On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 01:52:00PM -0800, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Can't you appreciate the humor? AG
No - it came across as obtuse. If it was meant to be humour, it backfired.
--
----
Dr Russe
hey should do bla" and "we should
do bla". The former might refer to (say) your local government council
- and the latter might refer to society in general.
Contrast: "They should do something about climate change" vs "We
should do something about climate change&qu
e, or the various sorts of bacteria.
--
--------
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Senior Research Fellowhpco...@hpcoders.com.au
Economics, Kingston University
On Sat, Jan 06, 2018 at 04:30:35PM +1100, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On 6/01/2018 4:15 pm, Russell Standish wrote:
>
> > Other things seem possible, such as the
> > extraordinary unlikelihood that all animals can be conscious.
>
> That is an extraordinary claim, and suffici
On Sat, Jan 06, 2018 at 03:33:44PM +1100, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On 6/01/2018 11:50 am, Russell Standish wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 02:22:08PM +1100, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> > > The original suggestion by Russell was that "our human consciousness _is_
> > >
assume that I am a computationalist
when I'm simply neutral on the matter.
--
--------
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Senior Research Fellow
t he means by a "computation cannot be conscious" - as by analogy
it would a be similar statement to "a bunch of molecules cannot be a gas".
--
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119
y of mind that Bruno et al keep saying
> is impossible?
>
This is an astute comment. The MGA (and Maudlin's argument) supposedly
works by producing a physical philosophical zombie under computationalism.
Cheers
--
---
t; military intelligence. AG
>
--
--------
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Senior Research Fellowhpco...@hpcoders.com.au
Economics, K
s in Rome in July.
--
--------
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Senior Research Fellowhpco...@hpcoders.com.au
Economics, Kingston University http://ww
were
together. Communication via that common point in the past is the
classic definition of a local hidden variable.
--
--------
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coder
the conclusion before reading the remainder.
You have to convince someone it is worth their while. Youtube videos
are mostly a waste of time in my experience.
Cheers
--
--------
Dr Russell StandishPhone 04
nnecting simple dots? AG
>
I know what the Fermi paradox is. I was asking why a video about the
Roswell "incident" sheds any light on it?
TL; DW (too long, didn't watch - by analogy with TL; DR).
Cheers
--
-------
lfM4DITeU
>
--
----
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Senior Research Fellowhpco...@hpcoders.com.au
Economics, Kingston University http://www.hpc
f that reasoning proves
inconsistent with observed reality. In which case we've learnt something.
I'm not sure what else one could expect, though.
--
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Princip
s not extend to the measurement process;
> onlyevolution of the wf prior to measurement. AG *
Yes - that is exactly the measurement problem.
--
--------
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
an. It is a relatively trivial exercise to prove that any
operator of the form exp(iA) is unitary, where A is Hermitian. Trivial
when you see how to do it, but nevertheless I had to seek help from my
college tutor when I first encountered this :).
Cheers
--
-------
are linear, which I believe is what the model affirms,
> how can any measurement be non linear as it presumably is for spin
> measurements. AG*
>
Indeed that would be a problem. A sum of unitary operators need not be
unitary, though.
--
---
On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 02:10:44PM -0800, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> On Saturday, December 23, 2017 at 2:11:32 PM UTC-7, Russell Standish wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 09:20:05AM -0800, agrays...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
> > >
> > &g
ssing from our reality.
If you subscribe to Deutsch's Turing tropic principle, then mechanism
= computationalism.
--
--------
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance C
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 11:04:58AM +0100, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 19 Dec 2017, at 00:56, Russell Standish wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 05:25:12PM +0100, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > What is the difference you make between an instr
lapse type theory.
--
--------
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Senior Research Fellowhpco...@hpcoders.com.au
Economics, Kingston University http://ww
ect of consciousness or observerhood, since the continuous/discrete
distinction should not be controversial to anyone, and a lot in known
mathematically about it.
--
--------
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425
e still experiments directly testing the principle of
equivalence. A finding of a departure from it would be very big news!
--
--------
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performan
n is dropped, since it is obvious from the way
the equation is written.
--
--------
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Senior Research Fellowhpco...@
eory. I have an idea for an outline of a proof of that contention,
> which I may get around to writing up sooner or later..
>
I would be very interested in that.
--
Dr Russell Standish
lines are shifted by the same amount. But the lines
are recognisable by the patterns - a bit like a bar code.
--
----
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visi
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 08:03:48PM -0800, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> On Saturday, December 9, 2017 at 3:53:28 AM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Saturday, December 9, 2017 at 2:40:12 AM UTC, Russell Standish wrote:
> >>
>
ce in terms of z factor, which is related to their Doppler
shift, rather than an exlicit distance, as the latter vlaue is not
model independent.
Cheers
--
--------
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (m
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 12:18:02PM +1100, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On 5/12/2017 11:53 am, Russell Standish wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 11:26:53AM +1100, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> > > On 5/12/2017 3:15 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> > > > I think that is enough to get
-------
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Senior Research Fellowhpco...@hpcoders.com.au
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 02:11:11PM +1100, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On 3/12/2017 9:03 am, Russell Standish wrote:
> > The point being that the uncertainty in the coin's initial position is
> > itself due to the amplification of quantum uncertainty by classical
> > chaos.
&g
coin lands on a hard surface, rather than the
tosser's hand, which is why that is usually insisted upon.
--
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Senior Res
way, as I stated, this will be an
> exception. Try being tolerant. AG
In particular, ensemble theories of everything. For an introduction,
see my book "Theory of Nothing", or Tegmark's "Mathematical Universe".
But other "theories of everything"
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 05:09:13PM -0800, Brent Meeker wrote:
>
>
> On 11/27/2017 4:17 PM, Russell Standish wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 03:57:37PM -0500, John Clark wrote:
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > Your so
this list, and prevent these sorts of stupid confusions.
Cheers
--
--------
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Senior Research Fellowhpco...@hpco
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:20:45AM +1100, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On 16/11/2017 9:14 am, Russell Standish wrote:
> > But not all measurements are measurements of the position of
> > something. What about measuring the voltage of a circuit using an A->D
> > converter?
>
&
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:54:51PM +1100, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On 15/11/2017 5:02 pm, Russell Standish wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 02:46:21PM +1100, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> > > I said "one of the strongest"! I know that you want to define QM from the
>
t; is the elephant in the room that no one wants to discuss, apparently. *
>
As Brent explained, if the universe is infinite in extent at t=0, it
remains infinite in extent at finite times.
--
Dr Russell Standish
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 02:46:21PM +1100, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On 15/11/2017 12:49 pm, Russell Standish wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:05:22AM +1100, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> > > One of the strongest arguments for MWI was that it eliminates the concept
> > > of
rvers entirely
requires solving the preferred basis problem without reference to an
observer or observation.
--
--------
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting S
a gap between 100% code coverage, and
correctly implementing the requirements...
--
--------
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Senior Research Fellowhpco...@hpc
--
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Senior Research Fellowhpco...@hpcoders.com.au
Economics, Kingston University http://www.hpcoders.com.au
elevant to phenomenology.
--
----
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Senior Research Fellowhpco...@hpcoders.com.au
Economics, Kingston University ht
y doing here?
--
----
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Senior Research Fellowhpco...@hpcoders.com.au
Economics, Kingston University http://www.hpc
On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 09:56:05AM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On 9/09/2017 9:36 am, Russell Standish wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 05:08:39PM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> >>OK, proper time is taken from SR and applied only locally, so the
> >>concept is not rule
ne the
various assumptions. So far, they're not nonsense.
--
--------
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Senior Research Fellowhpco...@hpcoders.com.au
Econ
f the
latter. Computationalism is the position that it is both necessary and
sufficient, of course.
--
--------
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Senior
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 09:44:02PM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On 6/09/2017 5:39 pm, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> >On 6/09/2017 2:52 pm, Russell Standish wrote:
> >>More importantly, I'm sure you appreciate that codings are also entirely
> >>arbitrary, that every possi
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 05:39:07PM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On 6/09/2017 2:52 pm, Russell Standish wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 11:44:12AM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> >>I find the discussion in your book rather cursory, unless I have not
> >>located the rele
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 11:44:12AM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On 5/09/2017 2:55 pm, Russell Standish wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 11:58:57AM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> >>I have no problems with the assumption that all forms of data can be
> >>represented by bi
y bit string.
But I do - see the discussion of time and projection postulates in the
book, as well as the evolutionary framework within which it
sits. Obviously, we would like a more detailed account of observation
at some point, but that seems like a good start.
--
---
ther my theory is
dualist or not. It's kind of irrelevant. (Or maybe that should be
irrelephant - cf story of the blind men that I quote at the end of my book).
--
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
here the dualism was property
dualism, not Decartes' substance dualism). I actually put this to
David on the one and only lunch meeting I had with him, and he
admitted his classification was for a specific purpose (which he
didn't go into), and probably not at all universal.
f computations possible
with a quantum computer, and that a working 512 qubit quantum computer
will be strong empirical evidence that we live in a robust universe anyway.
--
----
Dr Russell StandishPhone 042
> Where in the bit strings is the information that one knows? How
> does a bitstring know
> a different bitstring?
>
Information is in the constraints. If I know something or other, then
this entails that some bitstrings are compatible with my existence,
and others are
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 12:28:26PM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On 29/08/2017 3:17 pm, Russell Standish wrote:
> >I attach a brief PDF of what I have so far. It shows how observer
> >moments, modelled as sets of bitstrings classified by looking at a
> >finite number of
, but think are plausible).
Cheers
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 04:55:02AM +1000, Russell Standish wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:03:24PM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> > On 6/07/2017 5:55 pm, Russell Standish wrote:
> > >On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 04:18:49PM +1000, Bruce Kellett wr
ng List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/every
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:03:24PM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On 6/07/2017 5:55 pm, Russell Standish wrote:
> >On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 04:18:49PM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> >>On 6/07/2017 2:33 pm, Russell Standish wrote:
> >>>Establishing linearity is key.
know that the task is going to be quite so easy...
--
--------
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Senior Research Fellowhpco...@hpcoders.com.au
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 03:04:13PM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On 11/07/2017 2:12 pm, Russell Standish wrote:
> >You're still missing the point. The quantum reality is a 1p thing, it
> >is the observed phenomenal physics. Substrate independence is a 3p
> >thing, and ma
st needing to
support universal computation.
--
--------
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Senior Research Fellowhpco...@hpcoders.com.au
Economics, Kingston Un
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 10:56:27AM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On 7/07/2017 10:40 am, Russell Standish wrote:
> >On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 10:22:40PM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> >
> >>No, position and momentum are dual in the sense I defined. The
> >>observabl
onventional term is
"complementary".
Observing S=X+P does not imply simultaneously observing X and P.
Prove that I can't observe S, or provide a reference to someone doing
so. It appears rather crucial to your critique.
--
------
On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 04:18:49PM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On 6/07/2017 2:33 pm, Russell Standish wrote:
> >Establishing linearity is key.
>
> Yes, and you haven't made progress with that.
All I ask is to give me some more time on this. I have some further
ideas in t
Sorry for having gone dark, although maybe you relished the
respite. I've been travelling, and its not been all that convenient to
check and respond to emails.
On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 02:56:58PM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On 1/07/2017 11:18 am, Russell Standish wrote:
> >To summ
ad-hoc assumption to make contact with
regular QM).
--
--------
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Senior Research Fellowhpco...@hpcoders.com.au
Economics, Kings
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 11:26:50AM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On 29/06/2017 5:36 pm, Russell Standish wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 03:19:40PM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> >>On 28/06/2017 2:26 pm, Russell Standish wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 05:09:4
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 03:19:40PM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On 28/06/2017 2:26 pm, Russell Standish wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 05:09:49PM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> >>On 27/06/2017 10:21 am, Russell Standish wrote:
> >>>No, you are just dealing with a
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 05:09:49PM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On 27/06/2017 10:21 am, Russell Standish wrote:
> >No, you are just dealing with a function from whatever set the ψ and ψ_α
> >are drawn from to that same set. There's never been an assumption that
> >ψ are
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 08:52:15AM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On 26/06/2017 3:57 pm, Russell Standish wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:50:45AM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> >>That is not what is normally meant by the '+' symbol. You have
> >>simply defi
ublished.
I have never claimed that I do any such thing, of course, whilst
admitting that it does look a bit like it. What I suspect the case is,
is that I've started with a different set of metaphysical assumptions,
namely that we live in a Multiverse, and that observer moments are
dr
anifestation of physical supervenience. My
argument for that goes by the name of the Occam catastrophe.
--
--------
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
V
ds interesting. I've downloaded it, and added it to my stack.
--
--------
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Senior Research Fellowhpco...@
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 04:25:07PM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On 24/06/2017 8:36 pm, Russell Standish wrote:
> >On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 06:29:54PM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> >>On 24/06/2017 5:23 pm, Russell Standish wrote:
> >>
> >>OK, it was possibly the
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 06:29:54PM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On 24/06/2017 5:23 pm, Russell Standish wrote:
>
> OK, it was possibly the case that you gave arguments earlier in the
> book. But I was going on the basis of the Appendix "Derivation of
> Quantum postulates&quo
nings,
meaning an evolved world is overwhelming more likely to occur in the
Multiverse of Everything than Boltzmann brain existences.
--
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Cod
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 01:09:41PM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On 24/06/2017 11:20 am, Russell Standish wrote:
> >The 3p is what is left after removing all personal baggage of each 1p
> >view point. It is literally the view from nowhere (since location is
> >just such a ba
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 04:21:09PM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On 21/06/2017 4:03 pm, Russell Standish wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 12:15:31PM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> >>On 19/06/2017 10:23 am, Russell Standish wrote:
> >>>I know Scott wouldn'
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 12:15:31PM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On 19/06/2017 10:23 am, Russell Standish wrote:
> >I know Scott wouldn't go as far as me. For me, all such irreversible
> >processes are related to conscious entities in some way. Whilst
> >agreeing that Ge
MWIist, so that could be the source of
our disagreement :).
--
----
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Senior Research Fellowhpco...@hpcoders.com.au
Economics
a difference from a
computational complexity point of view. I confess to not understanding
that proof, but it is in Chang et al op. cit.
Cheers
--
----
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Princip
On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 11:48:23AM -0400, John Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Russell Standish
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > That is not the same thing. The largest prime number doesn't exist, so
> >
> > there's no answer to
On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 09:20:29PM -0400, John Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 Russell Standish wrote:
>
> >
> > Random oracle computers appear to be faster for some problems in a
> > similar way, but don't compute anything a Turing machine can't do.
>
r for some problems in a
similar way, but don't compute anything a Turing machine can't do.
--
----
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting S
of T. Rexes from first principles without making any
further measurements, then we don't live in such a superposition. But I
still think that if it requires a measurement (no matter how indirect)
to determine the fact of colour, than we do live in a superposition.
Cheers
--
------
se :).
Cheers
--
--------
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Senior Research Fellowhpco...@hpcoders.com.au
Economics, Kingston University http://www.h
=0 (at FAPP), in which case the
two histories do not interfere, and there is no quantum interference phenomena.
--
----
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiti
pses, and the 3p looks more like Everett, with deterministic wave
functions and many worlds.
The incompatibility between relativity and wave function collapse can
be seen as a manifestation of the incommensurate nature of the 1p/3p
distinction.
Cheers
--
----
But I don't see how you
can leverage that into support for the MWI.
--
--------
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Senior Research Fellow
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 08:42:22AM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:>
>
> On 16 May 2017, at 10:20, Russell Standish wrote:
>
> >On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 09:47:14AM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >>
> >>On 16 May 2017, at 04:44, Russell Standish wrote:
> >>
onsciousness is no
longer supervenient on the original program, but on the
transformation.
I can't help feeling this is telling me something is awry with the
definition of supervenience, rather than of computationalism or materialism.
--
------
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 09:47:14AM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 16 May 2017, at 04:44, Russell Standish wrote:
>
> >On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 11:41:04AM -0700, Brent Meeker wrote:
> >>
> >>We had extended arguments starting from "Why isn't
> >
the universal dovetailer and IMHO the classroom (see the
paper) are counterexamples to that belief.
--
--------
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Senior
------
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Senior Research Fellowhpco...@hpcoders.com.au
On Sun, May 07, 2017 at 07:26:02AM +0100, David Nyman wrote:
> On 7 May 2017 5:02 a.m., "Russell Standish" wrote:
> Anyway, back to our sheep (as they say in French). Bruno has been
> reluctant to really address the question of physical supervenience in
> his work. It has to
ny real derivation of physical
supervenience in his theories.
--
----
Dr Russell StandishPhone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Senior Research Fellowhpco...@hpcoders.com.au
Econo
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 09:42:45AM -0500, Jason Resch wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 1:51 AM, Russell Standish
>
> HAVEGE periodically dumps entropy into /dev/random, when available. Do you
> know what the consumption-rate of your ALife simulation is in relation to
> the intr
n random number generation. Maybe
it requires a massive workload of parallel scientific computations to
work :).
Anyway, it is a question that I will return to in the next few years -
I now have a completely new implementation of Tierra and the
complexity analysis tools...
Cheers
--
-
201 - 300 of 2363 matches
Mail list logo
