Re: Have to reformat IPL volume with IPLTEXT

2006-04-24 Thread Ambat Ravi Nair
it's a case of i'm right and the whole world didn't figure it out right
anyhow, i'm leaving that place very soon 


On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 09:02:38 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+ibm-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 04/22/2006
   at 08:17 PM, Ambat Ravi Nair [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

  my current employer believes in doing just that:
  applying to live system.

Who's going to wind up holding the bag when the balloon goes up?

--

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Monitoring tool for STK 9310

2006-04-24 Thread Ambat Ravi Nair
how was it done prior to XE ?
and what sort of monitoring is being conducted ?

isn't messages on console sufficient ?
else some automation packages (AF/Operator, etc)
can help - depending on your needs.

the picture still isn't clear to me - sorry.


- ravi.


On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 21:10:57 -0700, Roland P. Chung 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi Ambat, one of my client is installing the Omegamon XE for Storage 
product montorring. We just discovered recently that the product does not 
provide interface EXIT to monitor the STK tape libraries. This was 
confirmed by IBM. We need to find another product that can do the job 
until IBM can provide this function at the end of this year in Omegamon XE.

 With best regards,

...Roland Chung
Senior Technical Specialist (S/390,VM/VSE,DB2/VSEVM)
MAXC Consultants Inc.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


intermittently session failure

2006-04-24 Thread Abdullah AlShaalan

i migrate remote 3174 to CISCO router in place of 3745.
we have a problem that some control units timed out and disconnect then 
connect each 5 seconds.

the control unit is connected thru modem to serial interface.
the interface configured as SDLC.

_
Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! 
http://search.msn.com/


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


FTP PUT of a temporary dataset

2006-04-24 Thread Steve Flynn
Can I PUT a temporary dataset using FTP... For example, I have a job
where the last thing it should do is slap some results over to a GDG
on another machine. I'd really like to be able to:

PUT TEMPDSN 'SOME.REMOTE.GDG.BASE(+1)'

However, TEMPDSN doesn't appear to get resolved to it's real
temporary name. Can you only FTP PUT cataloged datasets?

Is there some way of referring to a DD name instead of the real name
of the dataset itself? For example:

PUT DD:REPFILE 'SOME.REMOTE.GDG.BASE(+1)'

I can't find anything in TCP/IP manuals indicating I can do this, but
I thought I'd ask the collective before I start cataloging transient
datasets.

--
Steve
Despair - It's always darkest just before it goes pitch black...

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Fw: IXC102A automated by SFM ?

2006-04-24 Thread Bill Neiman
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 15:41:20 -0700, Skip Robinson 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

To shut down, we VARY XCF OFF. The HMC beeps and turns red. We move on. No
system reset.


Bruce Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Re: Fw: IXC102A automated by SFM ?


What do you do to shutdown?  The red icons indicate that the LPAR is not
running, meaning that it is in STOP state or some sort of error state,
so you must have done something.

System reset is generally a good thing on a shutdown system.  Among
other things, it does a selective reset to every I/O device, which
releases any RESERVES or pending conditions, resets path group
definitions, and generally clears the device.

--
Bruce A. Black


Skip,

 If you do not system reset before replying 'DOWN', it is possible 
that the outgoing system may still have I/O in flight while the other 
systems' peer applications are recovering for the demise of their 
partner.  This can lead to data integrity issues.  As Bruce points out, 
the system reset has the effect of purging outstanding I/O, which prevents 
this situation.  If the target system's I/O is known to have completed, 
the other systems can safely take over whatever resources its applications 
were using without fear of unserialized collision.  In most cases, by the 
time you see the outgoing system stopped, its I/O is also complete.  But 
that isn't guaranteed unless you system reset.  So, yes, you have been 
lucky to avoid problems.

 Bill Neiman
 z/OS Development

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: intermittently session failure

2006-04-24 Thread Chris Mason
Abdullah,

Please post the NCP definition of a typical 3174, that is the GROUP, LINE
and PU statements (don't bother about LU statements). Also post the
specifications you have used with your Cisco machine software - is it SNASw
with DLSw+ perhaps?

I assume the 3274 control units worked quite happily with NCP/3745 so the
3174 customization is perfectly usable.

It may be that the idle polling from the primary side, the Cisco machine, is
too infrequent.

Chris Mason

- Original Message - 
From: Abdullah AlShaalan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Monday, 24 April, 2006 12:14 PM
Subject: intermittently session failure


 i migrate remote 3174 to CISCO router in place of 3745.
 we have a problem that some control units timed out and disconnect then
 connect each 5 seconds.
 the control unit is connected thru modem to serial interface.
 the interface configured as SDLC.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: FTP PUT of a temporary dataset

2006-04-24 Thread Charles Mills
Walt's link is all you need, but the short version is //DD:REPFILE

The earlier (current?) versions of the FTP manual manage to hide this
feature like they were ashamed of it or something, but as a result of my
grumbling in this forum I was contacted by the head of IP documentation and
they have changed the organization of the manual so the DD support is now
more obvious - but I don't know if the changes made it into V1R7 or not.

Charles


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Walt Farrell
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 8:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FTP PUT of a temporary dataset


On 4/24/2006 7:28 AM, Steve Flynn wrote:
 Can I PUT a temporary dataset using FTP... For example, I have a job
 where the last thing it should do is slap some results over to a GDG
 on another machine. I'd really like to be able to:
 ...snipped...
 PUT DD:REPFILE 'SOME.REMOTE.GDG.BASE(+1)'
 
 I can't find anything in TCP/IP manuals indicating I can do this, but
 I thought I'd ask the collective before I start cataloging transient
 datasets.
 

See 
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/f1a1b950/4.2.4?SH
ELF=EZ2ZO10GDT=20050708142126 
or http://makeashorterlink.com/?F6DD2610D

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re-Scheduled Enterprise Security Meeting *** GSE UK ***

2006-04-24 Thread Mark Wilson
All,

The Re-scheduled Enterprise Security Guide meeting will take place on the 8th 
June 2006.

The location will be either IBM Southbank or Bedfont Lakes; I am awaiting 
confirmation and will let you know ASAP.

The Agenda is setout below. If you would like to attend this meeting please 
send an email to myself at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I will register you for the 
vent.

  Start
 End
 Topic
 Who
 
  09:00
 09:30
 Arrive at meeting  coffee
 All
 
  09:30
 10:00
 Introduction  GSE Working Group Business:

   

a.. Membership 
b.. Annual Conference 
c.. Future Venues 
d.. Future Topics
 Dave McRoberts
 




  10.00

   



  10:15



   



  10:30

   



  10:45
 



  10:15

   



  10:30

   





  10:45

   



  11::00
 Vendor Updates

   

a.. Vanguard
   

a.. CA
   

a.. Innovation
   

a.. Software Europe/Consul
  

   

  TBC

   



  Graham Tapper

   



  Richard Suggitt

   





  TBC
 
  11:15
 12:15
 IBM Encryption Facilities
 Keith George (IBM)
 
  12:15
 12:45
 Why De-Provisioning is important
 CA
 
  12:45
 13:30
 Lunch
 All
 
  13:30
 14:30
 Security Architectures
 Martin Borrat/Dave McRoberts
 
  14:30
 15:00
 Hints  Tips
 All
 
  15:00
 15:30
 Coffee
 All
 
  15:30
 16:45
 RACF Update

  Covering changes made in zOS 1.6, 1.7  announced for 1.8
 Mark Wilson
 
  16:45
 17:00
 Round Up  Finish
 Dave McRoberts
 



Kind Regards
 
Mark Wilson

Mobile: +44 (0) 7768 617006
 
Chairman GSE Large Systems Working Group
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: FTP PUT of a temporary dataset

2006-04-24 Thread Paul Gilmartin
In a recent note, Walt Farrell said:

 Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 08:41:59 -0400
 
 On 4/24/2006 7:28 AM, Steve Flynn wrote:
  ...snipped...
  PUT DD:REPFILE 'SOME.REMOTE.GDG.BASE(+1)'
 
Is FTP  GDG-savvy?  There's a long litany of problems accessing
GDG generations by any method other than JCL DD allocation.

I see:

4.8 z/OS V1R7.0 Comm Svr: IP User's Guide and Commands

4.8 Generation data group support   
 
   ... You cannot use FTP to create a new GDG, ...

And, in the next paragraph:

   ... Therefore, when creating a new GDG [ ... ], at least one of the
   following must be true: ...

???  So, they tell me I can't do it, then proceed to tell me the
rules for doing it?  Needs editorial revision.

 http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/f1a1b950/4.2.4?SHELF=EZ2ZO10GDT=20050708142126
 
Wherein I note:

4.2.4 z/OS V1R7.0 Comm Svr: IP User's Guide and Commands

  4.2.4 DD name support

   The FTP Client API does not support DD name transfers. The DD names
   associated with a batch job that invokes an application program using
   the FTP Client API are not available to the spawned FTP client process.

That's pretty harsh.  What was the design rationale for spawning
the client process rather than using a more DD name friendly
mechanism such as ATTACH?  Is there any security concern that
would preclude running an FTP server task in the same address
space as the caller?

But, I wondered, could one use DYNALLOC (BPXWDYN) to capture the
volume and provide that to FTP?

So, in the same publication:

5.34 z/OS V1R7.0 Comm Svr: IP User's Guide and Commands

5.34 LOCSIte subcommand--Specify site information to the local host

   VOLume
   Specifies the volume serial number for allocation of new data sets.

Alas, the operant word is new.  What was the design rationale
for not applying LOCSITE VOLUME likewise to existing data sets?

I note that the API restriction does not apply to invoking
FTP in a batch job step.

-- gil
-- 
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: z/os 1.7 install

2006-04-24 Thread Jousma, David
 Dennis,

Besides reading the book that John pointed you too, I'd suggest a mod-9
is NOT overkill.  Just out Root, and Java filesystems together on 1.6
are 50,612 tracks. Regarding SYSRES, we just use a single mod-27 to
house all targets, and SMPE controlled HFS(non-SMS managed) datasets,
and a mod-27 to house all DLIBS, + SMPPTS's, etc.  Both are running
about 80% utilization.  We then clone the target sysres to additional
mod-27's to use as the actual running sysres volumes.  Works good for
us.

Dave



Dave Jousma
Principal Systems Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
616.653.8429



 Dennis Leong schreef: 
 We are getting ready to install z/os 1.7.  Would 3 3390-mod9 be 
 sufficent without wasting too much space (75% utilization or more is 
 good)?  One of the mod-9 would be sms managed for the USS HFS and I 
 think that this may be overkill - perhaps a mod-3 would suffice?
 Thank you.




This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be 
privileged.   It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you 
receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any 
manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please 
reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was 
misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your 
assistance in correcting this error is appreciated.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: FTP PUT of a temporary dataset

2006-04-24 Thread Paul Gilmartin
In a recent note, Steve Flynn said:

 Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:27:51 +0100
 
 PUT TEMPDSN 'SOME.REMOTE.GDG.BASE(+1)'
 
 However, TEMPDSN doesn't appear to get resolved to it's real
 temporary name.
 
I had believed the name construct is a JCL interpreter facility,
available in no other context.  Is there anywhere other than
a JCL DD statement where name is effective?

-- gil
-- 
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Status Of DASD Unit

2006-04-24 Thread willie bunter
Good Morning
   
  Can anyone tell me what the F means when I display a dasd unit?
   
  UNIT TYPE STATUSVOLSER VOLSTATE  
924A 3390 F-NRD  /RSDNT
  
 
  Thanks


-
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ 
countries) for 2¢/min or less.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Status Of DASD Unit

2006-04-24 Thread Bruce Black


  Can anyone tell me what the F means when I display a dasd unit?
   
  UNIT TYPE STATUSVOLSER VOLSTATE  
924A 3390 F-NRD  /RSDNT
F short for OFFLINE and NRD is NOT READY.  If the device was READY, it 
should just show as OFFLINE.


--
Bruce A. Black
Senior Software Developer for FDR
Innovation Data Processing 973-890-7300
personal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sales info: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tech support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.innovationdp.fdr.com

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Fw: IXC102A automated by SFM ?

2006-04-24 Thread Walter Marguccio
- Original Message 
From: Bill Neiman [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 Walter,

 When the documentation speaks about automating IXC102A, what it 
 really means is that the system will not issue IXC102A at all, with SFM 
 set up appropriately in a parallel sysplex.  Barbara is correct - in a 
 parallel sysplex, SFM can isolate the outgoing system by fencing it from 
 the I/O subsystem, as long as there is a CF having connectivity to both 
 the outgoing system and some other system in the plex that can initiate 
 the isolation.  You cannot achieve this function in a basic sysplex.

Bill,
I believe what you states, unfortunately I didn't understood that reading the 
book.
Yes, Barbara is correct about isolating a system from the plex, but my point 
was another one.
If you have a basic plex and you want to let SFM automate a system reset of a 
LPAR for a planning system shutdown, 
these stmts SYSTEM NAME(*) RESETTIME(20) in the SFM policy works fine. This is 
what I have experienced so far,
and I would be grateful to you if you can confirm the following:
 
1. V XCF,my_lpar,OFF
2. R xx,SYSNAME=my_lpar
... system waits cleanup time (defined in COUPLExx), then goes in 0A2 ...
... system waits reset time (defined in SFM) then SFM resets the lpar 
3. msg IXC102A pops up, having SFM reset the lpar I can safely reply R xx, DOWN
   (or automate the reply using my automation package)
 
Sorry for being persistent on this, but I don't want to play with the fire, nor 
explaining rubbish to my operating staff.
 
Best regards
 
Walter Marguccio
 
 
 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Status Of DASD Unit

2006-04-24 Thread Lizette Koehler
Willie,

If you look up the message ID (should be like an IEE message) with this
display you would find that it means that the dasd unit is offline. NRD
means not ready.  So you need to have someone vary the device online.  If
that does not work, then you would need to have someone do a display of the
dasd matrix and see if the paths are available.  If that does not work you
would need someone verify the hardware is connected to the system.  Since I
do not know if this is escon attached, a virtual device defined like dased,
or other, this is the only advice I can offer at this time.

But do use LOOKAT or use the MVS Messages and Codes manuals. They explain
messages very well.

Lizette 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: FTP PUT of a temporary dataset

2006-04-24 Thread Charles Mills
Are you/they perhaps confusing create a new GDG [new group] with create a
new generation of an existing GDG? I *think* FTP can do the latter but not
the former.

All of the why questions are valid but as useless as many why questions. Why
did they do it that way? Because they did.

Why they didn't bring the DD support over into the new API is utterly beyond
me also, but I gave up questioning these IBM design decisions back about
1972.

Charles



-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 10:08 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FTP PUT of a temporary dataset

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Fw: IXC102A automated by SFM ?

2006-04-24 Thread Jim Mulder
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 04/21/2006 
09:37:14 PM:

 
  To shut down, we VARY XCF OFF. The HMC beeps and turns red. We move 
on. No 
  system reset. 
 The VARY XCF OFF puts the system in a wait state, thus the red icon. 
 But it does not do a system reset.  Obviously you can get away without 
 it, but I recommend it

  APAR OY36587 on SP4.1.0 (around 1991) added support for a System Control
Program Initiated Reset.  When MVS loads a disabled wait state (for 
example,
the 0A2 wait state which results from VARY XCF OFF), MVS issues a Diagnose 

instruction to initiate the reset and load the disabled wait (assuming
the processor environment supports this function, which is indicated
by SCCBIRIN in IHASCCB). 
 
Jim Mulder   z/OS System Test   IBM Corp.  Poughkeepsie,  NY

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Fw: IXC102A automated by SFM ?

2006-04-24 Thread Mark Zelden
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 15:33:04 -0700, Skip Robinson 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Without mining thru previous posts--I thought the dangling issue was the
last system down, where SFM no longer has the power to initiate a cleanup.
Isn't that the case where system reset is proposed as necessary?


Also without mining thru previous posts, I *didn't* think it was the 
last system we were talking about.  Otherwise, there would be no
system left active to see the reply down message to begin with.

So I think you are safe.  I doubt our operations ever SYSTEM RESETs
the last system out of a plex here either.  Even if there was an
outstanding RESERVE, who would it hurt since no other systems are
sharing at that point.  The only way it could hurt is if the last system 
down was not the first system up in the sysplex (which is SOP, and if
it wasn't operations would be more confused by the messages when they 
IPL the wrong system first) and if a volume that has RESERVEs
issued against it is shared outside the scope of the sysplex (we have
one volume that falls in that category for HSC/VTCS).  

Cheers,

Mark

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Monitoring tool for STK 9310

2006-04-24 Thread Mark Zelden
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 10:48:59 -0400, Roland Chung [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

Hi Listers, my client is looking for a software package for monitorring
the STK tape libraries. They are at z/OS 1.5.

Any suggestion will be appreciated.


What do you want to monitor?  Cell free space? What is where?  

There is SLUADMIN for reports on what's in the library (part of HSC).

There are SMF records.  MXG can report on them I think or you can RYO.

There is ExLM to manage movement of tapes, free cells per LSM, scratch
tapes, etc.

There is also ExPR which is an Sun-Tek product for monitoring perforance
and capacity of their libraries and VSM.  Admitingly I don't know too much
about this one (even though we are licensed for it).

Regards,

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Monitoring tool for STK 9310

2006-04-24 Thread Mark Vitale
If you are looking for charts based on STK's user SMF records,
my company has a product that will do that.  Check our website
or contact me offlist if you want more information.

Regards,

Mark Vitale 
Senior Software Engineer
Telephone 610.865.0300 (ext. 138) 

ISM - The power behind great IT decisions
Visit us at www.perfman.com 



 

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roland Chung
 Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2006 10:49 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
 Subject: Monitoring tool for STK 9310
 
 Hi Listers, my client is looking for a software package for 
 monitorring the STK tape libraries. They are at z/OS 1.5.
 
 Any suggestion will be appreciated.
 
 Thanks in advance.
 
 --
 With best regards,
 
 ...Roland Chung
 Senior Technical Specialist (S/390,VM/VSE,DB2/VSEVM) MAXC 
 Consultants Inc.
 Voice/Fax: 416-469-3280 (If busy, call: 416-469-2268)
 197 Hastings Ave., Toronto, Ontario, Canada. M4L 2L6
 
 *Life is short. Stop once in a while and smell the roses.*
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access 
 instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the 
 message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at 
 http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Binder REP Cards (Was: What's the linkage editor really wants?)

2006-04-24 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 04/24/2006
   at 01:29 AM, Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

Check this out. It appears to be CMS HELP for the LOAD command. It
includes a description of the REP card but also a VER card.

Thanks.
 
-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Binder REP Cards (Was: What's the linkage editor really wants?)

2006-04-24 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 04/24/2006
   at 01:46 AM, Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

The conjecture may be mine. The operating system was *not* DOS (VSE)
or VM. I'm pretty sure it was the usual smaller OS of the time, VS1
was it mot?

OS/VS1 was the follow-on to OS/360 MFT II. While smaller than MVS, it
was arguably larger than OS/VS2 R1 (SVS) and certainly larger than
DOS/VS and DOS/VSE. I would never have had occasion to check whether
OS/VS1 supported REP; my OS/VS experience was with OS/VS2 and by then
I had effectively abandoned EAM cards.
 
-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: FTP PUT of a temporary dataset

2006-04-24 Thread Gilbert Saint-Flour
On Monday 24 April 2006 08:58, Charles Mills wrote:

 ... the short version is //DD:REPFILE
 
 The earlier (current?) versions of the FTP manual manage to hide this
 feature like they were ashamed of it or something, .

My understanding (I may be wrong) is that support for //DD:ddname was a 
by-product of a change in one of the C routines used by the FTP client, 
i.e. it's not something that resulted from a change in the code for the 
FTP client itself. ISTR //DD:ddname was introduced in OS/390 R9 or R10.  
A few releases later (z/OS 1.2 IIRC), VSAM support became available in 
the FTP client through the same mechanism, but it's neither documented 
not supported.  Again, this is my understanding, don't take my word for 
it.

-- 

 Gilbert Saint-Flour
 GSF Software
 http://gsf-soft.com/
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Need Help defining an AS400 with an IP address to the mainframe

2006-04-24 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 04/24/2006
   at 02:26 AM, Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

I think the text you found logically, if not chronologically,
precedes the introduction of the type 2.1 node and the introduction
of the control point as the entity managing the node rather than
always the PU.

Chronologically, which is why I made sure to mention that it was old.
But the PUCP was already there. If you have a recent FAPL manual, is
there a section on nomenclature around p I-8?
 
-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: TOD Clock the same as the BIOS clock in PCs?

2006-04-24 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 04/23/2006
   at 06:08 PM, John S. Giltner, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

Any OS can support the hardware clock for the platform it is running
on  to be set to local time or UTC.

Where did I imply that a OS can support hardware that is not
there?

The text that you quoted above, because some hardware platforms do not
contain a hardware clock that can be set to either.

I said that it can support what the platform supplies.

You said more than that; you made a claim as to how it could be set.

Again, I stated that OS can support what the platform supplies. 

Again, you stated more than that.

So a TOD clock does not supply the time of day?

Red herrings! Get your red herrings while they're fresh. I didn't say
that the TOD clock can't supply the time of day; I said that tw
different pieces of hardware weren't supplying the same function.

However that is one of the functions it does do and that  function
can be compared with hardware clocks on other platforms (at  least
those platforms that supply hardware clocks).

Only with some of the platforms that supply hardware clocks.

I did go and read the POP and it seems to imply that the TOD clock 
only provides the time  of day.  That there are two other timers 
that do the clock comparator  and CPU synchronization and that these 
three clocks together provide the  timer functions for z/Series 
hardware.

There are only two timing facilities; CPU and TOD. The clock
comparator compares the value in the TOD clock.

Again, according to the POP, some of the other functions you mention
are  not provided by the TOD clock, but by other clocks all
considered part  of the mainframe timer facilities.

There is nothing in the PoOps about a third clock. 

Is the TOD clock like a RTC/CMOS clock?

Which? The PC has several different timing facilities. 

-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: TSO COLUMNS Command

2006-04-24 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
04/23/2006
   at 11:06 AM, willie bunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

Subject: TSO COLUMNS Command

Do you mean ISPF?

I would like to just view columns 50 -55 when in edit/browse mode in
a dsn.

ISPF EDIT and VIEW provide a line command called BNDS that can be used
to limit the scope of editing commands. In addition, you can specify
columns in some editing commands, e.g., FIND.

Also, can we do an INCLUDE or EXCLUDE when performing a FIND
command.

The options X and NX limit the find to excluded lines and non-excluded
lines, respectively.

-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: TOD Clock the same as the BIOS clock in PCs?

2006-04-24 Thread J R
From:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Subject: Re: TOD Clock the 
same as the BIOS clock in PCs?

Date: Date:  Mon, Apr 24 2006 4:36 am



which was probably brought to you by the same people who have a bizarre 
collating sequence where zero follows 9 (see your local keyboard or 
telephone keypad for examples).




I think that the zero really means ten.

At least it did, back in the pulse days.


No. Zero means zero.

Since it was difficult to count zero pulses,
it was represented by ten pulses instead,
hence its position on the rotary dial.

_
Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! 
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Binder REP Cards (Was: What's the linkage editor really wants?)

2006-04-24 Thread Chris Langford
However CMS LOAD rejects a SYM card as invalid. Assembler generates it, 
LOAD hiccups.


Chris Mason wrote:


Shmuel,

Check this out. It appears to be CMS HELP for the LOAD command. It includes
a description of the REP card but also a VER card.
 



--
Chris Langford,
Cestrian Software:
Consulting services for: VM, VSE, MVS, z/VM, z/OS, OS/2, P/3x0 etc. 


z/FM  - A toolbox for VM  MVS at http://zfm.cestrian.com
Deva Woodcrafting:
Furniture creation, House remodeling, Wagon restoration etc.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Fw: IXC102A automated by SFM ?

2006-04-24 Thread Edward Jaffe

Jim Mulder wrote:

  APAR OY36587 on SP4.1.0 (around 1991) added support for a System Control
Program Initiated Reset.  When MVS loads a disabled wait state (for 
example, the 0A2 wait state which results from VARY XCF OFF), MVS issues a Diagnose 
instruction to initiate the reset and load the disabled wait (assuming

the processor environment supports this function, which is indicated
by SCCBIRIN in IHASCCB).
  


How funny! I was just going to suggest that someone modify MVS to 
initiate the RESET just before it loads the disabled WAIT. Glad to see 
it's already been done!


Now, if someone can just figure out a way to inform my SE/HMC that there 
is no need to record the _intended and deliberate_ disabled wait as a 
hardware failure, I'll be happy. Deleting hardware failure false 
alarms every time we IPL an LPAR on our z800 is tiring. Has this already 
been addressed with the latest and greatest gear?


--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: PDSEs in LNKLST at IPL can't be deleted

2006-04-24 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 04/23/2006
   at 08:48 PM, Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

If the appropriate SETPROG is issued, each address space gets the new
linklist.

Isn't there still some code in the system that uses the original DEB?
 
-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Status Of DASD Unit

2006-04-24 Thread Harry Riedel
F-NRD offline, not ready


   
 willie bunter 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 OO.COMTo
 Sent by: IBM  IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
 Mainframe  cc
 Discussion List   
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject
 .EDU Status Of DASD Unit   
   
   
 04/24/2006 10:31  
 AM
   
   
 Please respond to 
   IBM Mainframe   
  Discussion List  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
   .EDU 
   
   




Good Morning

  Can anyone tell me what the F means when I display a dasd unit?

  UNIT TYPE STATUSVOLSER VOLSTATE
924A 3390 F-NRD  /RSDNT


  Thanks


-
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+
countries) for 2¢/min or less.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Disclaimer: The information contained in this communication is confidential and 
only for the use of the intended addressee(s).  If you have received this 
communication in error, any disclosure or use of such information is strictly 
prohibited.  Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies.  
Thank you.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


z8 ???

2006-04-24 Thread Phil Payne
 SNAPSHOT: Please join us for an IBM System z9 Business Class announcement
 on Thursday, April 27 at 16:30 UK.

Who thinks of these things, and do they have ANY contact with reality?

OK, guys.  We've had an increasingly tough time over the past couple of 
decades, mostly
because of IBM's software price gouging.  Not to mention its asshole lawyer.

But c'mon - when was the last time a paid mainframe employee flew Business 
Class at company
expense?

I thought bc stood for Business Computer.  Now that makes a bit of sense.  
But Business
Class?

You get there just the same, but pay 60% more and get a free orange juice.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Need Help defining an AS400 with an IP address to the mainframe

2006-04-24 Thread Thomas Lawrence
USSTAB - fine - but why only some of the LUs?

To reply to that question only, you don't need USSTAB's for printers. 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: z8 ???

2006-04-24 Thread (IBM Mainframe Discussion List)
 
 
In a message dated 4/24/2006 11:40:34 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

when was the last time a paid mainframe employee flew Business  Class at 
company
expense?
October, 1998 was my last time.  It all depends on who your  employer is, how 
profitable they are, their travel policy, and how far the  trip is.  I flew 
from Boston to Johannesburg, my employer was  extremely profitable, and I 
qualified under their policy because flying  each way took about 18 hours.  It 
was 
wonderful.  And I had a lot  more than a free orange juice; e.g., there was 
free food and booze in the  exclusive waiting lounges at Logan and Heathrow.

You get there just  the same, but pay 60% more and get a free orange juice.
You also have a LOT more leg room, elbow room, comfort in general, and  
storage space for carry-on items.


Bill  Fairchild


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Need Help defining an AS400 with an IP address to the mainframe

2006-04-24 Thread Thomas Lawrence
Some of these questions I am asking the originator of the project and have
not gotten an answer yet. 

Some I can answer: Yes, all of the sessions are 5250/3270, some are
printers, but they are still considered 'of that type'.

The other 3 questions will remain unanswered for now. 
Sorry.



On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 09:14:52 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 04/21/2006
   at 06:20 PM, Thomas Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

Does this help?

It still leaves a few questions un answered.

Are all of the sessions on the AS/400 either 3270 or 5250? If not,
what other types of session do you run?

How will the *new* AS/400 be connected?

What is the relevance of the IP addresses?

Do you, or do you plan to, run TN3270 on your PC's? Do you need 3270
access from real terminals as opposed to only from PC's?

--
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
=

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: z8 ???

2006-04-24 Thread Edward Jaffe

Phil Payne wrote:

SNAPSHOT: Please join us for an IBM System z9 Business Class announcement
on Thursday, April 27 at 16:30 UK.



Who thinks of these things, and do they have ANY contact with reality?

OK, guys.  We've had an increasingly tough time over the past couple of 
decades, mostly
because of IBM's software price gouging.  Not to mention its asshole lawyer.

But c'mon - when was the last time a paid mainframe employee flew Business 
Class at company
expense?

I thought bc stood for Business Computer.  Now that makes a bit of sense.  But 
Business
Class?

You get there just the same, but pay 60% more and get a free orange juice.
  


Agreed completely!

The problem stems from the extremely poor choice of System z9 as a 
brand name. (The IBM System z9 109 was obviously named by someone in 
IBM's Department of Redundancy Department!) By putting the number 9 
into the brand name, they broke the quite reasonable zSeries convention 
of using 9 for the big machines and 8 for the mid-size offering. So 
they decided to come up with the naming convention weirdness 
(presumably) being unveiled this week...


--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


ADMINISTRIVIA: Offensive Language

2006-04-24 Thread Darren Evans-Young
Please refrain from using words in your posts that may be
deemed offensive or inappropriate. ...like the one just recently posted.

Personally, I don't care, but I am getting flooded with rejections
from all the content analyzers (Mail Marshall, etc.). If it happens
again, I will put the offender on NOPOST and forward all these wonderful
rejection notices to the offender.

I will now have to kill the z8 thread because everyone is replying
to the post that had the offending word and I keep getting even MORE
rejection notices! Ah!

Darren

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: z8 ???

2006-04-24 Thread Edward Jaffe

Phil Payne wrote:

SNAPSHOT: Please join us for an IBM System z9 Business Class announcement
on Thursday, April 27 at 16:30 UK.



Who thinks of these things, and do they have ANY contact with reality?

OK, guys.  We've had an increasingly tough time over the past couple of 
decades, mostly
because of IBM's software price gouging.  Not to mention its [bleep!] lawyer.

But c'mon - when was the last time a paid mainframe employee flew Business 
Class at company
expense?

I thought bc stood for Business Computer.  Now that makes a bit of sense.  But 
Business
Class?

You get there just the same, but pay 60% more and get a free orange juice.
  


Agreed completely!

The problem stems from the extremely poor choice of System z9 as a
brand name. (The IBM System z9 109 was obviously named by someone in
IBM's Department of Redundancy Department!) By putting the number 9
into the brand name, they broke the quite reasonable zSeries convention
of using 9 for the big machines and 8 for the mid-size offering. So
they decided to come up with the naming convention weirdness
(presumably) being unveiled this week...

--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: LOADxx IEASYM parms

2006-04-24 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
I would have to try it to be sure, but I don't believe it matters in
regards to your concern for totally messing things up.

If IEASYMXY is specified in LOADxx, but not present in parmlib I would
expect the following:

IEA013E ERROR DETECTED PROCESSING IEASYMxx:...
IEA011A RESPECIFY ENTIRE IEASYMXX SUFFIX LIST OR U TO BYPASS

If specified in LOADxx and merely present in parmlib with comments I
would expect the following without any further problems:

IEA009I SYMBOLIC DEFINITIONS WILL BE READ FROM:...

I would create a new LOADxx member for trying this out.  Note in LOADxx
IEASYM suffixes are read from left to right where duplicate definitions
override previous definitions.

Regards,

Kevin

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 4:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: LOADxx IEASYM parms

What happens if the IEASYM parm in LOADxx specifies an used sufix; that 
is, specifies (00,XY) but IEASYMXY does not exist?  Is there just an 
error message?  A WTOR?  Something worse?

What if IEASYMXY exists but is empty or contains just comments?

I've just asked for a new IEASYMxx member, and am trying to determine 
what damage I might do if I screw up.

Thanks.

Pat O'Keefe  

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


WLM Service Definition for DDF Thread

2006-04-24 Thread Steve Grimes
Hello, DB2 V7.1, z/OS 1.4, WLM Goal Mode here, with DB2 PM, cross posting 
to DB2-L and IBM-Main, here!

There is a lot written about this topic in the archives, and I'm also 
looking at other resources (Hugh Smith presentation, DB2 Admin guide, 
etc.) but I'd like to make a recommendation to our Systems folks this 
afternoon and would appreciate any perspective anyone can offer:

Here is an excerpt  from our WLM DB2 Transaction Classification screen:

1  SI   DBP1
2PN   FIPLAN DB2TTRAN
2PN   MANTIS DB2PTRAN
2PN   *

DBP1 is our production subsystem.  I assume that DBTTRAN has a lower 
priority than DB2PTRAN.  (Because FIPLAN is mostly batch against 
production and MANTIS is mostly online.)  I assume the asterisk is to 
prevent our DDF threads from falling into the default discretionary class. 
 (Is this true?)

My issue is that I would like to throttle our users MSACCESS threads to 
this DBP1 subsystem.  Could this be as simple as adding:

2CI   MSACCESS   DB2TTRAN 

To the above list?   (DB2 PM says MSACCESS is the 'Correlation Name'.  It 
also says MSACCESS.EXE is the 'Client Application Name'.)  I get plenty of 
'Thread Id' stuff from PM, but am having trouble mapping it to the 'WLM 
Classification Attribute' abbreviations in the DB2 Admin guide.

Is there a better approach? 

Thanks in advance!

Stg

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Multi-level Alias

2006-04-24 Thread Cathy Taddei
Hi Dave.  I too have an unpleasant taste in my mouth from multi-level 
aliases.  I don't remember a lot of the details, but they were a PITA when 
I was merging two master catalogs.  It didn't help that the shop I was in 
also made extensive use of dataset aliases, which I detest. 

One question for you:  why are you considering MLA's?  Do you recall 
reading this in z/OS DFSMS: Managing Catalogs:

... the multilevel alias facility should only be used when a better 
solution cannot be found. The need for the multilevel alias facility can 
indicate poor data set naming conventions. Before defining multilevel 
aliases, review your data set naming conventions.

If MLA's will solve a problem for you, great, but I wouldn't do it lightly.

Regards,
Cathy Taddei


On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 13:10:04 -0400, Jousma, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

All,

We are evaluating making a change from MLA(1) to MLA(2).  I've read
through Managing Catalogs, and there seem to be a few issues that could
present themselves in a MLA environment.  I'm looking for some real
world experience, both the good things, and the pitfalls.  I'm also
hoping Mark Thomen might chime in.  

I've worked in other environments that had a MLA of 2, and ran into some
issues, and didn't come out with a good taste in my mouth.

It's Friday, I hope to get some good feedback.

Thanks, Dave


Dave Jousma
Principal Systems Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
616.653.8429

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: WLM Service Definition for DDF Thread

2006-04-24 Thread Ted MacNEIL
1  SI   DBP1
2PN   FIPLAN DB2TTRAN
2PN   MANTIS DB2PTRAN
2PN   *

DBP1 is our production subsystem.  I assume that DBTTRAN has a lower 
priority than DB2PTRAN.  (Because FIPLAN is mostly batch against 
production and MANTIS is mostly online.) 

Can't make that assumption here.
You need to know how the two service classes are defined.
Different set of panels to look that up.


I assume the asterisk is to 
prevent our DDF threads from falling into the default discretionary class. 


Since there is no service class defined on the same line as '*', it will fall 
into what ever is defined as your default class for DDF work.
If that's discretionary, it will be discretionary.

-
-teD

O-KAY! BLUE! JAYS!
Let's PLAY! BALL!

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: The return of Hot Catholic High School Girls in Bondage - z/OS version

2006-04-24 Thread Jon Brock
Let me get this straight: you offer ten labs [that] let you get your hands on 
. . . Hot Catholic High School Girls in Bondage?  

Computer training sure has changed a lot over the years.

Jon



snip
Back in 1999, I wrote a course about inter-language
communication in OS/390 and asked the ibm-main folks
to suggest a title that was lively and attention
getting. Someone (and I can't find my notes on who)
suggested Hot Catholic High School Girls in Bondage
- my all time favorite title for a technical training
course.

...

The student handout consists of 538 exciting, thrill-packed
pages of notes, examples, and explanations. Ten labs let
you get your hands on and actually accomplish all this
kind of work yourself.

/snip

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: WLM Service Definition for DDF Thread

2006-04-24 Thread Steve Samson

Steve

It appears that the first level definition does not specify a default 
service class for SI DBP1. Therefore the asterisk does exactly what it 
should, putting the fallthrough threads in DISC.


The problem can be remedied by specifying as follows:

1 SI DBP1DB2TTRAN
2  PNMANTIS  DB2PTRAN

All the non-MANTIS transactions will go to DB2TTRAN. A level 2 
definition is an exception to the general rule that the first hit fixes 
the classification. If a different default from DB2TTRAN is necessary, 
put it on the level 1 line and add a level 2 for PN FIPLAN. If the 
MANTIS transactions are more important or much more numerous than the 
others, put the MANTIS rule as the first level 2, to save some minuscule 
increment of processing time.


The asterisk catcher is unnecessary here. It was a leftover from the 
days of implicit classification of STCs.


Cheers,

Steve Samson

Steve Grimes wrote:
Hello, DB2 V7.1, z/OS 1.4, WLM Goal Mode here, with DB2 PM, cross posting 
to DB2-L and IBM-Main, here!


There is a lot written about this topic in the archives, and I'm also 
looking at other resources (Hugh Smith presentation, DB2 Admin guide, 
etc.) but I'd like to make a recommendation to our Systems folks this 
afternoon and would appreciate any perspective anyone can offer:


Here is an excerpt  from our WLM DB2 Transaction Classification screen:

1  SI   DBP1
2PN   FIPLAN DB2TTRAN
2PN   MANTIS DB2PTRAN
2PN   *

DBP1 is our production subsystem.  I assume that DBTTRAN has a lower 
priority than DB2PTRAN.  (Because FIPLAN is mostly batch against 
production and MANTIS is mostly online.)  I assume the asterisk is to 
prevent our DDF threads from falling into the default discretionary class. 
 (Is this true?)


My issue is that I would like to throttle our users MSACCESS threads to 
this DBP1 subsystem.  Could this be as simple as adding:


2CI   MSACCESS   DB2TTRAN 

To the above list?   (DB2 PM says MSACCESS is the 'Correlation Name'.  It 
also says MSACCESS.EXE is the 'Client Application Name'.)  I get plenty of 
'Thread Id' stuff from PM, but am having trouble mapping it to the 'WLM 
Classification Attribute' abbreviations in the DB2 Admin guide.


Is there a better approach? 


Thanks in advance!

Stg


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?

2006-04-24 Thread Thomas David Rivers
I've got a question for the group-at-large, which I hope
will be obvious to someone deeply in-the-know.

I've got a program that opens a VB PDS (RECFM=VB,BLKSIZE=2550,LRECL=255).

But - note that I said it opens the PDS, not a member of the PDS.  That
open succeeds, and presumably, the program will merrily try to
read the PDS directory as Format-V records.

So - the first read succeeds, and it gets these bytes back for
the first 6:

000E  
| BDW  | | RDW 

The BDW indicates a block-len of 14, but the 'reserved' bytes are not 00.
The RDW then indicates a record length of 65535 - which is preposterous
given that the BDW said the entire block-len was only 14.

And - of course, trying to read 65531 bytes for the remaining record
doesn't work, because they aren't there.  The 14 isn't there either.

OK - admittedly - walking thru the directory entries and trying
to interpret that as VB isn't the best thing in the world... but,
what's a program to do with what the user types.

Should it look at the lrecl/blksize in the DCB and decide that
this doesn't make sense?  What if it did make sense - then what?

Or - is there a way to know this is a bunch of bytes from a
PDS directory... and this READ doesn't make sense?

- Many thanks! -
- Dave Rivers -

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Work: (919) 676-0847
Get your mainframe programming tools at http://www.dignus.com

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: The return of Hot Catholic High School Girls in Bondage - z/OS version

2006-04-24 Thread Steve Comstock

Jon Brock wrote:
Let me get this straight: you offer ten labs [that] let you get your hands on . . . Hot Catholic High School Girls in Bondage?  


Computer training sure has changed a lot over the years.


Yeah. Well, I try to stay current!

-Steve Comstock

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: FTP PUT of a temporary dataset

2006-04-24 Thread Paul Gilmartin
In a recent note, Gilbert Saint-Flour said:

 Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:03:42 -0400
 
 My understanding (I may be wrong) is that support for //DD:ddname was a
 by-product of a change in one of the C routines used by the FTP client,
 i.e. it's not something that resulted from a change in the code for the
 FTP client itself. ISTR //DD:ddname was introduced in OS/390 R9 or R10.
 A few releases later (z/OS 1.2 IIRC), VSAM support became available in
 the FTP client through the same mechanism, but it's neither documented
 not supported.  Again, this is my understanding, don't take my word for
 it.
 
It may have originated that way, but nowadays it's not that simple.
The behavior is discernibly (and irritatingly) different depending
on whether ddname is allocated to a Classic data set or to a UNIX
file.  Apparently FTP doesn't simply OPEN and QSAM GET/PUT on the
ddname.  Another unwarranted deviation from the S/360 model of I/O
abstraction.

-- gil
-- 
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?

2006-04-24 Thread McKown, John
 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas David Rivers
 Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 1:41 PM
 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
 Subject: Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?
 
 
 I've got a question for the group-at-large, which I hope
 will be obvious to someone deeply in-the-know.
 
 I've got a program that opens a VB PDS 
 (RECFM=VB,BLKSIZE=2550,LRECL=255).
 
 But - note that I said it opens the PDS, not a member of the 
 PDS.  That
 open succeeds, and presumably, the program will merrily try to
 read the PDS directory as Format-V records.
 
 So - the first read succeeds, and it gets these bytes back for
 the first 6:
 
   000E  
 | BDW  | | RDW 
 
 The BDW indicates a block-len of 14, but the 'reserved' bytes 
 are not 00.
 The RDW then indicates a record length of 65535 - which is 
 preposterous
 given that the BDW said the entire block-len was only 14.
 
 And - of course, trying to read 65531 bytes for the remaining record
 doesn't work, because they aren't there.  The 14 isn't there either.
 
 OK - admittedly - walking thru the directory entries and trying
 to interpret that as VB isn't the best thing in the world... but,
 what's a program to do with what the user types.
 
 Should it look at the lrecl/blksize in the DCB and decide that
 this doesn't make sense?  What if it did make sense - then what?
 
 Or - is there a way to know this is a bunch of bytes from a
 PDS directory... and this READ doesn't make sense?
 
   - Many thanks! -
   - Dave Rivers -

The directory of a PDS is not VB. It is
RECFM=F,LRECL=256,BLKSIZE=256,KEYLEN=8. You can ignore the key, if you
want. You must read all 256 bytes and deblock the logical records
yourself. They are not compatable with RECFM=VB, but they are close.
Close only counts in horse shoes and nuclear weapons.

I have code, which I got from somewhere, that I can share. I also sure
that there is some available on http://cbttape.org somewhere, but I
don't know where.

--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Information Technology

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its
content is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you
should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action
based on it, is strictly prohibited. 
 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?

2006-04-24 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:40:51 -0400 Thomas David Rivers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

:I've got a question for the group-at-large, which I hope
:will be obvious to someone deeply in-the-know.

:I've got a program that opens a VB PDS (RECFM=VB,BLKSIZE=2550,LRECL=255).

:But - note that I said it opens the PDS, not a member of the PDS.  That
:open succeeds, and presumably, the program will merrily try to
:read the PDS directory as Format-V records.

:So - the first read succeeds, and it gets these bytes back for
:the first 6:

:  000E  
:| BDW  | | RDW 

:The BDW indicates a block-len of 14, but the 'reserved' bytes are not 00.
:The RDW then indicates a record length of 65535 - which is preposterous
:given that the BDW said the entire block-len was only 14.

:And - of course, trying to read 65531 bytes for the remaining record
:doesn't work, because they aren't there.  The 14 isn't there either.

:OK - admittedly - walking thru the directory entries and trying
:to interpret that as VB isn't the best thing in the world... but,
:what's a program to do with what the user types.

:Should it look at the lrecl/blksize in the DCB and decide that
:this doesn't make sense?  What if it did make sense - then what?

:Or - is there a way to know this is a bunch of bytes from a
:PDS directory... and this READ doesn't make sense?

It is not clear what your question is.

Are you asking if there is a way to determine if a DD statement is pointing to
a PDS without a member name specified?

--
Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dissensoftware.com

Director, Dissen Software, Bar  Grill - Israel


Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.

I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


LINKLIB on EXTENTS - Still OK to do REFRESH for APF?

2006-04-24 Thread Desi de la Garza
I have defined a new loadlib to our APF member list but am not sure if it is
OK to do an LLA,REFRESH since our LINKLIB has extents. Is it possible?

Thanks,
 
Desi de la Garza
Systems Programmer
Bexar County Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


-

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?

2006-04-24 Thread McKown, John
 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas David Rivers
 Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 2:19 PM
 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?
 
 
 Hi John,
 

snip

   So - I suppose - what's the best way to ask Hey - is this at
   all a reasonable thing to be trying a VB-read on?

Ah. NO.

 
   - Thanks -
   - Dave Rivers -

--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Information Technology

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its
content is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you
should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action
based on it, is strictly prohibited. 
 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: LINKLIB on EXTENTS - Still OK to do REFRESH for APF?

2006-04-24 Thread Jon Brock
If all you have done is added a file to the APF list, an LLA REFRESH is not 
necessary.  You will need to do a SET PROG command, however.

Jon


snip
I have defined a new loadlib to our APF member list but am not sure if it is
OK to do an LLA,REFRESH since our LINKLIB has extents. Is it possible?
/snip

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: LINKLIB on EXTENTS - Still OK to do REFRESH for APF?

2006-04-24 Thread Imbriale, Donald (Exchange)
If the loadlib has been added to JUST APF, then there is no need to do
anything with LLA.

If the loadlib is LLA-managed, then an LLA,UPDATE is less disruptive
than LLA,REFRESH.

I'm not clear what you mean by our LINKLIB has extents.  Did a library
in linklist go into extents after IPL?

Don Imbriale

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of Desi de la Garza
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 3:18 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: LINKLIB on EXTENTS - Still OK to do REFRESH for APF?

I have defined a new loadlib to our APF member list but am not sure if
it is
OK to do an LLA,REFRESH since our LINKLIB has extents. Is it possible?

Thanks,

Desi de la Garza
Systems Programmer
Bexar County Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


***
Bear Stearns is not responsible for any recommendation, solicitation, 
offer or agreement or any information about any transaction, customer 
account or account activity contained in this communication.
***

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


z/OS17 with JAVA

2006-04-24 Thread George Bly
Hi 

 

I just looked at SMPE 3.4 and it requires IBM SDK for z/OS, Java 2
Technology Edition, Version 1.4 to receive maintenance from the server.

 

Was it supposed to include with my server pack order or was I supposed to
know to order it.  Either way I don't have it.  I hope it's free! 

 

Anyone else having this dilemma 

 

Thanks!!

 

George 

 

George A. Bly

Senior Systems Programmer

331 Hayes Hall

Information Technology Services

Bowling Green State University

Bowling Green, Ohio  43403

Office: (419) 372-7729

Fax:(419) 372-7723

Cell:(419) 260-4487

 

PS:  A friend will help you move.  A really good friend will help you move a
body!!!

 

e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?

2006-04-24 Thread Richard Tsujimoto
You could trying getting the FMT1DSCB for the data set and looking at the 
organization.




Thomas David Rivers [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
04/24/2006 03:18 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU


To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?






Hi John,

  Yeah... I know the directory portion isn't VB.  But, the program
  doesn't know that.. it thinks it's simply been given the name
  of a sequential VB file that it wants to process

  So - it stumbles blindly into the directory - and *whamo* - gets
  this bad data.

  So - I suppose - what's the best way to ask Hey - is this at
  all a reasonable thing to be trying a VB-read on?

 - Thanks -
 - Dave Rivers -


McKown, John wrote:

 
 The directory of a PDS is not VB. It is
 RECFM=F,LRECL=256,BLKSIZE=256,KEYLEN=8. You can ignore the key, if you
 want. You must read all 256 bytes and deblock the logical records
 yourself. They are not compatable with RECFM=VB, but they are close.
 Close only counts in horse shoes and nuclear weapons.
 
 I have code, which I got from somewhere, that I can share. I also sure
 that there is some available on http://cbttape.org somewhere, but I
 don't know where.
 
 --
 John McKown
 Senior Systems Programmer
 HealthMarkets

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Work: (919) 676-0847
Get your mainframe programming tools at http://www.dignus.com

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?

2006-04-24 Thread Paul Gilmartin
In a recent note, Thomas David Rivers said:

 Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:18:39 -0400
 
   So - I suppose - what's the best way to ask Hey - is this at
   all a reasonable thing to be trying a VB-read on?
 
My inclination would be to verify:

o DSORG != PO in the DCB after OPEN.  (But DON'T try to enforce
  DSORG == PS, because that is not set if DDNAME is allocated to
  a UNIX file.)

o BDW consistent with BLKSIZE, and no invalid flag bits set.

o RDW consistent with LRECL (and with BDW), and no invalid
  flag bits set.

(most of which QSAM does NOT verify)  If all tests pass, then
give the user what he asked for.  If any fail, indicate an
I/O error.

Now, suppose the user attempts to open for OUTPUT?  Wnat's a
good way to avoid trashing the PDS directory?

-- gil
-- 
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?

2006-04-24 Thread J R

Use DYNALLOC Information Retrieval for the DSORG.



From: Thomas David Rivers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:18:39 -0400

Hi John,

 Yeah... I know the directory portion isn't VB.  But, the program
 doesn't know that.. it thinks it's simply been given the name
 of a sequential VB file that it wants to process

 So - it stumbles blindly into the directory - and *whamo* - gets
 this bad data.

 So - I suppose - what's the best way to ask Hey - is this at
 all a reasonable thing to be trying a VB-read on?

- Thanks -
- Dave Rivers -


McKown, John wrote:



The directory of a PDS is not VB. It is
RECFM=F,LRECL=256,BLKSIZE=256,KEYLEN=8. You can ignore the key, if you
want. You must read all 256 bytes and deblock the logical records
yourself. They are not compatable with RECFM=VB, but they are close.
Close only counts in horse shoes and nuclear weapons.

I have code, which I got from somewhere, that I can share. I also sure
that there is some available on http://cbttape.org somewhere, but I
don't know where.

--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Work: (919) 676-0847
Get your mainframe programming tools at http://www.dignus.com

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


_
Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! 
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?

2006-04-24 Thread (IBM Mainframe Discussion List)
 
 
In a message dated 4/24/2006 1:41:01 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

I've got a program that opens a VB PDS  (RECFM=VB,BLKSIZE=2550,LRECL=255).

But - note that I said it opens  the PDS, not a member of the PDS.  That
open succeeds, and  presumably, the program will merrily try to
read the PDS directory as  Format-V records.

So - the first read succeeds, and it gets these  bytes back for
the first 6:

000E   
| BDW  | | RDW  


The first block in a PDS is the first block of the directory, which has  a 
fixed format (lrecl=blksize=256 with 8-byte keys).  Presumably your  program is 
not trying to do a Read Key and Data but rather a Read Data CCW, so  you do 
not read the key but instead read only the first data block in the  directory.  
The first 2 bytes in the data area of a PDS directory block  are the number of 
bytes in that 256-byte block that are used.  You show  000E.  I did an 
IMASPZAP dump of a CNTL PDS of mine and found two  blocks with 00FE in the 
first two 
bytes, and the third block had  X'000E' at the 
beginning.  The 8 bytes of FF are  a fake member name of all X'FF' so that it 
will 
always be last when all the  member names are sorted into ascending sequence.  
A PDS directory is  supposed to have its member names in that sequence.  In my 
case, the 000E  is the correct number of bytes used in this block, as the 
minimum length of  one entry is 8 for the member name, 3 more for the relative 
TTR within the PDS  where the member begins, and 1 byte of flags.  The minimum 
entry length  is then 12.  Two more bytes for the obligatory 2-byte block 
length at the  beginning yields 14 bytes.  A block that begins as this one does 
is 
a  block indicating the last directory block with any meaningful information 
in  it, and in this case the meaningful info is the fake member name showing 
the  end of the directory's list of members.  There are more blocks in my  
directory after this one, and they are all X'00'.
 
It looks as if your PDS is completely empty.  That would explain why  you see 
000E in the first 6 bytes.  The read CCW does not move  any bytes 
around, change them, or interpret them.  It reads what is on  the track.  Then 
the VBS access method will assume that the first 2 bytes  are the block length, 
then 2 reserved bytes, then 2 RDW bytes, etc.  In  other words, because you 
told QSAM to read a PDS directory block and to treat  it as VBS data, you have 
thoroughly confused not only the access method but  also yourself.
 
You need to put a lot more logic into your program; i.e., be sensitive to  
file organization type (DSORG=PO for a PDS), etc.  I cannot begin to  suggest 
what extra logic you should add, since I do not know the purpose of  your 
program or why you want to read a PDS with it including its  directory.
 
A much better way to read through a PDS is with BSAM, which can also read  
through any other data set organization.  But you have to code more logic  
after 
each block is read in with the READ/CHECK macros.
 
what's a program to do with what the user types.
I cannot understand the meaning of this phrase.

Should it look  at the lrecl/blksize in the DCB and decide that
this doesn't make  sense?  What if it did make sense - then what?
At the very least, your program must look at the data set  organization.  
Then what depends on what you want your program to do,  which I don't know.

Or - is there a way to know this is a bunch of  bytes from a
PDS directory... and this READ doesn't make sense?
Your program can know that this bunch of bytes is a PDS directory because  it 
is the first block in the input data of a PDS.  The end of the  directory is 
marked by an end of file record.  That will probably confuse  your program, 
too.  Then the first block of the first member begins  after the end of file 
record, unless the first member has been  deleted after the second member was 
added, in which case what you  will read next is what used to be the first 
member, which also ends with  another end of file record.  More confusion.
 
I would suggest a complete redesign of your program beginning with a  
thorough understand of what your program is supposed to accomplish, followed  
by 
research into the internals of a PDS.



Bill  Fairchild

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?

2006-04-24 Thread Thomas David Rivers

Hi Binyamin!

 That would work.. the program could avoid even trying the OPEN.

 In this case, the OPEN succeeds... and then the subsequent READ (BSAM)
 gets some bytes, but they aren't valid...

 I tried looking at DCBDSORG after the OPEN, but it has the value
 DCBDSGPS (Physical Sequential), since PS was specified at OPEN time.

- Thanks! -
- Dave Rivers -



Binyamin Dissen wrote:



It is not clear what your question is.

Are you asking if there is a way to determine if a DD statement is pointing to
a PDS without a member name specified?




--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Work: (919) 676-0847
Get your mainframe programming tools at http://www.dignus.com

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: LINKLIB on EXTENTS - Still OK to do REFRESH for APF?

2006-04-24 Thread Ted MacNEIL
I have defined a new loadlib to our APF member list but am not sure if it is
OK to do an LLA,REFRESH since our LINKLIB has extents. Is it possible?

Extents are irrelevent, except where you end up with more than 255 of them.
Each library counts as at least one.
PDSE's count as only one, regardless.
The rest depend on how many extents each non-PDSE library is in.

LLA refresh doesn't care about the number if it's less than 256.

-
-teD

O-KAY! BLUE! JAYS!
Let's PLAY! BALL!

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Multi-level Alias

2006-04-24 Thread Jousma, David
Cathy,

You ask why do MLA?  It's not my call, the Storage group is the one
calling this one as they own all the usercats.  I've read the quote
you mention, in fact I had already sent them the same quote a few weeks
ago.  I don't know that it is a bad thing. One of the reasons I believe
they are looking at it is the fact that our DSN naming conventions put
the test vs. prod qualifier as the 2nd level in the data set name.  We'd
love to change this, and maybe will for new datasets, but there is no
project on the books to go back and retrofit.  I think the push is to
separate test from production in the catalog structure as well.  

You make a comment about dataset aliases.  I have not read(have not
tried that hard yet), but do aliases have to be in the same catalog as
the base dataset?

I'm still looking for more feedback from the list population on this
topic. 

Thanks, Dave


Dave Jousma
Principal Systems Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
616.653.8429


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Cathy Taddei
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 2:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Multi-level Alias

Hi Dave.  I too have an unpleasant taste in my mouth from multi-level
aliases.  I don't remember a lot of the details, but they were a PITA
when I was merging two master catalogs.  It didn't help that the shop I
was in also made extensive use of dataset aliases, which I detest. 

One question for you:  why are you considering MLA's?  Do you recall
reading this in z/OS DFSMS: Managing Catalogs:

... the multilevel alias facility should only be used when a better
solution cannot be found. The need for the multilevel alias facility can
indicate poor data set naming conventions. Before defining multilevel
aliases, review your data set naming conventions.

If MLA's will solve a problem for you, great, but I wouldn't do it
lightly.

Regards,
Cathy Taddei



This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be 
privileged.   It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you 
receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any 
manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please 
reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was 
misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your 
assistance in correcting this error is appreciated.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?

2006-04-24 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:42:53 -0400 Thomas David Rivers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

:  That would work.. the program could avoid even trying the OPEN.

Get the JFCB, use it (DSNAME + VOLUME) to read the DSCB.

The DSCB will indicate whether it is a PDS and what its recorded RECFM and
LRECL are. The JFCB will indicate whether a member name was specified.

:  In this case, the OPEN succeeds... and then the subsequent READ (BSAM)
:  gets some bytes, but they aren't valid...

:  I tried looking at DCBDSORG after the OPEN, but it has the value
:  DCBDSGPS (Physical Sequential), since PS was specified at OPEN time.

The DSCB or JFCB never override a DCB value.

OPEN will not set DCBDSORG.

:Binyamin Dissen wrote:
 
: It is not clear what your question is.
 
: Are you asking if there is a way to determine if a DD statement is pointing 
to
: a PDS without a member name specified?

--
Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dissensoftware.com

Director, Dissen Software, Bar  Grill - Israel


Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.

I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: [DB2-L] WLM Service Definition for DDF Thread

2006-04-24 Thread Steve Grimes
Great tips -- thanks all.

Using RMF screens (which I have access to) and looking over someone's 
shoulder for WLM screen's (which I don't have access to) I found that my 
assumptions were basically correct, but that I was looking at the wrong 
thing.

Our production DDF thread rules are:

1 SIDBP1
2 . PN  . *DDFPROD

(Our test DDF thread on the same LPAR looks similar, but with DDFTEST.)

DDFPROD is defined as 1 period, Imp = 2, 90% within 2 secs.
DDFTEST is defined as 2 periods, 
1st Period Duration=1, Imp = 3, 90% within 2 secs
2nd Period Imp = 5, Execution Velocity of 50

Using PM and RMF panals, I found my user's thread running with DDFPROD 
priority.

So, I'm going to make my suggestion to add:

2  CI   MSACCESS   DDFTEST 

to the DBP1 definition and see where it goes. 

Thanks!

Stg

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?

2006-04-24 Thread Paul Gilmartin
In a recent note, Binyamin Dissen said:

 Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 22:52:21 +0300
 
 Get the JFCB, use it (DSNAME + VOLUME) to read the DSCB.
 
I very much deplore it when people do that, then treat any
unexpected result as a failure.  It's an unwarranted flouting
of the OS/360 I/O abstraction model.  It prevents extension
of the I/O system.  For example, that sort of design now
prevents using an HFS directory as the first catenand in
SYSEXEC, while it works perfectly well as the second or later.

Let the access method detect errors; don't invent your own.

-- gil
-- 
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?

2006-04-24 Thread Thomas David Rivers

Hi Bill...

 Well - yes - you've hit the nail on the head - the routines are very
 confused because they are expecting to see VB-type records (with a BDW
 and RDW) and they are not.

 The program uses BSAM I/O.

 The issue here is that the program expects to not be directed to a PDS,
 and when that accidently happens - things go, as you mention,
 alarmingly wrong.

 What I'm looking for is some way for the program to say Hey!  This
 isn't a sequentional VB file at all.   Instead of miserably blowing
 up.

 As I mentioned before, I tried looking the DSORG in the DCB, but that
 indicates PS (because the PDS was opened with a PS DCB.)

 So - is there another way to tell if the file I'm trying to read
 with BSAM I/O (doing my own unblocking of the VB records) is at all
 reasonable?

 Someone else suggested using DYNALLOC to query the organization
 of the file before the OPEN... is there a way to accomplish
 this after the OPEN?

 Then - when the user points the program to a PDS instead of a nice
 sequential file (or PDS member), things don't just blow up, but
 can simply inform the user that is an invalid file.

- Thanks -
- Dave Rivers -


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Your program can know that this bunch of bytes is a PDS directory because  it 
is the first block in the input data of a PDS.  The end of the  directory is 
marked by an end of file record.  That will probably confuse  your program, 
too.  Then the first block of the first member begins  after the end of file 
record, unless the first member has been  deleted after the second member was 
added, in which case what you  will read next is what used to be the first 
member, which also ends with  another end of file record.  More confusion.
 
I would suggest a complete redesign of your program beginning with a  
thorough understand of what your program is supposed to accomplish, followed  by 
research into the internals of a PDS.




Bill  Fairchild





--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Work: (919) 676-0847
Get your mainframe programming tools at http://www.dignus.com

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: z/OS17 with JAVA

2006-04-24 Thread John Eells

George Bly wrote:


I just looked at SMPE 3.4 and it requires IBM SDK for z/OS, Java 2
Technology Edition, Version 1.4 to receive maintenance from the server.

Was it supposed to include with my server pack order or was I supposed to
know to order it.  Either way I don't have it.  I hope it's free! 


I think it should have been identified as a bypassable 
prerequisite in the configurator (but did not check).  It 
appears on the ServerPac checklist as Java(tm)2 Technology 
Edition 1 01.00 5655-D35 5802.


But don't despair!  See:

http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/software/java/j5pcont64.html

It's a no charge product.

snip

--
John Eells
z/OS Technical Marketing
IBM Poughkeepsie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?

2006-04-24 Thread Edward Jaffe

Thomas David Rivers wrote:

Hi Bill...

 Well - yes - you've hit the nail on the head - the routines are very
 confused because they are expecting to see VB-type records (with a BDW
 and RDW) and they are not.

 The program uses BSAM I/O.

 The issue here is that the program expects to not be directed to a PDS,
 and when that accidently happens - things go, as you mention,
 alarmingly wrong.

 What I'm looking for is some way for the program to say Hey!  This
 isn't a sequentional VB file at all.   Instead of miserably blowing
 up.


| TMDCBRECFM,DCBRECUUndefined format ?
| JORECUBranch if yes
| TMDCBRECFM,DCBRECVVariable format ?
| JORECVBranch if yes
|* Handle Fixed Format Records
|RECF DC0H
| .
| .
|* Handle Variable Format Records
|RECV DC0H
| .
| .
|* Handle Undefined Format Records
|RECU DC0H
| .
| .

--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: z/OS17 with JAVA

2006-04-24 Thread Gray, Larry - Larry A
NOTICE:
All information in and attached to the e-mail(s) below may be proprietary, 
confidential, privileged and otherwise protected from improper or erroneous 
disclosure.  If you are not the sender's intended recipient, you are not 
authorized to intercept, read, print, retain, copy, forward, or disseminate 
this message.  If you have erroneously received this communication, please 
notify the sender immediately by phone (704-758-1000) or by e-mail and destroy 
all copies of this message (electronic, paper, or otherwise).  Thank you.

Yes it is free.  If it is not in your order, you can go to
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/software/java/ and
download the non-SMP/E version.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George Bly
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 3:29 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: z/OS17 with JAVA

Hi 

 

I just looked at SMPE 3.4 and it requires IBM SDK for z/OS, Java 2
Technology Edition, Version 1.4 to receive maintenance from the server.

 

Was it supposed to include with my server pack order or was I supposed
to
know to order it.  Either way I don't have it.  I hope it's free! 

 

Anyone else having this dilemma 

 

Thanks!!

 

George 

 

George A. Bly

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?

2006-04-24 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:06:11 -0600 Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

:In a recent note, Binyamin Dissen said:

: Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 22:52:21 +0300
 
: Get the JFCB, use it (DSNAME + VOLUME) to read the DSCB.
 
:I very much deplore it when people do that, then treat any
:unexpected result as a failure.  It's an unwarranted flouting
:of the OS/360 I/O abstraction model.  It prevents extension
:of the I/O system.  For example, that sort of design now
:prevents using an HFS directory as the first catenand in
:SYSEXEC, while it works perfectly well as the second or later.

:Let the access method detect errors; don't invent your own.

I believe that his intent was to detect a particular case. This will do it.

Of course one can go on with the 001-whatever, but it may be a good idea to
provide an intelligible error or, perhaps, a default member name.

I do agree that this is overkill for application level code, but I doubt that
such code is produced by Cole Software.

--
Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dissensoftware.com

Director, Dissen Software, Bar  Grill - Israel


Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.

I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?

2006-04-24 Thread Paul Gilmartin
In a recent note, Thomas David Rivers said:

 Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:11:15 -0400
 
   Someone else suggested using DYNALLOC to query the organization
   of the file before the OPEN... is there a way to accomplish
   this after the OPEN?
 
I would expect DYNALLOC IR to work equally well after OPEN as
before.  But you must do it before attempting to process any
record.

But, what does DYNALLOC IR indicate if DDNAME identifies a
properly allocated _member_ of a PDS with RECFM=VB, etc.?

-- gil
-- 
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?

2006-04-24 Thread (IBM Mainframe Discussion List)
 
 
In a message dated 4/24/2006 3:12:40 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

What  I'm looking for is some way for the program to say Hey!   This
isn't a sequentional VB file at all.

Make sure the DCB in the program does not specify the file  organization.  
Then that field in the your DCB will be filled in with  information from the 
file's external label.  Then test it as Ed Jaffe  showed.

 
Bill  Fairchild

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SMF71 and ICETOOL

2006-04-24 Thread Frank Yaeger
On May 30, 2005, Antonio Fonseca wrote:
I'm looking at ICETOOL for displaying SMF71 records and for
the majority of the fields it works OK. But...

Is there a way to process the floating fields (like the
high-medium-low impact central storage frames...) in ICETOOL
or it is necessary to make a Assembler or C program to do that?

With z/OS DFSORT V1R5 PTF UK90007 or DFSORT R14 PTF UK90006 (April, 2006),
you can now display/convert FL (hexadecimal floating point) fields with
DFSORT and
ICETOOL.

Here's an example:

//REPT71 EXEC PGM=ICETOOL
//TOOLMSG DD SYSOUT=*
//DFSMSG DD SYSOUT=*
//SMFIN DD DSN=...  input file
//SMF71 DD DSN=SMF71,DISP=(,PASS),SPACE=(CYL,(5,5)),UNIT=SYSDA
//SMF71RPT DD SYSOUT=*
//TOOLIN DD *
* Sort SMF Type 71 records by id, date and time.
SORT FROM(SMFIN) TO(SMF71) USING(TY71)
* Create report with SMFID sections.
DISPLAY FROM(SMF71) LIST(SMF71RPT) -
  TITLE('Low impact central storage frames') -
  BREAK(15,4,CH,L'System: ') -
  HEADER('Date') ON(11,4,DT1,E'-99-99') -
  HEADER('Time') ON(7,4,TM1,E'99:99:99') -
  HEADER('Min Frames') ON(925,8,FL,U10) -
  HEADER('Max Frames') ON(933,8,FL,U10) -
  HEADER('Avg Frames') ON(941,8,FL,U10) -
  BLANK PAGE
/*
//TY71CNTL DD *
* Select type 71 records that are more than
* 18 bytes long.
  OMIT COND=(6,1,BI,NE,+71,OR,1,2,BI,LE,+18)
* Sort by SMFID, SMFDATE and SMFTIME
  SORT FIELDS=(15,4,CH,A,11,4,PD,A,7,4,BI,A)
/*

For more details, see my paper at:

http://www.ibm.com/servers/storage/support/software/sort/mvs/peug/

In particular, see Example 1 in the Floating-Point Display (FL) section.

Frank Yaeger - DFSORT Team (IBM)
 Specialties: PARSE, JFY, SQZ, ICETOOL, IFTHEN, OVERLAY, Symbols, Migration

 = DFSORT/MVS is on the Web at http://www.ibm.com/storage/dfsort/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?

2006-04-24 Thread J R

Your inclinations assume that:
(a) DCBDSORG will change during OPEN, and
(b) the data will appear in his program without an error.

I don't believe (a) ever happens.
I think he already has the error before he sees the data.



From: Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:35:55 -0600

In a recent note, Thomas David Rivers said:

 Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:18:39 -0400

   So - I suppose - what's the best way to ask Hey - is this at
   all a reasonable thing to be trying a VB-read on?

My inclination would be to verify:

o DSORG != PO in the DCB after OPEN.  (But DON'T try to enforce
  DSORG == PS, because that is not set if DDNAME is allocated to
  a UNIX file.)

o BDW consistent with BLKSIZE, and no invalid flag bits set.

o RDW consistent with LRECL (and with BDW), and no invalid
  flag bits set.

(most of which QSAM does NOT verify)  If all tests pass, then
give the user what he asked for.  If any fail, indicate an
I/O error.

Now, suppose the user attempts to open for OUTPUT?  Wnat's a
good way to avoid trashing the PDS directory?

-- gil
--
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Multi-level Alias

2006-04-24 Thread Bob Rutledge
I haven't tried it, but after attending  Mark Thomen's Best Practices for 
Catalog and VSAM session (3057) at Seattle SHARE, I'm seriously considering it. 
 The handout is on the SHARE web site.


Bob

Jousma, David wrote:


I think the push is to
separate test from production in the catalog structure as well.  


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?

2006-04-24 Thread Kirk Talman
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 04/24/2006 
04:11:15 PM:

 The issue here is that the program expects to not be directed to a PDS,
 and when that accidently happens - things go, as you mention,
 alarmingly wrong.

 What I'm looking for is some way for the program to say Hey!  This
 isn't a sequentional VB file at all.   Instead of miserably blowing
 up.

Before you OPEN the file, use RDJFCB to get the JFCB.

Look at expanded macro list to find the values of JFCDSORG (two byte 
field!) to test for.

RDJFCB MF=(E,$RDJFCB)
.
.
.
$RDJFCB  RDJFCB DUMMY,MF=L
DUMMYDCB   DSORG=PS,MACRF=GL,DDNAME=RMSIRXCW,EXLST=X_DUMMY
*   DATA CONTROL BLOCK 
X_DUMMY  DS0A 
 DCAL1(7),AL3(INFMJFCB)
.
.
.
IEFJFCBN LIST=YES

  - Thanks -
  - Dave Rivers -



-
The information contained in this communication (including any
attachments hereto) is confidential and is intended solely for the
personal and confidential use of the individual or entity to whom
it is addressed.  The information may also constitute a legally
privileged confidential communication.  If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for
delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that you have received this communication in error and that any
review, dissemination, copying, or unauthorized use of this
information, or the taking of any action in reliance on the
contents of this information is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by e-mail, and delete the original message.  Thank you

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: z/OS17 with JAVA

2006-04-24 Thread Jousma, David
John,

Permit me to vent for a moment.  This has been one of my pet-peeves for
a while.  I've placed many Servpac orders over the years, and one thing
I wish IBM would do, is somehow distinquish no-charge products from the
others when ordering on ShopZ.  Another is the XML-toolkit.  I order
everything we are licensed for, plus all the no-charge items(that make
sense) just for completeness, so that I can try to avoid adding products
after the fact. Maybe IBM should just issue a license for all the
freebie stuff so that users can just place orders for all licensed
products, and be done with it.

Anyway, if you have connections, it would be nice if those were somehow
flagged at order time, rather than having to read the announcement to
find that info.

Thanks, Dave



Dave Jousma
Principal Systems Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
616.653.8429


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Eells
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 4:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS17 with JAVA


I think it should have been identified as a bypassable prerequisite in
the configurator (but did not check).  It appears on the ServerPac
checklist as Java(tm)2 Technology Edition 1 01.00 5655-D35 5802.

snip

It's a no charge product.

snip

--
John Eells
z/OS Technical Marketing
IBM Poughkeepsie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search
the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be 
privileged.   It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you 
receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any 
manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please 
reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was 
misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your 
assistance in correcting this error is appreciated.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?

2006-04-24 Thread Paul Gilmartin
In a recent note, J R said:

 Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:24:54 -0400
 
 Your inclinations assume that:
 (a) DCBDSORG will change during OPEN, and
 
 I don't believe (a) ever happens.
 
I certainly did assume that.  Have I misunderstood the
following:

Title: z/OS V1R5.0 DFSMS: Using Data Sets
Document Number: SC26-7410-03

#   3.2.2.1 z/OS V1R5.0 DFSMS: Using Data Sets

  3.2.2.1 Filling in the DCB

4. From the JFCB, OPEN fills in any field not completed in the DCB or
   DCBE. This completes what is called the forward merge.

??? (I know, it's pretty complicated.)

 From: Paul Gilmartin [log in to unmask]
 Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:35:55 -0600
 
 My inclination would be to verify:
 
 o DSORG != PO in the DCB after OPEN.

-- gil
-- 
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Announcement - fixed up

2006-04-24 Thread Steve Comstock

Matthew Webber wrote:
 Steve,
 I appreciated the humour, but some spam filters may not. Consider posting
 without embedded text that may result in the message not being seen 
by some

 folks.
 FWIW


Hmmm. Perhaps you're right. OK, here's the squeaky clean version:

Announcing the availabliity of our newest course: Secrets of
Inter-Language Communication in z/OS. I used Secrets
simply because a lot of the techniques discussed in this
course seem to be unknown to a large number of programmers.

Although the course focuses on calling and being called
across language boundaries, it could be taken just for
learning the techniques in any one of the languages we
cover in the class: Assembler, COBOL, PL/I, and C.

Major topics:

* Declaring data items (elementary, structures, arrays)
  in all four languages

* working with null-terminated strings and halfword
  prefixed strings in all these languages

* calling statically from programs written in all of
  the discussed languages

* passing arguments in the call / invocation
  - by reference, by value
  - variable numbers of arguments
  - all types of arguments (elements, structures, arrays)
  - omitted arguments

* receiving paramters in the subroutine / subfunction
  - by reference, by value
  - variable numbers of parameters
  - all types of parameters (elements, structures, arrays)
  - omitted parameters

* how to catch values returned from a function

* how to set values to return as if from a function

* formats of object decks (OBJ, XOBJ, GOFF)

* how the program binder works

* sharing external data items

* load modules vs program objects

* calling dynamically from all languages

* creating DLLs in all four languages

* invoking DLL functions from all four languages

* accessing and changing values in DLL variables
  in all four languages

The student handout consists of 538 exciting, thrill-packed
pages of notes, examples, and explanations. Ten labs let
you get your hands on and actually accomplish all this
kind of work yourself.

The previous version was only offered once. But judging
by several of the recent threads on ibm-main, the time
may be just right for this course. Take a look at the
details at:
http://www.trainersfriend.com/Language_Environment_courses/m520descr.htm

Kind regards,

-Steve Comstock
The Trainer's Friend, Inc.
http://www.trainersfriend.com

P.S. I seem to be incorrigible. I just love this
stuff (z/OS, programming, teaching) so I guess I'll
just keep plugging away at it as long as it is so
much fun.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Overhead of SMF Records

2006-04-24 Thread Joel Wolpert
Please do not laugh.

My management is asking me how much overhead is consumed by z/OS for
processing the SMF records. I have no idea. Has anyone ever researched this
and can share some info on it.

Thanks in advance.

Joel Wolpert
Director - Performance and Capacity Planning
Shared Data Center
Securities Industry Automation Corporation
2 Metrotech Center
New York, NY 11201
(212) 383-3323
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
This message and its attachments may contain  privileged and
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient(s),
you are prohibited from printing, forwarding, saving or copying this
email.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately
notify the sender and delete this e-mail and its attachments from your
computer.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: ***: Offensive Language

2006-04-24 Thread Paul Gilmartin
In a recent note, Darren Evans-Young said:

 Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:18:20 -0500
 
 Personally, I don't care, but I am getting flooded with rejections
 from all the content analyzers (Mail Marshall, etc.). If it happens
 again, I will put the offender on NOPOST and forward all these wonderful
 rejection notices to the offender.
 
I'd go the other way, and put the rejectors on NOMAIL.  It's
backscatter (Google for); and sites that backscatter spam,
viruses, or other unwanted material should rightly be ostracised.

-- gil
-- 
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Need Help defining an AS400 with an IP address to the mainframe

2006-04-24 Thread Patrick O'Keefe
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:09:30 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] wrote:

In lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt;, on 04/24/2006
   at 02:26 AM, Chris Mason lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; said:

gt;I think the text you found logically, if not chronologically,
gt;precedes the introduction of the type 2.1 node and the introduction
gt;of the control point as the entity managing the node rather than
gt;always the PU.

Chronologically, which is why I made sure to mention that it was old.
But the PUCP was already there. If you have a recent FAPL manual, is
there a section on nomenclature around p I-8?

--
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see lt;http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.htmlgt;
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
=

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Overhead of SMF Records

2006-04-24 Thread Ed Finnell
 
In a message dated 4/24/2006 3:54:05 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

My  management is asking me how much overhead is consumed by z/OS  for
processing the SMF records. I have no idea. Has anyone ever researched  this
and can share some info on it.




 
 PHB's say the darnedest things! It's not insignificant and  tuning
 still matters. Some records are required by law and auditors  depending on 
type of business. Ever see a *Nixen in tears 'cause their system  got 
hacked/hosed and they had logging turned off for 'performance reasons'. It's  
also 
different in every shop. Run a modified version of MXG ANAL30DD and it's  
usually 
in 3-5% range.
  

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?

2006-04-24 Thread J R

I may be wrong but I thought that DSORG
was not optional on the DCB macro.



From: Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:40:33 -0600

In a recent note, J R said:

 Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:24:54 -0400

 Your inclinations assume that:
 (a) DCBDSORG will change during OPEN, and

 I don't believe (a) ever happens.

I certainly did assume that.  Have I misunderstood the
following:

Title: z/OS V1R5.0 DFSMS: Using Data Sets
Document Number: SC26-7410-03

#   3.2.2.1 z/OS V1R5.0 DFSMS: Using Data Sets

  3.2.2.1 Filling in the DCB

4. From the JFCB, OPEN fills in any field not completed in the DCB or
   DCBE. This completes what is called the forward merge.

??? (I know, it's pretty complicated.)

 From: Paul Gilmartin [log in to unmask]
 Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:35:55 -0600
 
 My inclination would be to verify:
 
 o DSORG != PO in the DCB after OPEN.

-- gil
--
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


_
Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! 
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?

2006-04-24 Thread Thomas David Rivers

Hi again Bill...

 Yeah - that's a good idea...  But - I don't think I'm communicating
 something right...

 But - in this case, the user specified a file name.  OPEN filled in the
 DCBRECFM, etc... and the program went merrily on its way trying to
 do what the DCB said would work...

 This would normally be just fine, if the USER had specified a
 DSN(MEMBER), but instead, the user only specified the DSN.
 In this case, after the OPEN, the DCB is filled with the attributes
 of the PDS members, not the PDS directory.

 So - the filled-in DCB says RECFM=VB.  Which doesn't work
 well for 'reading' the PDS (works correctly for reading a member,
 not the PDS itself.)  Since we're not pointing at a member,
 but pointing at the PDS 'file' - we wind up reading directory
 bytes, which confuses the VB unblocking routines - and we
 wind up with erroneous data, and general badness.

 Note that sometimes, a plain DSN is the right thing, since it could
 be a 'plain' flat/sequential file.  No reason to disallow those.
 So - the program can't apriori simply disallow names without
 members.

 I'd like things to be abstract enough that the program could
 say hey - you gave me something invalid - wanna try again?
 instead of S0C4.

 So - in this case, the values found in the DCB can't be used.
 In fact, in this particular situation, the GET and subsequent
 unblocking can't be used either, and I'd like the program
 to fail gracefully.  A check either at read-time or open-time
 would be fine.

 So far, it seems the only way to do that is to get the JFCB, etc...
 But - Gil seemed to think that wasn't the best approach.
 DYNALLOC looks like another possible answer, but how expensive
 is that?


 - Thanks -
- Dave Rivers -


, IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote:
 
 
In a message dated 4/24/2006 3:12:40 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:




What  I'm looking for is some way for the program to say Hey!   This
isn't a sequentional VB file at all.



Make sure the DCB in the program does not specify the file  organization.  
Then that field in the your DCB will be filled in with  information from the 
file's external label.  Then test it as Ed Jaffe  showed.


 
Bill  Fairchild




--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Work: (919) 676-0847
Get your mainframe programming tools at http://www.dignus.com

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Overhead of SMF Records

2006-04-24 Thread Ted MacNEIL
My management is asking me how much overhead is consumed by z/OS for 
processing the SMF records.

Producing SMF records is the cost.
Presenting them to SMF and having the task write them out is cheap.
Because it's asynchronous.
Move SMF down in importance and you won't suffer.
The records will get written when there are cycles available.
That's why SMF has buffers.

The sub-systems have built in metrics.
If you supress the records, you haven't stopped the 'overhead' of collecting 
them.

But, here's a question for you:
What is the cost of not producing them?


-
-teD

O-KAY! BLUE! JAYS!
Let's PLAY! BALL!

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?

2006-04-24 Thread Edward Jaffe

J R wrote:

I may be wrong but I thought that DSORG
was not optional on the DCB macro.


RECFM is optional.

--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Overhead of SMF Records

2006-04-24 Thread Joel Wolpert
Thanks. This is good info. Does this mean that if I measure the CPU usage
of the SMF address space I will be able to approximate the CPU overhead?




   
   
   




My management is asking me how much overhead is consumed by z/OS for
processing the SMF records.

Producing SMF records is the cost.
Presenting them to SMF and having the task write them out is cheap.
Because it's asynchronous.
Move SMF down in importance and you won't suffer.
The records will get written when there are cycles available.
That's why SMF has buffers.

The sub-systems have built in metrics.
If you supress the records, you haven't stopped the 'overhead' of
collecting them.

But, here's a question for you:
What is the cost of not producing them?


-
-teD

O-KAY! BLUE! JAYS!
Let's PLAY! BALL!

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



-
This message and its attachments may contain  privileged and
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient(s),
you are prohibited from printing, forwarding, saving or copying this
email.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately
notify the sender and delete this e-mail and its attachments from your
computer.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Overhead of SMF Records

2006-04-24 Thread (IBM Mainframe Discussion List)
 
 
In a message dated 4/24/2006 4:01:48 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

My  management is asking me how much overhead is consumed by  z/OS  for
processing the SMF records. I have no idea. Has anyone  ever researched  this
and can share some info on it.
The eternal correct answer to all known questions:  it  depends.
 
MVS internally creates all the record types even if you don't want them  
written.  Some record types are much more complex than others, and the  
creation 
of complex records uses more overhead than that of simple record  types.  Then 
just before the already-created record is written, the test  is made to see if 
you want record type X written.  If yes, then there is  the overhead of 
writing that record type multiplied by the frequency of  occurrence of record 
type 
X.  If you don't want X types written, then no  additional overhead.  The 
frequency of occurrence of any given record  type also depends on innumerable 
variables; e.g., one record type might be  written by a TSO session every time 
it 
performs operation Y.  How many  TSO sessions do you have at the same time?  
How often do they perform  operation Y?
 
You asked for the overhead in processing the records.  MVS does  not pr
ocess the records.  MVS creates and then optionally writes  them.  Your 
application program processes the records after they are  written.  So the 
total 
overhead of writing them must be increased by  whatever overhead your program 
that 
reads them in and processes them  imposes.  You may be able to offload  the 
post-processing overhead to another system or even  platform.


Bill  Fairchild


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Overhead of SMF Records

2006-04-24 Thread (IBM Mainframe Discussion List)
 
 
In a message dated 4/24/2006 4:12:25 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Does this mean that if I measure the CPU usage
of the SMF  address space I will be able to approximate the CPU overhead?
No.  The greatest part of the overhead is in creating them, and  this takes 
place in the various other address spaces and they get charged for  the CPU 
time to create them.  The SMF address space's CPU time reflects  only the time 
to 
write them to an external  file.




Bill  Fairchild

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Overhead of SMF Records

2006-04-24 Thread Alan C. Field
Are they asking about the overhead of collecting them, and/or the overhead 
of processing them to
derive useful information - or hadn't they thought of that.





Please do not laugh.

My management is asking me how much overhead is consumed by z/OS for
processing the SMF records. I have no idea. Has anyone ever researched 
this
and can share some info on it.

Thanks in advance.

Joel Wolpert
Director - Performance and Capacity Planning
Shared Data Center
Securities Industry Automation Corporation
2 Metrotech Center
New York, NY 11201
(212) 383-3323
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Overhead of SMF Records

2006-04-24 Thread Joel Wolpert
They are asking about the overhead of collecting them. I know how to
measure the overhead of processing them.

Thanks.



   
   
   




Are they asking about the overhead of collecting them, and/or the overhead
of processing them to
derive useful information - or hadn't they thought of that.





Please do not laugh.

My management is asking me how much overhead is consumed by z/OS for
processing the SMF records. I have no idea. Has anyone ever researched
this
and can share some info on it.

Thanks in advance.

Joel Wolpert
Director - Performance and Capacity Planning
Shared Data Center
Securities Industry Automation Corporation
2 Metrotech Center
New York, NY 11201
(212) 383-3323
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



-
This message and its attachments may contain  privileged and
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient(s),
you are prohibited from printing, forwarding, saving or copying this
email.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately
notify the sender and delete this e-mail and its attachments from your
computer.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?

2006-04-24 Thread (IBM Mainframe Discussion List)
 
 
In a message dated 4/24/2006 4:05:12 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

So far, it seems the only way to do that is to get the JFCB,  etc...


My first inclination was to answer the same way, since I did that  many 
decades ago.  But that approach may not work now for due  to the presence of 
many 
newer components with which I have little (SMS)  or no (HFS) experience.


But - Gil seemed to think that wasn't the best approach.
Could be.  My experience was during the Jurassic era.

DYNALLOC looks like another possible answer, but how  expensive
is that?
The expense is not in executing the DYNALLOC function.  The great  expense is 
in finding the IBM doc, then coding and debugging the convoluted  data 
structure which you have to feed to DYNALLOC.  I did that once long  ago, and 
it was 
not easy.  Basically you must first choose the exact JCL  parameters you 
would need in a batch job to use the file, then you convert  those same JCL 
parameters to their DYNALLOC equivalent.  I would try very  hard to use RDJFCB 
instead.



Bill  Fairchild


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Overhead of SMF Records

2006-04-24 Thread Ted MacNEIL
Does this mean that if I measure the CPU usage
of the SMF address space I will be able to approximate the CPU overhead?

No!
Most of the overhead is in the sub-systems producing the records.
CMF, DB2, NPM, SILO, RMF, JES2,  etc.

SMF actually writing them is cheap.

-
-teD

O-KAY! BLUE! JAYS!
Let's PLAY! BALL!

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?

2006-04-24 Thread J R
Code DINRTORG to request the return of the data set organization (DSORG) of 
the specified resource.


Code DINRTMEM to request the return of the member name associated with the 
specified allocation.


By getting this information *before* OPEN you should be able to set up your 
DCB appropriately.




From: Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Reading Variable record with bad BDW/RDW?
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:20:55 -0600

In a recent note, Thomas David Rivers said:

 Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:11:15 -0400

   Someone else suggested using DYNALLOC to query the organization
   of the file before the OPEN... is there a way to accomplish
   this after the OPEN?

I would expect DYNALLOC IR to work equally well after OPEN as
before.  But you must do it before attempting to process any
record.

But, what does DYNALLOC IR indicate if DDNAME identifies a
properly allocated _member_ of a PDS with RECFM=VB, etc.?

-- gil
--
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: ***: Offensive Language

2006-04-24 Thread Pommier, Rex R.
Sorry, Gil, but I have to disagree with you here.  I have no say over
the spam/porn/naughty word filter in use here, nor do I know whether or
not the filter sent a nasty-gram back to Darren or if the filter simply
dropped the offending messages.  I didn't even know there was a problem
until Darren's note telling us there was.  Why should I then be
ostracized over something I have no control over - or even know about?
It makes the most sense to send it back to the person who actually sent
in the offending message.  Besides, if Darren did what you suggested,
IBM-MAIN would be flooded with messages asking are there problems with
IBM-MAIN because I'm not getting any messages.  I don't think anybody
really wants that.

Rex



In a recent note, Gil said:

In a recent note, Darren Evans-Young said:

 Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:18:20 -0500
 
 Personally, I don't care, but I am getting flooded with rejections 
 from all the content analyzers (Mail Marshall, etc.). If it happens 
 again, I will put the offender on NOPOST and forward all these 
 wonderful rejection notices to the offender.
 
I'd go the other way, and put the rejectors on NOMAIL.  It's
backscatter (Google for); and sites that backscatter spam, viruses, or
other unwanted material should rightly be ostracised.

-- gil
-- 
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Offensive Language

2006-04-24 Thread Shane
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 12:18 -0500, Darren Evans-Young wrote:
 Please refrain from using words in your posts that may be
 deemed offensive or inappropriate. ...like the one just recently posted.

How is one to judge - see a recent advertising campaign by an agency of
the federal government of this country.
Would such usage qualify ???. 
*extremely* common usage here.

 I will now have to kill the z8 thread because everyone is replying
 to the post that had the offending word and I keep getting even MORE
 rejection notices! Ah!

Unfortunate side effect - I'm with gil on this.

Shane ...

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Offensive Language

2006-04-24 Thread Ted MacNEIL
How is one to judge - see a recent advertising campaign by an agency of
the federal government of this country.
Would such usage qualify ???. 
*extremely* common usage here.

I got slammed once for using a real vile word when I hadn't.

I was discussing British soccer and I mentioned a team.
The filter caught the 'buried' word, and reported it to my manager.
It took me a month to clear my name.

The team name was (* used to bypass filters):

Sc*nthorpe.
-
-teD

O-KAY! BLUE! JAYS!
Let's PLAY! BALL!

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Overhead of SMF Records

2006-04-24 Thread Craddock, Chris
 Please do not laugh.

Ok. My lips are contorted into a strange shape like a chortle in
progress, but I swear I am not laughing. Well, ok, maybe just a little.

 My management is asking me how much overhead is consumed by z/OS for
 processing the SMF records. I have no idea. Has anyone ever researched
 this and can share some info on it.

I'll bite. Overhead is presumably the aggregate of costs over and
above the value of the thing being done. If the thing being done is
more valuable than the cost of doing it then the overhead is nil.
Attribution of value is left as an exercise for the reader :-)

The cost of collecting, writing and (post) processing SMF records is
hard to quantify. Most records are created in memory by various parts of
the system whether you are actually collecting them or not. So that
aspect of the cost is always present and impossible to discern from the
background noise level within the system.

The cost of writing the SMF records is pretty low. You can get a back of
the envelope estimate of that by checking the resource consumption of
the SMF address space, which is what does all of the actual SMF I/O.
Don't forget to add in the cost of the periodic IFASMDFP jobs that copy
the SMF data from the SYS1.MANx datasets to GDGs or whatever technique
you use. IBM is working on lowering those costs over the next couple of
releases. But they're pretty low now in the great scheme of things.

The cost of actually post-processing all of those jillions of SMF
records to produce useful information, accounting, charge-back, planning
data or whatever can be very significant. Most shops I see spend a lot
of overnight batch resources bashing though SMF with SORT to sort/merge
and run various reports. That definitely costs resources, but the cost
of not doing it may be worse in the long run. 

There are always trade-offs to be made between the processing cost of
function X and the business value derived from X. Did they have any
particular problem in mind or was this another rock-fetch exercise from
a freshly minted manager? The question for management is what problem
are you trying to solve and what would you have us do differently?

CC

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Overhead of SMF Records

2006-04-24 Thread Ted MacNEIL
Don't forget to add in the cost of the periodic IFASMDFP jobs that copy
the SMF data from the SYS1.MANx datasets

I make those IMP=5.
The cost is nothing, since I bought the machine for other work.
IFASMFDP fills in the valleys that would not be used if they weren't there!

-
-teD

O-KAY! BLUE! JAYS!
Let's PLAY! BALL!

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Offensive Language

2006-04-24 Thread Paul Gilmartin
In a recent note, Shane said:

 Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 08:38:25 +1000
 
 On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 12:18 -0500, Darren Evans-Young wrote:
  Please refrain from using words in your posts that may be
  deemed offensive or inappropriate. ...like the one just recently posted.
 
 How is one to judge - see a recent advertising campaign by an agency of
 the federal government of this country.
 Would such usage qualify ???.
 *extremely* common usage here.
 
Can you give a poor isolated provincial Yank a hint?  Perhaps a URL
that would help me root out what you're talking about?

 Unfortunate side effect - I'm with gil on this.
 
Much though I flinch at some of Phil's content (but where's Dubbo
when he's really needed?), I am more upset that the ignorant
masses, promoters of V-chips, Palladium Chips, censorers of
Super Bowl entertainment, etc., should interfere with his opportunity
to have a platform.  And his style, while perhaps unnecessary, is a
thin veneer over valuable content.  I can take Phil c*m grano salis.
(But I was tempted.  Only it's too much a pain in the *rse to
resubscribe with a different address.  And it would bug D.
unnecessarily.)

-- gil
-- 
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


  1   2   >