jksbt wrote:
> FWIW--one of the more obvious differences in SQ (in addition to those I
> noticed with EDO) was soundcheck's advice to cause FLAC decoding to be
> done on the LMS instead of the sbt. It doesn't require the TT3.0. This
> improvement was very clear and required a simple setting ch
FWIW--one of the more obvious differences in SQ (in addition to those I
noticed with EDO) was soundcheck's advice to cause FLAC decoding to be
done on the LMS instead of the sbt. It doesn't require the TT3.0. This
improvement was very clear and required a simple setting change to the
file types
JohnSwenson wrote:
>
>
> Can I personally hear the difference? On some DACs yes and on some no.
> On the ones that I can hear the difference it's not a huge night and day
> difference.
>
> John S.
At least that's a more sober assessment than the guy who stated that
going from the incredible
The way EDO works when selecting the 192 digital out will use less
memory and will result in less processing going on. (please note that
this output will do all sample rates up to and including 192, not JUST
192). What Triode has done here COULD have been done with the original
S/PDIF driver (and
SBGK wrote:
> Think you will find that as the Touch is bit perfect that nothing can
> change the sound quality, have you tried room compensation software eg
> Inguz, moving your speakers or physical room improvements to stop sound
> reflections ? These are all better solutions than any physically
Triode wrote:
> There has been some discussion on the Touch forum about the EDO app and
> the potential benfits to audio quality from the spdif output at 96k and
> below. This is not the primary purpose of the enhanced digital ouput
> app but people have debated whether any possible change in au
There has been some discussion on the Touch forum about the EDO app and
the potential benfits to audio quality from the spdif output at 96k and
below. This is not the primary purpose of the enhanced digital ouput
app but people have debated whether any possible change in audio quality
exists. I
Mdac has just received a 5 review in the new Hifi Choice
Sent from my HTC Desire using Tapatalk 2
tank121's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17169
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/sh
For the last few days, I've been listening to my main system (see sig
below) with EDO+TT3.0+buffer=2+SBGK's priorities of 03-25-12.
My impression is that there is an improvement in sound over the
SBT+TT3.0 alone, very much along the lines of the improvements from
plain SBT to TT2.0 and 3.0. M
Given that SBT can be used as digital transport into your DAC of choice,
your comment seems non-sensical to me.
pandasharka wrote:
> Those people who proffer that all streamers dish out the same music are
> simply wrong.
>
---
I don't think I've ever read that forum. I have read the
'_*alternative_Hoffman_forum*_'
(http://stereocentral.tv/phpbb/index.php) though :D.
andy_c's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3128
View this
pandasharka wrote:
> Boy I didn't realise there was quite so much pent up negativity around
> here - chill pills chaps! I know there are trolls to be fed, but even
> so...
>
> Anyway, time for a goodbye. Am having a Linn Klimax DS and amps
> installed tomorrow - home trialled over Easter, and it
lg.lindstrom wrote:
> Hi
>
> Currently I have a numbers of Logitech Receiver units in different
> room.
>
> During the latest years I have collected a lot of music, mainly
> classical, in 24/192 flac format.
>
> I am planning upgrade my "main" system by adding a external DAC.
> I have tried t
Hi
Currently I have a numbers of Logitech Receiver units in different
room.
During the latest years I have collected a lot of music, mainly
classical, in 24/192 flac format.
I am planning upgrade my "main" system by adding a external DAC.
I have tried to find out if Logitech Receiver plays 24/
14 matches
Mail list logo
