[gentoo-user] Re: Re:

2006-07-20 Thread Mick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Richard Fish wrote: > On 7/20/06, Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Is anyone else getting this when they send a message to the list? > > Someone asked a day or two ago...who was that? :-) > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140263 I have

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: glibc

2005-04-29 Thread Thomas Kirchner
* On Apr 29 15:21, Jose Moreira (gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org) wrote: > i think my sistem is a little messed up, because of locales: Is your /etc/locales.build file correct? If you don't have all the languages you want specified there, you'll be lacking some important ones... (if some are miss

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: star

2007-09-24 Thread Alexander Skwar
Stroller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 24 Sep 2007, at 09:30, Alexander Skwar wrote: >> ... >>> and if p7zip supports pipes, you don't need its support in tar. >>> Just pipe >>> from/to it. >> >> It does and that's the way it's supposed to be used on unix, according >> to its manpage. > > GN

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: star

2007-09-24 Thread Alexander Skwar
Florian Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexander Skwar schrieb: >> Florian Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> star supports p7zip which can be much better and especially more >>> flexible than bzip2, gzip and zip. >> >> Uhm, what's bad about >> >> tar cf - | p7zip > >

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: star

2007-09-26 Thread Alexander Skwar
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:34:41 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > >> What does this have to do with GNU tar and it adding superflous >> options? Quite a lot. -j et.al. are non-standard options. If a >> (badly written) script relies on the presence of -j, this

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: star

2007-09-26 Thread Alexander Skwar
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:14:58 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > >> Back to tar: Why use "tar -j" in scripts, when "bzip2 | tar" >> does the same thing? I very much disagree that "tar -j" is >> the "better" option here; > > Either way requires that you firs

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: antivirus

2006-03-06 Thread Peter
On Mon, 06 Mar 2006 16:33:53 +0200, Ghaith Hachem wrote: > i have avast updated daily i dono how this virus got in > i must try AVG > On 3/6/06, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mon, 06 Mar 2006 07:55:18 +0200, Ghaith Hachem wrote: >> >> > hello, >> > i was wondering if there's any good anti

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Resize /

2006-11-18 Thread Alexander Skwar
· Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Alexander Skwar wrote: >> < snip > >> The advantage of EVMS over LVM in this case would be, that he >> wouldn't have to reformat/repartition and would still be able >> to resize the partition/filesystem, wouldn't he? >> < snip > >> Yes, with reiserfs, this can be don

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re:

2006-07-20 Thread Richard Fish
On 7/20/06, Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have a theory and this response may help prove it. When I respond to the ML using a mail client I don't seem to get this problem . . . however, when I respond using a news-reader then I do! How do you explain this? No idea. filter of some sort on

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Nvidia drivers

2008-04-02 Thread James
Gregory Shearman gmail.com> writes: > It looks like the kernel devs are trying to update references to the include > asm files and the nvidia devs are yet to catch up. Maybe one day nvidia will > release its driver specs and save itself a lot of trouble and money building > catchup linux driver

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: packages.gentoo.org down?

2007-08-10 Thread Alexander Skwar
· Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Friday 10 August 2007 18:01:09 Dan Cowsill wrote: >> > > > Again, I apologize for the outage. We'll be back online next week >> > > > and hopefully after that we'll have a better way of dealing with >> > > > issues like this when they arise. So pleas

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: star

2007-09-25 Thread b.n.
Alexander Skwar ha scritto: > Stroller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 24 Sep 2007, at 09:30, Alexander Skwar wrote: >>> ... and if p7zip supports pipes, you don't need its support in tar. Just pipe from/to it. >>> It does and that's the way it's supposed to be used on unix, acco

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: star

2007-09-25 Thread Florian Philipp
Alexander Skwar schrieb: > Florian Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Alexander Skwar schrieb: >>> Florian Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> star supports p7zip which can be much better and especially more flexible than bzip2, gzip and zip. >>> Uhm, what's bad about >>> >>>

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: star

2007-09-26 Thread Neil Bothwick
Hello Alexander Skwar, > Yes, it's very bad that Gentoo scripts don't limit themselves to > POSIX. Another windmill to fight against. Artificially limiting yourself to the lowest common denominator when better options are available is bad, and discourages evolution. POSIX specifies the minimum s

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: star

2007-09-26 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:45:51 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > > Either way requires that you first determine the type of compression > > used before you can decide where to pipe tar's output, if at all. > > Whereas something like "tar xf somefile" avoids the need to do" file > > somefile" and parse

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: star

2007-09-26 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Wednesday 26 September 2007 10:59:00 Neil Bothwick wrote: > > Pardon? "tar xf somefile" doesn't do any compression at all. > > I don't get what you mean. > > No, but it does do whatever decompression is required. Of course, you do > have to specify a compression method when creating a compressed

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: star

2007-09-26 Thread Alexander Skwar
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:45:51 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > >> > Either way requires that you first determine the type of compression >> > used before you can decide where to pipe tar's output, if at all. >> > Whereas something like "tar xf somefile" av

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: star

2007-09-26 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Mittwoch, 26. September 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote: > Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:34:41 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > >> What does this have to do with GNU tar and it adding superflous > >> options? Quite a lot. -j et.al. are non-standard options. If a

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: zd1211 patch?

2007-05-10 Thread Stefan Schweizer
hmh, works fine for me on 2.6.21. You might want to consider using gentoo-sources-2.6.20-r8 because that is the latest stable one. Best regards, Stefan -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: xmms alternative

2006-10-24 Thread Alexander Skwar
· Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Nope, no use flag. > > Configure Amarok... -> Engine -> Sound System Thanks. Alexander Skwar -- Some men are so interested in their wives' continued happiness that they hire detectives to find out the reason for it. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing lis

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: PAM issues

2006-11-14 Thread Alexander Skwar
· Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tuesday 14 November 2006 15:23, Alexander Skwar wrote: >> > Any clues from revdep-rebuild? >> > I take it you did log out and in again, >> >> Yes. >> >> Reboot: No. > > That's worth a try. I know it goes against the grain but at this stage > what do you

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Resize /

2006-11-18 Thread Dale
Alexander Skwar wrote: > > > Impossible to do. Nothing at all can be done without knowledge. > > IMO a better question is: How hard is it, to get proper > knowledge? > > Answer: Easy, thanks to the excellent LVM howto. See > http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/ > > > < snip > > > > Alexander Skwa

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Another hardware thread

2011-11-14 Thread masterprometheus
Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 23:00:15 +0200, masterprometheus wrote: > >> For AMD I'd recommend to go for a 960T : >> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103995 >> It's a 95W and as a Zosma it's actually a 6-core. Most of those (not >> all unfortunately) can be

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Another hardware thread

2011-11-16 Thread masterprometheus
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > > I ask myself if I need the K-version at all, I don't want to overclock No, if you're not going to overclock the K version is not needed. > > Did you also consider the newer i7-2700k? Maybe too expensive because > it's so new. And I assume it's not that much f

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Full disk encryption

2011-11-30 Thread Jack Byer
Dale wrote: > Did you use a howto for Dracut? If so, have a link you could post? I > tried making a init thingy and after about 20 failed reboots, I scraped > the idea. I was trying to follow the howto on the Gentoo wiki I think. > The unofficial wiki. > I had some difficulties because the wa

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Full disk encryption

2011-11-30 Thread Jack Byer
David W Noon wrote: > I have a working initramfs layout, but currently it is too large > (>32MiB) for my /boot partition. The problem package is e2fsprogs, as > it requires dynamic linkage and, consequently, a full-sized glibc. > This sucks, so I need to patch the Makefile(s) to build a more sens

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: glibc 2.13 warning

2011-02-08 Thread Holger Hoffstaette
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 08:55:27 +, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 01:39:15 +0100, Holger Hoffstaette wrote: > >> > That's odd, it broke local deliveries for me - and others. >> > Fortunately, nothing was lost, it just stayed in the queue while I >> > recompiled glibc. >> >> Same her

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: CUPS-PDF failing

2010-03-10 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Dirk, Dirk Uys wrote: > On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Jörg Schaible > wrote: > >> >> Look into /etc/cups/cups-pdf. The individual spool directories must have >> proper access rights (like .ssh in your home) and match the UserUMask >> setting. Otherwise cups-pdf will not generate the PDF, s

[gentoo-user] Re: re-extracting linux sources

2009-09-25 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 09/26/2009 12:35 AM, Maxim Wexler wrote: Hi group, After my last -uvDN world and subsequent revdep-rebuild and emerge --depclean I found the main Makefile under /usr/src/linux was missing. I managed to extract it from the sources and copy it over only to find that, naturally, many other file

[gentoo-user] Re: re-extracting linux sources

2009-09-25 Thread walt
On 09/25/2009 02:35 PM, Maxim Wexler wrote: Hi group, After my last -uvDN world and subsequent revdep-rebuild and emerge --depclean I found the main Makefile under /usr/src/linux was missing. I managed to extract it from the sources and copy it over only to find that, naturally, many other file

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: cloning + upgrade howto?

2009-07-27 Thread ABCD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:39:27 -0400, ABCD wrote: > >> > It should, unless you are woefully out of date. > >> Not true: the versions of portage that support sets (including @world) >> are all hardmasked currently. > > Still? I

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: next step X

2005-05-13 Thread Thomas Kirchner
* On May 13 20:30, Neil Bothwick (gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org) wrote: > emerging kde, gnome and fluxbox instead of fvwm would oonly make the > world file two lines longer :) If you only install the meta-ebuilds, that's true... Perhaps I should have prefaced it with a 'YMMV', but if you have thr

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: /etc/shadow syntax

2005-06-06 Thread Hans Hvelplund Odborg
Zac Medico wrote: >Did you see man 5 shadow? yes man 5 shadow (this all there is about the password field): The password field must be filled. The encryped password consists of 13 to 24 characters from the 64 character alphabet a thru z, A thru Z, 0 thru 9, interpreted. > I've used freenx > suc

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: automated code validation

2014-12-07 Thread Sam Bishop
In order to catch up a bit since I wasn't subscribed to the mailing list with this email at the time I found this thread. If anything sounds odd, read through to the end. I'm trying to top reply so I'm leaving my 'backstory' till the end. > Rich Freeman gentoo.org> writes: > > > James tampabay.r

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Qt-4.8.7 bug

2017-05-22 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Peter, Peter Humphrey wrote: [snip] > Have you seen https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595618 ? It says > that "Qt plugins compiled with gcc-4 are incompatible with > expected to anticipate that. On the other hand, some kind of notice could > be issued, and bug 618922 is pursuing that.

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Home Network Printing

2005-11-26 Thread Mick
Hlp! Michael Kintzios wrote: > >> From:: Oliver Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org >> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Home Network Printing >> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:58:27 +0100 > >> Michael Kintzios wrote: >> >> > I created a new printer on hostname1 and also

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Home Network Printing

2005-11-30 Thread Mick
Guys, this is ridiculous! Every time I want to print something from my main Linux machine I have to physically disconnect the printer from the second box and connect it to this one. The way this is going I will soon need to buy another parallel port connector because the pins will wear out! Surel

[gentoo-user] Re: RE: Home Network Printing

2005-12-01 Thread Mick
Richard Fish wrote: > First, let me say that I don't have this setup, but based on > /usr/share/doc/cups-1.1.23-r4/html/ipp.pdf, you should have something > like: > > ipp://192.168.0.3/printers/Compaq-HP Wey-hey! It WORKS! :-D Thanks Richard, thank you all. The mistake was with me missing out

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Fonts fell apart

2006-01-06 Thread Mick
Grant wrote: >> Did you try deleting directories related to .kde. >> Also try deleting .fonts.conf and .Xresources. I hope that you have not >> customised them and got messed up while using KDE. >> >> Regards, >> Abhay > > Thank you so much Abhay. Deleting .font.conf fixed it. Just renaming the

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: rhythmbox plays silently

2008-03-26 Thread Michael Schmarck
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now, onto your actual problem. It is exceptionally hard to even attempt > to provide a solution unless someone else fixed the exact same problem > before, as you have not provided any configuration at all and very > little useful information. What would

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: rhythmbox plays silently

2008-03-30 Thread Michael Schmarck
Stroller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 30 Mar 2008, at 06:47, Michael Schmarck wrote: >> ... >> In your world, an aggressor is doing nothing wrong? Do I understand >> that right? >> ... >> Get real. > > When you're describing someone who has annoyed you on the Internet as > an "aggressor" it

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: rhythmbox plays silently

2008-03-31 Thread Michael Schmarck
darren kirby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > quoth the Michael Schmarck: > >> My attitude? Well, maybe. But I rather think it has everything >> to do with Alan, who made a bad comment. > > Have you not noticed that you are the _only_ person upset by Alan's post? Yes, I have. > Why don't you think

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Nvidia drivers

2008-04-02 Thread Steven Lembark
>> Maybe hell will also freeze over on that day. More likely pigs will floss... -- Steven Lembark +1 888 359 3508 Workhorse Computing 85-09 90th St [EMAIL PROTECTED] Woodhaven, NY 1142

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: KAudioCreator - Stopped Working

2008-04-30 Thread Anno v. Heimburg
Paul Sobey wrote: > Wow, well done that man! I got bitten by broken config files often enough in the early KDE 3.x days, especially on minor version changes. It has gotten much better since 3.3 or so though, I'm actually a bit suprised... Also, changing from SuSE on reiserfs to gentoo on xfs help

[gentoo-user] Re: Re enter chroot install

2008-05-14 Thread reader
James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > # mount -o bind /dev /mnt/gentoo/dev [...] > Any of the above steps that are not necessary? Other have commented about the .../boot stuff but in dozens of times chrooting during all kinds of install situations I've never done `mount -o bind /dev /mnt/gento

[gentoo-user] Re: Re enter chroot install

2008-05-15 Thread James
newsguy.com> writes: > > # mount -o bind /dev /mnt/gentoo/dev > Other have commented about the .../boot stuff but in dozens of times > chrooting during all kinds of install situations I've never done > `mount -o bind /dev /mnt/gentoo/dev' > And far as I know it never caused me a problem.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: packages.gentoo.org down?

2007-08-10 Thread Dan Cowsill
> > The point is if you want > > immediate and professional reactions everytime something happens you should > > be paying someone to monitor things.. I'm sorry, it just seems a tad ignorant to assume that the reason the problem with the server was not addressed is because no one was being paid to

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: SSH won't restart

2007-09-16 Thread Alexander Skwar
· Mike Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sunday 16 September 2007 16:40:45 Alexander Skwar wrote: > >> > openssh, in some circumstances (I believe to be openssl changing ABI), >> > will not restart as you found. It will only not restart when it's being >> > actively used, so you can't do so will

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: SSH won't restart

2007-09-16 Thread Alexander Skwar
· Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Graham Murray wrote: >> What circumstances? I too have performed updates on several remote >> systems via SSH and run /etc/init.d/sshd restart and never had any >> problems. > > Something like "/etc/init.d/sshd test-restart" would be nice. For

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: star

2007-09-26 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:08:11 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > > No, but it does do whatever decompression is required. > > Hey, that's a nice feature. I didn't know about that. Be careful, it is not part of the POSIX standard and may cause premature hair loss ;-) -- Neil Bothwick Klingons d

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Picasa 2.7 Beta

2007-12-12 Thread Alexander Skwar
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:01:55 +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote: > >> > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200568 reports success using >> > rpm2targz >> >> And why should that make any difference? I mean, after all, >> I am able to extract the package. I

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Is GWN dead?

2008-01-11 Thread Michael Schmarck
Galevsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > tel me how to install Gentoo in that case. Boot from any Live CD (like GRML) and do the installation from there, in a chroot. Michael -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Is GWN dead?

2008-01-11 Thread Michael Schmarck
· Galevsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Jan 11, 2008 11:02 AM, Michael Schmarck > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] >> As far as I'm concerned, the Gentoo install CD could easily be dropped >> without a loss. >> >> Michael > > I'll try to make you understand it. After reading your reply, I've go

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Is GWN dead?

2008-01-12 Thread Michael Schmarck
· Norman Rieß <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Michael Schmarck schrieb: >> · Norman Rieß <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >>> Right, basicly telling people "You have to depend on / use other distros >>> to install our OS, cause we are not able to / don´t have time to provide >>> this" sounds a little fishy. I

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Is GWN dead?

2008-01-13 Thread Michael Schmarck
· Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:06:39 +0100, b.n. wrote: > >> Because you don't have to add *anything* to such cd. >> -What do you need to install Gentoo? A working Linux live cd with a >> terminal and chroot. >> -Are a terminal and chroot available on 99.9% of Linux

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Is GWN dead?

2008-01-13 Thread Michael Schmarck
· Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:35:55 +0100, b.n. wrote: > >> > But i still think a Gentoo-Install-CD/DVD is a good thing. >> >> Any practical reason for that? > > It is a lot more comfortable for the first-time installer. Why's that? > One of the > problems w

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: CUPS -- fails better!

2006-01-31 Thread Mick
maxim wexler wrote: > > > --- Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> maxim wexler wrote: >> >> [snip...] >> > I [30/Jan/2006:14:52:31 -0700] Job 23 queued on >> > 'deskjet' by 'root'. >> >> Why are you running it as root? > > That was a test page run from localhost631 which > requires that I b

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Kernel not updating...

2006-02-16 Thread Mick
gentuxx wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Mick wrote: > >> >>I'm no portage guru, but this is what I would do on my system: >> >>1. Check what you have in your RSYNC_EXCLUDEFROM and package.keywords. > > Looks like this was it. I had it in the /etc/portage/rsync_excl

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: unformat a partition

2006-03-17 Thread Peter
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 10:09:37 -0500, Nick Smith wrote: > thanks for the replies, i was actually able to get the data off the > drive with getdataback, i can rest easy now. > > thanks again > > Nick Aren't you the lucky one!! Bet you'll never do _that_ again! However, it's important to have a lis

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: portage logging configuration

2006-04-07 Thread Wiebe Cazemier
On Friday 07 April 2006 00:05, Neil Bothwick wrote: > Both are redundant with portage 2.1, which is able to save or mail > emerge messages, or even pass them to a custom handler. Hey, that's good to know. I'll pay attention to it when Portage 2.1 becomes stable. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Bon Echo (why?)

2007-02-25 Thread Christian Marie
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 05:15:14PM -0500, Willie Wong wrote: > I prefer something like FlameCanid that more properly expresses the > fact that "ours" is almost-exactly-but-not-quite-perfectly-the-same. We use Bon Echo as it's upstreams default unbranded name. Many other distros are using Bon Echo

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Reducing disk usage

2007-04-28 Thread Alexander Skwar
· Ralf Stephan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> This Depends largely on the "type" of files. I've got my portage >> tree on a reiserfs, and in comparison to ext3, it saves couple >> 100 (one-zero-zero) megs! > > OTOH, you may not need to switch to reiser for that. Uhm, any particular reason, why switchin

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: zd1211 patch?

2007-05-10 Thread Arnau Bria
On Thu, 10 May 2007 16:48:04 +0200 Stefan Schweizer wrote: > hmh, works fine for me on 2.6.21. > > You might want to consider using gentoo-sources-2.6.20-r8 because > that is the latest stable one. Mmmm... I use suspend ones... Linux pataki 2.6.19-suspend2-r3 #1 PREEMPT Fri Mar 9 02:17:29 CET 2

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: /etc/conf.d/net

2006-08-21 Thread Alexander Skwar
· Alan Mckinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 10:05 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: >> · Alan Mckinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> > Docs on /etc/conf.d/net are about as clear as mud from where I sit. The >> > last thing I need to figure out is what exactly is the difference >> > betwe

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: The Real Darkside...

2006-09-10 Thread Alexander Skwar
· Jerry McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Saturday 09 September 2006 16:31, Alexander Skwar wrote: >> · Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > Although she promised that when the NTFS drivers for Linux are developed >> > adequately to allow her to work on her NTFS stored data from both OS, she >> > will m

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: BIG reiserfs problem

2006-10-28 Thread Alexander Skwar
· Uwe Thiem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 28 October 2006 13:14, Alexander Skwar wrote: >> · Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > I'm even looking forward to Reiserfs4 myself. >> >> Well, actually I wouldn't hold my breath for Reiserfs anymore, >> now that Hans Reiser is in jail. I really don't think that r

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Basic Vmware setup

2006-11-13 Thread Alexander Skwar
· Brett I. Holcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Server you can't do snapshots Well, almost correct. You can create 1 snapshot, but not multiple snapshots, that's correct. > so you create a VM, save it, copy it, then > modify it. Yep. And supposedly, VMware Workstation has some better "memory optim

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: PAM issues

2006-11-14 Thread Lorenzo Marussi
but, with pam-0.99.6.3-r1, have you tried to make a "revdep-rebuild -p -i" ? Lorenzo Marussi Il giorno mar, 14/11/2006 alle 17.40 +0100, Alexander Skwar ha scritto: · Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tuesday 14 November 2006 15:23, Alexander Skwar wrote: >> > Any clues from revdep-

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: PAM issues

2006-11-14 Thread Alexander Skwar
· Lorenzo Marussi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > but, with pam-0.99.6.3-r1, have you tried to make a "revdep-rebuild -p > -i" ? Oh, right, no, I have not, but I'll do so tomorrow morning. Thanks for reminding me again! Alexander Skwar -- "Never laugh at live dragons, Bilbo you fool!" he said to himself

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Kaspersky Rescue Disk

2013-02-13 Thread Michael Sondow
Hi, Alecks. You wrote: > I believe there is a way to setup persistent storage. I've never done > it personally, but I think tools such as unetbootin or Pendrivelinux[1] > offer it. It wont work on your standard CD, of course. Yes, there seem to be a number of programs that will create a bootable

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Another hardware thread

2011-11-16 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 2011-11-16 16:22, schrieb masterprometheus: > Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > > >> >> I ask myself if I need the K-version at all, I don't want to >> overclock > > No, if you're not going to overclock the K version is not needed. But as far as I read reviews online it is easy and rather safe

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Another hardware thread

2011-11-16 Thread Michael Mol
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Am 2011-11-16 16:22, schrieb masterprometheus: >> The 2700K is nothing different than the 2600K. The only plus is a 100 >> MHz frequency boost. Not worth the extra $70 over a 2600/2600K. > > Yep. So Intel noticed "wow, we get a few of

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Another hardware thread

2011-11-16 Thread masterprometheus
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Am 2011-11-16 16:22, schrieb masterprometheus: >> Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: >> >> >>> >>> I ask myself if I need the K-version at all, I don't want to >>> overclock >> >> No, if you're not going to overclock the K version is not needed. > > But as far as I read

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Another hardware thread

2011-11-16 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 16.11.2011 17:00, schrieb Michael Mol: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: >> Am 2011-11-16 16:22, schrieb masterprometheus: >>> The 2700K is nothing different than the 2600K. The only plus is a 100 >>> MHz frequency boost. Not worth the extra $70 over a 2600/2600K.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Full disk encryption

2011-11-30 Thread Dale
Jack Byer wrote: Dale wrote: Did you use a howto for Dracut? If so, have a link you could post? I tried making a init thingy and after about 20 failed reboots, I scraped the idea. I was trying to follow the howto on the Gentoo wiki I think. The unofficial wiki. I had some difficulties beca

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Full disk encryption

2011-11-30 Thread Jack Byer
Dale wrote: > Jack Byer wrote: >> Dale wrote: >> >>> Did you use a howto for Dracut? If so, have a link you could post? I >>> tried making a init thingy and after about 20 failed reboots, I scraped >>> the idea. I was trying to follow the howto on the Gentoo wiki I think. >>> The unofficial wik

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Gentoos community communication rant

2010-09-07 Thread Jörg Schaible
Al wrote: >> Al, >> >> Do everyone a favor. Go use Gmane and tell us what exactly >> you'd be able to do that Gmane does not already do. >> It's archived, search-able (via keywords) and many, many >> other very cool features. > > I do you favour and confirm that it is a very cool web interface to

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: glibc 2.13 warning

2011-02-08 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 10:58:03 +0100, Holger Hoffstaette wrote: > > I rebuilt 2.12.2. You have to remove the downgrade check from > > $PORTDIR/sys-libs/glibc/files/eblits/pkg_setup.eblit. As the binary > > package created with FEATURES=buildpkg contained this check, I could > > not emerge -k it, I h

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: [gentoo-user] kernel bug?

2014-07-15 Thread taozhijiang
Yes, genkernel-next should be used. look at the install gentoo gnome with systemd from scratch ( Sorry for currently I can not access Internet so can not provide your link) I have test genkernel-next with systemd (needed by GNOME 3.12), all seems OK, with kernel version 3.15。 But now I am using

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: runlevels and service list

2009-09-21 Thread walt
On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 16:51 -0500, Dale wrote: > Alan McKinnon wrote: > > On Sunday 20 September 2009 22:06:44 Dale wrote: > > > >> Neil Bothwick wrote: > >> > >>> On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 21:51:17 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > >>> > /bin/bash is also shown in htop even though ba

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Kmail / uw-imap problems

2009-10-15 Thread Elric Wolfsbruder
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > On Donnerstag 15 Oktober 2009, Elric Wolfsbruder wrote: >> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: >> > On Donnerstag 15 Oktober 2009, Elric Wolfsbruder wrote: >> >> Hello all, >> >> >> >> I am currently having some interesting problems with kmail since the >> >> flagging of kde

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: FIXED: Re: KDE3 removal

2009-11-28 Thread Jörg Schaible
Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Friday 27 November 2009 23:07:25 Jörg Schaible wrote: >> Alan McKinnon wrote: >> > On Thursday 26 November 2009 19:34:34 James wrote: >> >> kde-4.3.1 went smooth, except >> >> for I have to manually removed all the kde-3.5 packages. >> >> It had kde-meta-3.5.10. Is there

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: cloning + upgrade howto?

2009-07-28 Thread Helmut Jarausch
On 27 Jul, ABCD wrote: > I believe the mask is still in place because of a couple issues with sets, > as well as issues with FEATURES=preserve-libs. I don't think so. I'm using the bleeding egde portage since several months now without any problems. These have been mask for 'political' reasons -

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: next step X

2005-05-13 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, May 13, 2005 8:43 pm, Thomas Kirchner said: > * On May 13 20:30, Neil Bothwick (gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org) wrote: >> emerging kde, gnome and fluxbox instead of fvwm would only make the >> world file two lines longer :) > > If you only install the meta-ebuilds, that's true... Perhaps I sh

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: CFLAGS CPU optimization question.

2005-05-24 Thread Thomas Kirchner
* On May 24 13:37, Mitko Moshev (gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org) wrote: > Put -pipe in there too, it speeds up compiling (or so I've heard). Right! I forgot -pipe, that one's good. Unless you have bad RAM that you're trying to use as little as possible, or some such thing... > Right now I use C

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: foomatic build(rebuild) broken

2005-06-06 Thread Hans Hvelplund Odborg
Stoian Ivanov wrote: > Nope this is not the case: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ # grep MAKEOPTS /etc/make.conf > MAKEOPTS="-j1" > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ # That option does not mean that you can not start emerge in parallel. Is says that emerge should tell each instance of make to not compile in parallel. Wh

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: /etc/shadow syntax

2005-06-06 Thread Richard Fish
Hans Hvelplund Odborg wrote: >Me too. I just started wondering what the difference was > > "Use the source Luke!" >From src/login.c in shadow-4.0.7: /* * If the encrypted password begins with a "!", the account * is locked and the user cannot

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: /etc/shadow syntax

2005-06-07 Thread Hans-Gunther Borrmann
On Monday 06 June 2005 18:54, Hans Hvelplund Odborg wrote: > Zac Medico wrote: > >Did you see man 5 shadow? > > yes > man 5 shadow (this all there is about the password field): > The password field must be filled. The encryped password consists of 13 to > 24 characters from the 64 character alphabe

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Emerge order not deterministic !?

2015-11-12 Thread Jörg Schaible
Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 12/11/2015 10:29, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> Alan McKinnon wrote: >> >>> On 11/11/2015 21:35, Walter Dnes wrote: Ongoing installation. I looked at 2 instances of "emerge -pv x11-base/xorg-server" and the order was somewhat different. Here are a couple of o

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: dev-qt/qtwebkit-5.4.0

2015-02-06 Thread Jörg Schaible
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > On 05.02.2015 17:59, Michael Palimaka wrote: >> On 04/02/15 08:07, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: >>> Am 03.02.2015 um 20:30 schrieb Jörg Schaible: >>> Consider a memcheck. Arbitrary failures while the CPU is high is often because some component starts dying. S

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Flashing hardware via WINE ?

2017-03-19 Thread Jörg Schaible
tu...@posteo.de wrote: [snip] > Hi Kai (that's a rhyme! :) > > I have installed Virtualbox already and use the Linux Image I > installed there for banking purposes only. Feels more secure. > > I would prefer the WIndows-in-a-(virtual)box-solution) as you > do -- if I would own a Windows install

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Qt-4.8.7 bug

2017-05-22 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Monday 22 May 2017 09:49:01 Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Peter Humphrey wrote: > > [snip] > > > Have you seen https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595618 ? It says > > that "Qt plugins compiled with gcc-4 are incompatible with > > > be > > expected to anticipate that. On the other

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Qt-4.8.7 bug

2017-05-22 Thread Jörg Schaible
Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Monday 22 May 2017 09:49:01 Jörg Schaible wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> Peter Humphrey wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >> > Have you seen https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595618 ? It says >> > that "Qt plugins compiled with gcc-4 are incompatible with >> > > > be >> > expec

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Qt-4.8.7 bug

2017-05-23 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 09:49:01AM +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Peter Humphrey wrote: > > [snip] > > well, this does not seem to be the complete truth. When I switched to gcc > 5.x I did a revdep-rebuild for anything that was compiled against > libstdc++.so.6 just like the according news entry wa

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Qt-4.8.7 bug

2017-05-24 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Tuesday 23 May 2017 23:16:48 Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 09:49:01AM +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote: > > Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > > well, this does not seem to be the complete truth. When I switched to > > gcc > > 5.x I did a revdep-rebuild for anything tha

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Qt-4.8.7 bug

2017-05-25 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Wednesday 24 May 2017 08:58:53 Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Tuesday 23 May 2017 23:16:48 Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > I, too, was affected by this. I did the libstdc++ rebuild after > > upgrading > > gcc (some 550 packages) a while back and now I was hit by the Qt > > problem, > > so another rebu

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: /dev/cdrom has gone!

2005-09-04 Thread Greg Yasko
> yes, it works just well in WindowsXP. > it even works before i use udev. hehe > > i'm not sure it failed due to the udev, > i have no idea now. I had the exact same problem when switching to the 2.6 kernel and udev several months ago. After deleting .devfsd from the devices directory my CD bur

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Rate limiting TCP connections...

2008-08-18 Thread Holger Hoffstaette
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:23:27 +0100, gentoo_stev wrote: > Thanks... I was pretty sure that reserving a proportion of my LAN > bandwidth wouldn't help - though I didn't have that reference to hand. I'd > have been happy to rate-limit to 80mbps if that would have helped - though > I saw no reason tha

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Home Network Printing

2005-11-26 Thread Kevin Hanson
Mick wrote: Hlp! Michael Kintzios wrote: From:: Oliver Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Home Network Printing Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:58:27 +0100 Michael Kintzios wrote: I created a new printer on hostname1 and

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Home Network Printing

2005-11-30 Thread brettholcomb
Are you running cups? > > From: Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2005/11/30 Wed PM 02:31:16 EST > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Home Network Printing > > Guys, this is ridiculous! Every time I want to print something from my mai

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >