I'm looking at the problem.
I can't even re-build the latest release of the annotation spec.
Try the following:
svn co
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.0
mvn source:jar javadoc:jar install
The javadoc fails :-( and the source jar does not
Hi Kevan,
Thanks for your input. I'll take some time and see what i can do to
re-engineer a better representation. Hopefully this implementation will
help eliminate/reduce the frustration you and others are experiencing with
the current view.
Any other ideas or comments are certainly welcome!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12564340#action_12564340
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-1775:
2nd patch applied in rev 617070 with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks reassigned GERONIMO-3786:
--
Assignee: David Jencks
Command deploy.bat/sh failed to start in the exported
Just a quick note... I'm starting to fix up the GShell site more...
and added a new page for the upcoming/ongoing goals here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/GSHELL/goals.html
Please have a look, add, comment whatever.
Thanks,
--jason
Congrats Viet
On Jan 31, 2008 11:26 AM, Joseph Leong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations Viet
On Jan 31, 2008 12:36 AM, Shiva Kumar H R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations Viet!
On Jan 31, 2008 9:17 AM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I'd like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3746?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12564350#action_12564350
]
Joseph Leong commented on GERONIMO-3746:
Update:
Getting close! The configIds
Geronimo Revision: 617039 built with tests included
See the full build-0300.log file at
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080131/build-0300.log
Download the binaries from
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080131
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO
Hi,
What does the community think about having a portlet in the admin
console for configuring openejb related stuff as well as displaying
the different containers etc deployed in Geronimo. I think this may
improve the usability of Geronimo. If there is interest I would like
to investigate it
Welcome Viet.
Paul
On Jan 30, 2008, at 10:47 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
I'd like to welcome Viet Nguyen as a new committer on the Geronimo
project. Viet has made a number of contributions to Geronimo,
including our new monitoring capabilities, the J2G conversion tool,
as well as a
Congratulations Viet!
Jay
Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
I'd like to welcome Viet Nguyen as a new committer on the Geronimo
project. Viet has made a number of contributions to Geronimo, including
our new monitoring capabilities, the J2G conversion tool, as well as a
number of bug fixes, and other
On Jan 31, 2008, at 7:36 AM, Manu George wrote:
Hi,
What does the community think about having a portlet in the admin
console for configuring openejb related stuff as well as displaying
the different containers etc deployed in Geronimo. I think this may
improve the usability of Geronimo. If
Congrats Viet and welcome aboard !
Cheers!
Hernan
Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
I'd like to welcome Viet Nguyen as a new committer on the Geronimo
project. Viet has made a number of contributions to Geronimo, including
our new monitoring capabilities, the J2G conversion tool, as well as a
number
Hey Jason,
What I saw looks nifty. I like where Gshell is going. One thing that I
didn't see on there, and that might be because you are already working on
it, is user docs. I think that Gshell is fairly intuitive and easy to use,
but there are a couple things that I didn't get without bugging
On Jan 31, 2008, at 3:03 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I'm looking at the problem.
I can't even re-build the latest release of the annotation spec.
Try the following:
svn co
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.0
mvn source:jar javadoc:jar
On Jan 31, 2008 4:44 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008, at 3:03 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I'm looking at the problem.
I can't even re-build the latest release of the annotation spec.
Try the following:
svn co
Just a heads-up ... I've also encountered some problems in running TCK
with the updated specs. I've posted details on the tck list. So far
there is a possible problem with the JSP spec (or perhaps I just haven't
included it in the geronimo image correctly). I'll post more
information here
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-3786.
--
Resolution: Fixed
You are right, patch applied in rev 617161, thanks!
Command
Joe Bohn wrote:
Just a heads-up ... I've also encountered some problems in running TCK
with the updated specs. I've posted details on the tck list. So far
there is a possible problem with the JSP spec (or perhaps I just haven't
included it in the geronimo image correctly). I'll post more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3746?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joseph Leong updated GERONIMO-3746:
---
Attachment: GERONIMO-3746.patch
This patch is not complete, but up for review to help
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3746?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joseph Leong updated GERONIMO-3746:
---
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Plugin Progress Bar Not Updating
Geronimo Revision: 617128 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080131/build-0900.log
See the unit test reports at
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080131/unit-test-reports
It seems like if we are going to release this spec then we should use it
ourselves and validate it by running the tck for geronimo with it
instead of the axis2-saaj-api jar. I'll give it a shot locally and see
how things go.
Joe
Joe Bohn wrote:
I was going to test out these specs in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3746?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12564504#action_12564504
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-3746:
I applied the patch in rev 617243 with
i've just committed a few changes to specs/trunk.
I will recut a release soon, but if the generated jars could be reviewed
in case i missed something else
On Jan 31, 2008 9:57 PM, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems like if we are going to release this spec then we should use it
Given these legal problems, I'm cancelling all the votes I've started and will
start a *single* one for all the specs asap.
On Jan 31, 2008 2:44 AM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guillaume,
I'm extremely sorry to say that the javadoc and sources jars all seem to be
missing the required
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3746?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12564532#action_12564532
]
Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-3746:
---
Btw, I just added
I have tagged and uploaded a new set of the specs jars for review:
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/specs-1.4
The tag is available at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-1.4
All the jars, source and javadocs should contain the legal files, the
resources have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-2204.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
We turned off proxies in the server so there isnt much reason to work
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-3683.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1
If someone wants to test 2.0.3 and theres a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks reassigned GERONIMO-1567:
--
Assignee: David Jencks (was: Jason Dillon)
Plan XML files aren't included in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-1567.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.x)
2.1
The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks reassigned GERONIMO-3466:
--
Assignee: David Jencks
car-maven-plugin can not generate server plugin which
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-3250.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1
Assignee: David Jencks
geronimo-kernel
Geronimo Revision: 617327 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080131/build-2100.log
Download the binaries from
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080131
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO
Congrats Viet!
Thanks,
Gianny
On 31/01/2008, at 2:47 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
I'd like to welcome Viet Nguyen as a new committer on the Geronimo
project. Viet has made a number of contributions to Geronimo,
including our new monitoring capabilities, the J2G conversion tool,
as well
On Jan 31, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I have tagged and uploaded a new set of the specs jars for review:
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/specs-1.4
The tag is available at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-1.4
All the jars, source and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-2025.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.x)
Assignee: Kevan Miller
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller updated GERONIMO-3354:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1)
2.1.1
Requisite fixes have not been
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller updated GERONIMO-3124:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1)
2.1.1
Defer to 2.1.1.
Do we need this,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller resolved GERONIMO-1775.
Resolution: Fixed
I'm resolving this issue.
YunFeng please re-open or create a new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller updated GERONIMO-3442:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1)
2.1.1
Tomcat exception reports
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller resolved GERONIMO-1293.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0
Anita,
I'm assuming we can close this one
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2758?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12564655#action_12564655
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-2758:
Donald,
Can you either close this or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-1792.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
Heinie,
Thanks for your contribution. However, as it's been ~ 2 years
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12564658#action_12564658
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-3769:
Joe,
Could plexus be moved to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller updated GERONIMO-3687:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1)
2.1.1
This is only a problem on Mac's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller updated GERONIMO-3483:
---
Affects Version/s: 2.1.1
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1)
Sorry but this does not follow our agreed policy of tagging the specs
individually. IMO the tagging is unacceptable. We had a long drawn
out war on this and I'm afraid I think that changing it without
agreement is not a good idea and will lead to too much confusion.
I also don't think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller updated GERONIMO-3243:
---
Affects Version/s: 2.1.1
2.1
2.0.x
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1631?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-1631.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
Doesn't sound like there's a problem. Closing... Re-open if you
Just noticed the following in DefaultArtifactResolver.java:
if (list.isEmpty()) {
if (xbean-naming.equals(working.getArtifactId())) {
return new Artifact(org.apache.xbean,
xbean-naming, 2.8, jar);
} else {
return
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-2621.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
The console has been extensively reworked. If we want to take up this
On Feb 1, 2008 6:24 AM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I have tagged and uploaded a new set of the specs jars for review:
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/specs-1.4
The tag is available at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-3791.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in rev 617364. I had to split the package mojo in two, one to
I doubt it very much since we don't include that artifact anytime
we resolved to the hardcoded version we should get an exception.
What happens if you take it out?
david jencks
On Jan 31, 2008, at 11:01 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Just noticed the following in DefaultArtifactResolver.java:
56 matches
Mail list logo