The reply *should* come from the IP that the request arrived at ... ...
Thanks!
TJ
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 12:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pix NAT - Two to one [7:37179]
When the two outside
TLending
> New York, NY 10038
> (212) 651 - 7695 Voice
> (212) 651 - 7795 Fax
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Hire, Ejay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:52 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Pix NAT - Two to one [7:37179]
&
-Original Message-
From: Gaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pix NAT - Two to one [7:37179]
Eventually, two separate static commands for two separate outside addresses
going to two separate DMZ addresses.
At the moment there is just
038
(212) 651 - 7695 Voice
(212) 651 - 7795 Fax
-Original Message-
From: Hire, Ejay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Pix NAT - Two to one [7:37179]
On a cisco router, you use the Extendable command. not sure about the pix.
When the two outside addresses are resolved to the single inside address
(port 80) everything is OK but when the web server sends back a reply
which of the address translations with be used? If the wrong one is
picked any firewall will choke on it, and if no firewall, the other end
of the connecti
t; To:
> Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:06 PM
> Subject: Pix NAT - Two to one [7:37179]
>
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Has anybody tried NAT'ing two outside addresses to one internal (DMZ)
> > address on the same port (80) in some way.
> > Not too diffi
Why not add an additional ip to the internal host and have two nats?
- Original Message -
From: "Gaz"
To:
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:06 PM
Subject: Pix NAT - Two to one [7:37179]
> Hi all,
>
> Has anybody tried NAT'ing two outside addresses to one interna
On a cisco router, you use the Extendable command. not sure about the pix.
-Original Message-
From: Gaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Pix NAT - Two to one [7:37179]
Hi all,
Has anybody tried NAT'ing two ou
Eventually, two separate static commands for two separate outside addresses
going to two separate DMZ addresses.
At the moment there is just one machine inside. Possibility of putting
multiple addresses on the server but preferred option is not to do this.
What I would like to miss out is the time
what is the overall goal?
>>> Gaz 03/04/02 03:06PM >>>
Hi all,
Has anybody tried NAT'ing two outside addresses to one internal (DMZ)
address on the same port (80) in some way.
Not too difficult to get round, as I can get the DNS of one site changed and
use the single address outside to single i
Hi all,
Has anybody tried NAT'ing two outside addresses to one internal (DMZ)
address on the same port (80) in some way.
Not too difficult to get round, as I can get the DNS of one site changed and
use the single address outside to single inside.
The advantage would be that when the web sites are
11 matches
Mail list logo