On 10/31/06, Burkhard Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I allredy regret my mail. While I am really interested in seeing proper
GTK2 support + I am really willing to pay for that, I admit that there
are some problems with this bounty offer:
* who decides, if the goal is reached
That's why it
Guys, just reminding that it would be good if everyone posts here
about this bounty:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Bounties
I also put there a small list of indispensable bug fixes. Others can add more.
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
___
On 01/11/06, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oh really ? well, what are you waiting for then ?
Get to work and grab that bounty... ;-)
Talking bounties:
Did you already get the last bounty ? Form Inheritance ?
Cause I'm really waiting for that one...
(one of these things which I f
On Wednesday 01 November 2006 10:42, Vincent Snijders wrote:
> johnf schreef:
> > On Wednesday 01 November 2006 04:57, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> >> On 11/1/06, zeljko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday 31 October 2006 18:19, johnf wrote:
> I will offer $200.00 US to anyone
johnf schreef:
On Wednesday 01 November 2006 04:57, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On 11/1/06, zeljko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 18:19, johnf wrote:
I will offer $200.00 US to anyone that delivers Lazarus running either
QT
or GTK2 at the current level Lazarus
On Wednesday 01 November 2006 04:57, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> On 11/1/06, zeljko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 31 October 2006 18:19, johnf wrote:
> > > I will offer $200.00 US to anyone that delivers Lazarus running either
> >
> > QT
> >
> > > or GTK2 at the current level L
On 11/1/06, zeljko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 18:19, johnf wrote:> I will offer $200.00 US to anyone that delivers Lazarus running either QT> or GTK2 at the current level Lazarus runs today with GTK1.more $500 for Qt from me
Please guys, organize this in this page:http:/
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 00:10:14 +0100 (CET)
> Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:37:13 +0100 (CET)
> > > Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 10:32:44 +0200
"George Birbilis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> gtk2 uses pango which is a rather high level font rendering lib.
> >> gtk1 was almost X level and therefore fast but lacks a lot of
> >> unicode specials. OTOH SynEdit needs some fast and simple text
> >> functions
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 00:10:14 +0100 (CET)
Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:37:13 +0100 (CET)
> > Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Mattias Gaert
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:33:29 -0300
Cesar Romero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > gtk2 uses pango which is a rather high level font rendering lib.
> > gtk1 was almost X level and therefore fast but lacks a lot of
> > unicode specials. OTOH SynEdit needs some fast and simple text
> > functions. May
gtk2 uses pango which is a rather high level font rendering lib. gtk1
was almost X level and therefore fast but lacks a lot of unicode
specials. OTOH SynEdit needs some fast and simple text functions. Maybe
cairo is the solution. Sebastian is already working on this.
When you say "simple text fu
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 18:19, johnf wrote:
> I will offer $200.00 US to anyone that delivers Lazarus running either QT
> or GTK2 at the current level Lazarus runs today with GTK1.
more $500 for Qt from me
_
To unsubscribe: m
gtk2 uses pango which is a rather high level font rendering lib. gtk1
was almost X level and therefore fast but lacks a lot of unicode
specials. OTOH SynEdit needs some fast and simple text functions. Maybe
cairo is the solution. Sebastian is already working on this.
Just wondering, how is G
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:37:13 +0100 (CET)
> Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> >
> > > That's very noble of you. But also very vague.
> > >
> > > The gtk2 will never run on
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:37:13 +0100 (CET)
Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
>
> > That's very noble of you. But also very vague.
> >
> > The gtk2 will never run on the level of gtk1. Most things can and
> > will be done better, som
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:10:17 +0100
Ales Katona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I stand corrected, gtk2 fixes in latest revisions are pretty good.
>
> I still find it rather slow compared to gtk1 tho, probably a gtk2
> issue.
Yes and No.
gtk2 uses pango which is a rather high level font rendering li
Probably it would be fair to split the money.
2006/10/31, johnf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 11:28, Matt Henley wrote:
> The best metric for me would be the developers feeling confident
> enough to setting gtk2 as the default toolkit for building the IDE for
> Linux in a relea
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 11:28, Matt Henley wrote:
> The best metric for me would be the developers feeling confident
> enough to setting gtk2 as the default toolkit for building the IDE for
> Linux in a released version. However, I would be happy to send money
> based on some reasonable milesto
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> On 10/31/06, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Now Lazarus freezes and I need to use the command line to kill it.
>> >
>> > This is Mantis bug 7619
>>
>> Works here?
>
> Umm, it´s possible that I was wrong, and this was recently fixed by
> Andrew
On 10/31/06, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now Lazarus freezes and I need to use the command line to kill it.
>
> This is Mantis bug 7619
Works here?
Umm, it´s possible that I was wrong, and this was recently fixed by
Andrew Haines. I´m no longer on linux so cannot test.
--
Fe
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho schrieb:
I just did svn update, and then
make clean all LCL_PLATFORM=gtk2
Opened lazarus. Menu Environment -> Environment Options
Now Lazarus freezes and I need to use the command line to kill it.
This is Mantis bug 7619
Works here?
___
The best metric for me would be the developers feeling confident
enough to setting gtk2 as the default toolkit for building the IDE for
Linux in a released version. However, I would be happy to send money
based on some reasonable milestone (works well enough for general use
as a beta version). I
>
> I will also add another 100,- Euro but for me, it must be GTK2
> because I need the freedom to write Close Source Apps ..
>
I allredy regret my mail. While I am really interested in seeing proper
GTK2 support + I am really willing to pay for that, I admit that there
are some problems with th
I do not represent the people paying for the bounty, but I would like
to suggest some things to be on the list, such as these mantis items:
http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=7619
http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=964
http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=7385
http:
I stand corrected, gtk2 fixes in latest revisions are pretty good.
I still find it rather slow compared to gtk1 tho, probably a gtk2 issue.
Ales
signature.asc
Description: Toto je digitálne podpísaná časť správy
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 20:39, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> On 10/31/06, A.J. Venter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Actually though -for me personally, QT would be a more important - once
> > KDE4 is out, openlab WILL switch, and nothing would make me happier than
> > to migrate wole, ol
On 10/31/06, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would say that it was quite clear in the initial announcement:
The IDE should run and all IDE functionality should work.
I disagree. If you say a vague statement such as "IDE should work",
there can be misinterpretation about what is
Ales Katona schrieb:
IOW, what is still missing in the gtk2 support?
It's not about "what is missing" more like "what is working properly and
what not".
Ever ran environment options in gtk2 lazarus? It's slow, blinks and
takes ages to show up.
Ever tried working in gtk2 synedit? Same story.
On 10/31/06, A.J. Venter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually though -for me personally, QT would be a more important - once KDE4
is out, openlab WILL switch, and nothing would make me happier than to
migrate wole, olad and the installer to QT instead - maximum integration.
I don´t want to rain
> IOW, what is still missing in the gtk2 support?
It's not about "what is missing" more like "what is working properly and
what not".
Ever ran environment options in gtk2 lazarus? It's slow, blinks and
takes ages to show up.
Ever tried working in gtk2 synedit? Same story.
Fix this and you'll d
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> That's very noble of you. But also very vague.
>
> The gtk2 will never run on the level of gtk1. Most things can and
> will be done better, some things like speed and library stability can
> not be reached.
Can you elaborate on this ?
What is wro
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:58:09 +0200
> "A.J. Venter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > If I were to claim the bounty with the svn version of today, saying
> > > that gtk2 is as good as gtk1, why would you deny it?
> > >
> > > IOW, what is still miss
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 20:16, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:58:09 +0200
>
> "A.J. Venter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If I were to claim the bounty with the svn version of today, saying
> > > that gtk2 is as good as gtk1, why would you deny it?
> > >
> > > IOW, what is s
Mattias Gaertner schreef:
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:58:09 +0200
"A.J. Venter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If I were to claim the bounty with the svn version of today, saying
that gtk2 is as good as gtk1, why would you deny it?
IOW, what is still missing in the gtk2 support?
For starters: menu ima
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:58:09 +0200
"A.J. Venter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If I were to claim the bounty with the svn version of today, saying
> > that gtk2 is as good as gtk1, why would you deny it?
> >
> > IOW, what is still missing in the gtk2 support?
> For starters: menu images and listv
Am Dienstag, 31. Oktober 2006 18:23 schrieb A.J. Venter:
> I will add another 100USD to the bounty.
>
> That's 300USD so far in other words :)
> A.J.
>
> On Tuesday 31 October 2006 19:19, johnf wrote:
> > I will offer $200.00 US to anyone that delivers Lazarus running
> > either QT or GTK2 at the c
> If I were to claim the bounty with the svn version of today, saying that
> gtk2 is as good as gtk1, why would you deny it?
>
> IOW, what is still missing in the gtk2 support?
For starters: menu images and listview images.
A.J.
--
"80% Of a hardware engineer's job is application of the uncertain
johnf schreef:
I will offer $200.00 US to anyone that delivers Lazarus running either QT or
GTK2 at the current level Lazarus runs today with GTK1.
So what I'm saying is the IDE should be able to run using either QT or GTK2
and programs compiled as either QT or GTK2 must run.
It does not ha
It's over US$ 500 now.
2006/10/31, Burkhard Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Am Dienstag, 31. Oktober 2006 18:23 schrieb A.J. Venter:
> I will add another 100USD to the bounty.
>
> That's 300USD so far in other words :)
> A.J.
>
> On Tuesday 31 October 2006 19:19, johnf wrote:
> > I will offer $200
I'm not trying to be vague. I just want either GTK2 or QT to work. If there
are required difference - so be it. If a combobox requires different
parameters OK.
John
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 09:46, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> That's very noble of you. But also very vague.
>
> The gtk2 will n
Alexsander Rosa wrote:
It's over US$ 500 now.
A Lazarus Foundation is now required and 50% (minimum) sent back to FPC
Foundation :-)
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
That's very noble of you. But also very vague.
The gtk2 will never run on the level of gtk1. Most things can and
will be done better, some things like speed and library stability can
not be reached. The gtk1 lacks some features and has some bugs. The
gtk2 has other bugs.
IMHO the gtk1 lacks too m
I would add another US$100, tired of GTK1
Matt Henley
On 10/31/06, A.J. Venter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I will add another 100USD to the bounty.
That's 300USD so far in other words :)
A.J.
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 19:19, johnf wrote:
> I will offer $200.00 US to anyone that delivers Lazar
I will add another 100USD to the bounty.
That's 300USD so far in other words :)
A.J.
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 19:19, johnf wrote:
> I will offer $200.00 US to anyone that delivers Lazarus running either QT
> or GTK2 at the current level Lazarus runs today with GTK1.
>
> So what I'm saying is th
I will offer $200.00 US to anyone that delivers Lazarus running either QT or
GTK2 at the current level Lazarus runs today with GTK1.
So what I'm saying is the IDE should be able to run using either QT or GTK2
and programs compiled as either QT or GTK2 must run.
It does not have to be both -
46 matches
Mail list logo
