Hi
I am a newbie, i wish to configure JBOSS on my
machine i downloaded jboss-3.0.4_tomcat-4.1.12.zip file but after extracting it
and on running the run.bat file ho do i know that the server has actually
started. i need to check for the JMS support in JBOSS. I would be grateful if
any one c
Hm...any ideas on how we might handle things like the -Xhprof argument, which has to
be specified on JVM initalization? I've been holding off on a JVM Profiler MBean
because the whole load-time issue defeats the point of even having the profiler
interfaced as an MBean.
-Original
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, marc fleury wrote:
> I was not aware of this.
>
> marcf
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> > Behalf Of Scott M Stark
> > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:00 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev]
Bugs item #665394, was opened at 2003-01-09 15:46
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=665394&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Elias Ross (genman)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
Just thought it would be easier if you could run php->java->php then you
could have a total working system that you port incrementally.
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> julien viet
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 8:34 PM
> T
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, marc fleury wrote:
> Nukes on JBoss is going to be SUCH A GREAT PROJECT. Finally ENTERPRISE
> CMS for the MASSES.
Well, we have been playing with OFBiz(www.ofbiz.org) lately. It uses it's own
entity engine(which I know you guys don't like), but their GenericValue
objects are
What about just writing a shell script to walk the tree of jboss.org via
the PHP every x min or hours, spit out static HTML, and only offer paths
to the PHP-based pages for POSTing of new forum stuff? Would that be a
bit faster and reduce your server load at the PHP end for read-only
stuff, before
To my mind creating an PHP compiler/interpreter/whatever on a java VM
is feasible but would require lot of resources.
I did a pascal compiler in my early courses, but the context was
very different. With pascal you have things that are well defined.
PHP is another case :
1.there are no specifica
Damn PHP install doesn't even work for the java stuff. Followed directions
and can't get it to build. Now I'm hacking Makefiles :(
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Holger Baxmann
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 8:03 PM
> To: [EM
Hi,
I am working on a new invocation layer (IL) for JbossMQ that encodes all
communication in Xml (XIL). I've got the IL pretty near completion, and
I am working on a C# jbossmq client. I am trying to develop the
TopicSubsciber, which is an extension of MessageConsumer. In reviewing
the code in t
Its the same as any other JNI code. The only issue is that the jar that loads
the shared library for the native code cannot be redeployed. I have not
really looked into if this is a limitation of the JNI layer, or a JBoss class loading
issue.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology O
> I've been looking into this as you speak. Seems from reading doco that you
> can't go Java->PHP->Java which is what we need. Not sure what would happen
> if PHP called from Java created a JVM. Too bad there isn't a PHP Jython
> like thing
>
have a look at the java sapi (server [sic!] app
I've been looking into this as you speak. Seems from reading doco that you
can't go Java->PHP->Java which is what we need. Not sure what would happen
if PHP called from Java created a JVM. Too bad there isn't a PHP Jython
like thing
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTE
> finally they'll have a true OOP language
>
OOP in this case: Other Orphaned Preprocessor ;-)
bax
> julien
>
> mf> what is the zend engine?
>
> mf> marcf
>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
>>> Behalf Of julien viet
>>> Sent: Thurs
the php 'vm'
bax
> Von: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Datum: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 19:31:26 -0500
> An: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Betreff: RE: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
>
> what is the zend engine?
>
> marcf
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
zend engine is PHP parser-compiler from zend company : www.zend.com
now they are working on a version 2 with more robust object as said
on their website.
finally they'll have a true OOP language
julien
mf> what is the zend engine?
mf> marcf
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTEC
Bugs item #665183, was opened at 2003-01-09 10:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=665183&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Matt Cleveland (groovesoftware)
Assigned to: Nobody/
holger,
we totally agree and we are talking about the same thing. I already
proposed it to Julien back when we wanted to go PN. The idea is indeed
to RUN PHP APPS AS IS in JBoss but with the merit of same VM cache
access. That is what it is all about and what is killing the current
www.jboss.or
what is the zend engine?
marcf
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> Behalf Of julien viet
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:27 PM
> To: Holger Baxmann
> Subject: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
>
>
> I thought about it, but that wouldn't solve the
hi all,
with the php thing we are back to my favoured item:
how do i describe and call a native method in the jboss semantic. same
procedure as in the embedded world.
any suggs?
bax
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterpr
mmmmmm, i am not talking about porting xor integration. i am talking
about php beeing a _frontend_ in the depest meaning. unfortunately was
this not sufficient for the php people to fullfill the the marketing flyers
of their products. so they called the backend, and there is definitely only
> zip) -> done (redeployed) ... now if only some Atlanta company would
> show the money - hehe
Dude,
code like julien did and I will pay for your next development like I did
with julien on the "nukes on jboss thing"
peace,
marcf
> /me
>
>
> --
Bugs item #665183, was opened at 2003-01-09 10:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=665183&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Matt Cleveland (groovesoftware)
Assigned to: Nobody/
we already tried to investigate that way a couple of month ago.
but servlet and PHP are not in the same space. Therefore no
tight interraction is possible with jboss, serialization issues
are a consequence.
julien
HB> just found it:
HB> XLVIII. Java
HB> There are two possible ways to bridge PHP
Yeah that was my first impulse, to have a PHP interpreter in JBoss so
that we could leverage all the PHP thingies out there.
clearly the problem with PHP is that the guys who do the front end
modules and app DON"T KNOW THE FIRST THING ABOUT COMPONENTS and the
benefits it brings in caching (see wh
I was not aware of this.
marcf
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> Behalf Of Scott M Stark
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:00 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] One thing I like about the Apache thing
>
>
> It is al
just found it:
XLVIII. Java
There are two possible ways to bridge PHP and Java: you can either integrate
PHP into a Java Servlet environment, which is the more stable and efficient
solution, or integrate Java support into PHP. The former is provided by a
SAPI module that interfaces with the Servl
the php community has a servlet that is able to execute in a container php.
at least when i was involved in php - one and a half year ago...
will investigate ...
bax
> Von: julien viet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Datum: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 00:51:52 +0100
> An: Bill Burk
> I thought about it, but that wouldn't solve the case. Direct DB
> would still be used and slowness would still be there, PHP db
> functions would be mapped to JDBC.
>
> The problem is not PHP, it's the way PHP guys code.
>
i know, deeply: i know.
my last paid job was for a company with around 8
Problem Bill, such a thing does not exists yet and that would be
time consuming to start that from scratch.
julien
BB> Actually your idea does have merit. Julien. Maybe run PHP as a servlet and
BB> slowly replace PostNuke functionality with JSP/Java/EJB.
BB> Bill
>> -Original Message---
Bugs item #665394, was opened at 2003-01-09 15:46
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=665394&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Elias Ross (genman)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
Bugs item #665183, was opened at 2003-01-09 10:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=665183&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Matt Cleveland (groovesoftware)
Assigned to: Nobody/
Actually your idea does have merit. Julien. Maybe run PHP as a servlet and
slowly replace PostNuke functionality with JSP/Java/EJB.
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Holger Baxmann
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:20 PM
>
anybody thought about integrating php (and this way the cms-whatever-this-is
thingy) into the the containers? maybe by calling the zend engine natively?
layer rules ...
just an idea ..
bax
> Von: "Bill Burke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Datum: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 15:34:1
Bugs item #665183, was opened at 2003-01-09 10:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=665183&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Matt Cleveland (groovesoftware)
Assigned to: Nobody/
Bugs item #665183, was opened at 2003-01-09 11:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=665183&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Matt Cleveland (groovesoftware)
Assigned to: Nobody/
After upgrading from 3.0.2 to 3.0.4 it seems JBoss handles EJB
properties of type Serializable in a different way.
My whole solution is running the way it used to except for one
thing: Those of my EJB’s which have CMP fields which are of type serializable
object fail. For instance, one
I thought about it, but that wouldn't solve the case. Direct DB
would still be used and slowness would still be there, PHP db
functions would be mapped to JDBC.
The problem is not PHP, it's the way PHP guys code.
Anyway that would be a great project and could attract many
developpers onto J2EE pl
Bugs item #665183, was opened at 2003-01-09 10:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=665183&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Matt Cleveland (groovesoftware)
Assigned to: Nobody/
Bugs item #665183, was opened at 2003-01-09 11:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=665183&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Matt Cleveland (groovesoftware)
Assigned to: Nobody/
Yes - well as alwyas it is easy ... We need a
xmleditor(ChooseYourOSSFav) and have it open -> edit -> write(repackage
zip) -> done (redeployed) ... now if only some Atlanta company would
show the money - hehe
/me
---
This SF.NET email is sp
It is already there. Many times I have gone in and edited the jboss.org site
content in the unpacked war to pick it changes. Its not even a redeployment.
The web container watches the timestamps on the web content.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
Bugs item #665360, was opened at 2003-01-09 14:37
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=665360&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Elias Ross (genman)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
Bugs item #665183, was opened at 2003-01-09 10:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=665183&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Matt Cleveland (groovesoftware)
Assigned to: Nobody/
Amen. Having jsp pages just recompile with a browser
reload would save an huge amount of development time...
> admit the nightmare of scalability with PN there is one thing that
> caught my eye.
>
> I really had forgotten how nice it is to edit a webpage and see it
> picked up live by the webser
Bugs item #665183, was opened at 2003-01-09 11:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=665183&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Matt Cleveland (groovesoftware)
Assigned to: Nobody/
Bugs item #665183, was opened at 2003-01-09 10:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=665183&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Matt Cleveland (groovesoftware)
Assigned to: Nobody/
> Matt Munz wrote:
> > Marc,
> >
> > If you're writing tissue-paper code (write once, never
> modify, throw
> > away when broken), "script kiddie" languages are great.
> > If not, be prepared to eat it in the long run on man
> > hours / maintennance.
>
> And remember that eating used tissue
admit the nightmare of scalability with PN there is one thing that
caught my eye.
I really had forgotten how nice it is to edit a webpage and see it
picked up live by the webserver. It sounds like nothing but we really
lost something with this stupid EAR/WAR packaging nightmare. We already
suppor
what's a pronoun? :)
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: danch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] PHP problems
Matt Munz wrote:
> Marc,
>
> If you're writing tissue-paper code (write once, never modify, thr
it is not a separate project on sourceforge anyway this is fully a JBoss
project
nukes on JBoss aka JNUKE (the one and only :)
marcf
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> Behalf Of Bill Burke
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:50 PM
> To: Jb
> What's good in PN is that the underlying model is proven to
> work. Also reusing all HTML, CSS and icons is very good.
yes all the functionality is KICK ASS. Just take it and solidify it
with a refactor port to JBoss as you are moving forward with it.
> I am a java coder not a web designer. W
Screw em. We have the development community and development process. They
don't.
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Kuckartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:54 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: PostNuke / JNuke (Fw: [JBoss-de
Matt Munz wrote:
Marc,
If you're writing tissue-paper code (write once, never modify, throw
> away when broken), "script kiddie" languages are great.
> If not, be prepared to eat it in the long run on man
> hours / maintennance.
And remember that eating used tissue-paper is never a good thing
> My good friend Google just explained "CMS publishing" to
> me, and I think I understand the issue. It is not PHP vs.
> J2EE, but Post-Nuke vs. a J2EE-based CMS that apparently DNE.
DNE == Does not exist
DNYE == Does NOT YET exist
JNUKE JNUKE JNUKE
(Nukes on JBoss/ JNUKE is the officia
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 1010
Successful tests: 1004
Errors:5
Failures: 1
[time of test: 2003-01-09.12-02 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
> Don't forget that hardware is cheap compared to man-hours.
> If you're writing tissue-paper code (write once, never
> modify, throw away when broken), "script kiddie" languages
> are great.
right interestingly enough we might have to upgrade the machine just to
get decent response times o
> I agree Julien. HTML/CSS sucks. Takes about 80% of my time
> when I do it. In fact, the port to PostNuke would have taken
> me 1 or 2 days less.
given that it took you 4 days that would be a feat indeed :)
marcf
---
This SF.NET email
I agree Julien. HTML/CSS sucks. Takes about 80% of my time when I do it.
In fact, the port to PostNuke would have taken me 1 or 2 days less.
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> julien viet
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:31
IWE. Go Go Julien Viet!
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matt
> Munz
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] PHP
>
>
> Marc & group,
>
> Thanks for the details.
>
> > We tr
Marc,
Don't forget that hardware is cheap compared to man-hours. If you're writing
tissue-paper code (write once, never modify, throw away when broken), "script kiddie"
languages are great. If not, be prepared to eat it in the long run on man hours /
maintennance. I think that the use of th
What's good in PN is that the underlying model is proven to work.
Also reusing all HTML, CSS and icons is very good.
I am a java coder not a web designer. While developping forums app,
the lack of HTML development slowed me a lot. In the port reusing
their will help a lot : HTML and all that stuff
Marc & group,
Thanks for the details.
> We tried to rewrite
> the forums (which we did) and it took us for ever due to the publishing
> framework getting in the way.
My good friend Google just explained "CMS publishing" to me, and I think I
understand the issue. It is not PHP vs. J2EE
interesting.
We went with PN for the functionality. It was there for the taking, it
worked.
but man does it NOT scale. I mean we have about 100 people on the site
(I love that counter thingy).
JNUKE is needed badly. As I said I just hired julien to do it with
JBoss it is a perfect time
>
OK so we are really in a bind here. The script kiddy code may be
functional, this lack of caching is really killing us. The site is
pegged at 100 with dips at 50% on occasion but all in all the profile
looks pretty bad. The Java code was 3 times faster. I feel good on one
hand because this is y
Funny, I was just doing research for a CMS that offers webdav access,
versioning, workflow, etc. as you find in most real CMSs (not those
incessent fake ones)..
I was about this close {index fingers almost touching} to going with
Post-Nuke.. My reasons not to? Well, most of the people that would
> Bill,
>
> Don't worry, I'm not going to blast you for not "eating your
> own dog food".
you should.
> > JSP/Servlets/J2EE is better, but PostNuke is a good Content
> Management
> > System.
>
> This statement, in and of itself, is a rationale for using
> J2EE instead of PHP ;) Could y
Bill,
Don't worry, I'm not going to blast you for not "eating your own dog food".
> JSP/Servlets/J2EE is better, but PostNuke is a good Content Management System.
This statement, in and of itself, is a rationale for using J2EE instead of PHP ;)
Could you divulge the precise reason(s) for choosi
new website. Its PHP and PostNuke. Its OK. JSP/Servlets/J2EE is better,
but PostNuke is a good Content Management System. Julien Viet is looking
into porting it to the Java world. We're gonna call it JNuke.
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group, LLC
>
Hi all,
I just noticed that many of the pages on the website end in ".php". Has it always
been this way, or is it new? I'd be very interested in hearing the rationale for
using PHP over a servlet-based or other solution. I'm not all-to familiar with PHP,
but I'm seeing it a lot lately...
Bugs item #665192, was opened at 2003-01-09 13:22
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=665192&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Matthew Munz (mattmunz)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymou
Bugs item #665183, was opened at 2003-01-09 11:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=665183&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Matt Cleveland (groovesoftware)
Assigned to: Nobody/
Or it may contain something else. For HA-RMI/HTTP the targets are the URLs of
the invoker servlets in the clusters.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "Sacha Labourey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Well, for this we would need to wrap the proxy inside another object, which
was already on the todo list. Then, you can attach whatever you want to this
proxy. Nevertheless, the list of proxies (and thus the data attached to
them) is only updated if the network topology changes. Consequently, if yo
thanx Sacha
I asked that because I have an idea to improve load balancing of JBoss, maybe even to
use some kind of neural network.
( http://www.jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=155&thread=26907 )
Do you think it's possible using your existing codebase ?
Neural network (or any advanced LB algo
Bugs item #665067, was opened at 2003-01-09 16:12
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=665067&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michael Ukpong (michaelukpong)
Assign
Bugs item #665037, was opened at 2003-01-09 14:32
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=665037&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
>Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Shone Sadler (ssadler)
Assigned
Bugs item #665037, was opened at 2003-01-09 14:32
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=665037&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Shone Sadler (ssadler)
Assigned to: Nobody/An
>From the point of view of the LBP, it is not important to know what's in it:
you have to elect one object, that's all.
(the list contains RMI proxies for the HA-JRMP RMI Server)
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de
> Maris Orbidans
> En
hello
I would like to ask: What targets list contains ? Which class objects ?
public class RoundRobin implements LoadBalancePolicy
{
...
public Object chooseTarget(java.util.List targets)
{
cursorRemote = ( (cursorRemote + 1) % targets.size() );
r
Bugs item #665013, was opened at 2003-01-09 13:24
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=665013&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
>Priority: 8
Submitted By: Markus Menner (morphace)
Assigned to: Nobody/An
Bugs item #665013, was opened at 2003-01-09 13:24
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=665013&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Markus Menner (morphace)
Assigned to: Nobody/Ano
Bugs item #665008, was opened at 2003-01-09 13:16
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=665008&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Markus Menner (morphace)
Assigned to: Nobody/Ano
After upgrading from 3.0.2 to 3.0.4 it seems JBoss handles EJB
properties of type Serializable in a different way.
My whole solution is running the way it used to except for one
thing: Those of my EJB’s which have CMP fields which are of type serializable
object fail. For instance, one
Hi all:
I have a problem with my servlet. The entire application ( e-commerce
web page) is packed in myservlet.war.
The servlet needs to know the session of the user in the web to handle
security.
When I build a new myservlet.war and JBoss make a new redeploy of the
web, the old java objects are d
Just get it into the 3.0 build and provide a commented out setup of the deployer.
That way people can use if they want, but its not enabled by default until it sees
some action.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original
OK, I will backport it to 3.2 (not sure about doing it for 3.0)
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de
> Scott M Stark
> Envoyé : jeudi, 9 janvier 2003 09:23
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : Re: Scott? RE: [JBoss-user] RE: [Beanshell-users
Bugs item #664453, was opened at 2003-01-08 17:14
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=664453&group_id=22866
Category: Clustering
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Matt Cleveland (groovesoftware)
>Assigned
ÔÚеÄÒ»ÄêÀףÄúÉíÌ彡¿µ£¬ÍòÊÂÈçÒ⣬²ÆÔ´¹ã½ø£¡£¡£¡
Seems like a rather independent feature that can't cause any harm. 3.2 is fine as
is 3.0 as long as there truly are no backward compatibility issues with existing
services.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Messa
90 matches
Mail list logo
