On Sunday 25 June 2017 22:13:04 Tom Easterday wrote:
> Gene,
> Thanks for the response. The machine has been running great for years
> on those values but in position mode, not in velocity mode. I
> wouldn't think that any of the step-gen parameters would need to
> change when changing to veloci
On 06/25/2017 06:51 PM, andy pugh wrote:
On 25 June 2017 at 15:21, dave wrote:
I suspect that this is a thermal problem
Whereas I consider the idea that it is a _Computer_ thermal problem almost
inconceivable.
Yes, for a CPU to foul up ONLY the counting of one axis in
ONE direction seems
Gene,
Thanks for the response. The machine has been running great for years on those
values but in position mode, not in velocity mode. I wouldn't think that any
of the step-gen parameters would need to change when changing to velocity
mode...?
I suspect the PID parameters I am using, DEADBAN
On 06/25/2017 04:53 PM, andy pugh wrote:
On 25 June 2017 at 21:47, dave wrote:
For right now I suspect cpu temp.
Homing is manual
Are you sure that you are doing this right?
If you jog to your manual home position and re-home, does the problem go
away?
I've lost the thread
As of thi
On Sunday 25 June 2017 18:12:14 tom-...@bgp.nu wrote:
> I would like to attempt to get my machine with stepper motors running
> in velocity mode with feedback from the encoders. Below are the
> relevant parts of my Hal and Ini files for just the X-Axis. I figured
> I would do one axis at a time.
On 25 June 2017 at 15:21, dave wrote:
> I suspect that this is a thermal problem
Whereas I consider the idea that it is a _Computer_ thermal problem almost
inconceivable.
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is designed
for the especial use of mechanical genius
On 25 June 2017 at 21:47, dave wrote:
> For right now I suspect cpu temp.
> Homing is manual
>
Are you sure that you are doing this right?
If you jog to your manual home position and re-home, does the problem go
away?
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is desi
I would like to attempt to get my machine with stepper motors running in
velocity mode with feedback from the encoders. Below are the relevant parts of
my Hal and Ini files for just the X-Axis. I figured I would do one axis at a
time. Currently nothing happens when I try to jog the X axis exc
Greetings all;
I just about have my g33wrapper.ngc working again, but I see several
problems because I used fixed values for some of the variables, derived
by successive approximations. Not good for versatility should I want to
carve some of Andy's threads. :)
I want it to be universal, but I
On 06/25/2017 12:34 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
On 06/25/2017 12:44 PM, dave wrote:
Multiple problems:
Having cooled off the shop a bit the limits violation seems to have
gone away for now. We'll see
what later in the day brings. BTW the limit violations were
consistent between axis and tklinu
On 06/25/2017 12:32 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
On 06/25/2017 09:21 AM, dave wrote:
.warning: gcode exceeds machine limits. I classically set my
limits at -.2 ..18, -.2, ..9 and 0 ... -3.
Moving to -9 ... 9, -4 ... 4 for x and y and it still gave me the
same error message. and yes I sh
On 06/25/2017 09:21 AM, dave wrote:
.warning: gcode exceeds machine limits. I classically
set my limits at -.2 ..18, -.2, ..9 and 0 ... -3.
Moving to -9 ... 9, -4 ... 4 for x and y and it still
gave me the same error message. and yes I shutdown
linuxcnc and restarted homing on the
On 06/25/2017 12:44 PM, dave wrote:
Multiple problems:
Having cooled off the shop a bit the limits violation
seems to have gone away for now. We'll see
what later in the day brings. BTW the limit violations
were consistent between axis and tklinuxcnc.
Multiple passes thru a small routine
On 06/24/2017 06:20 PM, dave wrote:
Thanks Jon,
Tried that earlier in the day and didn't get anything.
Just tried it again and what to my wondering eyes ...
axis. :-)
Still struggling with the interface but it seems to be
giving me the same errors as tk.
I can't quite figure out how I can be
On 06/25/2017 07:21 AM, dave wrote:
On 06/25/2017 02:55 AM, andy pugh wrote:
On 25 June 2017 at 00:20, dave wrote:
can't quite figure out how I can be in the middle of the bed
with a
small part and still
get limit violations
Is this actual limit-switch trips. or warnings that the
All machine move offs should be in the negative direction. I.e. I believe
you have your scales backwards. There was an illustration pinned in the
forum about this
On Jun 25, 2017 9:28 AM, "dave" wrote:
>
>
> On 06/25/2017 02:55 AM, andy pugh wrote:
>
>> On 25 June 2017 at 00:20, dave wrote:
>>
On 06/25/2017 02:55 AM, andy pugh wrote:
On 25 June 2017 at 00:20, dave wrote:
can't quite figure out how I can be in the middle of the bed with a
small part and still
get limit violations
Is this actual limit-switch trips. or warnings that the G-code exceeds
machine limits?
The firs
On 25 June 2017 at 00:20, dave wrote:
> can't quite figure out how I can be in the middle of the bed with a
> small part and still
> get limit violations
>
Is this actual limit-switch trips. or warnings that the G-code exceeds
machine limits?
The first is probably electrical noise. I seem
18 matches
Mail list logo