Hey,
you're exactly right... that box (i'm not even sure
what distro it's running... mandrake?) is also using
that weird naming scheme (i actually had to check mtab
to see what the root really was). that seems kind of
lame to do it by label instead of device file, but i
guess that's the way it go
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 09:23:34PM +0200, Alexander Jolk wrote:
> Cameron Matheson wrote:
>
> >it's similar to my other clients which are all working
> >fine... why would it be sending this tar command? (the
> >other clients are all having '/' be their directory)
>
> Actually, I thought that you
--On June 2, 2005 12:05:58 PM -0700 Cameron Matheson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
<>>
devdb.tonservices.com /dev/ida/c0d0p2 root-tar
it's similar to my other clients which are all working
fine... why would it be sending this tar command? (the
other clients are all having '/' be their director
Cameron Matheson wrote:
hmm, there is no sendbackup file... i'm assuming it
never got that file. i did look around in a few of
the other files, and the problem seems to be here at
how it's running tar:
/bin/tar --create --file /dev/null --directory
/dev/ida/c0d0p2
--one-file-system --listed-
Hi,
> > FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
> > devdb.tons /dev/ida/c0d0p2 lev 0 FAILED [disk
> > /dev/ida/c0d0p2 offline on
> > devdb.tonservices.com?]
> > Ok, the whole /dev/ida/c0d0p2 thing is a word
> device i
> > will admit, but it's definitely not offline...
>
> Does this setup pass amchec
Cameron Matheson wrote:
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
devdb.tons /dev/ida/c0d0p2 lev 0 FAILED [disk
/dev/ida/c0d0p2 offline on
devdb.tonservices.com?]
gatorade.t /dev/sda6 lev 0 STRANGE
Ok, the whole /dev/ida/c0d0p2 thing is a word device i
will admit, but it's definitely not offline..
Hi,
so my amanda setup is coming along pretty nicely... i
added two clients to my setup yesterday though, and
there are some errors that came up in my email... i
don't really understand them:
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
devdb.tons /dev/ida/c0d0p2 lev 0 FAILED [disk
/dev/ida/c0d0p2 offline
Bijnens
> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 10:56 AM
> To: Brian Tima
> Cc: Amanda Mailing List
> Subject: Re: failure and strange dump summary -- disk offline
>
>
> Brian Tima wrote:
>
>> File system is ext3
>> Which debug file do I check?
>>
>> Here a
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Paul Bijnens
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 10:56 AM
To: Brian Tima
Cc: Amanda Mailing List
Subject: Re: failure and strange dump summary -- disk offline
Brian Tima wrote:
> File system is ext3
> Which debug fil
Brian Tima wrote:
Does anyone have any more suggestions I can look into for resolving my sda3
disk?
What filesystem is sda? ext2 reiserfs? ...
What is in the debug file on the client: /tmp/amanda/*.debug
concerning this DLE ?
(I thought someone already asked, but I never saw the answer.)
--
Paul
Brian Tima wrote:
File system is ext3
Which debug file do I check?
Here are the files showing in the directory /tmp/amanda
All the ones relevant to /dev/sda3 ?
You never posted (afaik) which program you used to
dump the filesystem (dump or gnutar).
Do a grep of /dev/sda3 or the mountpoint for gnuta
Hi, Brian Tima,
on Freitag, 29. Oktober 2004 at 17:20 you wrote to amanda-users:
BT> Does anyone have any more suggestions I can look into for resolving my sda3
BT> disk?
BT> amcheck does not report any problems.
BT> my amanda user is part of the disk group
BT> /dev/sda1
BT> performs without m
Does anyone have any more suggestions I can look into for resolving my sda3
disk?
amcheck does not report any problems.
my amanda user is part of the disk group
/dev/sda1
performs without missing a beat, /dev/sda3
continuously reports /dev/sda3 lev 0 FAILED [disk /dev/sda3 offline on
mn-py-linux
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 10:26:57AM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> If [...] you tell amanda to use a version of dump, those programs
> generally work at the device level (even when told to work on a
> mount point) and should be able to backup umounted partitions.
To add a bit more detail, dump does th
that I get the "disk ... offline" error when trying to backup
any files on mounted volumes (non-root drives).
osx1 /Users standard
Works fine
osx1 /Volumes/hfs-mounted-part standard
Gives the "disk offline" error (the hfs-mounted-part is a mounted/functioning
hfs or hf
On Tuesday 01 June 2004 10:26, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 09:14:16PM -0700, gen2 wrote:
>> > /dev/sda9 is NOT a mount point, its a descriptor only and will
>> > probably fail forever.
>> >
>> > now, if that disk is mounted someplace, as in /mnt/sda9 on the
>> > machine whose alias
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 09:14:16PM -0700, gen2 wrote:
> > /dev/sda9 is NOT a mount point, its a descriptor only and will
> > probably fail forever.
> >
> > now, if that disk is mounted someplace, as in /mnt/sda9 on the machine
> > whose alias is node1, and it is mounted when amdump runs, it should
> /dev/sda9 is NOT a mount point, its a descriptor only and will
> probably fail forever.
>
> now, if that disk is mounted someplace, as in /mnt/sda9 on the machine
> whose alias is node1, and it is mounted when amdump runs, it should
> work like a champ.
Ok, what I'm experiencing lends that a lot
Hi all, I have a very functional amanda 2.4.3 LAN backup system that I'm
having one problem with: I can't seem to back up any partitions, only
directories and files. If I use disklist specs like this
node1 /home standard
I get a proper backup, but if I use
node1 /dev/sda9 standard
I get an er
/boot comp-hd-dump
> >> > daisy /optcomp-hd-dump
> >> > daisy /usr comp-hd-dump
> >> > -
> >> >
> >> > If I put comp-hd-tar in here, all works fine ... !?
> >> >
> >>
ks fine ... !?
>> >
>> > -
>> > FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
>> > daisy /usr lev 0 FAILED [disk /usr offline on daisy?]
>> > daisy /opt lev 0 FAILED [disk /opt offline on daisy?]
>> > daisy /lev 0 FAILED [disk / off
here, all works fine ... !?
> >
> > -
> > FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
> > daisy /usr lev 0 FAILED [disk /usr offline on daisy?]
> > daisy /opt lev 0 FAILED [disk /opt offline on daisy?]
> > daisy /lev 0 FAILED [disk / offline on daisy?]
> daisy /opt lev 0 FAILED [disk /opt offline on daisy?]
> daisy /lev 0 FAILED [disk / offline on daisy?]
Disk offline messages are generally a result of permissions
problems (if the disk were really offline you would have much
bigger problems). Make sure your backup user is part
AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
daisy /usr lev 0 FAILED [disk /usr offline on daisy?]
daisy /opt lev 0 FAILED [disk /opt offline on daisy?]
daisy /lev 0 FAILED [disk / offline on daisy?]
...
DUMP SUMMARY: DUMPER STATSTAPER STATS
HOSTNAME DISK L ORIG-KB OUT
--On Friday, November 07, 2003 00:01:08 + Mohammad Meskarian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Dear All.
>
> I have some strange report on Amanda starting after no change on
> Amanda or at least I don't know what is
> Changed.
> I receive di
Dear All.
I have some
strange report on Amanda starting after no change on Amanda or at least I don’t
know what is
Changed.
I receive disk offline ?. only for remote servers.
ServerName /etc/ lev 0
FAILED [disk /etc/ offline on ServerName?]
I
ent01 /samba 20030901 0 [disk /samba offline on rid96pdc?]
planner: FAILED client01 /home 20030901 0 [disk /home offline on rid96pdc?]
planner: FAILED client01 /var 20030901 0 [disk /var offline on rid96pdc?]
planner: FAILED client01 / 20030901 0 [disk / offline on rid96pdc?]
---
Scott Phelps
--On Tuesday, August 12, 2003 11:53:59 -0400 "LaValley, Brian E" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I have not been able to backup anything on my local system. AMANDA reports
> that it thinks the disk is offline. Where should I start looking to find
> out what is wrong?
Make sure you're not trying t
On Tuesday 12 August 2003 11:53, LaValley, Brian E wrote:
>I have not been able to backup anything on my local system. AMANDA
> reports that it thinks the disk is offline. Where should I start
> looking to find out what is wrong?
Start in the disklist and get rid of any localhost entries, use on
I am using Red Hat Linux on Power PC.
I wanted to BACKUP my SYSTEM IMAGE with AMANDA (version 2.4.2p2) and got
following error message wonder why!
FAIL planner my_host_name hdk1 0 [disk hdk1 offline on my_local_host?]
Any hints/tips or related information is appreciated!
Thanks!
__
I have not been able to backup anything on my local system. AMANDA reports
that it thinks the disk is offline. Where should I start looking to find
out what is wrong?
I am using Red Hat Linux on Power PC.
I wanted to BACKUP my SYSTEM IMAGE with AMANDA (version 2.4.2p2) and got
following error message wonder why!
FAIL planner my_host_name hdk1 0 [disk hdk1 offline on my_local_host?]
Any hints/tips or related information is appreciated!
Thanks!
__
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 02:37:43PM -0400, Kurt Yoder wrote:
> sendsize[505]: time 0.054: error [cannot find user backup in passwd file]
This message is a bit misleading. It really means:
`getpwnam("backup") was unsuccessful'. Perhaps getpwnam()
searched /etc/passwd, but perhaps it tried to use N
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 10:57:31AM -0400, Kurt Yoder wrote:
> Looking more closely in /tmp/amanda/sendsize...debug, I see
> something strange:
> [...]
> sendsize[7578]: time 0.137: Usage: dump [-?CDVcgl -L[v] -a[v] -f[v]
> -h[dnv] -o[v] -r[dnv] -s[dnv] -t[nv] -T index1[, index2]] file(s)
On Solari
So it looks like this has something to do with me compiling this on
SCO. I've asked my local "knowledgeable SCO guy" and he gave me an
explanation that I don't understand but perhaps one of the coders
would. Should I direct this thread to amanda-hackers instead?
Kurt Yoder said:
> More informatio
So I'm still getting the "disk offline" error, and seeing this in my
/tmp/amanda/sendsize...debug:
sendsize: debug 1 pid 502 ruid 19 euid 19: start at Fri Jul 25
14:24:16 2003
sendsize: version 2.4.4
sendsize[5
en, you
need 1.13-25, getting it from alpha.gnu.org.
> However, I still get
>the "disk offline" error. Now in /tmp/amanda/sendsize... I see this
>which doesn't look good either:
>
>sendsize: debug 1 pid 15490 ruid 19 euid 19: start at Thu Jul 24
>00:30:05 2003
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 10:26:30AM -0400, Kurt Yoder wrote:
>
> Again I see "cannot find user backup in passwd file". In looking at
> /etc, I noticed the passwd file is actually a symlink to a passwd
> file in another directory (For anyone who has SCO, why in GOD'S NAME
> do they do this symlink B
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 at 10:26am, Kurt Yoder wrote
> > tar is nice for being so cross platform. If you can get that to go,
> > it
> > might be your better option.
>
> OK, I got gnu tar 1.13 compiled and working. However, I still get
> the "disk offline" error.
cross platform. If you can get that to go,
> it
> might be your better option.
OK, I got gnu tar 1.13 compiled and working. However, I still get
the "disk offline" error. Now in /tmp/amanda/sendsize... I see this
which doesn't look good either:
sendsize: debug 1 pid 1549
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 at 10:57am, Kurt Yoder wrote
> sendsize[7578]: time 0.020: calculating for amname '/', dirname '/',
> spindle -1
> sendsize[7578]: time 0.020: getting size via dump for / level 0
> sendsize[7578]: time 0.020: calculating for device '/' with ''
> sendsize[7578]: time 0.022: runn
Kurt Yoder wrote:
Weird errors here. The root user is definitely in the passwd file.
Could this be part of the problem?
Thanks for any ideas on fixing this...
Maybe a silly question, but, can your amanda backup user read the passwd file
on that system?
Marc
More information about this problem:
Looking more closely in /tmp/amanda/sendsize...debug, I see
something strange:
sendsize[7578]: time 0.020: calculating for amname '/', dirname '/',
spindle -1
sendsize[7578]: time 0.020: getting size via dump for / level 0
sendsize[7578]: time 0.020: calculati
Everything
appears successful, and the machine passes amcheck tests. When I run
amdump at night, my other linux, freebsd, and windows machines dump
successfully. However on my SCO machine, I get the message:
shcorp.shc /stand lev FAILED [disk /stand offline on
shcorp.shcorp.com?]
shcorp.shc / lev FA
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 09:46:36AM -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> Nope. / has an entry in fstab just like everybody else.
Well, not *just* like *everybody* else: :-)
Solaris:
#devicedevice mount FS fsckmount mount
#to mount to fsck
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 at 4:10pm, Jay Lessert wrote
> > selfcheck: device sda6
> > selfcheck: could not access sda6 (sda6): No such file or directory
>
> I'm not a Linux guy, but this is the one where Linux does not have
> a conventional entry for "/" in /etc/fstab, right?
Nope. / has an entry in
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 03:05:24PM -0800, Stephen Walton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Haven't posted here in a long time because, well, Amanda just works.
>
> I recently added a new client, to my Amanda setup. A few details about
> my configuration are after my .signature. Five partitions on /dev/sda
> (/,
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 15:39, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> On 20 Nov 2002 at 3:05pm, Stephen Walton wrote
>
>
> > selfcheck: debug 1 pid 19828 ruid 513 euid 513 start time Wed Nov 20
> > 14:52:28 2002
> > /opt/amanda-2.4.2p2/libexec/selfcheck: version 2.4.2p2
> *snip*
> > selfcheck: could not acce
On 20 Nov 2002 at 3:05pm, Stephen Walton wrote
> I recently added a new client, to my Amanda setup. A few details about
> my configuration are after my .signature. Five partitions on /dev/sda
> (/, /boot, /usr, /var, /opt) and one on /dev/sdb (/home). amanda.conf
> lists them by partition (sda6
Hi,
Haven't posted here in a long time because, well, Amanda just works.
I recently added a new client, to my Amanda setup. A few details about
my configuration are after my .signature. Five partitions on /dev/sda
(/, /boot, /usr, /var, /opt) and one on /dev/sdb (/home). amanda.conf
lists them
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 at 3:20pm, Chad Morland wrote
> Error from sendsize*debug:
> runtar: error [must be invoked by operator]
>
> However, amanda is in my operator group.
> torbackup# id amanda
> uid=1000(amanda) gid=1000(amanda) groups=1000(amanda), 5(operator)
Are you using inetd or xinetd? If
Chad Morland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: disk offline
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 at 2:39pm, Chad Morland wrote
>
> > backup. /backup lev 0 FAILED [disk /backup offline on
> > backup.domain.com?] (I
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 at 2:39pm, Chad Morland wrote
> backup. /backup lev 0 FAILED [disk /backup offline on
> backup.domain.com?] (I have also tried using the device
> [/dev/vinum/striped])
>
*snip*
>
> My backup partition is a 430G striped vinum partition on FreeBSD. I have
> followed everything
I am having some problems getting amanda to run. I have used amanda
before and this is the first time that I have encountered this problem.
I followed the instuctions from the backup and recovery chapter and
amcheck is not reporting any problems. However, when I run amdump I get
the following sent
Hello,
I have several logical volumes which I want to backup with AMANDA.
To make a proper backup, I create snapshot volumes before I start the
backup.
Now, trying to backup these snapshot volumes, AMANDA reports 'disk
offline'.
If I try to backup the nomal volumes, everything wor
I have just installed 2.4.2p2 on a few redhat 7.0 servers. All work
great except 1. I get the following report after backup.
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
gator20.tr /home lev 0 FAILED [disk /var offline on
gator20.triparish.net?]
I get this on all directories on this server. The other se
Please help me out, folks -- tried a bunch of things, I really do not know
how to proceed..
Can not get amanda (2.4.2p2) to work for HP C160 running UX11.0
Amcheck runs through fine. But then dump gives me
zip /zi2 lev 0 FAILED [disk /zi2 offline on zip?]
Dumps are not that big - under 10GB,
: Jonathan Murray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 June 2002 18:25
To: Spicer, Kevin
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: disk offline - runtar as root
borzoi 63# pwd
/usr/freeware/libexec
-rwsr-x---1 root sys21876 May 31 17:36 runtar
/etc/group:
borzoi 6% cat /etc/group
sys::0:root
ou
>may need to recompile?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jonathan Murray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 06 June 2002 15:25
> To: Jonathan Murray
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: disk offline - runtar as root
>
>
> It appears that the client i
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 June 2002 15:25
To: Jonathan Murray
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: disk offline - runtar as root
It appears that the client isn't running runtar as root. Does anyone
know how to force the client to run runtar as root?
Thanks,
Jonathan Murray
from report:
FAIL
It appears that the client isn't running runtar as root. Does anyone
know how to force the client to run runtar as root?
Thanks,
Jonathan Murray
from report:
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
borzoi /dev/dsk/dks0d2s7 lev 0 FAILED [disk /dev/dsk/dks0d2s7
offline on borzoi?]
borzoi
Hi!
> Recently had a drive fail on a RAID I am backing up. Since replacing
> the drive and re-building the RAID, amanda has been failing on all of
> the partitions on this computer.
>
> The error I see in the amanda report is the following:
>
>hostname /dev/da0s1f lev 0 FAILED [disk /dev
Hi...
Running the version of amanda-client from the freebsd ports
collection on freebsd-stable i386.
Recently had a drive fail on a RAID I am backing up. Since replacing
the drive and re-building the RAID, amanda has been failing on all of
the partitions on this computer.
The error I see in
> >My amdump email report starts out:
> >
> >These dumps were to tape daily001.
> >The next tape Amanda expects to use is: daily001.
>
> This in itself, is odd, very odd. Your amanda.conf seems to be
> out of whack somehow.
Well, that could very well be, I suppose...
> >(brought to you by Amand
On Tuesday 23 April 2002 02:38 am, GIC MLs wrote:
>I would expect this to be a frequently asked question, but after
> looking through Google, I didn't see much specifically on it,
> so...
>
>My amdump email report starts out:
>
>These dumps were to tape daily001.
>The next tape Amanda expects to u
I would expect this to be a frequently asked question, but after looking
through Google, I didn't see much specifically on it, so...
My amdump email report starts out:
These dumps were to tape daily001.
The next tape Amanda expects to use is: daily001.
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
client
0 /
> planner: FAILED pc20 / 0 [disk / offline on pc20?]
>
> Seems like amanda can't get the size of the disk.
> Any suggestions? Should I use tar unstead of dump?
Well, seeing as there *is* no dump for ReiserFS, yes, you have to use tar.
--
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University
iliar... Try to supply the absolute path for the obstinate
> drive. If that helps, we're two...
I got the same problem with one of my boxes.
Are there known problems with amanda and ReiserFS?
My log entries messages look like:
got result for host pc20 disk /: 0 -> -1K, -1 -> -1K, -1
Rainer Fuegenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After adding a "new" old server named fav to amanda, I keep
> getting the following message:
>
> FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
> fav/home2 lev 0 FAILED [disk /home2 offline on fav?]
>
> It doesn't matter if the disk is specified by d
Hi,
After adding a "new" old server named fav to amanda, I keep
getting the following message:
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
fav/home2 lev 0 FAILED [disk /home2 offline on fav?]
It doesn't matter if the disk is specified by device file or
mount directory:
favc1t4d0s6
sorry, I forgot
OS is:
SunOS fav 5.4 Generic_101945-43 sun4m sparc
regards,
rainer.
>FAIL planner servera /data0 0 [disk /data0 offline on servera?]
Always run amcheck first. That will most likely tell you that the
selfcheck timed out which, in turn, should point you at detailed debugging
steps in the FAQ:
http://amanda.sourceforge.net/fom-serve/cache/16.html
http://amanda
Hello,
Finally, went back to stable release of amanda (2.4.2p2) from sources,
since debian package seems to be broken.
Looking at logs got this:
START driver date 20020213
START planner date 20020213
INFO planner Adding new disk servera:/data0.
FAIL planner servera /data0 0 [disk /data0 offline
Good afternoon,
Well, when i execute "dump..." i receive the next e-mail
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
sc01us0105 /software/amanda/share/ lev 0 FAILED [disk /software/amanda/share/
offline on sc01us0105?]
DUMP SUMMARY:
DUMPER STATSTAP
On 15 Jan 2002 at 2:47pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
> FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
> sc01us0105 /software/amanda/share/ lev 0 FAILED [disk
>/software/amanda/share/offline on sc01us0105?]
> frostis.cf /export/home/setup/freeware/amanda-2.4.2p2/ lev 0 FAILED [disk
>/export/home/setup/freew
I'm here again,
When i execute amdump, the backup fails
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
sc01us0105 /software/amanda/share/ lev 0 FAILED [disk /software/amanda/share/offline
on sc01us0105?]
frostis.cf /export/home/setup/freeware/amanda-2.4.2p2/ lev 0 FAILED [disk
/export/home/setup/freewa
Rainer Fuegenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After adding a "new" old server named fav to amanda, I keep
> getting the following message:
>
> FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
> fav/home2 lev 0 FAILED [disk /home2 offline on fav?]
>
> It doesn't matter if the disk is specified by d
Hi,
After adding a "new" old server named fav to amanda, I keep
getting the following message:
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
fav/home2 lev 0 FAILED [disk /home2 offline on fav?]
It doesn't matter if the disk is specified by device file or
mount directory:
favc1t4d0s6
sorry, I forgot
OS is:
SunOS fav 5.4 Generic_101945-43 sun4m sparc
regards,
rainer.
Ok thanks
i will let you know tomorrow
after the nigthly backup
thanks
Best Regards
Patrick
John R. Jackson wrote:
>> vxdump: WARNING: no file `/etc/dumpdates', making an empty one
>> vxdump: cannot create /etc/dumpdates: Permission denied
>>...
>>ho /etc/amdumpdates not there
>>is it the pro
What does /tmp/amanda/* say?
Patrick LIN wrote:
>
> FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
>bigeasy.in vg00_lvol5 lev 0 FAILED [disk vg00_lvol5 offline on
> bigeasy.in?]
>
> what that mean please
> amcheck without errors but the report giveme that.
>
> the client is a HP
> the serveur is a sun
> vxdump: WARNING: no file `/etc/dumpdates', making an empty one
> vxdump: cannot create /etc/dumpdates: Permission denied
>...
>ho /etc/amdumpdates not there
>is it the prob ?
Yes, that's the problem. Create it (as root, since it's in /etc) and
make sure your Amanda user (uid 15) has read/w
John R. Jackson wrote:
>>FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
>> bigeasy.in vg00_lvol5 lev 0 FAILED [disk vg00_lvol5 offline on
>>bigeasy.in?]
>>
>
> What's in /tmp/amanda/sendsize*debug on bigeasy.in?
>
>
>>patrick
>>
ho /etc/amdumpdates not there
is it the prob ?
ok here it is :
sendsiz
>FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
> bigeasy.in vg00_lvol5 lev 0 FAILED [disk vg00_lvol5 offline on
>bigeasy.in?]
What's in /tmp/amanda/sendsize*debug on bigeasy.in?
>patrick
John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
bigeasy.in vg00_lvol5 lev 0 FAILED [disk vg00_lvol5 offline on
bigeasy.in?]
what that mean please
amcheck without errors but the report giveme that.
the client is a HP
the serveur is a sun Solaris
and the version of amanda is 2.4.2p2
thanks
Best Regards,
pa
>Also as suggestion that somebody kindly gave me I did as root this:
>[root@miro sandra]# /bin/gtar --create --file /dev/null --directory
>/Local --one-file-system --listed-incremental
>/usr/local/var/amanda/gnutar-lists/miro.tomandandy.com_Local_0.new
>--sparse --ignore-failed-read --totals
>/
Hi everybody:
Still I have problems with amanda on my server as client, I am trying to backup /Local area from my backup Sever but I get this error
I am using Amanda version 2.4.2p2
miro.toman /Local lev 0 FAILED [disk /Local offline on miro.tomandandy.com?]
I check the permissions looks ok
d
>(no size line match in above gnutar output)
That line says GNU tar terminated but did not give Amanda an answer.
What happens if you run this **as root** on that client:
/bin/gtar --create --file /dev/null --directory /Local \
--one-file-system --listed-incremental /dev/null \
--spars
Hi everybody:
since the last thrusday I'm getting this error "miro.toman /Local lev 0 FAILED [disk /Local offline on miro.tomandandy.com?]" I don't know what it is the problem. I have amanda 2.4.2p2 and tar(GNU tar) 1.13.17. root@miro /bin]# tar --version
tar (GNU tar) 1.13.17
Copyright 2000 Fre
that this debug file is mentionned in the FAQ, about
the "disk offline" question. It seems that it was mentionned several
times on the mailing list.
Here are few other ideas I had during the weekend.
- My problem was due to the fact I did a ./configure --with-user=14
going with userID i
On May 20, 2001, "Bernhard R. Erdmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> #! /bin/sh
>> X=; export X
>> exec $0.exe ${1+"$@"}
> What is ${1+"$@"} good for? Never seen that construction before...
Some shells expand "$@" to "" when $# = 0.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unica
> #! /bin/sh
> X=; export X
> exec $0.exe ${1+"$@"}
What is ${1+"$@"} good for? Never seen that construction before...
On May 20, 2001, Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This appears to be a bug that triggers in a very particular
> condition: when the environment is empty. It doesn't trigger with
> 1.12 because it just doesn't depend on librt.so.
Nope. It didn't trigger on 1.12 because it wasn't lin
On May 19, 2001, Olivier Nicole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have upgraded to tar 1.13.19 but when I try to activate amanda on a
> client machine, I get disk off line error:
> FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
> oak/home/fidji lev 0 FAILED [disk /home/fidji offline on oak?]
> oak
On May 19, 2001, Olivier Nicole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder what is the tar command that is used to calculate the
> estimate.
It's printed in sendsize.debug, IIRC. And in runtar.debug.
It will reference a gnutar-list-dir .new file. It's created initially
empty for level 0 estimates,
Hello,
I have upgraded to tar 1.13.19 but when I try to activate amanda on a
client machine, I get disk off line error:
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
oak/home/fidji lev 0 FAILED [disk /home/fidji offline on oak?]
oak/home/hawai lev 0 FAILED [disk /home/hawai offline on oa
>FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
> kascha sdb2 lev 0 FAILED [disk sdb2 offline on kascha?]
> kascha sdb1 lev 0 FAILED [disk sdb1 offline on kascha?]
> kascha sda1 lev 0 FAILED [disk sda1 offline on kascha?]
>
>Since these are my boot disk and /usr disk they arnt off
>line.
amanda email output,
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
kascha sdb2 lev 0 FAILED [disk sdb2 offline on kascha?]
kascha sdb1 lev 0 FAILED [disk sdb1 offline on kascha?]
kascha sda1 lev 0 FAILED [disk sda1 offline on kascha?]
Since these are my boot disk and /usr disk they arnt of
98 matches
Mail list logo
