> Please find below the latest reports for your distributions, generated by
> CPAN Testers, from the last 24 hours. 
> 
> To change your preferences, or disable notifications, please visit the CPAN
> Testers Preferences system at https://prefs.cpantesters.org.
> 
> 
[SNIPPED] 
> CPAN Testers is only made possible with the support of our sponsors.
> For more information on sponsoring, please visit the I ♥ CPAN Testers website
> (http://iheart.cpantesters.org)
> 
> One of our etseemed sponsors is , a .
> 

Shouldn't it be "esteemed": https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/esteemed ? Should it
be corrected?

Regards,

Shlomi Fish



-- 
-
Shlomi Fish

Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post

Re: Possible Typo in Report [was Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report]

[Tom Molesworth]

On 28/11/15 08:07, Shlomi Fish wrote:

On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 02:23:17 +
CPAN Tester Report Server  wrote:
  

One of our etseemed sponsors is , a .


Shouldn't it be "esteemed": https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/esteemed ? Should it
be corrected?


What about the rest of that sentence? If the sponsor information isn't 
actually available, might make more sense to remove the line entirely 
until that part can be fixed?


cheers,

Tom

Getting rid of the problem of an overloaded PERL5LIB on Windows [was Fw: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report]

[Shlomi Fish]

Hi all,

I keep receiving such erroneous reports from Windows machines, and
apparently they are caused by overloaded PERL5LIB variables.

Would it be possible to simply load the @INC from a file containing
each path per line and populate it in a loop in Perl inside a BEGIN
{...} block to eliminate such erroneous warnings?

Regards,

Shlomi Fish

Begin forwarded message:

Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 02:20:02 +
From: CPAN Tester Report Server 
To: "Shlomi Fish" 
Subject: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report


Dear Shlomi Fish,

Please find below the latest reports for your distributions, generated
by CPAN Testers, from the last 24 hours. 

To set your preferences for what you wish to have reported in this
Daily Summary, please visit the CPAN Testers Preferences system at
https://prefs.cpantesters.org.


XML-RSS-1.49:
- MSWin32-x86-multi-thread / 5.12.3:
  - FAIL
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/350886ae-6dcf-1014-833b-b7211ede6b02



If you have an issue with a particular report, or wish to gain further
information from the tester, please use the 'Find A Tester' tool at
http://stats.cpantesters.org/cpanmail.html, using the ID or GUID of the
report, as listed above, to locate the correct email address.

If you wish to unsubscribe from these notifications, please login to
the CPAN Testers Preferences system, with your PAUSE credentials, and
disable CPAN Testers notifications permanently or temporarily. If you
have problems with accessing the site, please contact Barbie
 and request to be removed from the automatic
mailings. 

Thanks,
The CPAN Testers
-- 
Reports: http://www.cpantesters.org
Statistics:  http://stats.cpantesters.org
Wiki:http://wiki.cpantesters.org
Preferences: https://prefs.cpantesters.org


-- 
-
Shlomi Fish   http://www.shlomifish.org/
What does "Zionism" mean? - http://shlom.in/def-zionism

Give me ASCII or give me deaþ!

Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post -
http://shlom.in/reply .

Re: Getting rid of the problem of an overloaded PERL5LIB on Windows [was Fw: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report]

[Przemyslaw Wesolek]

On 10/19/2012 09:48 AM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> I keep receiving such erroneous reports from Windows machines, and
> apparently they are caused by overloaded PERL5LIB variables.
> 
> Would it be possible to simply load the @INC from a file containing
> each path per line and populate it in a loop in Perl inside a BEGIN
> {...} block to eliminate such erroneous warnings?

Sure, I see no reason not to work. There is even a special 'hook' in the
form of sitecustomize.pl being read at startup, when such a support has
been compiled into perl ($Config{usesitecustomize}).

However, I don't know which Perl builds enable this feature; perlbrew
doesn't enable this feature by default, neither does Ubuntu.

I remember seeing such an approach a few times in hosting environments,
to add to @INC libraries of Cpanel-installed software.

Przemek

Re: Getting rid of the problem of an overloaded PERL5LIB on Windows [was Fw: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report]

[Reini Urban]

On 10/19/2012 06:31 AM, Przemyslaw Wesolek wrote:

On 10/19/2012 09:48 AM, Shlomi Fish wrote:

I keep receiving such erroneous reports from Windows machines, and
apparently they are caused by overloaded PERL5LIB variables.


The overloaded @INC entries are caused by recursive CPAN calls, where a 
library needs another library still in blib.

PERL5_CPAN_IS_RUNNING_IN_RECURSION="7080,3632"
PERL_CR_SMOKER_CURRENT="Task-Tapper-Server-0.001"

I do not see what this has to do with your XML::RSS problem.


Would it be possible to simply load the @INC from a file containing
each path per line and populate it in a loop in Perl inside a BEGIN
{...} block to eliminate such erroneous warnings?


1. I do not believe that these warnings are erroneous.
The XML-RSS blib dirs are missing from your @INC, so CPAN fails.
PERL5LIB only prepends to your INC, but does not remove the missing blib 
dirs.


I suspect it is a Test::Run::Builder::Manifest problem.
You have different logical paths for EUMM and MB.

2. No, this is crazy.


Sure, I see no reason not to work. There is even a special 'hook' in the
form of sitecustomize.pl being read at startup, when such a support has
been compiled into perl ($Config{usesitecustomize}).

However, I don't know which Perl builds enable this feature; perlbrew
doesn't enable this feature by default, neither does Ubuntu.

I remember seeing such an approach a few times in hosting environments,
to add to @INC libraries of Cpanel-installed software.

Przemek


--
Reini

Working towards a true Modern Perl.
Slim, functional, unbloated, compile-time optimizable

Why am I *still* getting test failures for Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ProgCriticTests-1.131250 [was Fw: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report]

[Shlomi Fish]

Hi all,

due to the many test failures of Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ProgCriticTests-1.131250 I
have removed it from PAUSE, but I am still getting test failure reports for it.
How can I make them stop?

Frustrated,

Shlomi Fish

Begin forwarded message:

Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 02:29:23 +
From: CPAN Tester Report Server 
To: "Shlomi Fish" 
Subject: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report


Dear Shlomi Fish,

Please find below the latest reports for your distributions, generated by CPAN
Testers, from the last 24 hours. 

To set your preferences for what you wish to have reported in this Daily
Summary, please visit the CPAN Testers Preferences system at
https://prefs.cpantesters.org.


Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ProgCriticTests-1.131250:
- amd64-freebsd-thread-multi / 5.16.0:
  - FAIL
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/809e3b6e-bf70-11e2-8c80-50d7c5c10595



Graph-Easy-0.72:
- darwin-2level / 5.18.0:
  - FAIL
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/29071e72-bfd2-11e2-bd11-2b43ecc1fe0c



XML-Grammar-Vered-0.0.6:
- OpenBSD.amd64-openbsd / 5.14.0:
  - FAIL
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/7ce0766e-bf97-11e2-8c80-50d7c5c10595

- OpenBSD.amd64-openbsd / 5.14.1:
  - FAIL
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/19707eae-bfeb-11e2-8c80-50d7c5c10595

- OpenBSD.amd64-openbsd-thread-multi / 5.12.5:
  - FAIL
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/d1582a7c-bf72-11e2-8c80-50d7c5c10595

- OpenBSD.amd64-openbsd-thread-multi / 5.14.0:
  - FAIL
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/2d7528e2-bfc7-11e2-8c80-50d7c5c10595

- OpenBSD.i386-openbsd / 5.10.1:
  - FAIL
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/4a3d29a4-bfb1-11e2-8c80-50d7c5c10595

- OpenBSD.i386-openbsd-64int / 5.10.0:
  - FAIL
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/6504bf6a-bf87-11e2-8c80-50d7c5c10595

- OpenBSD.i386-openbsd-thread-multi / 5.10.0:
  - FAIL
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/95da47d0-bf5b-11e2-8c80-50d7c5c10595

- OpenBSD.i386-openbsd-thread-multi-64int / 5.10.1:
  - FAIL
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/7cd2778c-bfef-11e2-8c80-50d7c5c10595

- amd64-freebsd / 5.16.1:
  - FAIL
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/98580b42-bfe1-11e2-8c80-50d7c5c10595

- amd64-freebsd-thread-multi / 5.16.0:
  - FAIL
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/47e085c8-bf95-11e2-8c80-50d7c5c10595

- amd64-midnightbsd / 5.12.2:
  - FAIL
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/e13f4464-bf9c-11e2-ad73-dd0a7cfad375

- amd64-midnightbsd-thread-multi / 5.12.2:
  - FAIL
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/64116bdc-bffd-11e2-ad73-dd0a7cfad375

- i386-freebsd-64int / 5.10.1:
  - FAIL
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/d280c4cc-bfb8-11e2-ad73-dd0a7cfad375

- i386-freebsd-thread-multi / 5.10.1:
  - FAIL
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/03153b38-bf5d-11e2-ad73-dd0a7cfad375

- x86_64-linux-thread-multi / 5.16.1:
  - FAIL
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/3ca2aef2-bf7c-11e2-ad73-dd0a7cfad375

- x86_64-linux-thread-multi-ld / 5.16.1:
  - FAIL
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/bc36ad20-bfe6-11e2-ad73-dd0a7cfad375



XML-GrammarBase-v0.2.2:
- OpenBSD.i386-openbsd-64int / 5.12.2:
  - FAIL
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/9851a21e-bfb6-11e2-ad73-dd0a7cfad375



XML-LibXML-2.0018:
- i586-linux-thread-multi / 5.8.8:
  - FAIL
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/c518764e-bfd2-11e2-ad79-519ee104d833



If you have an issue with a particular report, or wish to gain further
information from the tester, please use the 'Find A Tester' tool at
http://stats.cpantesters.org/cpanmail.html, using the ID or GUID of the report,
as listed above, to locate the correct email address.

If you wish to unsubscribe from these notifications, please login to the CPAN
Testers Preferences system, with your PAUSE credentials, and disable CPAN
Testers notifications permanently or temporarily. If you have problems with
accessing the site, please contact Barbie  and request to be
removed from the automatic mailings. 

Thanks,
The CPAN Testers
-- 
Reports: http://www.cpantesters.org
Statistics:  http://stats.cpantesters.org
Wiki:http://wiki.cpantesters.org
Preferences: https://prefs.cpantesters.org


-- 
-
Shlomi Fish   http://www.shlomifish.org/
http://www.shlomifish.org/humour/bits/Can-I-SCO-Now/ - "Can I SCO Now?"

Chuck Norris taught God how to create the universe.
— http://www.shlomifish.org/humour/bits/facts/Chuck-Norris/

Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply .

Re: Why am I *still* getting test failures for Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ProgCriticTests-1.131250 [was Fw: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report]

[Alexandr Ciornii]

2013/5/19 Shlomi Fish :
> Hi all,
>
> due to the many test failures of Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ProgCriticTests-1.131250 I
> have removed it from PAUSE, but I am still getting test failure reports for 
> it.
> How can I make them stop?

PAUSE waits for 3 days before really deleting anything and then it
will take some time to propagate to mirrors and from public mirrors to
private mirrors.

Simplest way to stop is to upload fixed version (maybe based on 1.111750).

--
Alexandr Ciornii, http://chorny.net

Re: Why am I *still* getting test failures for Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ProgCriticTests-1.131250 [was Fw: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report]

[Andreas Koenig]

Alexandr Ciornii  writes:

> 2013/5/19 Shlomi Fish :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> due to the many test failures of Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ProgCriticTests-1.131250 I
>> have removed it from PAUSE, but I am still getting test failure reports for 
>> it.
>> How can I make them stop?
>
> PAUSE waits for 3 days before really deleting anything and then it
> will take some time to propagate to mirrors and from public mirrors to
> private mirrors.
>
> Simplest way to stop is to upload fixed version (maybe based on 1.111750).

And you can configure the amount of mail you get from cpantesters. Visit
prefs.cpantesters.org

-- 
andreas