Well if they really need to be bound to 1 ip, I suspect multilink pp is
the way to go. Alternatively, you could just point the same static routes
at all 3 and turn off caching if you really want to.
Brian "Sonic" Whalen
Success = Preparation + Opportunity
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Al Smith wrote:
Al,
Look at 'interface multilink' and 'multilink-group #'
on the interface. 12.1(2)T I believe for
multilink-group command. multilink-group can't be used
on DDR interfaces.
Example:
int multilink1
ip address ...
encaps ppp
ppp multilink
...rest of interface cfg...
int s0
multilink
Take a look at this config and see if it work for you:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/131/7.html
-Original Message-
From: Al Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 8:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How to Multiplex 3 T1s [7:4625]
Colleagues,
I am currently
External inverse multiplexing devices also should be considered.
Tiara Networks make some interesting ones, and I believe Adtran and
some others also have a product. While these are another box to
manage, they do unload lots of CPU cycles from the router, and may be
cheaper per-interface.
Berkowitz" |
|| |
|+--->
>|
||
| To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| cc: (bcc: Dom
Stocqueler/LON/GB/Reuters) |
| Subject: Re: H
I have used a Larscom Mega-T inverse mux CSU. Works great with 2 to 4 T-1s.
""Al Smith"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Colleagues,
>
> I am currently trying to multiplex / bind 3 parallel T1 clear channel
> circuits.
> The circuits will be terminating on a 7206
Multilink PPP will let you bind all three circuits, I'll see if I can
scavenge up the link on CCO.cisco.com. For a slightly less complex
solution, create 3 separate numbered links across the three t1's and put 3
equal cost routes pointing to the same destination on both ends. Cap it off
with "no
Orion's.
FWIW,
doctorcisco
>From: "Howard C. Berkowitz"
>Reply-To: "Howard C. Berkowitz"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: How to Multiplex 3 T1s [7:4625]
>Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 10:08:49 -0400
>
>External inverse multiplexing devices also s
IL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: How to Multiplex 3 T1s [7:4625]
>Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 05:55:02 -0400
>
>Orion's.
>
>FWIW,
>doctorcisco
>
> >From: "Howard C. Berkowitz"
> >Reply-To: "Howard C. Berkowitz"
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
In your particular case, due to the existing T1 ports on the 7206, I would
guess at PPP multilink is the most cost effective way to go.
But just FYI, you can put an IMA device (either a card in a Cisco router, or
an external box such as Adtrans or a number of other vendors sell) and
multiplex tho
What is to be gained by using an inverse mux ? How much extra overhead is
caused by this rather than running in inversed mode?
""Jon Wagner"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Take a look at this config and see if it work for you:
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/publi
To:
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 8:54 PM
Subject: Re: How to Multiplex 3 T1s [7:4625]
> What is to be gained by using an inverse mux ? How much extra overhead is
> caused by this rather than running in inversed mode?
>
>
> ""Jon Wagner"" wrote in messa
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Kelly D Griffin
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 8:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How to Multiplex 3 T1s [7:4625]
Has anyone done this successfully and shown an increase in bandwidth? Has
anyone done this
ones who had designed the
network with that equipment before we took over management ... go figure.
FWIW,
doctorcisco
>From: "Kelly D Griffin"
>Reply-To: "Kelly D Griffin"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: How to Multiplex 3 T1s [7:4625]
>Date: Tue, 22
NA, CCDA
> Network Engineer
> Kg2 Network Design
> 877.418.4025
> http://www.kg2.com
> - Original Message -
> From: "Wojtek Zlobicki"
> To:
> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 8:54 PM
> Subject: Re: How to Multiplex 3 T1s [7:4625]
>
>
> > What
15 matches
Mail list logo
