On 14.10.2013 21:42, Michel Fortin wrote:
Indeed. The current garbage collector makes it easy to have shared
pointers to shared objects. But the GC can also interrupt real-time
threads for an unpredictable duration, how do you cope with that in a
real-time thread?
The work I was talking about
On 2013-10-14 23:22, Dicebot wrote:
If we need to care about that, D module system is a failure.
But I don't think it is a valid concern.
People already complain about conflict function names in Phobos.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2013-10-15 05:11, Michel Fortin wrote:
mprotect isn't available at all with the iOS SDK. So making this
collector work on iOS (and the iOS Simulator) would require a different
codegen.
I haven't tried compiling anything and I don't know if I'm looking in
the correct file but this file:
/
Am 15.10.2013 09:08, schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
On 2013-10-14 23:22, Dicebot wrote:
If we need to care about that, D module system is a failure.
But I don't think it is a valid concern.
People already complain about conflict function names in Phobos.
And I'd agree with them. At least inside o
Am 14.10.2013 20:24, schrieb Robert Schadek:
On 10/14/2013 04:44 PM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 14.10.2013 15:12, schrieb Robert Schadek:
On 10/14/2013 02:39 PM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
- The static methods in LogManager should be made global and the class
be removed. It's not for objects so it
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 12:48:14 UTC, Martin Drasar wrote:
1) MultiLogger class that takes references to other loggers and
just
forwards the call to the log function.
+1
Also, we should support a few loggers whith same type. For
example, I can use 2 file loggers: the 1-st only for debug
On 10/15/2013 04:06 AM, Eric Anderton wrote:
> On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 11:39:52 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> Lets unleash the forces of constructive destruction.
>
> So, not to be too heavy-handed with criticism on this library, but I
> think this should come up to par with solutions like log4j, lo
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 19:24:27 UTC, Spacen Jasset wrote:
Hello,
Whilst porting some C++ code I have discovered that the
compiled output from the gdc compiler seems to be 47% quicker
than the dmd compiler.
Here is a few more data points for microbenchmarks of simple
functions (P
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 19:24:27 UTC, Spacen Jasset wrote:
gdc 4.6 (0.29.1-4.6.4-1ubuntu4) Which I assume might be v2.020?
with flags: ["-O2"]
That's a really old gdc. If you can, upgrade to ubuntu 13.10 and
you'll get a more up-to-date version. Alternatively, build from
source: http://
On 10/15/2013 02:44 AM, Kapps wrote:
> A few concerns:
>
> There doesn't seem to be a debug or trace log level. This is quite a
> useful thing to have once your program is deployed.
there is a LogLevel.debug and a LogLevel.info
>
> I don't like the returning by ref for log methods. For example, it
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 06:38:22 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 16:19:23 +0200
Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 10/14/13, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
> And any sane editor
There's your problem right there. I'd say a sane diff view
would make
it obvious that CRLF or tabs were in
On 10/15/2013 09:32 AM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
> Am 15.10.2013 09:08, schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
>> On 2013-10-14 23:22, Dicebot wrote:
>>
>>> If we need to care about that, D module system is a failure.
>>> But I don't think it is a valid concern.
>>
>> People already complain about conflict function na
What are the philosophy behind errors vs fatal errors vs critical
errors?
When should we use each of these?
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 18:29:09 UTC, ilya-stromberg wrote:
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 18:00:12 UTC, Robert Schadek
wrote:
If you disagree, please tell why.
If you want a logger with a particular feature, this module will
allow to create a custom logger.
It would be a mistake to in
On 10/15/2013 09:40 AM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
> Am 14.10.2013 20:24, schrieb Robert Schadek:
>> On 10/14/2013 04:44 PM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
>>> The same could be said about the global "log" functions, which are
>>> tightly coupled to that state. I think this is already nicely grouped
>>> together by
On 10/15/2013 09:44 AM, ilya-stromberg wrote:
> On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 12:48:14 UTC, Martin Drasar wrote:
>> 1) MultiLogger class that takes references to other loggers and just
>> forwards the call to the log function.
>
> +1
> Also, we should support a few loggers whith same type. For exam
On 10/15/2013 10:49 AM, ponce wrote:
> What are the philosophy behind errors vs fatal errors vs critical errors?
> When should we use each of these?
fatal = the application is going down, I'm just letting you know
critical = the application is maybe going down, I'm not sure yet, but
this is a probl
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 09:45:18 UTC, Abdulhaq wrote:
I recommend to dump it and start from scratch. A clang-based
generator would be an interesting option to explore. Or, if
you want to preserve your sanity, just write Qt applications
in C++/QML.
Hi Max, so why dump it? I can see a f
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 11:35:05 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-10-14 11:03, Max Samukha wrote:
I recommend to dump it and start from scratch. A clang-based
generator
would be an interesting option to explore. Or, if you want to
preserve
your sanity, just write Qt applications in C+
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 07:33:15 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 15.10.2013 09:08, schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
On 2013-10-14 23:22, Dicebot wrote:
If we need to care about that, D module system is a failure.
But I don't think it is a valid concern.
People already complain about conflict funct
14.10.2013 17:42, robert пишет:
Damn it, you are right I did not think this through, somehow thought the
use in addrOf is enough, which is of course crap. Thank's a lot for your
time, I'll fix this ASAP.
So, here are your revised version:
https://github.com/phobos-x/phobosx/blob/1f0016c84c2043d
On 2013-10-15 02:20:49 +, "deadalnix" said:
It will indeed cause trouble for code that mutate a large amount of
shared pointers. I'd say that such code is probably asking for trouble
in the first place, but as always, no silver bullet. I still think
solution is the one that fit D the best
On 2013-10-15 07:28:16 +, Jacob Carlborg said:
On 2013-10-15 05:11, Michel Fortin wrote:
mprotect isn't available at all with the iOS SDK. So making this
collector work on iOS (and the iOS Simulator) would require a different
codegen.
I haven't tried compiling anything and I don't know
Am 15.10.2013 10:54, schrieb Robert Schadek:
On 10/15/2013 09:40 AM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 14.10.2013 20:24, schrieb Robert Schadek:
On 10/14/2013 04:44 PM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
The same could be said about the global "log" functions, which are
tightly coupled to that state. I think this is al
On 10/15/2013 02:54 PM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
> What I meant is just that in Druntime there is something like this:
>
> struct LogManager {
> static void somefunc();
> }
>
> instead of
>
> class LogManager {
> static void someFunc();
> }
>
> In any case, such a struct/class should also have a mem
Am 15.10.2013 10:41, schrieb Robert Schadek:
On 10/15/2013 02:44 AM, Kapps wrote:
The simple act of logging a message is very verbose right now:
log(LogLevel.trace, "Creating new pool") is a lot of boiler plate. I'd
prefer something like log.trace("Creating new pool") and log("Creating
new pool"
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 07:52:28 UTC, Robert Schadek wrote:
On 10/15/2013 04:06 AM, Eric Anderton wrote:
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 11:39:52 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Here's what I think is missing:
- System log support (as others have mentioned). This would
be syslog
or WEL, depending on
On 10/15/2013 03:21 PM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
> Am 15.10.2013 10:41, schrieb Robert Schadek:
>> On 10/15/2013 02:44 AM, Kapps wrote:
>>> The simple act of logging a message is very verbose right now:
>>> log(LogLevel.trace, "Creating new pool") is a lot of boiler plate. I'd
>>> prefer something like
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 13:31:40 UTC, ilya-stromberg wrote:
...
I think such stuff should go as an extra module in same package
with various useful out-of-the box logger implementations at the
very best. Probably even dub package built on top of std.logger;
Phobos has very specific g
On 10/15/2013 03:31 PM, ilya-stromberg wrote:
> On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 07:52:28 UTC, Robert Schadek wrote:
>> On 10/15/2013 04:06 AM, Eric Anderton wrote:
>>> On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 11:39:52 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>>> Here's what I think is missing:
>>> - System log support (as others h
But actual batteries - no, this does belong to Phobos.
* does not belong
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 13:52:17 UTC, Robert Schadek wrote:
I think this is good, as it gives you a way to quite libraries
down. The
idea behind the free standing "log" function is to provide an
ultra easy
way to log. It is not meant to be used for the 2<<31 line
program. In
that case yo
On 10/15/2013 03:54 PM, Dicebot wrote:
> On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 13:31:40 UTC, ilya-stromberg wrote:
>> ...
>
> I think such stuff should go as an extra module in same package with
> various useful out-of-the box logger implementations at the very best.
> Probably even dub package built on t
On 10/15/2013 03:57 PM, Dicebot wrote:
> On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 13:52:17 UTC, Robert Schadek wrote:
>> I think this is good, as it gives you a way to quite libraries down. The
>> idea behind the free standing "log" function is to provide an ultra easy
>> way to log. It is not meant to be us
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 13:54:12 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 13:31:40 UTC, ilya-stromberg
wrote:
...
I think such stuff should go as an extra module in same package
with various useful out-of-the box logger implementations at
the very best. Probably even dub pac
On Sunday, 13 October 2013 at 17:01:15 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
If single element access is needed, str.front yields decoded
`dchar`. Or simple `foreach (dchar d; str)` - it won't hide the
fact it is O(n) operation at least. As `str.front` yields
dchar, most `std.algorithm` and `std.range` utilities
Am 15.10.2013 15:52, schrieb Robert Schadek:
On 10/15/2013 03:21 PM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 15.10.2013 10:41, schrieb Robert Schadek:
On 10/15/2013 02:44 AM, Kapps wrote:
The simple act of logging a message is very verbose right now:
log(LogLevel.trace, "Creating new pool") is a lot of boiler
On Sunday, 13 October 2013 at 14:14:14 UTC, nickles wrote:
Also, I understand, that there is the std.utf.count() function
which returns the length that I was searching for. However, why
- if D is so UTF-8-centric - isn't this function implemented in
the core like ".length"?
Most code doesn't
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 14:09:36 UTC, ilya-stromberg wrote:
I did not talk about additional external libraries. As I know,
Vibe.d use OpenSSL to provide SSL streams. Since we haven't got
encryption support in Phobos, we can provide only TCP streams.
For example, sending mail is clearly
On 10/15/2013 04:12 PM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
>
> Believe it or not, for some reason I suspected as much.
>
> Yes, but the point is that when looking only at func1, you might
> expect that all messages are logged as debug messages, but the last
> one will be logged as a warning instead. func2 may be
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 14:12:38 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 15.10.2013 15:52, schrieb Robert Schadek:
On 10/15/2013 03:21 PM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 15.10.2013 10:41, schrieb Robert Schadek:
On 10/15/2013 02:44 AM, Kapps wrote:
The simple act of logging a message is very verbose right
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 14:20:15 UTC, Robert Schadek wrote:
On 10/15/2013 04:12 PM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Believe it or not, for some reason I suspected as much.
Yes, but the point is that when looking only at func1, you
might
expect that all messages are logged as debug messages, but th
Am 15.10.2013 15:31, schrieb ilya-stromberg:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 07:52:28 UTC, Robert Schadek wrote:
On 10/15/2013 04:06 AM, Eric Anderton wrote:
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 11:39:52 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Here's what I think is missing:
- System log support (as others have mentioned)
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 14:13:53 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 14:09:36 UTC, ilya-stromberg
wrote:
I did not talk about additional external libraries. As I know,
Vibe.d use OpenSSL to provide SSL streams. Since we haven't
got encryption support in Phobos, we can prov
On 10/15/2013 04:17 PM, ilya-stromberg wrote:
> On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 14:12:38 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
>> But if it's available people _will_ use it in complex contexts. Also
>> if the writer of a 2<<8 loc library uses it and the library is used
>> by a large piece of software, that will
On 10/15/2013 04:23 PM, ilya-stromberg wrote:
> On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 14:20:15 UTC, Robert Schadek wrote:
>> Logging is the most unpure functionality I can think of. It is side
>> effect heaven.
>
> Yes, but we should minimise possible side effects.
Of course, but having global state aka.
Am 15.10.2013 16:33, schrieb Robert Schadek:
On 10/15/2013 04:23 PM, ilya-stromberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 14:20:15 UTC, Robert Schadek wrote:
Logging is the most unpure functionality I can think of. It is side
effect heaven.
Yes, but we should minimise possible side effects.
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 14:25:55 UTC, Robert Schadek wrote:
On 10/15/2013 04:17 PM, ilya-stromberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 14:12:38 UTC, Sönke Ludwig
wrote:
But if it's available people _will_ use it in complex
contexts. Also
if the writer of a 2<<8 loc library uses it and
On 10/15/13 12:52 AM, Robert Schadek wrote:
On 10/15/2013 04:06 AM, Eric Anderton wrote:
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 11:39:52 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Lets unleash the forces of constructive destruction.
So, not to be too heavy-handed with criticism on this library, but I
think this should come
I think one increasingly important point for std.log is 'structured
logging'.
Structured logging is basically not simply logging textual messages, but
also logging additional KEY/VALUE pairs of data. The idea is that logs
should not only be readable by humans but also easy to parse and
analyze. St
On 10/15/2013 05:20 PM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> I think one increasingly important point for std.log is 'structured
> logging'.
>
> Structured logging is basically not simply logging textual messages, but
> also logging additional KEY/VALUE pairs of data. The idea is that logs
> should not only be r
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 15:53:34 UTC, Robert Schadek wrote:
That been said, you can add it. The method Logger.logf is a
variadic
template. You can simple create your own Logger Class and
overwrite that
method and implemented your structured logging approach there.
The only
pitfall is tha
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 09:38:15 UTC, Max Samukha wrote:
Long story short, D allows for two approaches to bindings like
QtD:
1. The traditional one is to allocate "shells" on GC heap and
have a set of manually specified rules for ownership transfers
and reference count adjustments.
2.
On 10/15/13, w0rp wrote:
> I couldn't think of a way to do it myself which was elegant.
Perhaps you can pin the object and hook into the C++ destructor somehow?
What is the fastest way for me to learn D? I think what I want is
a syntax reference manual and a good tutorial to learn how to
find and use libs.
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 18:13:46 UTC, ProgrammingGhost
wrote:
What is the fastest way for me to learn D? I think what I want
is a syntax reference manual and a good tutorial to learn how
to find and use libs.
The best way to learn D is to start by reading the API and code
examples in
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 20:13:45 +0200, ProgrammingGhost wrote:
> What is the fastest way for me to learn D? I think what I want is a
> syntax reference manual and a good tutorial to learn how to find and use
> libs.
I learned D by doing two things.
1) Downloading the bundled DMD in a ZIP file.
2)
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 11:03:01 UTC, Michel Fortin wrote:
On 2013-10-15 02:20:49 +, "deadalnix"
said:
It will indeed cause trouble for code that mutate a large
amount of shared pointers. I'd say that such code is probably
asking for trouble in the first place, but as always, no
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 18:25:48 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 20:13:45 +0200, ProgrammingGhost wrote:
What is the fastest way for me to learn D? I think what I want
is a
syntax reference manual and a good tutorial to learn how to
find and use
libs.
I learned D by doing
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 18:25:48 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
2) Reading the language reference at http://www.dlang.org (back
then it
was on DigitalMars website...)
If you want a more accurate version of the language grammar, take
a look at this:
https://github.com/Hackerpilot/DGrammar/bl
>
> You really learned D from the online language reference? Thats hard
> core! You must be much smarter than me.
>
> I suggested reading the Phobos docs online, but I was just joking.
Well, that was ~10 years ago... Language reference is still pretty much
okay, with more examples, plus we al
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 18:32:59 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 18:25:48 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 20:13:45 +0200, ProgrammingGhost wrote:
What is the fastest way for me to learn D? I think what I
want is a
syntax reference manual and a goo
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 18:32:59 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
You really learned D from the online language reference? Thats
hard core! You must be much smarter than me.
You know, good old times when it was the only information
available about D2, before even TDPL came out.. We litera
Perhaps I missed it from skimming, but why are we using atomic
operations here anyway? Has testing revealed that it's necessary?
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 18:36:19 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 18:32:59 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 18:25:48 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 20:13:45 +0200, ProgrammingGhost wrote:
What is the fastest way for me to lea
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 18:29:21 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
The is also an under construction tutorial:
http://beza1e1.tuxen.de/d-tut-0.1/index.html
which looks promising, but is far from complete.
As an addendum, this one is a neat example of how things can come
together in real co
I know this has been asked a few times before, but that was a few
years ago. Are there any reasonably complete and up to date
OpenCV bindings for D?
If not, are there any reasonably easy ways to generate them? I
tried SWIG and it choked on some of the macros they used, though
that may have be
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 19:20:10 UTC, TJSomething wrote:
I know this has been asked a few times before, but that was a
few years ago. Are there any reasonably complete and up to date
OpenCV bindings for D?
If not, are there any reasonably easy ways to generate them? I
tried SWIG and it
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 18:57:16 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
Perhaps I missed it from skimming, but why are we using atomic
operations here anyway? Has testing revealed that it's
necessary?
I presume you don't mean running some code and then seeing if it
breaks as a test to see if atomic o
On 10/15/2013 08:13 PM, ProgrammingGhost wrote:
> What is the fastest way for me to learn D? I think what I want is a
> syntax reference manual and a good tutorial to learn how to find and
> use libs.
I would suggest to write a compiler for D in D. Helped me alot, but I
still learning new stuff.
M
On Friday, 11 October 2013 at 10:57:38 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 11.10.2013 11:25, schrieb Sebastian Graf:
On Thursday, 10 October 2013 at 01:51:09 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
Take a look at copyFiles option. It copies files e.g. dll's
into the
bin directory when compiled. Although keep an
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 18:13:46 UTC, ProgrammingGhost
wrote:
What is the fastest way for me to learn D? I think what I want
is a syntax reference manual and a good tutorial to learn how
to find and use libs.
Ali's book is especially targeted at beginners :
http://ddili.org/ders/d.en/i
On Friday, 11 October 2013 at 10:57:56 UTC, Sebastian Graf wrote:
On Friday, 11 October 2013 at 09:25:58 UTC, Sebastian Graf
wrote:
On Thursday, 10 October 2013 at 01:51:09 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
Take a look at copyFiles option. It copies files e.g. dll's
into the bin directory when com
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 19:51:00 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 18:57:16 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
Perhaps I missed it from skimming, but why are we using atomic
operations here anyway? Has testing revealed that it's
necessary?
I presume you don't mean running som
Am 15.10.2013 22:11, schrieb Sebastian Graf:
On Friday, 11 October 2013 at 10:57:56 UTC, Sebastian Graf wrote:
On Friday, 11 October 2013 at 09:25:58 UTC, Sebastian Graf wrote:
On Thursday, 10 October 2013 at 01:51:09 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
Take a look at copyFiles option. It copies fil
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 20:57:14 +0200, Sean Kelly wrote:
> Perhaps I missed it from skimming, but why are we using atomic
> operations here anyway? Has testing revealed that it's necessary?
I believe it is the "why make it easy when we can make it complicated?"
approach...
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 18:36:19 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 18:32:59 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 18:25:48 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 20:13:45 +0200, ProgrammingGhost wrote:
What is the fastest way for me to lea
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 20:25:06 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 18:36:19 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 18:32:59 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 18:25:48 UTC, Dejan Lekic
wrote:
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 20:13:45 +0200, Pro
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 19:20:10 UTC, TJSomething wrote:
I know this has been asked a few times before, but that was a
few years ago. Are there any reasonably complete and up to date
OpenCV bindings for D?
If not, are there any reasonably easy ways to generate them? I
tried SWIG and it
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 20:33:59 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
I am a bit foggy on the diffence between openCL and openCV, but
is this helpful:
http://code.dlang.org/packages/derelict_extras-opencl
OpenCL is more or less completely unrelated. OpenCV is about
computer vision and OpenCL
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 20:41:58 UTC, TJSomething wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 20:33:59 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
I am a bit foggy on the diffence between openCL and openCV,
but is this helpful:
http://code.dlang.org/packages/derelict_extras-opencl
OpenCL is more or less c
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 20:31:54 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 20:25:06 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 18:36:19 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 18:32:59 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 18:25:48
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 21:20:09 +0200, TJSomething wrote:
> I know this has been asked a few times before, but that was a few years
> ago. Are there any reasonably complete and up to date OpenCV bindings
> for D?
>
> If not, are there any reasonably easy ways to generate them? I tried
> SWIG and it
I've done it using swig, and using C++ api (not C api), as well as for
other libs (sfml etc). it requires a bit of tweaking the '.i' file but is
doable. Much better than hand maintaining c wrappers.
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 21:20:09 +0200, TJSom
So, here are your revised version:
https://github.com/phobos-x/phobosx/blob/1f0016c84c2043da0b9d2dafe65f54fcf6b6b8fa/source/phobosx/signal.d
Sorry, but you are making the same mistake again.
Yeah, I made a mistake again. In my mind it was ok because "o" is
read from a shared variable, but thi
Could you post those?
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 21:51:06 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
I've done it using swig, and using C++ api (not C api), as well
as for
other libs (sfml etc). it requires a bit of tweaking the '.i'
file but is
doable. Much better than hand maintaining c wrappers.
On T
Well sure, but why not use a Mutex? What does trying to sort
out a correct lock-free algorithm gain us here?
It is not about concurrency for general purpose (phobosx.signal
is no more thread safe than std.signals), but for the GC. A
reference is hidden from the GC, when making it visible agai
See also: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4150
Best regards,
Robert
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1oi8wd/ruby_is_a_dying_language/ccs8yr8
Am 16.10.2013 00:15, schrieb Walter Bright:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1oi8wd/ruby_is_a_dying_language/ccs8yr8
Agree.
While I do like dynamic languages for prototyping and small
applications, I came to the conclusion they don't scale in the enterprise.
Plus with type in
On 14/10/2013 22:06, bearophile wrote:
Spacen Jasset:
const float pi = 3.14159265f;
float dx = cast(float)(Clock.currSystemTick.length %
(TickDuration.ticksPerSec * 10)) / (TickDuration.ticksPerSec * 10);
float xRot = sin(dx * pi * 2) * 0.4f + pi / 2;
float yRot = cos(dx * pi *
On 14/10/2013 22:22, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/14/2013 12:24 PM, Spacen Jasset wrote:
dmd32 v2.063.2
with flags: ["-O", "-release", "-noboundscheck", "-inline"]
gdc 4.6 (0.29.1-4.6.4-1ubuntu4) Which I assume might be v2.020?
with flags: ["-O2"]
dmd uses the x87 for 32 bit code for floating p
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 19:20:10 UTC, TJSomething wrote:
I know this has been asked a few times before, but that was a
few years ago. Are there any reasonably complete and up to date
OpenCV bindings for D?
If not, are there any reasonably easy ways to generate them? I
tried SWIG and it
On 10/13/2013 11:24 PM, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
13.10.2013 22:19, Walter Bright пишет:
On 10/13/2013 12:47 AM, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
--- Proposal ---
Please post as a DIP:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIPs
The trouble with it as a n.g. posting is they tend to scroll off and be
forgotten.
W
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 22:09:17 UTC, Robert wrote:
The problem is that destructors and thus the registered hooks
for the dispose events are called when threads are already
resumed. If this wasn't the case there would actually be no
problems.
Gotcha. Looking at the code... I think y
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 23:20:39 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 at 22:09:17 UTC, Robert wrote:
The problem is that destructors and thus the registered hooks
for the dispose events are called when threads are already
resumed. If this wasn't the case there would actua
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu <
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote:
> One note - log4j, log4cxx, and log4cpp are not part of the respective
> languages' standards. That doesn't mean much (in fact it may be a
> competitive advantage to integrating log4d in std) but it is on
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 03:15:45PM -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
>
> http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1oi8wd/ruby_is_a_dying_language/ccs8yr8
It's interesting how compile times seem to always crop up in discussions
about static vs. dynamic typing, even though it's really an orthogonal
i
an excellent post, thanks for linking it Walter
the relative weakness of dynamic-typed tools is compounded by the
fact that they tend to be used to build monolithic applications,
typical of what might emerge from rails, php etc. you take the
whole ball of mud or nothing. with no types to defin
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:15:45 -0700
Walter Bright wrote:
>
> http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1oi8wd/ruby_is_a_dying_language/ccs8yr8
>
Totally agree. 90+% of the argument for dynamic languages is "getting
shit done", and yet they ultimately *create* work: More unittests, more
roadb
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
