[digitalradio] Multipsk v 4.18 [1 Attachment]
There are all who can help me because? the screen panoramic is black,, tnx Francesco YV4GJN MULTIPSK V4.18
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk v 4.18
Hello Francesco, This is a small bug. To fix it, click on the Fonts button on the bottom of the RX/TX screen. Configure the colors as you want. Note: there is a Multipsk Yahoo group for this type of question. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Francesco Piccone To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2010 8:00 PM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk v 4.18 [1 Attachment] [Attachment(s) from Francesco Piccone included below] There are all who can help me because? the screen panoramic is black,, tnx Francesco YV4GJN MULTIPSK V4.18 Attachment(s) from Francesco Piccone 1 of 1 Photo(s) Multipsk.JPG
RE: [digitalradio] Multipsk v 4.18 [1 Attachment]
TNX Patrick J i love MULTIPSK,,, 73 Francesco YV4GJN De: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] En nombre de Patrick Lindecker Enviado el: sábado, 04 de septiembre de 2010 02:50 p.m. Para: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Asunto: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk v 4.18 Hello Francesco, This is a small bug. To fix it, click on the Fonts button on the bottom of the RX/TX screen. Configure the colors as you want. Note: there is a Multipsk Yahoo group for this type of question. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Francesco Piccone mailto:fpicc...@cantv.net To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2010 8:00 PM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk v 4.18 [1 Attachment] There are all who can help me because? the screen panoramic is black,, tnx Francesco YV4GJN MULTIPSK V4.18
Re: [digitalradio] Re: [digitalradio ]Multipsk ???? Final Call for Papers--2010 ARRL/TAPR Digital Communications Conference
TKS Andy. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Andy obrien To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 11:57 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: [digitalradio ]Multipsk Final Call for Papers--2010 ARRL/TAPR Digital Communications Conference Great. let me know if you nee any help with English words. Andy K3Uk On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Patrick Lindecker f6...@free.fr wrote: Hello Andy, Yes I could concatenate several papers about RS ID and Call ID and present the result. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Andy obrien To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 3:48 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Re: [digitalradio ]Multipsk Final Call for Papers--2010 ARRL/TAPR Digital Communications Conference Hmm, I wonder if Patrick has thought about publishing his work with RS-ID? On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Ford, Steve, WB8IMY sf...@arrl.org wrote: Technical papers are solicited for presentation at the 29th Annual ARRL and TAPR Digital Communications Conference to be held September 24-26, 2010 near Portland, Oregon. These papers will also be published in the Conference Proceedings (you do NOT need to attend the conference to have your paper included in the Proceedings). The submission deadline is July 31, 2010. Please send papers to: Maty Weinberg ARRL 225 Main St Newington, CT 06111 or you can make your submission via e-mail to: m...@arrl.org Papers will be published exactly as submitted and authors will retain all rights. 73 . . . Steve, WB8IMY ARRL
Re: [digitalradio] Re: [digitalradio ]Multipsk ???? Final Call for Papers--2010 ARRL/TAPR Digital Communications Conference
Hello Andy, Yes I could concatenate several papers about RS ID and Call ID and present the result. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Andy obrien To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 3:48 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Re: [digitalradio ]Multipsk Final Call for Papers--2010 ARRL/TAPR Digital Communications Conference Hmm, I wonder if Patrick has thought about publishing his work with RS-ID? On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Ford, Steve, WB8IMY sf...@arrl.org wrote: Technical papers are solicited for presentation at the 29th Annual ARRL and TAPR Digital Communications Conference to be held September 24-26, 2010 near Portland, Oregon. These papers will also be published in the Conference Proceedings (you do NOT need to attend the conference to have your paper included in the Proceedings). The submission deadline is July 31, 2010. Please send papers to: Maty Weinberg ARRL 225 Main St Newington, CT 06111 or you can make your submission via e-mail to: m...@arrl.org Papers will be published exactly as submitted and authors will retain all rights. 73 . . . Steve, WB8IMY ARRL
Re: [digitalradio] Re: [digitalradio ]Multipsk ???? Final Call for Papers--2010 ARRL/TAPR Digital Communications Conference
Great. let me know if you nee any help with English words. Andy K3Uk On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Patrick Lindecker f6...@free.fr wrote: Hello Andy, Yes I could concatenate several papers about RS ID and Call ID and present the result. 73 Patrick - Original Message - *From:* Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com *To:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com *Sent:* Friday, July 02, 2010 3:48 AM *Subject:* [digitalradio] Re: [digitalradio ]Multipsk Final Call for Papers--2010 ARRL/TAPR Digital Communications Conference Hmm, I wonder if Patrick has thought about publishing his work with RS-ID? On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Ford, Steve, WB8IMY sf...@arrl.orgwrote: Technical papers are solicited for presentation at the 29th Annual ARRL and TAPR Digital Communications Conference to be held September 24-26, 2010 near Portland, Oregon. These papers will also be published in the Conference Proceedings (you do NOT need to attend the conference to have your paper included in the Proceedings). The submission deadline is July 31, 2010. Please send papers to: Maty Weinberg ARRL 225 Main St Newington, CT 06111 or you can make your submission via e-mail to: m...@arrl.orgmaty%40arrl.org Papers will be published exactly as submitted and authors will retain all rights. 73 . . . Steve, WB8IMY ARRL
[digitalradio] Re: [digitalradio ]Multipsk ???? Final Call for Papers--2010 ARRL/TAPR Digital Communications Conference
Hmm, I wonder if Patrick has thought about publishing his work with RS-ID? On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Ford, Steve, WB8IMY sf...@arrl.org wrote: Technical papers are solicited for presentation at the 29th Annual ARRL and TAPR Digital Communications Conference to be held September 24-26, 2010 near Portland, Oregon. These papers will also be published in the Conference Proceedings (you do NOT need to attend the conference to have your paper included in the Proceedings). The submission deadline is July 31, 2010. Please send papers to: Maty Weinberg ARRL 225 Main St Newington, CT 06111 or you can make your submission via e-mail to: m...@arrl.orgmaty%40arrl.org Papers will be published exactly as submitted and authors will retain all rights. 73 . . . Steve, WB8IMY ARRL
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista
Hello Chuck, Could you ask the to the Multipsk group. Note: have you connected a jack to the USB sound card input. It is compulsory with Vista 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: ac5pw10 ac5p...@yahoo.com To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 12:06 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista Can anyone tell me how to setup Multipsk using a signalink USB with Vista?? Tis is driving me crazy 73, Chuck AC5PW http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html Chat, Skeds, and spots all in one (resize to suit)Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista
I assume you mean from the audio out on the rig to the signalink. I've sent in a request to join the group Thanks 73, Chuck AC5PW Once a Marine... ...Always a Marine OOORAHHH ! Saepe Expertus - Semper Fidelis - Fratres Aeterni Often Tested - Always Faithful - Brothers Forever From: Patrick Lindecker f6...@free.fr To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Cc: multi...@yahoogroups.com Sent: Mon, May 31, 2010 2:45:45 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista Hello Chuck, Could you ask the to the Multipsk group. Note: have you connected a jack to the USB sound card input. It is compulsory with Vista 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: ac5pw10 ac5p...@yahoo.com To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 12:06 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista Can anyone tell me how to setup Multipsk using a signalink USB with Vista?? Tis is driving me crazy 73, Chuck AC5PW http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html Chat, Skeds, and spots all in one (resize to suit)Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista
Chuck, I just validated your memerbship on the Multipsk page, welcome. Andy K3UK Hello Chuck, Could you ask the to the Multipsk group. Note: have you connected a jack to the USB sound card input. It is compulsory with Vista 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: ac5pw10 ac5p...@yahoo.com ac5pw10%40yahoo.com To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 12:06 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista Can anyone tell me how to setup Multipsk using a signalink USB with Vista?? Tis is driving me crazy 73, Chuck AC5PW http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista
I assume you mean from the audio out on the rig to the signalink. Yes. If so, control that the sound card appears in the sound card menus. Then select the source in the pseudo-mixer (in fact there is no such mixer as under XP, it is a regression of Vista compared to XP). 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: charles standlee To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 10:13 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista I assume you mean from the audio out on the rig to the signalink. I've sent in a request to join the group Thanks 73, Chuck AC5PW Once a Marine... ...Always a Marine OOORAHHH ! Saepe Expertus - Semper Fidelis - Fratres Aeterni Often Tested - Always Faithful - Brothers Forever -- From: Patrick Lindecker f6...@free.fr To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Cc: multi...@yahoogroups.com Sent: Mon, May 31, 2010 2:45:45 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista Hello Chuck, Could you ask the to the Multipsk group. Note: have you connected a jack to the USB sound card input. It is compulsory with Vista 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: ac5pw10 ac5p...@yahoo.com To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 12:06 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista Can anyone tell me how to setup Multipsk using a signalink USB with Vista?? Tis is driving me crazy 73, Chuck AC5PW http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html Chat, Skeds, and spots all in one (resize to suit)Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista
I assume you mean from the audio out on the rig to the signalink. Yes. If so, control that the sound card appears in the sound card menus. Then select the source in the pseudo-mixer (in fact there is no such mixer as under XP, it is a regression of Vista compared to XP). 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: charles mailto:ac5p...@yahoo.com standlee To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 10:13 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista I assume you mean from the audio out on the rig to the signalink. I've sent in a request to join the group Thanks 73, Chuck AC5PW Once a Marine... ...Always a Marine OOORAHHH ! Saepe Expertus - Semper Fidelis - Fratres Aeterni Often Tested - Always Faithful - Brothers Forever _ From: Patrick Lindecker f6...@free.fr To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Cc: multi...@yahoogroups.com Sent: Mon, May 31, 2010 2:45:45 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista Hello Chuck, Could you ask the to the Multipsk group. Note: have you connected a jack to the USB sound card input. It is compulsory with Vista 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: ac5pw10 ac5p...@yahoo.com mailto:ac5pw10%40yahoo.com To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 12:06 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista Can anyone tell me how to setup Multipsk using a signalink USB with Vista?? Tis is driving me crazy 73, Chuck AC5PW http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html Chat, Skeds, and spots all in one (resize to suit)Yahoo! Groups Links
[digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista
Can anyone tell me how to setup Multipsk using a signalink USB with Vista?? Tis is driving me crazy 73, Chuck AC5PW
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk
Hello John, You must normally start the Instal.exe to instal Multipsk (which will create and fill the Maps sub-directory). You can also copy the Multipsk Maps sub-directory from another Multipsk implantation. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: jgmags2000 jgmags2...@yahoo.com To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 12:54 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk Hello Group, Upon starting MultiPsk, I get an error message No sub-directory Maps!? Any way to fix error? 73, John KJ1J http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html Chat, Skeds, and spots all in one (resize to suit)Yahoo! Groups Links
[digitalradio] Multipsk
Hello Group, Upon starting MultiPsk, I get an error message No sub-directory Maps!? Any way to fix error? 73, John KJ1J
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active.
Hello Tony, Would it be possible for me to run the SDR feature without actually having and SDR rig attached? If so, how can I activate it? The SDR feature in Multipsk is only doing a I/Q processing, shifting in base band, in USB or LSB, a selected band (inside the 48, 96 or 192 KHz SdR band). Now as I discovered, thanks to Andy, is that professional SdR are controlled through a defined protocol, something as a Cat system protocol. Perhaps, Dave (AA6YQ) will add, in the future, through Commander, the necessary commands to control the different SdR... In the next version, I will add possibility to send a COM and EXEC command at initialization/RX/TX/finalization. But for a complex protocol when you are supposed to send/listen/send, it will not be sufficient. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Tony To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 12:04 AM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active. Andy, Thanks for posting your CPU test results with Multipsk. Patrick mentioned that he doesn't think RAM is important in this case and adding more than the minimum memory requirement wouldn't change anything; I guess that leaves the processor. It just seems odd that there would be a large disparity in CPU usage since both processors run similar clock speeds (yours is actually faster). My Dell has a Pentium dual core E2200 and I'm wondering if the difference is due to the dual vs. single core? The CPU demand is based on maximizing Multipsk's tasks (SDR- Direct active, with full RS-ID on and regular waterfall at 4 Khz) Would it be possible for me to run the SDR feature without actually having and SDR rig attached? If so, how can I activate it? Tony -K2MO - Original Message - From: Andy obrien To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2010 7:22 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active. Interesting data , Tony. I am was surprised that our similar computers have so dissimilar results. So , I checked a few things on different PCs here at my location. Here are my results, The CPU demand is based on maximizing Multipsk's tasks (SDR-Direct active, with full RS-ID on and regular waterfall at 4 Khz) . Casual readers of this thread should note that Multipsk under most common scenarios for ham radio, uses much less CPU than below. Shack Computer (Dell Opitiplex GX260 , 2.3 Ghz CPU single core , 1 gig RAM. Windows XP. Multipsk = 95-100+ % (not usable) Home PC (Dell Optiplex GX270 , 2.7 CPU single core , 512 RAM, WIndows XP. Multipsk = 65% , worked well.) Low end Acer Latop , 3 gig RAM, Windows 7. . Multipsk = 75%, worked fine. Ironic that the one PC I want to get Multipsk to work on is the one PC that it does poorly on ! The good news is that when maximizing Multipsk on a basic PC , with not a lot of other things multi-tasking, Multipsk will work. I am especially pleased to see it work well on the Windows 7 laptop which only cost $247.00 So while the desktop computers do not have identical parameters (different system files, ect) , I am intrigued about the 30-35% less CPU demand on the PC with only 512 RAM but .4 Ghz more processing speed . Does .4 ghz more speed usually make that much difference.. Your outcomes , Tony, also intrige me about what difference I might discover if I add another gig of RAM to my 2.3 CPU ham PC. Andy K3UK On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Tony d...@optonline.net wrote: [Attachment(s) from Tony included below] Andy, I configured Multipsk as you described and the CPU usage seems to average about 5 percent. Panoramic mode is about the same. I've included a few screen shots so you could see the results. Mixw seems to tax the CPU the same way as Multipsk does, but Fldigi needs a bit more to run - CPU usage jumped to 10%. I guess it's the difference in RAM. Would like to hear how the Vista laptop works out. Please let use know. Tony -K2MO PS: We're about the same here Andy, thanks for asking. Still waiting for research to catch up with type-I. Hope all is well with you and yours my friend. - Original Message - From: Andy obrien To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 3:55 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] SDR-Radio with DM780 20M Digital Band Tony, my shack PC sounds like yours. A Dell P4, 2.3 CPU , but only 1 gig of RAM. Perhaps we can compare current system resource utilization for regular Multipsk ? Regular Multipsk in PSK31 mode with a 4,3 Khz waterfall uses 25 % of CPU. With RS ID on , about the same 25-26% With Panoramic decode.. CPU increases to around 30%. Then Multipsk with Direct I/Q mode invoked , CPU increases to 60% Then RS ID in SDR /IQ direct invoked, Multipsk uses 90% of my CPU. The above is JUST Multipsk
RE: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active.
AA6YQ comments below -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on Behalf Of Patrick Lindecker Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 5:30 AM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active. Hello Tony, Would it be possible for me to run the SDR feature without actually having and SDR rig attached? If so, how can I activate it? The SDR feature in Multipsk is only doing a I/Q processing, shifting in base band, in USB or LSB, a selected band (inside the 48, 96 or 192 KHz SdR band). Now as I discovered, thanks to Andy, is that professional SdR are controlled through a defined protocol, something as a Cat system protocol. Perhaps, Dave (AA6YQ) will add, in the future, through Commander, the necessary commands to control the different SdR... Commander has long been able to control PowerSDR. If you send me the protocols you need supported, Patrick, I will extend Commander to support them. 73, Dave, AA6YQ
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active.
Hello Dave, Nice, I will send you the protocol sent by Andy, and, possibly, others in the future if I receive more. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Dave AA6YQ To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 8:33 PM Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active. AA6YQ comments below -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on Behalf Of Patrick Lindecker Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 5:30 AM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active. Hello Tony, Would it be possible for me to run the SDR feature without actually having and SDR rig attached? If so, how can I activate it? The SDR feature in Multipsk is only doing a I/Q processing, shifting in base band, in USB or LSB, a selected band (inside the 48, 96 or 192 KHz SdR band). Now as I discovered, thanks to Andy, is that professional SdR are controlled through a defined protocol, something as a Cat system protocol. Perhaps, Dave (AA6YQ) will add, in the future, through Commander, the necessary commands to control the different SdR... Commander has long been able to control PowerSDR. If you send me the protocols you need supported, Patrick, I will extend Commander to support them. 73, Dave, AA6YQ
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active.
Patrick / Dave... Thank you Tony -K2MO - Original Message - From: Patrick Lindecker To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 3:34 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active. Hello Dave, Nice, I will send you the protocol sent by Andy, and, possibly, others in the future if I receive more. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Dave AA6YQ To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 8:33 PM Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active. AA6YQ comments below -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on Behalf Of Patrick Lindecker Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 5:30 AM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active. Hello Tony, Would it be possible for me to run the SDR feature without actually having and SDR rig attached? If so, how can I activate it? The SDR feature in Multipsk is only doing a I/Q processing, shifting in base band, in USB or LSB, a selected band (inside the 48, 96 or 192 KHz SdR band). Now as I discovered, thanks to Andy, is that professional SdR are controlled through a defined protocol, something as a Cat system protocol. Perhaps, Dave (AA6YQ) will add, in the future, through Commander, the necessary commands to control the different SdR... Commander has long been able to control PowerSDR. If you send me the protocols you need supported, Patrick, I will extend Commander to support them. 73, Dave, AA6YQ
[digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active.
Interesting data , Tony. I am was surprised that our similar computers have so dissimilar results. So , I checked a few things on different PCs here at my location. Here are my results, The CPU demand is based on maximizing Multipsk's tasks (SDR-Direct active, with full RS-ID on and regular waterfall at 4 Khz) . Casual readers of this thread should note that Multipsk under most common scenarios for ham radio, uses much less CPU than below. Shack Computer (Dell Opitiplex GX260 , 2.3 Ghz CPU single core , 1 gig RAM. Windows XP. Multipsk = 95-100+ % (not usable) Home PC (Dell Optiplex GX270 , 2.7 CPU single core , 512 RAM, WIndows XP. Multipsk = 65% , worked well.) Low end Acer Latop , 3 gig RAM, Windows 7. . Multipsk = 75%, worked fine. Ironic that the one PC I want to get Multipsk to work on is the one PC that it does poorly on ! The good news is that when maximizing Multipsk on a basic PC , with not a lot of other things multi-tasking, Multipsk will work. I am especially pleased to see it work well on the Windows 7 laptop which only cost $247.00 So while the desktop computers do not have identical parameters (different system files, ect) , I am intrigued about the 30-35% less CPU demand on the PC with only 512 RAM but .4 Ghz more processing speed . Does .4 ghz more speed usually make that much difference.. Your outcomes , Tony, also intrige me about what difference I might discover if I add another gig of RAM to my 2.3 CPU ham PC. Andy K3UK On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Tony d...@optonline.net wrote: [Attachment(s) #1267d4450f7a3165_TopText from Tony included below] Andy, I configured Multipsk as you described and the CPU usage seems to average about 5 percent. Panoramic mode is about the same. I've included a few screen shots so you could see the results. Mixw seems to tax the CPU the same way as Multipsk does, but Fldigi needs a bit more to run - CPU usage jumped to 10%. I guess it's the difference in RAM. Would like to hear how the Vista laptop works out. Please let use know. Tony -K2MO PS: We're about the same here Andy, thanks for asking. Still waiting for research to catch up with type-I. Hope all is well with you and yours my friend. - Original Message - From: Andy obrien To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 3:55 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] SDR-Radio with DM780 20M Digital Band Tony, my shack PC sounds like yours. A Dell P4, 2.3 CPU , but only 1 gig of RAM. Perhaps we can compare current system resource utilization for regular Multipsk ? Regular Multipsk in PSK31 mode with a 4,3 Khz waterfall uses 25 % of CPU. With RS ID on , about the same 25-26% With Panoramic decode.. CPU increases to around 30%. Then Multipsk with Direct I/Q mode invoked , CPU increases to 60% Then RS ID in SDR /IQ direct invoked, Multipsk uses 90% of my CPU. The above is JUST Multipsk related, obviously other applications , like a web browser being open, add more demand. My daughter is away skiing this weekend, so I may borrow her Vista laptop and do a comparison. I do not know what is realistic for Multipsk with all its SDR receive capability and RS ID. I don;t really understand what actual performance increase one could expect if CPU was 3.0 Ghz rather than 2.3, Also not sure what performance improvement going to a dual core around the same clock speed would produce. On my shack PC, Multipsk seems close , I am guessing if I could eek out another 10% it would run just fine. I'm reluctant to put more RAM in to an old machine, but I do have a compatible 1 Gig memory chip that i could pilfer from another PC and see if 2 gigs of RAM ease demand on the CPU. I'm guessing it would not make much difference. I do have plenty of HD space. Hope you and the family are all OK, Andy. Andy On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Tony d...@optonline.net wrote: Andy, I plan on switching to SDR in the near future. My current PC is a dual CPU 2.2GHz Dell with 3 GHz RAM. Any idea what the minimum PC requirement is to run Multipsk with SDR? Could you also tell us what processor you're running now? Thanks, Tony -K2MO - Original Message - From: Andy obrien To: digitalradio Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 9:11 AM Subject: [digitalradio] SDR-Radio with DM780 20M Digital Band One of the things that I wanted to accomplish with an SDR receiver, is the ability to keep an eye on the whole 14065 to 14115 frequency range. If I was down on 14074 monitoring ALE 400 traffic, I would miss Olivia signals that popped up in the 14109 area. I would also miss Hell signals at 14068. Now the SDR affords the opportunity to keep an eye all all at once. My venture in to SDR from a digital mode perspective has led to a discovery that, other than Multipsk, the current state of the art does not support direct monitoring of wider I/Q data. I'm also challenged in that my PC cannot
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active.
Andy, Thanks for posting your CPU test results with Multipsk. Patrick mentioned that he doesn't think RAM is important in this case and adding more than the minimum memory requirement wouldn't change anything; I guess that leaves the processor. It just seems odd that there would be a large disparity in CPU usage since both processors run similar clock speeds (yours is actually faster). My Dell has a Pentium dual core E2200 and I'm wondering if the difference is due to the dual vs. single core? The CPU demand is based on maximizing Multipsk's tasks (SDR- Direct active, with full RS-ID on and regular waterfall at 4 Khz) Would it be possible for me to run the SDR feature without actually having and SDR rig attached? If so, how can I activate it? Tony -K2MO - Original Message - From: Andy obrien To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2010 7:22 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active. Interesting data , Tony. I am was surprised that our similar computers have so dissimilar results. So , I checked a few things on different PCs here at my location. Here are my results, The CPU demand is based on maximizing Multipsk's tasks (SDR-Direct active, with full RS-ID on and regular waterfall at 4 Khz) . Casual readers of this thread should note that Multipsk under most common scenarios for ham radio, uses much less CPU than below. Shack Computer (Dell Opitiplex GX260 , 2.3 Ghz CPU single core , 1 gig RAM. Windows XP. Multipsk = 95-100+ % (not usable) Home PC (Dell Optiplex GX270 , 2.7 CPU single core , 512 RAM, WIndows XP. Multipsk = 65% , worked well.) Low end Acer Latop , 3 gig RAM, Windows 7. . Multipsk = 75%, worked fine. Ironic that the one PC I want to get Multipsk to work on is the one PC that it does poorly on ! The good news is that when maximizing Multipsk on a basic PC , with not a lot of other things multi-tasking, Multipsk will work. I am especially pleased to see it work well on the Windows 7 laptop which only cost $247.00 So while the desktop computers do not have identical parameters (different system files, ect) , I am intrigued about the 30-35% less CPU demand on the PC with only 512 RAM but .4 Ghz more processing speed . Does .4 ghz more speed usually make that much difference.. Your outcomes , Tony, also intrige me about what difference I might discover if I add another gig of RAM to my 2.3 CPU ham PC. Andy K3UK On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Tony d...@optonline.net wrote: [Attachment(s) from Tony included below] Andy, I configured Multipsk as you described and the CPU usage seems to average about 5 percent. Panoramic mode is about the same. I've included a few screen shots so you could see the results. Mixw seems to tax the CPU the same way as Multipsk does, but Fldigi needs a bit more to run - CPU usage jumped to 10%. I guess it's the difference in RAM. Would like to hear how the Vista laptop works out. Please let use know. Tony -K2MO PS: We're about the same here Andy, thanks for asking. Still waiting for research to catch up with type-I. Hope all is well with you and yours my friend. - Original Message - From: Andy obrien To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 3:55 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] SDR-Radio with DM780 20M Digital Band Tony, my shack PC sounds like yours. A Dell P4, 2.3 CPU , but only 1 gig of RAM. Perhaps we can compare current system resource utilization for regular Multipsk ? Regular Multipsk in PSK31 mode with a 4,3 Khz waterfall uses 25 % of CPU. With RS ID on , about the same 25-26% With Panoramic decode.. CPU increases to around 30%. Then Multipsk with Direct I/Q mode invoked , CPU increases to 60% Then RS ID in SDR /IQ direct invoked, Multipsk uses 90% of my CPU. The above is JUST Multipsk related, obviously other applications , like a web browser being open, add more demand. My daughter is away skiing this weekend, so I may borrow her Vista laptop and do a comparison. I do not know what is realistic for Multipsk with all its SDR receive capability and RS ID. I don;t really understand what actual performance increase one could expect if CPU was 3.0 Ghz rather than 2.3, Also not sure what performance improvement going to a dual core around the same clock speed would produce. On my shack PC, Multipsk seems close , I am guessing if I could eek out another 10% it would run just fine. I'm reluctant to put more RAM in to an old machine, but I do have a compatible 1 Gig memory chip that i could pilfer from another PC and see if 2 gigs of RAM ease demand on the CPU. I'm guessing it would not make much difference. I do have plenty of HD space. Hope you and the family are all OK, Andy. Andy On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Tony d...@optonline.net wrote: Andy, I plan on switching to SDR in the near future. My current PC
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active.
Well, you can run the SDR part of Multipsk (just press SDR I/Q Direct button in the configuration area, then press RX/TX to return to the main screen. Then you will see the SDR waterfall open up. The problem is that without an SDR, you will only get up to khz of signal, same as the regular waterfall. Som other than testing CPU load, it defeats the purpose. I am guessing you are correct about the dual versus single core. I may try to minimize the other items that my PC boots at start up , but they aree not listed by the Task Manager as taking much CPU. Andy On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Tony d...@optonline.net wrote: Andy, Thanks for posting your CPU test results with Multipsk. Patrick mentioned that he doesn't think RAM is important in this case and adding more than the minimum memory requirement wouldn't change anything; I guess that leaves the processor. It just seems odd that there would be a large disparity in CPU usage since both processors run similar clock speeds (yours is actually faster). My Dell has a Pentium dual core E2200 and I'm wondering if the difference is due to the dual vs. single core? The CPU demand is based on maximizing Multipsk's tasks (SDR- Direct active, with full RS-ID on and regular waterfall at 4 Khz) Would it be possible for me to run the SDR feature without actually having and SDR rig attached? If so, how can I activate it? T
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active.
Andy, In my case, the CPU usage jumps to about 10% with the SDR function running; that's about 2 1/2 times what Multipsk uses when running without SDR. Tony K2MO - Original Message - From: Andy obrien To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2010 6:11 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk- CPU tests with SDR-IQ Direct active. Well, you can run the SDR part of Multipsk (just press SDR I/Q Direct button in the configuration area, then press RX/TX to return to the main screen. Then you will see the SDR waterfall open up. The problem is that without an SDR, you will only get up to khz of signal, same as the regular waterfall. Som other than testing CPU load, it defeats the purpose. I am guessing you are correct about the dual versus single core. I may try to minimize the other items that my PC boots at start up , but they aree not listed by the Task Manager as taking much CPU. Andy On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Tony d...@optonline.net wrote: Andy, Thanks for posting your CPU test results with Multipsk. Patrick mentioned that he doesn't think RAM is important in this case and adding more than the minimum memory requirement wouldn't change anything; I guess that leaves the processor. It just seems odd that there would be a large disparity in CPU usage since both processors run similar clock speeds (yours is actually faster). My Dell has a Pentium dual core E2200 and I'm wondering if the difference is due to the dual vs. single core? The CPU demand is based on maximizing Multipsk's tasks (SDR- Direct active, with full RS-ID on and regular waterfall at 4 Khz) Would it be possible for me to run the SDR feature without actually having and SDR rig attached? If so, how can I activate it? T
[digitalradio] Multipsk now with PSK Reporter
Test versions of Multipsk with PSK Reporter capability have been released and are being tested. Look for this feature in an official release soon. Very nice! Andy K3UK
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Help Files - Vista
Patrick, Unblocked CHM files - all is ok - thank you. Tony -K2MO - Original Message - From: Patrick Lindecker f6...@free.fr To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 2:49 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Help Files - Vista Hello Tony, Here is a solution to this generic Windows problem: The problem with downloaded .CHM files is caused by Windows. Whenever a .CHM file is downloaded from the Internet, Windows considers it to be a security risk and blocks it from being executed. You can clear this block as follows: 1. Use Windows Explorer (or My Computer, or My Documents) to find the file in your file system. 2. Right-click on the file with your mouse. 3. A pop-up menu will appear. The very last entry in the menu is Properties. Click on this menu item. 4. You will now see a dialog box titled (filename).chm Properties (where (filename) is replaced by the name of the file). If the file has been blocked by Windows, then near the bottom of this dialog box you will see the following: Security: This file came from another computer and might be blocked to help protect this computer. To the right of this message there will be a button called Unblock. Click on this button. The file should now start working. You will have to repeat this procedure every time you download a new version of the .CHM file. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Tony d...@optonline.net To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 9:52 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk Help Files - Vista All, Running Vista and having difficulty displaying Multipsk help files. Error : Navigation to the webpage was canceled Any suggestions? Tony -K2MO Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Pages at http://www.obriensweb.com/sked Recommended digital mode software: Winwarbler, FLDIGI, DM780, or Multipsk Logging Software: DXKeeper or Ham Radio Deluxe. Yahoo! Groups Links
[digitalradio] Multipsk Help Files - Vista
All, Running Vista and having difficulty displaying Multipsk help files. Error : Navigation to the webpage was canceled Any suggestions? Tony -K2MO
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Help Files - Vista
Hello Tony, Here is a solution to this generic Windows problem: The problem with downloaded .CHM files is caused by Windows. Whenever a .CHM file is downloaded from the Internet, Windows considers it to be a security risk and blocks it from being executed. You can clear this block as follows: 1. Use Windows Explorer (or My Computer, or My Documents) to find the file in your file system. 2. Right-click on the file with your mouse. 3. A pop-up menu will appear. The very last entry in the menu is Properties. Click on this menu item. 4. You will now see a dialog box titled (filename).chm Properties (where (filename) is replaced by the name of the file). If the file has been blocked by Windows, then near the bottom of this dialog box you will see the following: Security: This file came from another computer and might be blocked to help protect this computer. To the right of this message there will be a button called Unblock. Click on this button. The file should now start working. You will have to repeat this procedure every time you download a new version of the .CHM file. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Tony d...@optonline.net To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 9:52 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk Help Files - Vista All, Running Vista and having difficulty displaying Multipsk help files. Error : Navigation to the webpage was canceled Any suggestions? Tony -K2MO Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Pages at http://www.obriensweb.com/sked Recommended digital mode software: Winwarbler, FLDIGI, DM780, or Multipsk Logging Software: DXKeeper or Ham Radio Deluxe. Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Lock transmit freq
Hello Stan, For this select Master in the Mode box. A word about Master/Slave mode. In Master: * in RX you follow the drift of the other Ham, * afterwards, in TX you come back to your initial RX frequency, so you impose your frequency and avoid a possible drift along the waterfall. In Slave: * in RX you follow the drift of the other Ham, * afterwards, in TX you start at the final RX frequency. The ideal would be to have only one Master, but you can't know the position (Slave or Master) of the other Ham...More ideal would be to have both stable XCVRs (after one working hour, normally modern XCVRs are stable). 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: mhz14071 n...@arrl.net To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 3:48 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk Lock transmit freq How can I lock the transmit freq when in PSK31 or Oliver so that my TX does not follow the other station ? 73 Stan N1ZX Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Pages at http://www.obriensweb.com/sked Recommended digital mode software: Winwarbler, FLDIGI, DM780, or Multipsk Logging Software: DXKeeper or Ham Radio Deluxe. Yahoo! Groups Links
[digitalradio] Multipsk Lock transmit freq
How can I lock the transmit freq when in PSK31 or Oliver so that my TX does not follow the other station ? 73 Stan N1ZX
Re: [digitalradio] multipsk
or on a function key: a.. The Escape (Esc) key starts the CQ or QRZ message, b.. The F1 key starts the Answer 1 message, c.. The F2 key starts the Answer 2 message, d.. The F3 key starts the Answer 3 message, e.. The F4 key starts the Answer 4 message, f.. The F5 key starts the Free 1 message, g.. The F6 key starts the Free 2 message, h.. The F7 key starts the Free 3 message, i.. The F8 key starts the Free 4 message, j.. The F9 key starts the RO message, k.. The F10 key starts the RRR message, l.. The F11 key starts the 73 message, m.. The F12 key starts the Free 5 message. The QSO will be formatted. It means that it will be exchanged prepared messages in advance without possibility to change the text of the messages during the QSO (particularly the free messages). For this, an other Ham must have previously filled: a.. the blind Ham data (callsign and Locator) (Personal button). They will automatically fill the Call and Locator fields. For more details, report to Personal data and macros b.. the fields Free 1 to Free 4 must be filled (the field Free 5 being automatically filled with the Locator and the callsign of the Ham). It coud be, respectively, indicated, for example, the name of the Ham, his/her QTH and an abstract of the station. Answer to a call (CQ) On reception of a call CQ, the callsign following the CQ will automatically fill all the fields His/her call) and a short specific ring will be activated. The blind Ham will answer typing on the function key F1. In case of success a high-pitched ring is activated. Reversely, in case of failure a low-pitched ring is activated. This must not occur if a CQ has been decoded before, this one having automatically filled all the His/Her call fields. So the Ham will type on the function keys according of the sequence of events of ths QSO. It is interesting to study the previous examples. Calling CQ The blind Ham will call typing on the key Escape (or Esc). In case of success a high-pitched ring is activated. Reversely, in case of failure a low-pitched ring is activated (this might not occur). On reception of an answer to your call (your callsign being in second position), the callsign of the other Ham will automatically fill all the fields His/her call) and a short specific ring will be activated. You will have to do your QSO using the function keys, according to both previous examples. - Original Message - From: skip19755 skip19...@yahoo.com To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 1:35 AM Subject: [digitalradio] multipsk can not figure out my problemusing MULTIPSK...do you have to purchase it before you can xmit on JT65??? It RX greatbut can not figure out how to TXworks on RTTY and PSK...I know the program has limitations for non registered users...while on the other hand...using K1JT program can not RX but can TXI have another radio coming but on 20 meters what I have should be FB...Thank You Ken N5LYJ/5 Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at http://www.obriensweb.com/sked Recommended software: Winwarbler, FLDIGI, DM780, or Multipsk Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [digitalradio] multipsk
Thank You for your tip,s it is appreciated will let you know results...Ken --- On Thu, 3/19/09, Patrick Lindecker f6...@free.fr wrote: From: Patrick Lindecker f6...@free.fr Subject: Re: [digitalradio] multipsk To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Cc: multi...@yahoogroups.com Date: Thursday, March 19, 2009, 12:26 PM Hello Ken, You don't need any licence to use JT65. Below I have added the help part for JT65 transmission. To abstract, from the default state, for example, push on the CQ or QRZ button. The transmission will be automatically done. Here are some hints about Multipsk use. I must add that in JT65, the PC clock must be adjusted, but you must know it as you success decoding JT65. 73 Patrick Multipsk hints: - It is strongly recommended to calibrate the sound-card: click on the Adjustments menu button, then select the Determination of the RX/TX sound-card sampling frequencies option and push on the Determination of the 48 KHz RX sampling frequency (test on 3 minutes) button. At the end of the test, click on Return, Note about the sound level (Level indication in % at the top of the screen): an AF level superior or equal to 10 % is OK. About 50 % is ideal (but not critical). In case of very low AF level, select 16 bits in the Determination of the RX/TX sound-card sampling frequencies option (Adjustments menu button), About the help in Multipsk: - To bring up the text help (contextual sensitive one), click on the right button of the mouse, with the cursor over the mode button KISS, for example). - Also use the button hints (wait a fraction of second over a button). JT65 transmission The JT65 does correct only weak frequency drifts. So, the user will let the transceiver (XCVR) warms up for one hour and a half to stabilize its frequency (duration function of you XCVR, as modern XCVR stabilizes rapidly). As said before, the text of the message to be transmitted is either formatted or it is free. In the second case, the message is limited to 13 characters when, in the first case, more characters are transmitted because the information is compressed, but the Ham is not free to write what he/she wants. The message ready to be sent is displayed in a green label, to the right of To send:. It is reminded that there are 3 ways to send a message: 1) immediatly, with the Automat. TX button OFF and both Beacons button OFF, if a message is clicked (CQ or QRZ, for example), 2) automatically at the second 1 (or from the second 1 to the second 7, in case of Ham delay) , with the Automat. TX button ON and the Beacons button OFF, if a message is clicked (CQ or QRZ, for example) before the second 8, 3) automatically beaconing at each odd or even minute (at the second 1), pushing either Beacon odd/mn button or Beacon even/mn button, if a message is clicked (CQ or QRZ, for example). The Automat. TX button can be OFF or ON. The standard way is the one described in 2). This is a first VHF (EME) example of minimum QSO (with formatted messages): 1) CQ F6CTE JN18 (key Escape or Esc for blind Hams) 2) F6CTE F9XYZ JN07 (key F1 for blind Hams) 3) F9XYZ F6CTE -20 OOO (key F2 for blind Hams) 4) RO (key F9 for blind Hams) 5) RRR (key F10 for blind Hams) 6) 73 (key F11 for blind Hams) 1) F6CTE calls CQ. 2) F9XYZ answers to F6CTE. 3) F6CTE confirms the reception of the F9XYZ answer adding OOO (Your signals are weak but I have copied both of our callsigns or more simply I have copied both of our callsigns). -20 is the S/N ratio in dB of the received message (this information is automatically inserted by Multipsk). 4) RO is the acknowledgment of F9XYZ. 5) F6CTE sends RRR to say that the QSO is finished. 6) F9XYZ sends the traditional 73 to complete the QSO. The QSO could be enriched with other formatted messages or non-formatted messages. For more détails, report to the JT65 TX panel above. It is advised to transmit either on the odd minutes or on the even minutes. This is a second HF example of minimum QSO (with formatted messages): 1) CQ F6CTE JN18 (key Escape or Esc for blind Hams) 2) F6CTE F9XYZ -JN07 (key F1 for blind Hams) 3) F9XYZ F6CTE -20 (key F2 for blind Hams) 4) F6CTE F9XYZ R-18 (key F3 for blind Hams) 5) F9XYZ F6CTE 73 (key F4 for blind Hams) 6) F6CTE F9XYZ 73 (key F4 for blind Hams) 1) F6CTE calls CQ. 2) F9XYZ answers to F6CTE. 3) F6CTE confirms the reception of the F9XYZ answer. -20 is the S/N ratio in dB of the received message (this information is automatically inserted by Multipsk). 4) F9XYZ answers to F6CTE confirming that he/she received his/her report (R) and sending the F6CTE report in dB (this information is automatically inserted by Multipsk). 5) F6CTE sends the traditional 73 to complete the QSO. 6) F9XYZ confirms the end of the QSO with73. The QSO could be enriched with other
[digitalradio] multipsk
can not figure out my problemusing MULTIPSK...do you have to purchase it before you can xmit on JT65??? It RX greatbut can not figure out how to TXworks on RTTY and PSK...I know the program has limitations for non registered users...while on the other hand...using K1JT program can not RX but can TXI have another radio coming but on 20 meters what I have should be FB...Thank You Ken N5LYJ/5
Re: [digitalradio] MultiPSK and ALE141A
Hello John, Rick and all: For ALE and ALE400 with Multipsk, consult the file ALE_and_ALE400_easy_with_Multipsk.doc: http://f6cte.free.fr/ALE_and_ALE400_easy_with_Multipsk.doc 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Rick W mrf...@frontiernet.net To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 5:16 AM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MultiPSK and ALE141A Hi John, Tried the calls plus HFN and QRZ but the band is closed from SW WI at 0400Z. 73, Rick, KV9U John Bradley wrote: for those of you who may be interested, VE5GPM and VE5MU are currently on 14111.0 USB running 141A found on MultiPSK Please try and transfer small text files (under 3K) to either of these stations. They are both programmed to respond to either a HFN or QRZ call, so will respond to your sounding. The idea is to step beyond sending 1 line messages , and into an area that might have practical applications, especially if we could convince Patrick to add some “store and forward” ability. Under reasonable conditions a 1K file can transfer in under 3 minutes. Both stations are running TS480SAT transceivers at about 75 watts. John VE5MU No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.7/1895 - Release Date: 1/15/2009 7:46 AM Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at http://www.obriensweb.com/sked Yahoo! Groups Links
[digitalradio] MultiPSK and ALE141A
for those of you who may be interested, VE5GPM and VE5MU are currently on 14111.0 USB running 141A found on MultiPSK Please try and transfer small text files (under 3K) to either of these stations. They are both programmed to respond to either a HFN or QRZ call, so will respond to your sounding. The idea is to step beyond sending 1 line messages , and into an area that might have practical applications, especially if we could convince Patrick to add some store and forward ability. Under reasonable conditions a 1K file can transfer in under 3 minutes. Both stations are running TS480SAT transceivers at about 75 watts. John VE5MU
Re: [digitalradio] MultiPSK and ALE141A
Hi John, Tried the calls plus HFN and QRZ but the band is closed from SW WI at 0400Z. 73, Rick, KV9U John Bradley wrote: for those of you who may be interested, VE5GPM and VE5MU are currently on 14111.0 USB running 141A found on MultiPSK Please try and transfer small text files (under 3K) to either of these stations. They are both programmed to respond to either a HFN or QRZ call, so will respond to your sounding. The idea is to step beyond sending 1 line messages , and into an area that might have practical applications, especially if we could convince Patrick to add some “store and forward” ability. Under reasonable conditions a 1K file can transfer in under 3 minutes. Both stations are running TS480SAT transceivers at about 75 watts. John VE5MU No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.7/1895 - Release Date: 1/15/2009 7:46 AM Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at http://www.obriensweb.com/sked Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:digitalradio-dig...@yahoogroups.com mailto:digitalradio-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: digitalradio-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[digitalradio] Multipsk 4111
Hello I am getting started with Multipsk and have the latest 4111. I have the following questions Should I use it as is. or should I go ahead and register the softwar for the additional features ?. I intend to log and use the features of DXLabs. My system is a Lsptop PC, Navigator interface, Icom Pro 3. Besides the documentation. Does any one have, or is there a simplified sequential setup procedure to get this software running and cross over to DXLabs? 73 Stan N1ZX
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk 4111
Hello Stan, Should I use it as is. or should I go ahead and register the softwar for the additional features ?. You use it, first, in the free version first, it is widely enough for all Ham modes. Afterwards, if you need the licensed functions (mainly professional modes decoding as SYNOP/SHIP, ACARS...), you could ask for the licence. Besides the documentation. Does any one have, or is there a simplified sequential setup procedure to get this software running and cross over to DXLabs? There is nothing else that the Help (there is a presentation of Multipsk in http://f6cte.free.fr but it is much more about modes) . Notes about the help in Multipsk: a.. To bring up the text help (contextual one), click on the right button of the mouse, with the focus over the mode button ALE400, for example). b.. Also use the button hints (wait a fraction of second over a button). Now for precise help about DXLabs you have a Yahoo group. You have also a Yahoo group for Multipsk users (don't hesitate to ask questions in both groups). 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: mhz14071 n...@arrl.net To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2008 7:52 PM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk 4111 Hello I am getting started with Multipsk and have the latest 4111. I have the following questions Should I use it as is. or should I go ahead and register the softwar for the additional features ?. I intend to log and use the features of DXLabs. My system is a Lsptop PC, Navigator interface, Icom Pro 3. Besides the documentation. Does any one have, or is there a simplified sequential setup procedure to get this software running and cross over to DXLabs? 73 Stan N1ZX Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at http://www.obriensweb.com/sked Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [digitalradio] multipsk 4.9 on linux pactor problem
Hello Matt, operation en virgule flottante incorrecte means that a division by zero accurs somewhere. I will contact you in direct. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: matt gregory To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 2:12 AM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] multipsk 4.9 on linux pactor problem Patrick, Good evening sir, and thankyou for your quick response,your software is outstanding this is the first problem I ve had but it could be from on my end. the message reads operation en virgule flottante incorrecte it flashes like a strobe but is one error window that closes and reopens very fast. the only way to stop it and regain control of computer is to log off or shut down this only happens when the pactor button is selected. MultiPSK is running out of Wine 0.9.59 GNOME Desktop 2.22.2 LINUX is UBUNTO 8.04 Thankyou for your time and hard work MATTHEW A. GREGORY KC2PUA - Original Message From: Patrick Lindecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 4:05:20 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] multipsk 4.9 on linux pactor problem Hello Matt, I'm the author of Multipsk. It is curious no to run correctly Pactor1 FEC. Could you send me (or better to the Multipsk Yahoo group as it can interest other Hams and, moreover, some Hams use Linux) the information about this bug: first the text of the message and then the scenario of the bug occurrence. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: matt gregory To: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 12:37 AM Subject: [digitalradio] multipsk 4.9 on linux pactor problem hello is anybody using multipsk 4.9 on linux mpsk runs fine until pactor 1 fec is selected then the program locks up flashing a error message in french any ideas thanks MATTHEW A. GREGORY KC2PUA - Original Message From: Mark Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] com To: illinoisdigitalham@ yahoogroups. com; [EMAIL PROTECTED] com; digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com; DigitalModes@ yahoogroups. com; PSK_VHF_UHF_ HAMRADIO@ yahoogroups. com; DigitalOnSix DigitalOnSix@ yahoogroups. com Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] com; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com; PropNET-Online@ yahoogroups. com; List for people interested in the D Star repeaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] twinslan. org Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2008 2:53:40 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Need Articles for TAPR PSR Journal -Original Message- From: Stan Horzepa [EMAIL PROTECTED] net Sent: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 6:33 pm Subject: Packet Status Register in the works It is time again to hit the keys and write for TAPR's quarterly newsletter, Packet Status Register (PSR), as the deadline of the Digital Communcations Conference (DCC) issue of PSR fast approaches. You can write about SDR or APRS or LSMFT or anything with or without initials, as long as it is related to ham radio, preferably on the digital side of the hobby. And remember, besides the glory of having your work appear in PSR, your TAPR membership will be automatically extended by three months. Write early and write often! 73, Stan, WA1LOU PSR Editor
Re: [digitalradio] multipsk 4.9 on linux pactor problem
Hello Matt, I'm the author of Multipsk. It is curious no to run correctly Pactor1 FEC. Could you send me (or better to the Multipsk Yahoo group as it can interest other Hams and, moreover, some Hams use Linux) the information about this bug: first the text of the message and then the scenario of the bug occurrence. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: matt gregory To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 12:37 AM Subject: [digitalradio] multipsk 4.9 on linux pactor problem hello is anybody using multipsk 4.9 on linux mpsk runs fine until pactor 1 fec is selected then the program locks up flashing a error message in french any ideas thanks MATTHEW A. GREGORY KC2PUA - Original Message From: Mark Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; digitalradio@yahoogroups.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; DigitalOnSix [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; List for people interested in the D Star repeaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2008 2:53:40 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Need Articles for TAPR PSR Journal -Original Message- From: Stan Horzepa [EMAIL PROTECTED] net Sent: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 6:33 pm Subject: Packet Status Register in the works It is time again to hit the keys and write for TAPR's quarterly newsletter, Packet Status Register (PSR), as the deadline of the Digital Communcations Conference (DCC) issue of PSR fast approaches. You can write about SDR or APRS or LSMFT or anything with or without initials, as long as it is related to ham radio, preferably on the digital side of the hobby. And remember, besides the glory of having your work appear in PSR, your TAPR membership will be automatically extended by three months. Write early and write often! 73, Stan, WA1LOU PSR Editor
Re: [digitalradio] multipsk 4.9 on linux pactor problem
Patrick, Good evening sir, and thankyou for your quick response,your software is outstanding this is the first problem I ve had but it could be from on my end. the message reads operation en virgule flottante incorrecte it flashes like a strobe but is one error window that closes and reopens very fast. the only way to stop it and regain control of computer is to log off or shut down this only happens when the pactor button is selected. MultiPSK is running out of Wine 0.9.59 GNOME Desktop 2.22.2 LINUX is UBUNTO 8.04 Thankyou for your time and hard work MATTHEW A. GREGORY KC2PUA - Original Message From: Patrick Lindecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 4:05:20 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] multipsk 4.9 on linux pactor problem Hello Matt, I'm the author of Multipsk. It is curious no to run correctly Pactor1 FEC. Could you send me (or better to the Multipsk Yahoo group as it can interest other Hams and, moreover, some Hams use Linux) the information about this bug: first the text of the message and then the scenario of the bug occurrence. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: matt gregory To: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 12:37 AM Subject: [digitalradio] multipsk 4.9 on linux pactor problem hello is anybody using multipsk 4.9 on linux mpsk runs fine until pactor 1 fec is selected then the program locks up flashing a error message in french any ideas thanks MATTHEW A. GREGORY KC2PUA - Original Message From: Mark Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] com To: illinoisdigitalham@ yahoogroups. com; [EMAIL PROTECTED] com; digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com; DigitalModes@ yahoogroups. com; PSK_VHF_UHF_ HAMRADIO@ yahoogroups. com; DigitalOnSix DigitalOnSix@ yahoogroups. com Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] com; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com; PropNET-Online@ yahoogroups. com; List for people interested in the D Star repeaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] twinslan. org Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2008 2:53:40 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Need Articles for TAPR PSR Journal -Original Message- From: Stan Horzepa [EMAIL PROTECTED] net Sent: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 6:33 pm Subject: Packet Status Register in the works It is time again to hit the keys and write for TAPR's quarterly newsletter, Packet Status Register (PSR), as the deadline of the Digital Communcations Conference (DCC) issue of PSR fast approaches. You can write about SDR or APRS or LSMFT or anything with or without initials, as long as it is related to ham radio, preferably on the digital side of the hobby. And remember, besides the glory of having your work appear in PSR, your TAPR membership will be automatically extended by three months. Write early and write often! 73, Stan, WA1LOU PSR Editor
[digitalradio] multipsk 4.9 on linux pactor problem
hello is anybody using multipsk 4.9 on linux mpsk runs fine until pactor 1 fec is selected then the program locks up flashing a error message in french any ideas thanks MATTHEW A. GREGORY KC2PUA - Original Message From: Mark Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; digitalradio@yahoogroups.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; DigitalOnSix [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; List for people interested in the D Star repeaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2008 2:53:40 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Need Articles for TAPR PSR Journal -Original Message- From: Stan Horzepa [EMAIL PROTECTED] net Sent: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 6:33 pm Subject: Packet Status Register in the works It is time again to hit the keys and write for TAPR's quarterly newsletter, Packet Status Register (PSR), as the deadline of the Digital Communcations Conference (DCC) issue of PSR fast approaches. You can write about SDR or APRS or LSMFT or anything with or without initials, as long as it is related to ham radio, preferably on the digital side of the hobby. And remember, besides the glory of having your work appear in PSR, your TAPR membership will be automatically extended by three months. Write early and write often! 73, Stan, WA1LOU PSR Editor
[digitalradio] MultiPSK 4.8 doesn't decode all that great on Olivia ?
Hello to all, Here is an extract of the answer I did in the Multipsk group plus some other results. I have also ran into at least 8 different stations running MultiPSK 4.7 or newer that I can't decode UNLESS I run MultiPSK 4.7 or later. I tried here generating Olivia 32-1000 towards an old Multipsk version and Mixw...no problem. This is logical as there was no modification on Olivia for some versions (however a regression error was always possible but there was no such error). I decided to do a side-by-side receiving/decoding test with DM780 software (1806 beta) and MultiPSK 4.8 and found that DM780 consistently could decode very weak signals 80-90 pct. copy that MultiPSK would only get 10pct or less of. I was surprised - but did I tried here comparing Mixw, Multipsk and OliviaAid with a very noisy transmission: the decodings are more or less equivalent (Multipsk being slightly better and OliviaAid slightly worse with a relatively important decoding delay). The sound card speed calibration was the same for every softs. Note: OliviaAid is worth for DM780 and Fldigi. The results are the following (with a signal at -13 dB of S/N Gaussian which is the limit for Olivia 32-1000 decoding): * OliviaAid: 120 characters decoded, * Mixw: 164 characters decoded, * Multipsk: 208 characters decoded. However, I tested on Gaussian noise, when real conditions could be very different from a Gaussian noise (QSB was not simulated for example) and so the results could be different. I think the decoding's problem of Gary is linked to the sound card speed calibration (button Sampling freq. and follow the instructions). If it keeps on failing, Gary must check that the button Freq. search is pushed (to have an equivalent to Mixw or OliviaAid) . If it keeps on failing, let's Gary contact me or better the Multipsk group. A good thing would be to send me a record file (at 11025 samples/sec, 8 bits, mono) recording a phase when Multipsk decodes badly. I will check why. I tested previously thanks to the Multipsk group the 48 KHz sampling speed (adding a provisional measure of 48 KHz sampling speed). It is in general very good (my poor on-board sound card becomes suddenly excellent), but it is, unfortunatly, not a general case (I hoped that it was a general case to progressively switch to 48 KHz). special soundcard alignment that I haven't already done - too many As indicated above, it is true that with a 48 KHz sampling frequency the probability of an immediate good result is perhaps of 80 or 90 % but unfortunatly it is not 100 % so, in all cases, it is necessary to calibrate his sound card. With Multipsk, it is automatic, it takes 2x3 mn, so I don't think it could really be a big problem. And it is one time (you can control from time to time, in case of). So in any case, it is important to calibrate the sound card, moreover in Olivia. This because it is a MFSK mode with a lot of possible carriers (32 in the standard mode), so you must not to mix one carrier with another carrier or simply have a shift which makes that you assess your carriers (through a FFT or an inter-correlation) at a bad location. The other issue is the synchronization. You must synchronize on the right moment. In general you have a capacity of auto-synchronization (about +/- 1% in Multipsk (and also about the same for Mixw as far as I see) through a digital PLL) but for the best performance it is of course better not to have to modify the standard speed and to be just at the right speed. So if for a PSK or a RTTY transmission, you could have a certain tolerance with a slow degradation of the performance around the real sound card sampling speed, in Olivia you have a quick degradation of the performance. This problem of soundcard alignment is extreme with MT63 which works with 64 carriers... 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Jose A. Amador To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 4:56 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Re: [olivia] Re: MultiPSK 4.8 doesn't decode all that great on Olivia garylinnrobinson wrote: I didn't do my comparison's on MixW and Olivia Aid - I did them with DM780 and just recently FLDigi on a separate computer but same sound feed from transceiver since FLDigi is on Linux. Same results. You can say it's just Gary but I don't believe it. And it is doesn't apply to PSK or RTTY they work abt the same on all the progs. If I have to own a special computer or special soundcard or do some special soundcard alignment that I haven't already done - too many hoops for the regular user let alone a guy who has worked in the computer industry as a tech and programmer as I have. There are several factors to consider in order to achieve a fair relative evaluation, and I am sure you know with your claimed background. First, with the data you have at hand could you achieve a quantitative
[digitalradio] Multipsk appearance
John, One major advantage of Multipsk is that it works on next-to-nothing for a PC, you can use it on old 486 machines! Every drop-down box and fancy bell and whistle usually adds CPU and RAM demand. To compare ALE400 in Multipsk with Pactor's copyright is absurd . ALE 400 is FREE whereas PIII is getting close to $2000 these days (it takes 1.5 US dollars to buy one Euro). Andy K3UK On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 1:51 PM, John Becker, WØJAB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After reading this thread with great intrust I still fail to see the difference between it and what has been done with the Pactor modes. That is other than being narrow. I have copies Pactor that has to say the least been about 2 DB under ESP. As far as FAE400 goes, I would like to try it. Too bad one can only get it from one source. (gee that kind of makes it just like pactor 3. I don't hear any anyone screaming bloody murder about that.) Multipsk may be a very fine software package but the screen looks like crap. Just way way to much un-needed garbage there. Are you listing Patrick ? If it was my software I think I would have a drop down window to pick the mode of operation. And only what was needed for that mode would be on that screen. Yeah I know - that's just my option. Everyone has one. And I'm sitting on mine. John, W0JAB in the center of fly over country -- Andy K3UK www.obriensweb.com (QSL via N2RJ)
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk : Macro's in contests
Yes, there IS a way to have separate Multipsk macro buttons just for contests without having to pres CTRL each time. Actually two ways. 1. Have TWO separate folders for Multipsk on you PC. Configure the macros in one folder for regular use, configure the other for contests. When working a contest, book the Multipsk contest folder. 2. Have just one incidence of Multipsk on you PC BUT have two sets of macros. Example, in Multipsk the Macros you use are F1 through F24. Using a text editor, create two copies of each macro you want. F1 for regular use might say CQ CQ CQ , F1 for contest use might say CQ CQ Contest. Save the two sets of macros to a zip file. When you need the contest macros , unzip them to you Multipsk and have then over write you regular macro files. After the contest unzip your regular macros (which you will have also zipped) over the contest macros. This will only take a 3-5 seconds each contest, after initial creation of the two sets of macros.If you want different macro button labels . you will also need to edit N files too. Andy K3UK On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 3:39 AM, Kevin O'Rorke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since I have had no reply to this post and it may have gon astray I am re-posting Yesterday I decided that I would give a few numbers to the RTTY contest, and re-wrote a few of my existing macro's for the exercise. Is there any way that a second set of macro's (like in mixw) can be used, or is there any way that the second 12 macro's can be locked on screen, so that CTRL does not have to be pressed each time? Is there any macro that can cause the current log entry to be saved.? Kevin VK5OA -- Andy K3UK www.obriensweb.com (QSL via N2RJ)
[digitalradio] multipsk
Greetings Am new to the list and do have a problem. I downloaded multipsk and was able to run the program but when I shut it down, it left the desktop full of folders. Did miss something in the installation? Thanks Lynn
[digitalradio] MultiPSK newest version
Hi Group and Happy New Year; I have MultiPSK Ver. 6 but lately I have noted in the group talk about Ver.6 * Can anybody confirm please? 73 de Omar YK1AO
[digitalradio] MULTIPSK New release (4.6) with PSK250 - DTM/DBM
New release (4.6) of MULTIPSK (PSK250 - DTM/DBM) Posted by: Patrick Lindecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] f6cte Date: Sat Dec 15, 2007 5:49 pm ((PST)) New release (4.6) of MULTIPSK Pour les francophones: la version française de ce message se trouve sur mon site (http://f6cte.free.fr). Il suffit de cliquer sur le lien Principales modifications (courriel avertissant de la sortie de la nouvelle version). Hello to all Ham and SWL, The new release of MULTIPSK (4.6) is in my Web site (http://f6cte.free.fr). The main mirror site is Earl's, N8KBR: http://multipsk.eqth.info/index.html (click on United States). Another mirror site isTerry's: http://www.hamshack.co.uk/ Multispk associated to Clock are freeware programs but with functions submitted to a licence (by user key). The main modifications of MULTIPSK 4.6 are the following: 1) Decoding/coding of the BPSK250/QPSK250 modes. The BPSK250 and QPSK250 modes derive from BPSK31/QPSK31 but they are eigh times faster. See specifications further on. 2) ALE and ALE400: transmission of small DTM et DBM messages. 3) Frequencemeter function This frequencemeter, integered to the Spectrum function, measures the frequency of respectively the left input signal and the right input signal, up to about 20 Khz (only the licencied copies). 4) Fax HF: possibility to modify the shift, from 700 to 1200 Hz. For information, for all the Multipsk exotic modes (PSKFEC31, PSK10, PSKAM, PSK63F, PSK220F (+DIGISSTV), CCW-FSK, MFSK8, THROBX, DominoF, DominoEX, PAX, CHIP, Voice, Packet 110 bauds...), I propose the QRP frequency: 14075 Khz USB (AF around 1000 Hz), at 17h00 UTC. 73 Patrick BPSK250 and QPSK250 Description : Baud rate : 250 Speed : 296 wpm in capital letters and 408 wpm in small letters (average) Bandwidth : about 500 Hz, Lowest S/N : -2 dB For the remainder, the characteristics are identical to the ones of BPSK31/QPSK31 modes. Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
[digitalradio] Multipsk ALE actiivity this week + Complete Bozo's Guide to ALE (?)
Hello to all, Thanks to Bonnie, there are two interesting pictures which show a typical configuration of the 141A mode (ALE). The pictures don't correspond exactly to the last version (4.4.2) but it's 98 % OK. The first step is to leave the soft in monitoring on 14109.5 KHz (on the XCVR) USB and see the ALE frames (up the band closes). There is now some activity and some interest in Europ for this system of modes which is new. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: expeditionradio To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 5:41 AM Subject: [multipsk] Multipsk ALE actiivity this week I would like to encourage all Multipsk users to try ALE 141 this week. There is a lot of activity now, and this is a really good chance to get to know more about how ALE works in Multipsk, and link up with lots of other hams on the air. Here are 2 diagrams that may be helpful for using Multipsk with ALE: http://www.hflink.com/multipsk/MultipskALEoptionsSetup.jpg http://www.hflink.com/multipsk/MPSK_OPTIONS_USA.jpg 73 Bonnie VR2/KQ6XA - ALE On The Air Week: 05-15 October AOTAW (ALE On The Air Week) is an annual International Amateur Radio event sponsored by HFLINK, a resource for ALE, HF Interoperative Communications, and HF Emcomm. Ham radio operators worldwide are invited to participate in a 10 day readiness event of ALE HF activity on the air. AOTAW-2007 is an excellent chance to explore ALE communications. Start: 0001 UTC Friday 05 October End: 2359 UTC Monday 15 October Thousands of amateur radio operators worldwide have ALE capability now, using HF ham transceivers and computers running PCALE software, Multipsk software, or commercial ALE HF transceivers adapted to ham radio ALE use. The experience gained by operator participation is also useful for HF Emergency / Disaster Relief Communications. What Is ALE? Automatic Link Establishment. In the hands of a skilled HF ham operator, ALE is a force multiplier. With the capability to call up a specific HF station, a group of stations, a net, or a networked station, ALE is a versatile digital calling system for initiating and maintaining QSOs with SSB voice, data, text, instant messaging, internet messaging, or image communications. Each ALE station uses the operator's callsign as the digital address in the ALE controller. When not actively in communication with another station, the transceiver constantly scans through a list of frequencies in multiple HF or VHF bands, listening for its callsign. To reach a specific station, the operator simply enters the callsign just like dialing a phone number, and transmits a short digital signal burst. When the distant scanning station detects the first few characters of its callsign, it stops scanning and stays on that frequency. The receiving station, which was muted up until now, typically emits an audible alarm and visual alert for the receiving operator of the incoming call. It also indicates the callsign of the linked station. The two stations' ALE controllers automatically handshake to confirm that a link is established and they are ready to communicate in any mode, such as SSB voice, text or image. All of this happens quite fast, usually within a few minutes. A unique ALE Operator Certificate is available to operators who participate in AOTAW. To qualify for the certificate, the operator simply completes at least 5 QSOs through Automatic Link Establishment communications on HF or VHF. The initial ALE linking QSO can use SSB Voice or AMD Text Message (the standard text messaging format in all ALE systems). See AOTAW Guidelines and Details. http://hflink.com/aotaw Additional certificate endorsements are issued to operators who link with 25 stations or more, or send 2 ALE-SMS text messages through High Frequency Network Pilot Stations. ALE High Frequency Network (HFN) The HFN Pilot Stations are equipped with scanning ALE transceivers, multiband antenna systems, and special software control systems for internet connectivity. Ham radio ALE users in the field on HF connect with the HFN Pilot Stations to exchange digital ALE-SMS text messaging to and from internet devices such as cell mobile phones, black berry type devices, PDAs, PCs and laptops. The free service includes: HF-to-Cellphone message HF-to-email message HF-to-HF message All HFN stations automatically exchange signal reports with each other every hour on every HF band, and all this ALE HF activity with signal reports and messages is displayed in real time on the web at ALE CHANNEL ZERO: http://hflink.net/qso Organized ALE ham activity began about 6 years ago, when a group of operators started working together to experiment with various methods of HF selective calling on HF. The need to call up emergency nets or inter-operability and liaison with government HF systems led many hams to adopt the government ALE standard, called FED-STD-1045 or MIL-STD 188-141. This standard caught on slowly in the ham community, initiated by a few
[digitalradio] Multipsk/Winwarbler DM780 via remote access
Dave, I have used Winwarbler and Multipsk on the local computer this evening, connected to my home station via Skype. Both work well on the broadband wireless system my local PC was using. I did a test transmission in RTTY , AFSK, and the audio sounded a little rough at the remote end. I will have to record Skype throughput levels in the future. I have no clue how I would send FSK RTTY when accessing my rig over the Internet, but will give that idea some more thought since it might be cleaner transmitted tones, right? The tones would generated from rig to airwaves, no Skype involved. Winwarbler transceiver commands perhaps, I just changed the rig to FSK mode via Ham Radio Deluxe and sent a transmit command , I get a single tone rather than FSK RTTY tones (via monitoring TX output with my ears) . Too tired to think right now. The fix would involve thinking about Microham's device router , ham radio deluxe, an d more. The ham radio deluxe is working well as the vehicle for remote control of the TS2000. On 4/7/07, Dave AA6YQ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Was I was on Maui two years ago, I used Skype and LogMeIn to control my home station (near Boston) and made QSOs in CW, SSB, RTTY, and PSK. The software was WinWarbler, Commander, and DXView (antenna rotation). The transceiver being controlled was an Icom 756. I recall no latency issues. Were I to do this again, I'd instead run these applications locally on my laptop, and use Skype and virtual serial ports to remotely control the transceiver and antenna rotator. 73, Dave, AA6YQ -Original Message- *From:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Andrew O'Brien *Sent:* Saturday, April 07, 2007 1:30 PM *To:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com *Subject:* [digitalradio] DM780 via remote access Just tested DM780 with Ham Radio Deluxe and Skype and it worked in receive mode very well. I connected to my home station via the Internet, woke up my TS-2000, tuned to 14070 , launched DM780 in PSK31 mode and was able to decode dignals very well. All this from my neighbour's house, next step is my laptop and the local coffee shop. I am assuming the latency with Skype and digital modes can cause some issues , but did not see any on receive only. Has anyone tried transmitting PSK31 via remote access? I saw W1CDO doing it with JT65A mode last weekend but I am not sure if he was using HRD and Skype. If anyone wants to connect to my station, for receive only at this time, feel free to contact me and I will set things up that will grant you access. You will need Skype and Ham Radio Deluxe , both FREE. I 'll test transmit later today. Andy K3UK -- Andy K3UK Skype Me : callto://andyobrien73 www.obriensweb.com
[digitalradio] multipsk 141A and ALE
at 1530Z listening on 14109.5 , short frames calling CQ or sounding making a little noise in other words... Not sure? give me your phone number and will call and talk you thru. have 24/7 toll free North America John VE5MU
[digitalradio] MULTIPSK 4.1 / CLOCK 1.5.3 / MULTIDEM 1.0 (USB/LSB/AM demodulator for direct conversion receivers)
New release (4.1) of MULTIPSK RX/TX: PSK10/BPSK31-63-125/QPSK31-63-125/CHIP (64/128)/PSKFEC31/PSKAM10-31-50/PSK63F - PSK220F + DIGISSTV Run/CW/CCW/CCW-FSK/THROB/THROBX/MFSK8/ MFSK16 (+ SSTV)/OLIVIA/CONTESTIA/RTTYM/VOICE/DominoF DF/DominoEX/MT63/RTTY 45/75/ RTTY 50+SYNOP+SHIP/ASCII/AMTOR FEC/ PACKET 300-1200 + APRS+ DIGISSTV Run/ PACTOR 1-FEC/PAX+PAX2 + APRS/FELD HELL/PSK HELL/FM HELL (105-245)/HELL 80/ HF-FAX/SSTV/ RX only: AMTOR ARQ/NAVTEX/RTTY 100/ DSP: Filters + CW binaural reception PSK Panoramic (BPSK31/BPSK63/PSKFEC31): RX 23 channels simultaneously CW Panoramic: RX 8 or 23 channels simultaneously RTTY Panoramic: RX 8 RTTY QSO decoded simultaneously on 22 channels Programmation of Multipsk reception TCP/IP digital modem CLOCK 1.5.3 (FRANCE-INTER, DCF77, HBG, RUGBY, WWVB, WWV, WWVH, GPS) Hello to all Ham and SWL, The new release of MULTIPSK (4.1) is in my Web site (http://f6cte.free.fr) and, also, the 1.5.3 of Clock (improvement of the GPS decoding). The main mirror site is Earl's, N8KBR: http://multipsk.eqth.org/index.html Another mirror site isTerry's: http://www.hamsoft.co.uk/ Multispk associated to Clock are freeware programs but with functions submitted to a licence (by user key). The main modifications of MULTIPSK 4.1 are the following: 1) addition of the Contestia and RTTYM modes. See specifications further on. Main frequencies: For 1000 Hz bandwidth sub-modes, with an AF frequency of 1000 Hz, frequency displayed on the transceiver: 14103.5 Khz For 500 and 250 Hz bandwidth: 7039.5, 14075.5 Khz The Contestia and RTTYM modes are directly derived from the Olivia mode (Pawel Jalocha SP9VRC) but with a different compromise between speed and robustness. * CONTESTIA is a bit less sensitive than Olivia (+1.5 dB on minimum S/N). It is a also a bit less robust (due to a smaller block size) but it is twice more rapid (with a reduce set of characters). This mode is an excellent chat mode (because sensitive and rapid). * RTTYM is a less sensitive than Olivia (+3 dB on minimum S/N). It is also less robust (due to a small block size and due to the RTTY problem of random shift from letters to figures or reversely, on an error) but it is almost four times more rapid (with the RTTY set of characters). This mode is interesting for very quick QSO. 2) addition of the SSTV mode SC2 180. This mode gives very good SSTV pictures (the SSTV transmission lasts 3 minutes) 3) addition of a digital dual trace spectrum analyzer (+ waterfall) 0-20 KHz 4) addition of an interface to a direct conversion receiver through the Multidem program, the Multidem signal being transmitted to Multipsk via a TCP/IP link. MULTIDEM 1.0 is a USB/LSB/AM demodulator for direct conversion receivers available from my WEB site. This program (freeware) permits to: - extract any USB, LSB or AM transmission present in the AF band of a direct conversion receiver, up to 20 Khz, - to band-pass filter the received signal, - afterwards, to forward it to amplified loudspeakers and to Multipsk (for decoding) through a TCP/IP link. 5) APRS: Multipsk becoming compatible with UI-VIEW (about GIF pictures and .INF format description files), all the maps and .INF files of the UI-VIEW MAPS folder can be copied to the Multipsk MAPS folder and be used, 6) improvement of the recording function. The modifications 3 and 6 are about functions submitted to a licence. Note 1: all the modifications are given in the bottom of the Configuration screen. Nota 2: the software APRS-SCS version 1.29 (John KB2SCS) can connect to Multipsk through the TCP/IP link. For information, for all the Multipsk exotic modes (PSKFEC31, PSK10, PSKAM, PSK63F, PSK220F (+DIGISSTV), CCW-FSK, MFSK8, THROBX, DominoF, DominoEX, PAX, CHIP, Voice...), I propose the QRP frequency: 14075 Khz USB (AF around 1000 Hz), at 17h00 UTC. 73 Patrick Contestia/RTTYM specifications Here is a comparison board between Olivia, Contestia and RTTYM: Parameters OLIVIA CONTESTIA RTTYM Block size (symbols) 64 32 16 Scrambling pseudo-random sequence 0xE257E6D0291574EC 0xEDB88320 0xEDB88320 Scrambling shift (in number of bits of sequence right rotation) 13 5 5 Characters set 7 bits (ASCII) 6 bits char - decimal code 0 (remplissage)- 0 Space - 59 CR - 60 CHR(33) to CHR(90) - 1 to 58 Multipsk specificity: BS (--- key) - 61 Small letters are transformed in capital letters 5 bits Same set of characters as for standard RTTY, except that the letters character is the CHR(0) instead the CHR(31) one The idling character is the CHR(31) character. Multipsk specificity: Bell is coded as @ (second ' in Mixw) Characters transmission speed x1 x2 almost x4 Minimum S/N / Olivia for same the sub-mode +1.5
[digitalradio] Multipsk 3.14.2
Hello to all, I have issued a 3.14.2 version of Multipsk to solve several bugs in Olivia and CCW. My Web site is (http://f6cte.free.fr. The main mirror site is Earl's, N8KBR: http://multipsk.eqth.org/index.html Another mirror site isTerry's: http://www.hamsoft.co.uk/ 73 Patrick Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "digitalradio" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW
Hello Dave, If I transmit via the Windows buffering in a tone to the sound card, no problem. If I transmit through the serial port, I need to control the time ellapsed (for a dot or a dash). As under Windows there are no interruptions (sniff), there is no way to know at which moment is the end of the dot (or the dash). So I keep the CPU working in a loop, testing the Windows timer, until the end of the dot. It is not a very elegant method but I don't know an other way to do it. Note: the Delphi system timer is not sufficiently rapid (maximum between 20 to 60 /sec). 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 3:53 AM Subject: RE: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW A 50% cpu load seems really high, Patrick. WinWarbler consumes less than 1% of a 1.5 ghz Pentium 4 when generating CW via software. It uses ticks from TimerMM.dll to drive a state machine. What sort of timer are you using? 73, Dave, AA6YQ -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Lindecker Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 18:27 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW Hello Bill and Paul, Multipsk can directly key the transceiver (I use it this way). However, it is not advised under Windows XP because it takes about 50 % of the computing power (due to the obligation to manage a pseudo timer). The most simple to do CW is to do it as PSK31 (in USB). 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Box SisteenHundred [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 11:36 PM Subject: RE: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW That IS cw Paul. In reality, that's how your rig probably generates CW By injecting an audio tone into a SSB transmitter. When you say won't do regular cw... do you mean keying a circuit open and closed so you can connect it to the key jack of your rig? 73 Bill KA8VIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ka8vit.com From: Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:56:36 - MULTI PSK ONLY XMTS CW ON USB OR LSB DOES NOT DO REGULAR CW,AT LEAST I CANT GET IT TO WORK ?? BUT IS A EXCELLENT DIGITAL PROGRAM K8PG-Paul Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW
MULTI PSK ONLY XMTS CW ON USB OR LSB DOES NOT DO REGULAR CW,AT LEAST I CANT GET IT TO WORK ?? BUT IS A EXCELLENT DIGITAL PROGRAM K8PG-Paul Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW
That IS cw Paul. In reality, that's how your rig probably generates CW By injecting an audio tone into a SSB transmitter. When you say won't do regular cw... do you mean keying a circuit open and closed so you can connect it to the key jack of your rig? 73 Bill KA8VIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ka8vit.com From: Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:56:36 - MULTI PSK ONLY XMTS CW ON USB OR LSB DOES NOT DO REGULAR CW,AT LEAST I CANT GET IT TO WORK ?? BUT IS A EXCELLENT DIGITAL PROGRAM K8PG-Paul Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW
A 50% cpu load seems really high, Patrick. WinWarbler consumes less than 1% of a 1.5 ghz Pentium 4 when generating CW via software. It uses ticks from TimerMM.dll to drive a state machine. What sort of timer are you using? 73, Dave, AA6YQ -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Lindecker Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 18:27 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW Hello Bill and Paul, Multipsk can directly key the transceiver (I use it this way). However, it is not advised under Windows XP because it takes about 50 % of the computing power (due to the obligation to manage a pseudo timer). The most simple to do CW is to do it as PSK31 (in USB). 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Box SisteenHundred [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 11:36 PM Subject: RE: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW That IS cw Paul. In reality, that's how your rig probably generates CW By injecting an audio tone into a SSB transmitter. When you say won't do regular cw... do you mean keying a circuit open and closed so you can connect it to the key jack of your rig? 73 Bill KA8VIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ka8vit.com From: Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:56:36 - MULTI PSK ONLY XMTS CW ON USB OR LSB DOES NOT DO REGULAR CW,AT LEAST I CANT GET IT TO WORK ?? BUT IS A EXCELLENT DIGITAL PROGRAM K8PG-Paul Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[digitalradio] MULTIPSK Version 3.13 is out!
http://www.hamsoft.co.uk/multipsk/ de LA5VNA Steinar Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] MultiPSK problem
Hello Rick, You must have selected the Software mixer option of the mixer menu on the Configuration screen. In that case, the sound card mixer is managed directly by the program, this to adjust the optimum level (Automatic Gain Control). The problem is the diversity of sound card mixers which don't allow operation in all sound cards mixers. 73 Patrick For question about Multipsk, PSE contact the Multipsk Yahoo group - Original Message - From: williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 3:56 AM Subject: [digitalradio] MultiPSK problem I have been using Multipsk for a while now and recently was using it on a new computer and have found that whenever I switch from one mode to another mode, or go from tx to rx, the sound card changes the slider to the maximum on both the Line In and the Wave output. This of course overdrives the rig and for a while I had difficulty figuring out just what was going on. I tried it with Digipan and the problem does not show up and everything seems to work correctly. Does anyone else have such a problem? I just uploaded version 3.12 and it is still doing the same thing. 73, Rick, KV9U Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[digitalradio] MultiPSK problem
I have been using Multipsk for a while now and recently was using it on a new computer and have found that whenever I switch from one mode to another mode, or go from tx to rx, the sound card changes the slider to the maximum on both the Line In and the Wave output. This of course overdrives the rig and for a while I had difficulty figuring out just what was going on. I tried it with Digipan and the problem does not show up and everything seems to work correctly. Does anyone else have such a problem? I just uploaded version 3.12 and it is still doing the same thing. 73, Rick, KV9U Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[digitalradio] MultiPSK query
Hello, Thankyou Patrick and Jerry for the help in solving my problem, and thanks for the information about the MultiPSK group. I shall now go and sign on. Kind Rgards, 73, Mel G0GQK Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM ~- Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link below http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] MultiPSK query
Hello Mel, Position the mouse over a macro (sequence), click right, you are in the sequence edition where you will find macros for sending the call and the name of the contacted Ham. There are two set of sequences (with and without Ctrl) so 24 possible sequences). For this type of question, the best is to go to the Multipsk Yahoo group. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 10:50 PM Subject: [digitalradio] MultiPSK query Hello everyone, I've been having a look at MultiPSK today, ploughing through the help pages, and then filling in all the required details. Then came the confusion. How do I enter the call and name of the other station ? I've tried highlighting and dragging and double clicking and I can't think of anything else except typing the details in. But surely not ! So can someone enlighten me please, reading the far from user friendly help pages has already addled my brain ! Kind regards, Mel G0GQK Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link below http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM ~- Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link below http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk 311
Same thing here, I'll try another download later. Jerry WW0E -- -- Patrick Lindecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello There are a lot of mode titles missing. The buttons work ok but fiding Curious, perhaps a bad downloading. Try again, if it continues, PSE send me a snapshot. However, the modes can be selected from the button Mode. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Kevin O'Rorke [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Diitalradio digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 7:25 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk 311 Just installed V 3.11 There are a lot of mode titles missing. The buttons work ok but fiding the right one is a bit tricky Anyone else havfe this problem VK5OA Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link below http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html Yahoo! Groups Links Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link below http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html Yahoo! Groups Links ___ Try Juno Platinum for Free! Then, only $9.95/month! Unlimited Internet Access with 250MB of Email Storage. Visit http://www.juno.com/value to sign up today! Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM ~- Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link below http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk 311
Hello There are a lot of mode titles missing. The buttons work ok but fiding Curious, perhaps a bad downloading. Try again, if it continues, PSE send me a snapshot. However, the modes can be selected from the button Mode. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Kevin O'Rorke [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Diitalradio digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 7:25 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk 311 Just installed V 3.11 There are a lot of mode titles missing. The buttons work ok but fiding the right one is a bit tricky Anyone else havfe this problem VK5OA Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link below http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM ~- Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link below http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[digitalradio] Multipsk ver. 3.11 available with PAX mode
New version of Multipsk , ver. 3.11 available now. Any one up for a PAX mode connect? 73 John, N3WT Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM ~- Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ Looking for digital mode software? This group suggests you try either : http://www.mixw.net MIWX (many modes) http://f6cte.free.fr MultiPSK (many modes) http://www.dxlab.com DXLAB (logging, PSK31/63 and more) http://www.qsl.net/hamscope Hamscope (many modes) http://http://xoomer.virgilio.it/aporcino/Chip64 Chip64 http://www.digipan.net/Digipan Digipan (PSK31 and PSK63 http://www.kc4elo.com/ Logger32 (logging, PSK31/63 and RTTY) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk ver. 3.11 available with PAX mode
Sure, when ? - Original Message - From: n3wtus [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 2:51 PM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk ver. 3.11 available with PAX mode New version of Multipsk , ver. 3.11 available now. Any one up for a PAX mode connect? 73 John, N3WT Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ Looking for digital mode software? This group suggests you try either : http://www.mixw.net MIWX (many modes) http://f6cte.free.fr MultiPSK (many modes) http://www.dxlab.com DXLAB (logging, PSK31/63 and more) http://www.qsl.net/hamscope Hamscope (many modes) http://http://xoomer.virgilio.it/aporcino/Chip64 Chip64 http://www.digipan.net/Digipan Digipan (PSK31 and PSK63 http://www.kc4elo.com/ Logger32 (logging, PSK31/63 and RTTY) Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM ~- Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ Looking for digital mode software? This group suggests you try either : http://www.mixw.net MIWX (many modes) http://f6cte.free.fr MultiPSK (many modes) http://www.dxlab.com DXLAB (logging, PSK31/63 and more) http://www.qsl.net/hamscope Hamscope (many modes) http://http://xoomer.virgilio.it/aporcino/Chip64 Chip64 http://www.digipan.net/Digipan Digipan (PSK31 and PSK63 http://www.kc4elo.com/ Logger32 (logging, PSK31/63 and RTTY) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
