On Nov 17, 2013, at 5:46 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> I remember reading something that said fedora's grub is very
> different from upstream. Try using cgit to see what fedora are
> doing [ use a graphical browser ].
>
> ĸen
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/grub2.git/plain/
I found this a while b
On 11/17/2013 06:03 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 05:10:57PM -0500, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
>> On 11/16/2013 6:10 PM, Dan McGhee wrote:
>>
>> The kernel. It dies with a message like "... kernel panic ..."
>>
>>> Must you do a "hard" reset to start over or can you use
>>> ALT-CTRL-
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 05:10:57PM -0500, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
> On 11/16/2013 6:10 PM, Dan McGhee wrote:
>
> The kernel. It dies with a message like "... kernel panic ..."
>
> > Must you do a "hard" reset to start over or can you use
> > ALT-CTRL-DEL?
>
> I have to recycle the power.
>
W
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 05:02:09PM -0600, Dan McGhee wrote:
>
> I don't know how, or even
> if, the distros have modified GRUB in their packages.
>
I remember reading something that said fedora's grub is very
different from upstream. Try using cgit to see what fedora are
doing [ use a graphica
On 11/17/2013 04:10 PM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
> On 11/16/2013 6:10 PM, Dan McGhee wrote:
>
>
> For background on my comments below:
> Motherboard: ASUS P8Z77-V LK with latest BIOS update #1104
> Intel i7-3770K
> 16G Corsair DDR3
> 2 Western Digital 2TB hard drives
> One drive has Fedora 19 insta
On 18/11/2013 1:28 AM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
> On 11/16/2013 8:56 PM, Geoff Swan wrote:
>> On 17/11/2013 11:26 AM, Dan McGhee wrote:
>>> Just so I understand. You got your kernel--3.10.10 (?)--to boot from
>>> the EFI partition? And without initrd or initramfs? The answer to
>>> this question
On 11/16/2013 6:10 PM, Dan McGhee wrote:
> If I can't make any head-way in the next few days, I'm going to install
> a minimal ArchLinux system and try the various GRUB options. I don't
> think they sign their kernels--see last paragraph--and that will test
> the GRUB stuff.
About 3 weeks ago, a
On 11/16/2013 8:56 PM, Geoff Swan wrote:
> On 17/11/2013 11:26 AM, Dan McGhee wrote:
>> Just so I understand. You got your kernel--3.10.10 (?)--to boot from
>> the EFI partition? And without initrd or initramfs? The answer to
>> this question is important to me.
>
> Yes. 3.10.10. Selectable in t
On 11/16/2013 07:56 PM, Geoff Swan wrote:
Just so I understand. You got your kernel--3.10.10 (?)--to boot from
the EFI partition? And without initrd or initramfs? The answer to
this question is important to me.
Yes. 3.10.10. Selectable in the BIOS efi boot manager and boots
directly, fas
On 17/11/2013 11:26 AM, Dan McGhee wrote:
> On 11/16/2013 05:44 PM, Geoff Swan wrote:
>>
>> On 17/11/2013 10:10 AM, Dan McGhee wrote:
>>> On 11/16/2013 03:40 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 02:04:31PM -0500, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After getting the stock L
On 11/16/2013 07:26 PM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
> On 11/16/2013 8:17 PM, Dan McGhee wrote:
>
>> Alan, thank you for validating my research. Let me validate yours. Those
>> recommendations work.
> Good!
>
>> Did you see the questions I asked you earlier? I hope you will answer
>> them. They are impo
On 11/16/2013 8:17 PM, Dan McGhee wrote:
> Alan, thank you for validating my research. Let me validate yours. Those
> recommendations work.
Good!
> Did you see the questions I asked you earlier? I hope you will answer
> them. They are important to my research.
Yeah, I saw them. I'm in the proce
On 11/16/2013 06:51 PM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
> On 11/16/2013 7:36 PM, Dan McGhee wrote:
>
>> I think efivarfs is new in 3.10.10 "CONFIG_EFIVAR_FS=(y or m)" is what
>> I recommend if you're using 3.10.10
> The information I've gotten so far about setting these CONFIG variables,
> from Arch Linux
On 11/16/2013 7:36 PM, Dan McGhee wrote:
> I think efivarfs is new in 3.10.10 "CONFIG_EFIVAR_FS=(y or m)" is what
> I recommend if you're using 3.10.10
The information I've gotten so far about setting these CONFIG variables,
from Arch Linux, rodsbooks.com and other places, is summarized here,
On 11/16/2013 05:44 PM, Geoff Swan wrote:
On 17/11/2013 10:10 AM, Dan McGhee wrote:
On 11/16/2013 03:40 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 02:04:31PM -0500, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
Hi,
After getting the stock LFS system installed, with an MBR type boot
installation, I'm experiment
On 11/16/2013 05:44 PM, Geoff Swan wrote:
On 17/11/2013 10:10 AM, Dan McGhee wrote:
On 11/16/2013 03:40 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 02:04:31PM -0500, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
Hi,
After getting the stock LFS system installed, with an MBR type boot
installation, I'm experiment
On 17/11/2013 10:10 AM, Dan McGhee wrote:
> On 11/16/2013 03:40 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 02:04:31PM -0500, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> After getting the stock LFS system installed, with an MBR type boot
>>> installation, I'm experimenting with installing to a UE
On 11/16/2013 03:40 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 02:04:31PM -0500, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> After getting the stock LFS system installed, with an MBR type boot
>> installation, I'm experimenting with installing to a UEFI type boot
>> location on a brand new hard drive
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 02:04:31PM -0500, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After getting the stock LFS system installed, with an MBR type boot
> installation, I'm experimenting with installing to a UEFI type boot
> location on a brand new hard drive. I've been reading a lot of online
> documen
Hi,
After getting the stock LFS system installed, with an MBR type boot
installation, I'm experimenting with installing to a UEFI type boot
location on a brand new hard drive. I've been reading a lot of online
documentation, and have tried a first-cut installation, but am not
having success in
I tryed now: delete all from /tools, all unpacked sources, begin at first
with compile of binutils. That suceeded. Then, I continued the process with
compile of gcc. Sorry, nothing change, it give me the error message written
above.
Today afternoon I should install the unlike ubuntu (exact/distinc
Le 23/10/2013 23:49, Viola Zoltán a écrit :
> @akhiezer:
>
> I tryed:
>
> CFLAGS="-O2 -g" make
>
> but no changed:
Hi Viola,
What I told about the LFS_TGT variable is important. I've seen that you
have changed it in your 'printenv' output, but have you recompiled
binutils with this new setting?
Okay, thanks.
2013/10/23 Ken Moffat
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 09:00:36PM -0400, Viola Zoltán wrote:
> > Dear Ken, I need the new distro from you suggestion ONLY, JUST for the
> > building of LFS, no for other works/jobs! No problem, if it not have
> > wifi-possibility or others. I saved the ful
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 09:00:36PM -0400, Viola Zoltán wrote:
> Dear Ken, I need the new distro from you suggestion ONLY, JUST for the
> building of LFS, no for other works/jobs! No problem, if it not have
> wifi-possibility or others. I saved the full LFS and BLFS books to my
> new-used partition,
Dear Ken, I need the new distro from you suggestion ONLY, JUST for the
building of LFS, no for other works/jobs! No problem, if it not have
wifi-possibility or others. I saved the full LFS and BLFS books to my
new-used partition, I will work from its. And I was downloaded all needed
packages, of co
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 07:14:15PM -0400, Viola Zoltán wrote:
> Dear Ken, I am sure that this is no memory problem. I have absolutely full
> totally new memory chipset in my laptop, and all programs work very good,
> both in my Sabayon (because I use not Gentoo, but Sabayon) and my old
> Ubuntu 11.
Dear Ken, I am sure that this is no memory problem. I have absolutely full
totally new memory chipset in my laptop, and all programs work very good,
both in my Sabayon (because I use not Gentoo, but Sabayon) and my old
Ubuntu 11.10 distro in an other partition.
Okay, I try the LFS with any other h
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 05:49:27PM -0400, Viola Zoltán wrote:
> @akhiezer:
>
> I tryed:
>
> CFLAGS="-O2 -g" make
>
> but no changed:
>
My final suggestion is : try a different host distro. The recent
google matches for this were almost all for people updating packages
on gentoo, which is why
w \$\[\033[00m\]
> SHLVL=1
> HOME=/home/lfs
> _=/usr/bin/printenv
>
>
>
> 2013/10/23 akhiezer
>
>> > From lfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org Wed Oct 23 21:34:56 2013
>> > Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:16:23 -0400
>> > From: Viola Zoltán
>> &
t-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org Wed Oct 23 21:34:56 2013
> > Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:16:23 -0400
> > From: Viola Zoltán
> > To: akhiezer ,
> > LFS Support List
> > Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Newbie need help - bus error in 5.5.
> GCC-4.8.1 -
> > Pass 1
> From lfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org Wed Oct 23 21:34:56 2013
> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:16:23 -0400
> From: Viola Zoltán
> To: akhiezer ,
> LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Newbie need help - bus error in 5.5. GCC-4.8.1 -
> Pass 1
>
>
akhiezer
> > Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 10:01:40 +0100
> > From: (akhiezer)
> > To: LFS Support List
> > Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Newbie need help - bus error in 5.5.
> GCC-4.8.1 -
> > Pass 1
> >
> > > Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 19:41:24 -0400
> >
> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 10:01:40 +0100
> From: (akhiezer)
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Newbie need help - bus error in 5.5. GCC-4.8.1 -
> Pass 1
>
> > Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 19:41:24 -0400
> > From: Viola Zoltán
> > To: LFS Support
> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 19:41:24 -0400
> From: Viola Zoltán
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Newbie need help - bus error in 5.5. GCC-4.8.1 -
> Pass 1
>
>
>
> Excuse me, I am very newbie and very idiotic... I tryed it:
>
> CFLAGS="-fno-
Le 22/10/2013 23:31, Viola Zoltán a écrit :
>
> lfs@Csiszilla ~ $ cat .bashrc
> set +h
> umask 022
> LFS=/Mount/Simplicity
> LC_ALL=POSIX
> LFS_TGT=$(uname -m)-pc-linux-gnu
Should be :
|LFS_TGT=$(uname -m)-lfs-linux-gnu
See section 4.4 and 5.2 for why.
|
> PATH=/tools/bin:/bin:/usr/bin
> export
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 07:41:24PM -0400, Viola Zoltán wrote:
> Excuse me, I am very newbie and very idiotic... I tryed it:
>
> CFLAGS="-fno-exceptions -fno-rtti"; make
>
> CFLAGS="--fno-exceptions --fno-rtti"; make
>
> but nothing changed, the compile not succeeded, same error message...
>
I
Excuse me, I am very newbie and very idiotic... I tryed it:
CFLAGS="-fno-exceptions -fno-rtti"; make
CFLAGS="--fno-exceptions --fno-rtti"; make
but nothing changed, the compile not succeeded, same error message...
2013/10/22 Ken Moffat
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:12:09PM +0100, Ken Moffat
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:12:09PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> Someone in another gentoo response suggested reducing the CFLAGS to
> something sane - if you are following LFS exactly, then the default
> CFLAGS from the package should be used. I -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti
> are from the package.
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 05:31:19PM -0400, Viola Zoltán wrote:
> Hi, excuse me for the bad English... I try LFS from Sabayon host system,
> with this GCC version:
>
> lfs@Csiszilla /Mount/Simplicity/sources/gcc-build $ gcc --version
> gcc (Gentoo Hardened 4.7.2-r1 p1.5, pie-0.5.5) 4.7.2
>
> The "b
quot; user:
lfs@Csiszilla ~ $ cat .bashrc
set +h
umask 022
LFS=/Mount/Simplicity
LC_ALL=POSIX
LFS_TGT=$(uname -m)-pc-linux-gnu
PATH=/tools/bin:/bin:/usr/bin
export LFS LC_ALL LFS_TGT PATH
alias mc='. /usr/libexec/mc/mc-wrapper.sh'
Can anyone help me?
Thank you!
--
http://linuxfro
On 10/16/2013 03:59 PM, Dan McGhee wrote:
> On 10/16/2013 03:15 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
>> I've never tried two -exec directives in find, sorry. What I know is that
>> xargs is more flexible,
>> and I recommand that you insist on having it work.
>> It could be something similar to:
>> find... -
On 10/16/2013 03:15 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> I've never tried two -exec directives in find, sorry. What I know is that
> xargs is more flexible,
> and I recommand that you insist on having it work.
> It could be something similar to:
> find... -print| xargs -I xxx sh -c 'chmod xxx; chown xxx;
Le 16/10/2013 20:43, Dan McGhee a écrit :
> [...]
>
> Here's the find statement:
> ) \! -path /usr/src
> \! -path /tools -print>
>
> This statement achieves all the parameters stated above with the
> addition that it ignores /tools also. Now I would like to change group
> ownership and permis
This may come close to or straddle the "off topic" line for this list.
I thought I'd ask my question anyway since there are some who use the
More Control hint and who run into some of the same frustrations that I
do. There is a question about the use of find in this post. If you
don't want t
On Aug 16, 2013, at 3:25 PM, Dave Wagler wrote:
I just can't figure out how to write the configure command to
suppress this check.
Thanks for any help.
Libass isn't in BLFS. Where did you get libass? Maybe you need to
install fribidi!
Sincerely,
William Harringt
Hi everybody,
Thanks for all the advice, so far.
@Pierre:
I'll give that a go, if all else fails. Somehow, removing the linux
partition seems a bit scary, especially after my recent experience :)
@akh:
I'm afraid the disk cloning is not an option. My computer is a laptop,
and it's the only one
One other thing, although it qualifies as a false hope: it just may be
possible, at least theorethically, to recover most or all of the
contents of the NTFS partition. So if you did manage to nuke the few
starting sectors of your NTFS partition, do not lose hope just yet -
unless the damage hit a c
>On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 09:33:39 +
>tilmanbregler wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> sudo fdisk -l
>
> Disk /dev/sda: 750.2 GB, 750156374016 bytes
> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 91201 cylinders, total 1465149168 sectors
> Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes /
> Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 09:33:39 +
> From: tilmanbregler
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: [lfs-support] help, i hosed my windows partition
>
.
.
>
> so this is a bit emberassing, and I appreciate if you say this is
> nothing to do wi
Le 10/03/2013 10:33, tilmanbregler a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> so this is a bit emberassing, and I appreciate if you say this is
> nothing to do with you. I have this dual boot Ubuntu 12.04/Windows 7
> setup. And to make room for th LFS partitions i decided to shrink the
> Windows 7 partition.
>
> [...]
>
ted easily, and so i chickened out and
thought i'd ask for help. Unsurprisingly, I can no longer boot into
Windows, now. Any help would be much appreciated. This is how my
partition table looks, atm:
sudo fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 750.2 GB, 750156374016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 91201 cy
tory `/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build/ld'
I had searched in vain, I have found no solution.
Could someone help me?
Thank you in advance
PS: Note that I am running ubuntu 4.12 64bit and I'm in the book lfs7.2
I've already written an email, but I did not know that I need to be
register
er occurred to me to double-check that.
Sigh... turns out there *was* something significantly wrong with the
linker, which I only discovered on nuking /tools after the build
finished successfully. Installing the chapter 6 binutils into /tools
really doesn't help...
Simon.
signature.asc
On Sun, 2012-12-02 at 15:01 +1300, Simon Geard wrote:
> I think Ken has pointed me in the right direction - bash links not to
> libncurses or libncursesw, but to plain-old libcurses, and I seem to
> have missed the commands that create the linker script that redirects
> that one. I've just fixed it
On Sat, 2012-12-01 at 07:27 -0600, William Harrington wrote:
>
> On Nov 30, 2012, at 5:37 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
>
> > /bin/bash: error while loading shared libraries: libncurses.so.5:
> > cannot
> > open shared object file: No such file or directory
>
> Do you also get the same problem when run
On Sat, 2012-12-01 at 16:19 +0100, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
> Can you do `ldd /bin/bash'?
Oddly, no. I can't use ldd because that's a shell script depending
on /bin/sh working, but if I run:
/lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 --list /bin/bash
...I get:
/bin/bash: error while loading shared libraries:
>On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 16:24:08 +0100
>Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
> I mean `ldd /path/to/bash/that/is/the/problem/bash'.
>
> Also, there is an easy way to test if the problem is linking with a
> library from /tools. Make a symlink.
>
> ln -sv /usr /tools
>
> Then try it again.
>
Or maybe you can
>On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 16:19:38 +0100
>Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
>
> >On Sat, 01 Dec 2012 23:59:07 +1300
> >Simon Geard wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 11:17 -0500, Chris Staub wrote:
> > > First, check how Bash is linked: "readelf -l /bin/bash | grep
> > > interpret". Of course, this should sa
>On Sat, 01 Dec 2012 23:59:07 +1300
>Simon Geard wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 11:17 -0500, Chris Staub wrote:
> > First, check how Bash is linked: "readelf -l /bin/bash | grep
> > interpret". Of course, this should say that it's looking for the
> > dynamic linker in /lib. Then verify you actu
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 11:59:07PM +1300, Simon Geard wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 11:17 -0500, Chris Staub wrote:
> > First, check how Bash is linked: "readelf -l /bin/bash | grep
> > interpret". Of course, this should say that it's looking for the dynamic
> > linker in /lib. Then verify you a
On Nov 30, 2012, at 5:37 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
/bin/bash: error while loading shared libraries: libncurses.so.5:
cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory
Do you also get the same problem when running /bin/more /sbin/cfdisk
and /usr/bin/cal ?
Those are installed by util
On Dec 1, 2012, at 4:59 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
Basically, I'm hoping that someone more familiar than me with the
toolchain can tell me how a chapter 6 package (bash) might be linked
against a library not installed in chapter 6 (the non-wide version of
ncurses). The obvious answer is that it's f
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 11:17 -0500, Chris Staub wrote:
> First, check how Bash is linked: "readelf -l /bin/bash | grep
> interpret". Of course, this should say that it's looking for the dynamic
> linker in /lib. Then verify you actually have all the right libraries
> for Ncurses: "ls -la {/usr,}/
On 11/30/2012 06:37 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
> Hey guys...
>
> Rewriting my LFS build scripts, I'm getting an interesting linking error
> with bash in chapter 6, and am hoping someone can point me in the right
> direction for tracking down the cause.
>
> Basically, bash builds correctly, but the resu
Hey guys...
Rewriting my LFS build scripts, I'm getting an interesting linking error
with bash in chapter 6, and am hoping someone can point me in the right
direction for tracking down the cause.
Basically, bash builds correctly, but the resulting binary is bad, any
attempt to invoke it resulting
Hi,
For various reasons, among them, a lot I don't know, lfs has more and
more success in French-speaking users. It's all the more right since
Denis joined the team to maintain blfs up-to-date. Subsequently, we have
more support to do to help french-speaking users who don't speak
E
Richard Melville wrote:
> On another subject, and a minor issue, the tzdata package in the
> SVN-20120816 build instructions is version "e" but the package downloaded
> from the LFS repository is version "c"
The best place to get the tz data is
http://www.iana.org//time-zones/repository/releases
Richard Melville wrote:
> >> Just went through this step in linux mint 32bit in vmware and found
> >>> no issues.
> >>>
> >>> That's because it's an intermittent bug. I've just had the same
> >>> problem using Linux Mint Cinnamon 64 bit. Sometimes the error
> >>> message appears and sometimes it
Richard Melville wrote:
>> Just went through this step in linux mint 32bit in vmware and found
>>> no issues.
>>>
>>> That's because it's an intermittent bug. I've just had the same
>>> problem using Linux Mint Cinnamon 64 bit. Sometimes the error
>>> message appears and sometimes it doesn't. If
> Just went through this step in linux mint 32bit in vmware and found
> > no issues.
> >
> > That's because it's an intermittent bug. I've just had the same
> > problem using Linux Mint Cinnamon 64 bit. Sometimes the error
> > message appears and sometimes it doesn't. If you look back through
>
William Harrington wrote:
>
> On Aug 12, 2012, at 15:37 PM, Keiran wrote:
>
>> --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu
>> --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --target=i686-pc-linux-gnu
>
>
> What happened to your LFS_TGT variable? Are you using the lfs user?
> Make sure you are the lfs user and your environment is set up r
On 12/08/12 22:14, William Harrington wrote:
> On Aug 12, 2012, at 15:37 PM, Keiran wrote:
>
>> --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu
>> --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --target=i686-pc-linux-gnu
>
> What happened to your LFS_TGT variable? Are you using the lfs user?
> Make sure you are the lfs user and your environm
On Aug 12, 2012, at 15:37 PM, Keiran wrote:
> --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu
> --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --target=i686-pc-linux-gnu
What happened to your LFS_TGT variable? Are you using the lfs user?
Make sure you are the lfs user and your environment is set up right.
--target should not be your
On 12/08/12 21:39, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Keiran wrote:
>
>>> That tells me that gcc is not installed or binutils wasn't installed
>>> correctly. What is the output of the script in Section iii - Host
>>> System Requirements?
>> bash, version 4.2.24(1)-release
>> Binutils: (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu)
Keiran wrote:
>> That tells me that gcc is not installed or binutils wasn't installed
>> correctly. What is the output of the script in Section iii - Host
>> System Requirements?
> bash, version 4.2.24(1)-release
> Binutils: (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.22
> bison (GNU Bison) 2.5
> bzip2, Versio
On 12/08/12 21:34, William Harrington wrote:
> On Aug 12, 2012, at 15:16 PM, Keiran wrote:
>
>> Hello, I'm not sure if this is the correct place to mail with this, if
>> not could you please point me in the right direction?
>>
>> When trying to compile GCC at Chapter 5.5, I get this error, and no
>
On Aug 12, 2012, at 15:16 PM, Keiran wrote:
> Hello, I'm not sure if this is the correct place to mail with this, if
> not could you please point me in the right direction?
>
> When trying to compile GCC at Chapter 5.5, I get this error, and no
> amount of Googling has been able to solve it.
>
>
On 12/08/12 21:22, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Keiran wrote:
>> Hello, I'm not sure if this is the correct place to mail with this
> Yes, this is the right list.
>
>> When trying to compile GCC at Chapter 5.5, I get this error, and no
>> amount of Googling has been able to solve it.
>>
>> configure: error
Keiran wrote:
> Hello, I'm not sure if this is the correct place to mail with this
Yes, this is the right list.
> When trying to compile GCC at Chapter 5.5, I get this error, and no
> amount of Googling has been able to solve it.
>
> configure: error: in `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/lto-plugin':
>
On 12/08/12 21:16, Keiran wrote:
> Hello, I'm not sure if this is the correct place to mail with this, if
> not could you please point me in the right direction?
>
> When trying to compile GCC at Chapter 5.5, I get this error, and no
> amount of Googling has been able to solve it.
>
> configure: er
Hello, I'm not sure if this is the correct place to mail with this, if
not could you please point me in the right direction?
When trying to compile GCC at Chapter 5.5, I get this error, and no
amount of Googling has been able to solve it.
configure: error: in `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/lto-plu
again. Should i remove
the previous gcc-build and build it again or create another build
directory with some other name.
What should i do..?
Please help...urgent..
Thanking you,
Regards
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ
e another build
> directory with some other name.
> What should i do..?
>
> Please help...urgent..
>
> Thanking you,
> Regards
> --
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
> Unsubscribe: See the abov
I am not getting any output while running the program dummy.c after
GCC pass2 installation.
Also it says that create gcc-build directory again. Should i remove
the previous gcc-build and build it again or create another build
directory with some other name.
What should i do..?
Please help
I've been managing to get more consistent results in VirtualBox.
Boot Issues? Mostly were Grub2 Related, and getting more familiar
with it has help tremendously. However as I learned more, I
couldn't help but wonder why CentOS6 needs such a CRAZY startup
string. They must not us
Kevin Wise, Bruce Dubbs, Matjn
Thank you for all your responses...
What I from all that is I need to backtrack and just double and triple
check all my steps again. I have seen and try to do all the steps - but
I'm missing a few surely.
Thank you for your feedback! And as one of ya encouraged: Do
: donderdag 15 december 2011 18:51
Aan: LFS Support List
Onderwerp: Re: [lfs-support] help LFS 6.0 Ch 5.7.1 glibc-2.14.1 configure:
error: gcc must provide the header
On 12/15/2011 02:18 AM, Henk Teijema wrote:
> Guess I overlooked "The LiveCD cannot be used to build LFS 7.0 or later.&qu
> Guess I overlooked "The LiveCD cannot be used to build LFS 7.0 or
> later."
> So what liveCD should I use then?
There's the gentoo live dvd available at the bottom of this page:
http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/where.xml
it has current up-to-date tools to build LFS.
Alain
--
http://linuxfromsc
On 12/15/2011 02:18 AM, Henk Teijema wrote:
> Guess I overlooked "The LiveCD cannot be used to build LFS 7.0 or later."
> So what liveCD should I use then?
>
> Met vriendelijke groet,
>
> Henk
Just download any fairly recent distro...Fedora, Ubuntu, etc...and if
needed install whatever additional
ruce Dubbs
Verzonden: woensdag 14 december 2011 19:09
Aan: LFS Support List
Onderwerp: Re: [lfs-support] help LFS 6.0 Ch 5.7.1 glibc-2.14.1 configure:
error: gcc must provide the header
Henk Teijema wrote:
> Nope did not forget that one
> In other news groups I read that gcc is a too old version.
Hi,
ext4 is currently limited to 16tb, and you're looking for 18 if I
understood right. Only very recent packages have lifted the 16tb limit.
- Lauri
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - Access all of your messages and folders
wherever you are
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/m
Henk Teijema wrote:
> Nope did not forget that one
> In other news groups I read that gcc is a too old version.
> Use gcc 4.1.2 from the LFS liveCD 6.3
>
> The trick to copy the cupid.h to /usr/include results in:
> "checking installed Linux kernel header files... TOO OLD!
Have you seen: http
[lfs-support] help LFS 6.0 Ch 5.7.1 glibc-2.14.1 configure:
error: gcc must provide the header
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:04:32 +0100
Henk Teijema wrote:
> Configure stops with error:
> configureL error: gcc must provide the header
>
>
> Host Proc Arch = i686
&g
1. Partition each drives with a full "Linux RAID autodetect"
partition. (FD in cfdisk)
2. Go ahead with your "mdadm --create ..."
3. Partition your new array.
4. Create desired filesystems on your partitions.
5. Enjoy!
I am not sure, but I think md0 no longer requires to be partitioned
(point 3) s
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:04:32 +0100
Henk Teijema wrote:
> Configure stops with error:
> configureL error: gcc must provide the header
>
>
> Host Proc Arch = i686
> Gcc -version = 4.1.2
>
> Cupid.h is in /mnt/lfs/tools/lib/gcc/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/4.6.1/include/cupid.h
>
> What d
Configure stops with error:
configureL error: gcc must provide the header
Host Proc Arch = i686
Gcc -version = 4.1.2
Cupid.h is in /mnt/lfs/tools/lib/gcc/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/4.6.1/include/cupid.h
What do I need to do to fix this?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinf
> *else echo "WARNING: could not find \`runtest'" 1>&2; :;\*
> *fi*
> *WARNING: Couldn't find the global config file.*
> *WARNING: Couldn't find tool init file*
These warnings are normal.
There is something else wrong, but I don't know that I can
the
binutils tools themselves? Again, it doesn't seem to be related to ld or any
other single tool from binutils, but I don't know if it's safe to ignore
these errors. Any help or ideas on what I can look for will be greatly
appreciated.
My host system is an old laptop with a Pentium M
On 09/25/2011 10:44 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
[putolin]
>
> I'm lost here (probably because it is late) - you've used the same
> host to build LFS twice, first on the old disk, and then on the new
> disk ?
Yes that is correct. The scripts produced a LFS system that booted and
worked on the old ha
situations, and occasionally liable to break across
> > kernel upgrades on some hardware (particularly, intel). So, if you
> > are using it, I suggest that you build an alternative kernel without
> > it, and use that to help identify where your problem lies. Equally,
> > eve
1 - 100 of 512 matches
Mail list logo
