Re: [O] Org-Mode setup documentation

2014-03-09 Thread Nick Dokos
David Masterson writes: > I am not a user of org-mode yet, but it looks very interesting. I have > been able to get it setup with org-toodledo so that I can pull in my > task list from Toodledo. I'm working on understanding how to get > org-mode to work with MobileOrg. There's a lot I'd like t

Re: [O] org-mode/elpa setup

2014-02-26 Thread John Kitchin
Awesome! Thanks, this is exactly what I was looking for! John --- John Kitchin Associate Professor Doherty Hall A207F Department of Chemical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 412-268-7803 http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu On Wed, Feb 26

Re: [O] org-mode/elpa setup

2014-02-26 Thread Achim Gratz
John Kitchin andrew.cmu.edu> writes: > I was wondering if there is any documentation somewhere on > how the orgmode elpa repo is setup. Have a look in mk/server.mk, which you can include from local.mk if you want to roll your own ELPA tar balls. Regards, Achim.

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Bastien
t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > Then "punctuation" has two senses, one generic and another specific. To > my mind, the emacs guideline is ambiguous unless there is some > convention about which sense is meant in this case. I guess it would be > possible to look at the code to figure th

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Iannis Zannos
Agree. To do my own rebindings i use this kind of code: (eval-after-load 'org '(define-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-=") 'org-icicle-imenu)) But when re-opening a buffer with desktop after rebooting emacs, the new bindings are not added IZ On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Andreas Leha < and

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Iannis Zannos
Yep, I am also using org-mode with icicles. Made several mods to help with that. I use icicles for searching headers or text content all the time. Interesting is the possibility to open a section (subtree) in an independent buffer after finding it, with one command. I enclose the code here, plus

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Andreas Leha
Bastien writes: > Hi Nick, > > Nick Dokos writes: > >> I find myself more in agreement with Seb than with Bastien here. The >> argument that reducing the number of "bad" bindings reduces the chance >> of conflicts does not hold water IMO: we will always have to be looking >> in the rear-view mir

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Thomas S. Dye
Aloha Bastien, Bastien writes: > Hi Thomas, > > t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > >> Also, this is my first time trying to decode a syntax table, so caveat >> emptor. > > Yes -- when doing C-u C-x on { in fundamental-mode I read > > Character code properties: customize what to show >

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Achim Gratz
Bastien writes: > More precisely, I suggest these rebindings: > > C-c # Checkboxes => C-c C-# > C-c , Priorities => C-c C-, C-, can not be input using an ASCII terminal as it would produce a line control character. > C-c ; Comment lines => C-c C-; > C-c @ Mark subtree => C-c C-@ C-@ m

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Bastien
Hi Thomas, t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > Also, this is my first time trying to decode a syntax table, so caveat > emptor. Yes -- when doing C-u C-x on { in fundamental-mode I read Character code properties: customize what to show name: LEFT CURLY BRACKET old-name: OPENING CURLY

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Thomas S. Dye
Aloha Seb, "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > What about `C-c {' and such in the tables? The syntax table I see in my org file calls `{' an open delimiter character, not punctuation. Of course, I'm assuming that what the syntax table calls punctuation is what the emacs guideline means when it says

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Bastien writes: > Florian Beck writes: > >> But it is >> polite to provide alternatives for bindings that might be shadowed. > > Indeed. > > The only problem is C-c ^ since C-c C-^ is already taken. > > Btw, we could use C-c C-u (currently bound to `outline-up-heading') > instead of C-c

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Bastien
Florian Beck writes: > But it is > polite to provide alternatives for bindings that might be shadowed. Indeed. The only problem is C-c ^ since C-c C-^ is already taken. Btw, we could use C-c C-u (currently bound to `outline-up-heading') instead of C-c C-^ (currently bound to `org-up-element')

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Florian Beck
On 29.01.2014 14:16, Nick Dokos wrote: But it's not just a matter of satisfying rules: it's a matter of making it easy on users. That is why I don't recommend satisfying them here. Having a "bad" binding as well as a "good" binding for something would mean that if I load a minor mode that ta

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Bastien
Hi Nick, Nick Dokos writes: > I find myself more in agreement with Seb than with Bastien here. The > argument that reducing the number of "bad" bindings reduces the chance > of conflicts does not hold water IMO: we will always have to be looking > in the rear-view mirror for some minor mode that

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Nick Dokos
Florian Beck writes: > On 28.01.2014 10:08, Bastien wrote: > >> I think most of these keybindings could migrate to a C-c C- version. > > There is no need for migrating them IMO. > > The recommendation is: > >Sequences consisting of `C-c' followed by any other punctuation >character are al

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Florian Beck
On 28.01.2014 10:08, Bastien wrote: I think most of these keybindings could migrate to a C-c C- version. There is no need for migrating them IMO. The recommendation is: Sequences consisting of `C-c' followed by any other punctuation character are allocated for minor modes. Using them

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Bastien, Bastien wrote: > "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > >> Is it really important to have a couple less of "not >> standard" key bindings, if we still have others which don't comply? > > I think so, as it reduces the chances of conflicting keybindings from > other minor modes. OK. I (can) agree. B

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Bastien
Hi Sébastien, "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > Is it really important to have a couple less of "not > standard" key bindings, if we still have others which don't comply? I think so, as it reduces the chances of conflicting keybindings from other minor modes. -- Bastien

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Bastien, Bastien wrote: > "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > >> What about `C-c {' and such in the tables? > > (FWIW, that's one of the few keybindings I would not like to change.) > >> I guess it's better to comply to the Emacs guidelines. That change will >> allow us to wake up our neurons and fight a

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Bastien
"Sebastien Vauban" writes: > What about `C-c {' and such in the tables? (FWIW, that's one of the few keybindings I would not like to change.) > I guess it's better to comply to the Emacs guidelines. That change will > allow us to wake up our neurons and fight against Alzheimer. So, let's > do

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-29 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hello Bastien and Thomas, Bastien wrote: > thanks for starting this list. > > t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > >> C-c ! Creating timestamps >> C-c . Creating timestamps >> C-c # Checkboxes >> C-c ' Editing and debugging formulas, literal examples, include files, >> editing source code, coo

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-28 Thread Bastien
Hi Thomas, thanks for starting this list. t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > C-c ! Creating timestamps > C-c . Creating timestamps > C-c # Checkboxes > C-c ' Editing and debugging formulas, literal examples, include files, > editing source code, cooperation > C-c , Priorities > C-c ; Comme

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-24 Thread Thomas S. Dye
Aloha Bastien, Bastien writes: > Hi Thomas, > > t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > >> I just checked the Org mode manual and found that it has several entries >> that consist of `C-c' followed by a punctuation character. > > Can we list them in this thread to discuss how bad the situation

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-24 Thread Bastien
Hi Thomas, t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > I just checked the Org mode manual and found that it has several entries > that consist of `C-c' followed by a punctuation character. Can we list them in this thread to discuss how bad the situation is for each of these keybindings? > In my qu

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-23 Thread Thomas S. Dye
Aloha all, Bastien writes: > Drew Adams writes: > >> Dunno what that means. It's not a criminal offense, no. > > Let me quote the manual again: > > * Sequences consisting of `C-c' followed by any other punctuation > character are allocated for minor modes. Using them in a major > mo

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-23 Thread Bastien
Drew Adams writes: > Dunno what that means. It's not a criminal offense, no. Let me quote the manual again: * Sequences consisting of `C-c' followed by any other punctuation character are allocated for minor modes. Using them in a major mode is not absolutely prohibited, but if you

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-23 Thread Drew Adams
> * Sequences consisting of `C-c' followed by any other punctuation > character are allocated for minor modes. Using them in a major > mode is not absolutely prohibited, but if you do that, the major > mode binding may be shadowed from time to time by minor modes. > > That's pretty

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-23 Thread Drew Adams
> > > Perhaps it's better to report this as an Emacs bug so that > > > we can discuss the issue with Emacs maintainers and see > > > what's really at stake here. > > > > Since you are familiar with whatever bindings Org sets, and > > you have read the key-binding conventions section of the > > manu

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-23 Thread Bastien
Hi Drew, Drew Adams writes: > Since you are familiar with whatever bindings Org sets, and you > have read the key-binding conventions section of the manual, > please file a bug if you think it is appropriate. You are well > placed to give the details. > > [...] > > Consideration of whether to f

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-23 Thread Drew Adams
> > No major mode should do so. > > One problem is that Org uses C-c . too ... and some more. > > Perhaps it's better to report this as an Emacs bug so that we can > discuss the issue with Emacs maintainers and see what's really at > stake here. I'm not familiar with Org mode. As I said, I don'

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-23 Thread Bastien
Drew Adams writes: > No major mode should do so. One problem is that Org uses C-c . too ... and some more. Perhaps it's better to report this as an Emacs bug so that we can discuss the issue with Emacs maintainers and see what's really at stake here. For me, the keybindings are already too dee

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-23 Thread Drew Adams
> > * Sequences consisting of `C-c' followed by any other punctuation > >character are allocated for minor modes. Using them in a major > >mode is not absolutely prohibited, but if you do that, the major > >mode binding may be shadowed from time to time by minor modes. > > > > IOW, no

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-23 Thread Drew Adams
> I have an additional question: where does one ask for help about icicle? 1. `M-x icicle-send-bug-report' or menu Icicles > Send Icicles Bug Report or `M-x customize-group Icicles' > click Send Bug Report 2. Emacs Wiki: Bugs: http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/IciclesIssues Suggestions: http:/

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-23 Thread Alan Schmitt
Hello Drew, Drew Adams writes: > 1d. By default only. It is trivial to customize user option > `icicle-top-level-keybindings', to bind `icicle-occur' to a > different key or to give it no key binding at all. > > (And no, you do not need to fiddle with Lisp to do that - not > even `define-key'.

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-22 Thread Bastien
Drew Adams writes: > * Sequences consisting of `C-c' followed by any other punctuation >character are allocated for minor modes. Using them in a major >mode is not absolutely prohibited, but if you do that, the major >mode binding may be shadowed from time to time by minor modes. >

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-22 Thread Drew Adams
Someone pointed me to this thread. I am not subscribed to this list, so cc me if you want me to see a reply you write. Wrt some of what I read in the thread: 1. It is not true, (or else it is meaningless, depending on what you mean by that phrase) that "C-c ' is officially an Emacs keybinding".

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-20 Thread Alan Schmitt
Memnon Anon writes: > Okay. As I said, I found this the only one conflicting with org (or > other packages). Just remember to require icicles at the very end of > your config, and everything should work. I found that "C-`" (which I use to jump to errors when compiling in latex) also conflicts.

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-19 Thread Memnon Anon
John Kitchin writes: > I got icicles via ELPA. The version from describe-package is > Version: 20140118.1856. although in icicles.el it says ;; Version: > 2013.07.23. That is the current version. Icicles isn't only icicle.el, Drew has actually a whole bunch of elisp addon packages. Some I use,

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-19 Thread John Kitchin
I got icicles via ELPA. The version from describe-package is Version: 20140118.1856. although in icicles.el it says ;; Version: 2013.07.23. Thanks for the tip about the binding variable. I am content with this in my init file: (require 'icicles) ;; reclaim C-c ' for org-mode (setq icicle-top-lev

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-19 Thread Memnon Anon
John Kitchin writes: > I am trying it out, and icicles seems to have clobbered a few key > bindings like C-c ' to open source blocks. I used to have the same problem with "C-c '" at one point in time, but not anymore. This was the only binding which got in the way. Using customize-option on ic

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-19 Thread Bastien
Hi John, John Kitchin writes: > I am trying it out, and icicles seems to have clobbered a few key > bindings like C-c ' to open source blocks. > > It doesn't seem to matter which order  I load these packages. Does > anyone do this without clobbering org bindings? Thanks, I suggest to ask Drew d

Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

2014-01-18 Thread Alan Schmitt
John Kitchin writes: > Is anyone using org-mode and icicles? How interesting. I also started trying icicle out today. > I am trying it out, and icicles seems to have clobbered a few key > bindings like C-c ' to open source blocks. I'm having the same problem. I think one way to do it is to unb

Re: [O] Org-mode-publish: link to dedicated target accross files

2014-01-03 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Thanks for this quick answer. I have never built Org-mode myself (always relied on ELPA), but will give it a go and will report. Anyway, thank you for your dedication. Org is really a great tool ! Sébastien 2014/1/1 Nicolas Goaziou > Hello, > > Sébastien Brisard writes: > > > If I instead wr

Re: [O] Org-mode-publish: link to dedicated target accross files

2014-01-01 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Sébastien Brisard writes: > If I instead write > > [[file:./references.org::HASH1962][Hashin and Shtrikman (1962)]] > > (without the #), then the behaviour is the exact opposite > 3. in Emacs, the link (including the dedicated target) is found > 4. in the exported HTML file, the link is

Re: [O] Org-mode-publish: link to dedicated target accross files

2013-12-31 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hello, > yes, that might help. Org-file =references.org= is a list of bibliographic > > references. Each entry is actually an item in a description list, like so > > > > #+BEGIN_SRC > > - <> > > [[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(62)90004-2][Hashinand Shtrikman > > (1962)]] :: Z. Hashin and

Re: [O] Org-mode-publish: link to dedicated target accross files

2013-12-30 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Sébastien Brisard writes: > yes, that might help. Org-file =references.org= is a list of bibliographic > references. Each entry is actually an item in a description list, like so > > #+BEGIN_SRC > - <> > [[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(62)90004-2][Hashinand Shtrikman > (1962)]] :: Z. Hash

Re: [O] Org-mode-publish: link to dedicated target accross files

2013-12-30 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hello, yes, that might help. Org-file =references.org= is a list of bibliographic references. Each entry is actually an item in a description list, like so #+BEGIN_SRC - <> [[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(62)90004-2][Hashinand Shtrikman (1962)]] :: Z. Hashin and S. Shtrikman, /On some var

Re: [O] Org-mode-publish: link to dedicated target accross files

2013-12-30 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Sébastien Brisard writes: > Correction: CUSTOM_ID does not seem to work with description lists (it > seems it only works with headings, *, **, ***, ...). It would be useful to know what you wrote in your Org file, what the output is, and what you expected. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou

Re: [O] Org-mode-publish: link to dedicated target accross files

2013-12-30 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Correction: CUSTOM_ID does not seem to work with description lists (it seems it only works with headings, *, **, ***, ...). Sébastien 2013/12/30 Sébastien Brisard > Hi, > thanks for your answer. This indeed works. Is was sure I had already > tested this solution, with no success... Thanks a lot

Re: [O] Org-mode-publish: link to dedicated target accross files

2013-12-30 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi, thanks for your answer. This indeed works. Is was sure I had already tested this solution, with no success... Thanks a lot!!! Sébastien 2013/12/30 Nicolas Goaziou > Hello, > > Sébastien Brisard writes: > > > that's what I feared... I know it works with the CUSTOM_ID property. > > Unfortun

Re: [O] Org-mode-publish: link to dedicated target accross files

2013-12-30 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Sébastien Brisard writes: > that's what I feared... I know it works with the CUSTOM_ID property. > Unfortunately, I'd like to link to an item in a list. > Is there a (possibly dirty) work around? You may use a custom-id syntax pointing to your target: [[file:./file2.org::#item-target]

Re: [O] Org-mode-publish: link to dedicated target accross files

2013-12-29 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi, that's what I feared... I know it works with the CUSTOM_ID property. Unfortunately, I'd like to link to an item in a list. Is there a (possibly dirty) work around? Best regards, Sébastien 2013/12/29 Nicolas Goaziou > Hello, > > Sébastien Brisard writes: > > > I'm facing a problem with lin

Re: [O] Org-mode-publish: link to dedicated target accross files

2013-12-29 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Sébastien Brisard writes: > I'm facing a problem with links accross multiple org files, when I publish > to HTML. Here is a minimal working example. file1.org looks like > > <> Target 1 > > [[target1][Go to target #1]] > > [[file:./file2.org::target2][Go to target #2]] > > while file2.org

Re: [O] Org-mode c-c a

2013-12-24 Thread Todd Neufeld
Ha, never mind. After several hours of work, I finally figured out my configuration file was being saved as #.emacs # always. Once I changed it to .emacs it seems to have kicked in. Sorry for the bother. Possibly more information on how to get started with the configuration file might be usefu

Re: [O] org-mode habits graph dissapears

2013-12-19 Thread Josiah Schwab
Javier Ortiz writes: > Thank you for your response! Please CC the org-mode list in your responses. Others can join the conversation and the results will be archived for use by future users. > I added > (defcustom org-habit-show-all-today nil > "If non-nil, will show the consistency graph of

Re: [O] org-mode habits graph dissapears

2013-12-17 Thread Josiah Schwab
Hi Javier, > Thank you for your response. Here it is what I do: Thanks for the more detailed information. This is helpful. Please continue to cc the org-mode list your responses. > I open one of my agenda files, write the new habit, schedule it with > C-s, then add a repeat interval, and then

Re: [O] org-mode habits graph dissapears

2013-12-16 Thread Josiah Schwab
Javier Ortiz writes: > Hi there! I'm trying to learn about org-mode habits. Every time I > write a new habit, I can see the color bar on the right, but after I > mark the habit as "Done", it never appears again, I wonder if somebody > could give me some advice, on how to fix this. Could you giv

Re: [O] Org mode and "shunt" exporters?

2013-12-13 Thread Brett Viren
Hi Eric, Eric Schulte writes: > This should work in a recent Emacs. > > (require 'json) > (defun org-as-json-to-file (&optional path) > "Export the current Org-mode buffer as JSON to the supplied PATH." > (interactive "Fwrite to file: ") > (let ((tree (org-element-parse

Re: [O] Org mode and "shunt" exporters?

2013-12-13 Thread Eric Schulte
This should work in a recent Emacs. (require 'json) (defun org-as-json-to-file (&optional path) "Export the current Org-mode buffer as JSON to the supplied PATH." (interactive "Fwrite to file: ") (let ((tree (org-element-parse-buffer))) (org-element-map tree

Re: [O] Org mode and "shunt" exporters?

2013-12-13 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Brett Viren writes: > However this method only works for a very simple org document. I'm > successfully filtering out the :parent properties of (most of) the > elements but as soon as my document produces a plain text element like: > > #("Text" 0 4 (:parent #1)) > > then two problems o

Re: [O] Org mode and "shunt" exporters?

2013-12-13 Thread Brett Viren
Matt Price writes: > I am pretty ignorant and may have missed a referene o this in the > thread, but this (very outdated) code is on the emacswiki: > > http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/org-json.el Thanks. My searches didn't find this. It looks like this is parsing the org buffer directly and onl

Re: [O] Org mode and "shunt" exporters?

2013-12-13 Thread Brett Viren
Hi, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > You can walk the tree, e.g. with `org-element-map', and remove > all :parent references if you don't need them. I figured out how to follow this advice. I can even make valid JSON From the filtered parse tree by handing it to Edward O'Conner's json.el (link in exa

Re: [O] Org mode and "shunt" exporters?

2013-12-12 Thread John Kitchin
I tried this code but I get a JSON readtable error even with the examples in the code. John --- John Kitchin Associate Professor Doherty Hall A207F Department of Chemical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 412-268-7803 http://kitchingroup.c

Re: [O] Org mode and "shunt" exporters?

2013-12-12 Thread Matt Price
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Aaron Ecay wrote: > 2013ko abenudak 12an, John Kitchin-ek idatzi zuen: >> >> I wouldn't hold your breath waiting for my solution, it's currently a >> constructive procrastination project to see if it is possible ;) >> >> I made this: >> >> https://github.com/jkitch

Re: [O] Org mode and "shunt" exporters?

2013-12-12 Thread Aaron Ecay
2013ko abenudak 12an, John Kitchin-ek idatzi zuen: > > I wouldn't hold your breath waiting for my solution, it's currently a > constructive procrastination project to see if it is possible ;) > > I made this: > > https://github.com/jkitchin/jmax/blob/prelude/ox-json.el > > which does give some outp

Re: [O] Org mode and "shunt" exporters?

2013-12-12 Thread Eric Schulte
Here's a quick shot at using Common Lisp's cl-json package as a bridge between Emacs-lisp and JSON. The Org-mode file with necessary the code is attached (it requires a running lisp process w/cl-json loaded), as well as it's json conversion. #+Title: Org to JSON Use Common Lisp as a bridge betwe

Re: [O] Org mode and "shunt" exporters?

2013-12-12 Thread John Kitchin
I wouldn't hold your breath waiting for my solution, it's currently a constructive procrastination project to see if it is possible ;) I made this: https://github.com/jkitchin/jmax/blob/prelude/ox-json.el which does give some output that vaguely resembles json for a very simple org-file (no quot

Re: [O] Org mode and "shunt" exporters?

2013-12-12 Thread Brett Viren
Hi John, John Kitchin writes: > that sounds like an interesting approach. xml seems like what you > really want, since looking at the parsetree there is a lot of > information (e.g. attributes, properties, etc...) that would be tricky > to generate a fully representative json scheme. I see fro

Re: [O] Org-mode in windows fires Tramp without any intervention

2013-12-11 Thread Toni Cebrián
Hi Michael, Trying to file a minimal init.el for bug reporting I discovered the culprit. In my init file I had: (setq org-agenda-files (concat org-directory "/gtd.org")) The missing quote was causing Tramp to be ignited every time I opened a file or tried to open the agenda view. Thanks for

Re: [O] Org mode and "shunt" exporters?

2013-12-09 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Brett Viren writes: > Eric Schulte writes: > >> You can use `org-element-parse-buffer' to convert an Emacs Buffer to a >> structured Emacs Lisp object. At that point you can use existing tools >> for converting lisp to JSON or YAML. I've used cl-json for Common Lisp, >> I would imagine

Re: [O] Org mode and "shunt" exporters?

2013-12-09 Thread Brett Viren
Eric Schulte writes: > You can use `org-element-parse-buffer' to convert an Emacs Buffer to a > structured Emacs Lisp object. At that point you can use existing tools > for converting lisp to JSON or YAML. I've used cl-json for Common Lisp, > I would imagine something similar exists for Emacs L

Re: [O] Org-mode in windows fires Tramp without any intervention

2013-12-06 Thread Bastien
Hi Toni, Toni Cebrián writes: > Do you know where to look or what to try? This same Org > file, the same init.el and the same emacs version work without any > problem in Linux. This is weird: I would first try with a bare emacs -Q and only the culprit link in Org. Then with a more complex .ema

Re: [O] Org mode and "shunt" exporters?

2013-12-06 Thread John Kitchin
that sounds like an interesting approach. xml seems like what you really want, since looking at the parsetree there is a lot of information (e.g. attributes, properties, etc...) that would be tricky to generate a fully representative json scheme. This page suggests at the bottom you could export t

Re: [O] Org mode and "shunt" exporters?

2013-12-05 Thread Eric Schulte
Brett Viren writes: > Has anyone written any new-style exporter which will produce a common > markup/data language format like JSON or YAML? I'm looking for > something that fully preserves the original org document structure and > does no semantic interpretation along the way. > > What I really

Re: [O] Org-mode in windows fires Tramp without any intervention

2013-12-03 Thread Michael Albinus
Toni Cebrián writes: > Hi, Hi Toni, > I have my own complex Emacs configuration files developed over time > when working in a Linux environment. You can see that > https://github.com/tonicebrian/emacsconfig in case you are curious. It > works seamlessly in Linux and I tried to use that as-is wh

Re: [O] Org-mode issue with cyclic tasks and checkboxes

2013-11-27 Thread Borja Tarraso
Thanks for answer. I already got another answer from stackoverflow, where I ask exactly the same question, is here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20164918/how-to-untick-checkboxes-in-org-mode-for-the-next-cyclic-repetitive-task But basically the solution it was include this: :PROPERTIES: :

Re: [O] Org-mode issue with cyclic tasks and checkboxes

2013-11-27 Thread Myles English
Hi Borja, I can't see that you have received a reply yet, which is unusual for this excellent list. borja.tarr...@gmail.com writes: > I am working with cyclic or repetitive tasks in org-mode, inside this task, > I have several checkboxes. So when I finished all the list, normally I put > the ta

Re: [O] org mode and eev

2013-11-08 Thread Eduardo Ochs
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Alan Schmitt wrote: > Hi Eduardo, > > eduardoo...@gmail.com writes: > > > I am the author of eev... > > Nice! I knew I had seen you around here ;-) > > > How can I help? > > Your message already answered one question I had, but I have still one > pending. > > > I s

Re: [O] org mode and eev

2013-11-08 Thread Alan Schmitt
Hi Eduardo, eduardoo...@gmail.com writes: > I am the author of eev... Nice! I knew I had seen you around here ;-) > How can I help? Your message already answered one question I had, but I have still one pending. > I still know far less about org-mode than I would like to - maybe > because I h

Re: [O] org mode and eev

2013-11-07 Thread Eduardo Ochs
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote: > Hello Alan, > > Alan Schmitt wrote: > > I finally took the time to watch the eev video > > (http://angg.twu.net/eev-videos/video2.mp4) and I'm quite impressed by > > it. I find it may be redundant for some features of org mode (such as > >

Re: [O] org mode and eev

2013-11-07 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hello Alan, Alan Schmitt wrote: > I finally took the time to watch the eev video > (http://angg.twu.net/eev-videos/video2.mp4) and I'm quite impressed by > it. I find it may be redundant for some features of org mode (such as > basic links to files) but I find the driving of external shell-based >

Re: [O] org-mode in the wild

2013-11-06 Thread Karl Voit
* Julian M. Burgos wrote: > Thank you very much John!!! Your document contains a wealth of information on > how to > use org-mode for reproducible research! I really like the idea of > embedding the supporting documents (bibliography, additional analysis) into > the > document. Very nice. A ag

Re: [O] org-mode in the wild

2013-11-05 Thread Julian M. Burgos
Thank you very much John!!! Your document contains a wealth of information on how to use org-mode for reproducible research! I really like the idea of embedding the supporting documents (bibliography, additional analysis) into the document. Very nice. Perhaps it would be good to have a repositor

Re: [O] org-mode in the wild

2013-11-04 Thread John Kitchin
I wasn't familiar with pgf at all. we are usually limited by what publishers will accept in terms of formats, which is usually pdf, eps, png or tiff where we publish. for other features in pdf, we did not use any for these manuscripts, but sometimes I use some adobe specific javascript for making

Re: [O] org-mode in the wild

2013-11-04 Thread Rainer M Krug
John Kitchin writes: > Hi everyone, > > We had another manuscript written in org-mode accepted in Topics in > Catalysis (http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11244-013-0166-3)! > Check out references 14, 39 and 40 ;) > > The supporting information seems to be freely available ( > http://li

Re: [O] org-mode in the wild

2013-11-03 Thread Rasmus
John Kitchin writes: > We had another manuscript written in org-mode accepted in Topics in > Catalysis (http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11244-013-0166-3)! > Check out references 14, 39 and 40 ;) Congrats! And thanks for sharing. > The supporting information seems to be freely avail

Re: [O] org-mode in the wild

2013-11-02 Thread Thomas S. Dye
Aloha John, This is wonderful! The pdf file is a user-friendly entry into the Org mode compendium *and* an effective way to distribute it. Thanks for your pioneering efforts. All the best, Tom John Kitchin writes: > Hi everyone, > > We had another manuscript written in org-mode accepted in Top

Re: [O] org-mode in the wild

2013-11-02 Thread William Denton
On 2 November 2013, John Kitchin wrote: We had another manuscript written in org-mode accepted in Topics in Catalysis (http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11244-013-0166-3)! Check out references 14, 39 and 40 ;) Lovely! Here's the start of section 4, "Manuscript Preparation Method:"

Re: [O] Org-Mode newbie, configuration?

2013-11-02 Thread Mark Edgington
Hi Joe, While it isn't org-mode specific, you might want to take a look at Eric Schulte's "Emacs Starter Kit" configuration (http://eschulte.github.io/emacs24-starter-kit/) -- it includes some org-mode settings, and is an example of a great way of maintaining your emacs configuration. Regards, M

Re: [O] Org-Mode newbie, configuration?

2013-10-28 Thread Suvayu Ali
Hello Joe, Welcome to the Org mode community. On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 03:35:43PM -0500, Joe M wrote: > Hello, > > I am a newbie to Org-mode and am wondering if anyone would be kind > enough to share your org-mode configuration. I would suggest you look at articles on Worg instead. This is a go

Re: [O] Org-mode and continuing BBDB compatibility

2013-10-22 Thread Christopher Culver
> Nick Dokos writes: >> Christopher Culver writes: >> I am using org-mode version 20131021 and the latest checkout of the >> bbdb3 git repository. Although I have the following lines in my main >> .org file: >> >> * Anniversaries >>:PROPERTIES: >>:CATEGORY: Anniv >>:END:

Re: [O] Org-mode and continuing BBDB compatibility

2013-10-21 Thread Nick Dokos
Christopher Culver writes: > I am using org-mode version 20131021 and the latest checkout of the > bbdb3 git repository. Although I have the following lines in my main > .org file: > > * Anniversaries >:PROPERTIES: >:CATEGORY: Anniv >:END: > %%(org-bbdb-anniversaries) >

Re: [O] org-mode based groupware wiki

2013-10-21 Thread Torsten Wagner
Dear Eric, thanks for the reply. >> Now I was able to test both gollumn and org-ehtml it puts me into a dilemma. >> > > Multiple viable options for Org-mode wikis is a great problem to have. Indeed it is as usual with FOSS all those pesty options to choice from. Why couldn't I just trough my mon

Re: [O] Org-mode and continuing BBDB compatibility

2013-10-21 Thread Charles Philip Chan
"Sebastien Vauban" writes: Hi Sebastien: > Weird. > > In the BBDB 3 version that I have from ELPA [1], I do have a file > `bbdb-autoloads.el', but no `bbdb-loaddefs.el'... Strange, the name was changed on 11 Dec 2011: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bbdb.user/2945 Charles -- L

Re: [O] Org-mode and continuing BBDB compatibility

2013-10-21 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Charles Philip Chan wrote: > "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > >> You mean bbdb-autoloads? > > No, bbdb-loaddefs.el is part of bbdb3. Here is the instructions from the > README file: > > 4) Activate BBDB: > >i) If the BBDB lisp files are in a directory > "/path/to/bbdb/lisp" you can use i

Re: [O] Org-mode and continuing BBDB compatibility

2013-10-21 Thread Charles Philip Chan
"Sebastien Vauban" writes: > You mean bbdb-autoloads? No, bbdb-loaddefs.el is part of bbdb3. Here is the instructions from the README file: 4) Activate BBDB: i) If the BBDB lisp files are in a directory "/path/to/bbdb/lisp" you can use in your emacs init file (require 'b

Re: [O] Org-mode and continuing BBDB compatibility

2013-10-21 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi Charles, Charles Philip Chan wrote: > Christopher Culver writes: > >> I do not see anniversaries from my .bbdb file in the agenda. I know >> that some work was done in the past with making org-mode compatible >> with bbdb3, but are the two projects no longer compatible, or do I >> probably hav

Re: [O] Org-mode and continuing BBDB compatibility

2013-10-21 Thread Christopher Culver
Myles English writes: > I think you might need: > > (setq org-bbdb-anniversary-field 'birthday) > > or > > (setq org-bbdb-anniversary-field 'anniversary) > > depending on what you called the anniversary field. My anniversary field in ~/.bbdb is called "anniversary". Setting this option has no ef

Re: [O] Org-mode and continuing BBDB compatibility

2013-10-21 Thread Charles Philip Chan
Christopher Culver writes: Hi Christopher: > I do not see anniversaries from my .bbdb file in the agenda. I know > that some work was done in the past with making org-mode compatible > with bbdb3, but are the two projects no longer compatible, or do I > probably have some other problem on my end

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >